zenoo_rpc vs odoorpc Performance Benchmark Report

# 🚀 Performance Benchmark Report

zenoo_rpc vs odoorpc Comprehensive Analysis
Generated: 2025-07-27 10:07:51 | Report ID: benchmark_1753585671

### Overall Performance

63.4%
Improvement

### Best Scenario

76.3%
crud_light_load

### Avg Throughput Gain

2722.0%
Higher ops/sec

### Scenarios Tested

6
Test Cases

## 📊 Detailed Scenario Results

Crud Light Load
Grade: B
Response Time Improvement
+76.3%
Throughput Improvement
+30.1%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
29.0ms
odoorpc Avg Response
122.4ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
76.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%
Crud Medium Load
Grade: A
Response Time Improvement
+68.7%
Throughput Improvement
+495.0%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
52.4ms
odoorpc Avg Response
167.3ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
75.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%
Crud Heavy Load
Grade: A
Response Time Improvement
+54.1%
Throughput Improvement
+3277.0%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
327.9ms
odoorpc Avg Response
715.0ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
80.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%
Stress Concurrent Reads
Grade: A
Response Time Improvement
+57.3%
Throughput Improvement
+11616.8%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
121.1ms
odoorpc Avg Response
283.9ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
100.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%
Memory Large Datasets
Grade: A
Response Time Improvement
+51.0%
Throughput Improvement
+588.0%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
1021.0ms
odoorpc Avg Response
2083.7ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
100.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%
Workflow Sales Process
Grade: A
Response Time Improvement
+72.7%
Throughput Improvement
+325.2%
zenoo_rpc Avg Response
50.1ms
odoorpc Avg Response
183.5ms
zenoo_rpc Success Rate
100.0%
odoorpc Success Rate
100.0%

## 📈 Performance Comparison Table

Scenario | zenoo_rpc Avg (ms) | odoorpc Avg (ms) | Response Improvement | zenoo_rpc Throughput | odoorpc Throughput | Throughput Improvement | Grade
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Crud Light Load | 29.0ms | 122.4ms | +76.3% | 5.8 | 4.5 | +30.1% | B
Crud Medium Load | 52.4ms | 167.3ms | +68.7% | 35.4 | 6.0 | +495.0% | A
Crud Heavy Load | 327.9ms | 715.0ms | +54.1% | 47.2 | 1.4 | +3277.0% | A
Stress Concurrent Reads | 121.1ms | 283.9ms | +57.3% | 412.6 | 3.5 | +11616.8% | A
Memory Large Datasets | 1021.0ms | 2083.7ms | +51.0% | 3.3 | 0.5 | +588.0% | A
Workflow Sales Process | 50.1ms | 183.5ms | +72.7% | 22.8 | 5.4 | +325.2% | A

## 💡 Recommendations

- 🚀 Immediate migration to zenoo_rpc recommended - significant performance gains demonstrated
- 🔧 Enable intelligent caching for frequently accessed data
- 📊 Implement batch operations for bulk data processing
- 🔄 Use connection pooling for high-concurrency scenarios
- 📈 Set up performance monitoring in production
- 🛡️ Implement circuit breaker patterns for resilience
- ⚙️ Optimize async/await usage for maximum performance benefits
- 📋 Conduct load testing before production deployment
- 🔍 Monitor memory usage patterns and optimize as needed