# Feature Spec Enhancements

## Problem Statement

The feature specifications in `docs/features/` need enhancements based on research findings in `docs/research/`. While the specs are 85% aligned with research, 8 specific gaps were identified that could cause implementation issues.

## Solution Approach

Enhance the 4 feature specification files with:
1. Dependency consistency fixes
2. CancelledError handling patterns
3. Package clarification (mcp vs fastmcp)
4. Standardized Critical MCP Patterns tables
5. Import stability warnings
6. Concrete code examples

## Source Review

- **Review Task**: TASK-REV-A1B2
- **Review Score**: 85/100
- **Findings**: 8
- **Recommendations**: 8

## Subtask Summary

| Task ID | Description | Priority | Target Files |
|---------|-------------|----------|--------------|
| TASK-FSE-001 | Fix dependency consistency | HIGH | All specs |
| TASK-FSE-002 | Add CancelledError pattern | MEDIUM | FEAT-SKEL-002, 003 |
| TASK-FSE-003 | Add mcp/fastmcp clarification | MEDIUM | FEAT-SKEL-001 |
| TASK-FSE-004 | Add Critical MCP Patterns table | MEDIUM | All specs |
| TASK-FSE-005 | Add internal import warning | LOW | FEAT-SKEL-003 |
| TASK-FSE-006 | Add JSON output example | LOW | FEAT-INT-001 |

## Execution Strategy

- **Wave 1** (HIGH): 1 task - dependency fixes
- **Wave 2** (MEDIUM): 3 tasks - patterns and clarifications
- **Wave 3** (LOW): 2 tasks - warnings and examples

All tasks are documentation edits and can be executed directly without `/task-work`.

## Success Criteria

- [ ] All pyproject.toml snippets consistent across specs
- [ ] CancelledError handling documented in async tool specs
- [ ] mcp vs fastmcp package choice clearly explained
- [ ] All specs have standardized Critical MCP Patterns table
- [ ] Specs ready for `/feature-plan` execution
