# Acceptance Test Cases

> Feature: FEATURE-053-A - Application Reverse Engineering Tool Skill
> Generated: 2026-03-31
> Status: Executed

---

## Overview

| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Feature ID | FEATURE-053-A |
| Feature Title | Application Reverse Engineering Tool Skill |
| Total Test Cases | 74 |
| Test Type | Structured Review (all) |
| Priority | P0 (Critical): 22 / P1 (High): 35 / P2 (Medium): 17 |

---

## Prerequisites

- [x] Feature is implemented (TASK-1038 done)
- [x] All 15 skill files exist in production directory
- [x] Extractor SKILL.md updated with category registration
- [x] Specification with 74 ACs available

---

## Structured-Review Tests

All test cases are `structured-review` type — verified by agent self-review reading deliverable files against specification criteria.

### Group 01: Skill Discovery & Structure

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-001 | AC-053-01a | SKILL.md discovered via glob pattern | P0 | ✅ Pass | File exists at `.github/skills/x-ipe-tool-knowledge-extraction-application-reverse-engineering/SKILL.md` |
| TC-002 | AC-053-01b | Frontmatter contains categories: ["application-reverse-engineering"] | P0 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md lines 5-6: `categories: ["application-reverse-engineering"]` |
| TC-003 | AC-053-01c | Declares all 7 operations | P0 | ✅ Pass | Line 63 declares 7 operations; `<operation>` blocks at lines 155, 188, 207, 236, 260, 296, 359 |
| TC-004 | AC-053-01d | Templates directory contains 12 files (3 base + 4 repo + 5 lang) | P0 | ✅ Pass | `ls templates/` confirms: playbook-template.md, collection-template.md, acceptance-criteria.md, 4 repo-type mixins, 5 language-type mixins |

### Group 02: get_artifacts Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-005 | AC-053-02a | Returns paths to playbook, collection, acceptance-criteria | P0 | ✅ Pass | Lines 157-160: playbook_template, collection_template, acceptance_criteria paths listed |
| TC-006 | AC-053-02b | Returns mixin map with 4 repo-type + 5 language-type | P0 | ✅ Pass | Lines 162-173: 4 repo_type_mixins + 5 language_type_mixins |
| TC-007 | AC-053-02c | All referenced template files exist | P0 | ✅ Pass | Cross-referenced all 12 declared paths against actual files — all exist |

### Group 03: Playbook Template

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-008 | AC-053-03a | Defines exactly 8 sections with correct names | P0 | ✅ Pass | 8 sections: Architecture, Design Patterns, API Contracts, Dependencies, Code Structure, Data Flow, Tech Stack, Tests |
| TC-009 | AC-053-03b | Sections in 3 phases: Phase 1(5,7), Phase 2(8), Phase 3(1,2,3,4,6) | P0 | ✅ Pass | Phase table lines 11-15 confirms correct assignment |
| TC-010 | AC-053-03c | Phase 1 sections (5,7) specify inline output + Markdown tables | P1 | ✅ Pass | Sections 5,7: "PHASE: 1-Scan \| OUTPUT: inline" + "Output Format: Markdown tables" |
| TC-011 | AC-053-03d | Section 8 specifies subfolder output + executable test files | P1 | ✅ Pass | Section 8: "PHASE: 2-Tests \| OUTPUT: subfolder \| SPECIAL: executable files" + tests/ subfolder |
| TC-012 | AC-053-03e | Phase 3 sections specify subfolder output + visualization tools | P1 | ✅ Pass | Sections 1,2,3,4,6: "PHASE: 3-Deep \| OUTPUT: subfolder" with Architecture DSL/Mermaid |
| TC-013 | AC-053-03f | Each section defines description, subsections, output type, visualization | P1 | ✅ Pass | All 8 sections have description, Subsections list, Output Format/Structure |

### Group 04: Collection Template

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-014 | AC-053-04a | Extraction prompts for all 8 sections | P0 | ✅ Pass | 8 EXTRACTION PROMPTS blocks at: §5(ln8), §7(ln31), §8(ln55), §1(ln88), §2(ln120), §3(ln147), §4(ln175), §6(ln204) |
| TC-015 | AC-053-04b | Architecture Recovery: 4-level analysis (conceptual, logical, physical, data flow) | P1 | ✅ Pass | §1 lines 95-102: 4 levels documented |
| TC-016 | AC-053-04c | Design Pattern Detection: source priority, pattern catalog, confidence | P1 | ✅ Pass | §2: SOURCE PRIORITY (ln133), pattern catalog (ln123-128), confidence 🟢🟡🔴 (ln129) |
| TC-017 | AC-053-04d | Source Code Tests: scan, detect, collect/generate AAA, run, coverage | P1 | ✅ Pass | §8: scan(ln58), detect framework(ln59), AAA generation(ln62), execute(ln64), coverage ≥80%(ln65) |
| TC-018 | AC-053-04e | Each section's prompts specify source priority | P1 | ✅ Pass | All 8 sections have "SOURCE PRIORITY:" blocks (§5:ln16, §7:ln42, §8:ln69, §1:ln105, §2:ln133, §3:ln161, §4:ln189, §6:ln218) |

### Group 05: Acceptance Criteria Template

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-019 | AC-053-05a | Validation rules for all 8 sections with [REQ]/[OPT] markers | P0 | ✅ Pass | 8 sections with markers: §1(ln9), §2(ln21), §3(ln32), §4(ln44), §5(ln55), §6(ln67), §7(ln78), §8(ln88) |
| TC-020 | AC-053-05b | Architecture Recovery: module diagram, 2+ levels, Architecture DSL | P1 | ✅ Pass | §1: [REQ] ≥2 levels(ln11), module diagram(ln12), Architecture DSL(ln13) |
| TC-021 | AC-053-05c | Source Code Tests: AAA, all pass, ≥80% coverage, framework match | P0 | ✅ Pass | §8: [REQ] AAA(ln91), all pass(ln92), coverage ≥80%(ln93), framework matches(ln94) |
| TC-022 | AC-053-05d | Design Pattern Detection: confidence level, file:line evidence, inventory table | P1 | ✅ Pass | §2: [REQ] confidence(ln25), file:line(ln26), inventory table(ln24) |

### Group 06: get_collection_template Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-023 | AC-053-06a | Valid section_id → returns extraction prompts | P1 | ✅ Pass | Lines 191-192: section_id routing documented |
| TC-024 | AC-053-06b | Invalid section_id → returns error | P1 | ✅ Pass | **Fixed during testing:** Added INVALID_SECTION_ID error to error table (line 435). Originally FAIL — error was missing. |

### Group 07: validate_section Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-025 | AC-053-07a | Checks content against section's acceptance criteria | P1 | ✅ Pass | Lines 208-217: reads AC, extracts criteria, evaluates each against content |
| TC-026 | AC-053-07b | All [REQ] satisfied → validation_passed: true | P1 | ✅ Pass | Output (ln226): validation_result.passed: bool; PASS/FAIL/INCOMPLETE statuses |
| TC-027 | AC-053-07c | Missing [REQ] → validation_passed: false + missing_info | P1 | ✅ Pass | Lines 215-218: INCOMPLETE distinct from FAIL; missing_info[] populated |

### Group 08: Mixin System

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-028 | AC-053-08a | monorepo → mixin-monorepo.md with prompts + signals | P1 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md ln239 maps key; file has detection signals + overlay prompts |
| TC-029 | AC-053-08b | python → mixin-python.md with language prompts | P1 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md ln244 maps key; file has language-specific prompts |
| TC-030 | AC-053-08c | Monorepo: lerna.json, pnpm-workspace, nx.json; cross-package analysis | P1 | ✅ Pass | mixin-monorepo.md: lerna(ln12), pnpm-workspace(ln13), nx.json(ln14); cross-package(ln24-31) |
| TC-031 | AC-053-08d | Multi-module: pom.xml modules, settings.gradle, Cargo.toml; module boundary | P1 | ✅ Pass | mixin-multi-module.md: pom.xml(ln12), settings.gradle(ln13), Cargo.toml(ln14); boundaries(ln24-28) |
| TC-032 | AC-053-08e | Single-module: single package.json, pyproject.toml; internal layering | P2 | ✅ Pass | mixin-single-module.md: package.json(ln12), pyproject.toml(ln13); layering(ln24-28) |
| TC-033 | AC-053-08f | Microservices: docker-compose, Dockerfiles, k8s; service boundary | P1 | ✅ Pass | mixin-microservices.md: docker-compose(ln12), Dockerfiles(ln13), k8s(ln14); boundaries(ln26-30) |
| TC-034 | AC-053-08g | Python: *.py, pyproject.toml, requirements.txt; decorator/metaclass | P1 | ✅ Pass | mixin-python.md: *.py(ln12), pyproject.toml(ln13), requirements.txt(ln14); decorator(ln27), metaclass(ln28) |
| TC-035 | AC-053-08h | Java: *.java, pom.xml, build.gradle; Spring/annotation/interface | P1 | ✅ Pass | mixin-java.md: *.java(ln12), pom.xml(ln13), build.gradle(ln14); Spring(ln33), annotations(ln29-36) |
| TC-036 | AC-053-08i | JavaScript: *.js, *.jsx, package.json; CJS/ESM, React, events | P2 | ✅ Pass | mixin-javascript.md: *.js/*.jsx(ln12), package.json(ln13); CJS/ESM(ln28), React(ln32) |
| TC-037 | AC-053-08j | TypeScript: *.ts, *.tsx, tsconfig.json; type hierarchy, generics, decorators | P2 | ✅ Pass | mixin-typescript.md: *.ts/*.tsx(ln12), tsconfig.json(ln13); type hierarchy(ln28-31), generics(ln30) |
| TC-038 | AC-053-08k | Go: *.go, go.mod; interface satisfaction, goroutine, package layout | P2 | ✅ Pass | mixin-go.md: *.go(ln12), go.mod(ln13); interface(ln28), goroutine(ln33), cmd/internal/pkg(ln49-53) |
| TC-039 | AC-053-08l | Invalid mixin key → error | P2 | ✅ Pass | Error table ln437: INVALID_MIXIN_KEY documented |
| TC-040 | AC-053-08m | Mixin composition: repo-type primary, language-type additive overlay | P0 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md ln25+41: "Repo-type applied first; language-type merged on top" |

### Group 09: pack_section Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-041 | AC-053-09a | Formats content per playbook output structure | P1 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md pack_section (lines 258-287): reads playbook template, branches on output type |
| TC-042 | AC-053-09b | Inline output → Markdown tables and inline text | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 4 (lines 274-277): inline sections formatted "under proper H2 heading with Markdown tables" |
| TC-043 | AC-053-09c | Subfolder output → _index.md + per-item files | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 3 (lines 267-273): creates section-{nn}-{slug}/ with _index.md, per-unit files, screenshots/ |

### Group 10: score_quality Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-044 | AC-053-10a | 6 dimensions: completeness, structure, clarity, accuracy, freshness, coverage | P0 | ✅ Pass | Step 3 (lines 299-305): all 6 dimensions listed |
| TC-045 | AC-053-10b | Architecture sections: accuracy = 0.35 (highest) | P0 | ✅ Pass | Weight table (lines 321-331): accuracy = **0.35** (bolded) |
| TC-046 | AC-053-10c | Tests section: coverage = 0.50 (highest) | P0 | ✅ Pass | Weight table (lines 333-342): coverage = **0.50** (bolded) |
| TC-047 | AC-053-10d | Other sections: completeness = 0.30 (highest) | P0 | ✅ Pass | Weight table (lines 344-353): completeness = **0.30** (bolded) |
| TC-048 | AC-053-10e | Below threshold → improvement hints per dimension | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 5 (line 307): "Generate improvement_hints[] for any dimension below 0.6" |

### Group 11: test_walkthrough Operation

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-049 | AC-053-11a | Parses & categorizes 5 claim types | P0 | ✅ Pass | Step 2 (lines 362-367): module_exists, pattern_detected, api_contract, dependency_link, tech_stack_item |
| TC-050 | AC-053-11b | Each claim type verified with appropriate method | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 2: glob+imports, file:line+structural, function+signature, import chain, config+version |
| TC-051 | AC-053-11c | Claims cross-checked with Phase 2 test knowledge | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 3b (line 370): "Cross-check with Phase 2 test knowledge" |
| TC-052 | AC-053-11d | Returns verification_score = claims_verified / claims_total; pass ≥ 0.8 | P0 | ✅ Pass | Step 5 (line 376): score computation; output (line 384): verification_score field |
| TC-053 | AC-053-11e | Below 0.8 → unverified claims list | P1 | ✅ Pass | Step 6 (line 377): "Generate unverified_claims[]"; output: unverified_claims array |

### Group 12: Source Code Tests Pipeline

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-054 | AC-053-12a | Scans for existing tests before generating | P0 | ✅ Pass | collection-template.md §8 ln58: "Scan for existing test files" first |
| TC-055 | AC-053-12b | Copies existing tests preserving filenames/framework | P1 | ✅ Pass | §8 ln61: "Copy existing tests (copy-first — never modify source)" |
| TC-056 | AC-053-12c | Generated tests follow AAA structure | P0 | ✅ Pass | §8 ln62: "Generate missing tests in AAA format"; AC ln91: "[REQ] All tests follow AAA" |
| TC-057 | AC-053-12d | Framework detection: pytest, vitest, jest, JUnit, go test | P1 | ✅ Pass | §7 ln39: pytest, jest, vitest, JUnit, go test; §8 ln59: pytest, jest, vitest, JUnit, testify |
| TC-058 | AC-053-12e | All tests must pass; source code never modified | P0 | ✅ Pass | AC §8: [REQ] "all pass"(ln92) + [REQ] "source never modified"(ln95) |
| TC-059 | AC-053-12f | Coverage ≥ 80% | P0 | ✅ Pass | AC §8 ln93: "[REQ] Line coverage ≥ 80% (or gaps documented)" |
| TC-060 | AC-053-12g | Test-to-knowledge mapping: assertions→behaviors, fixtures→shapes, mocks→boundaries | P1 | ✅ Pass | §8 ln66: knowledge mapping; ln82: "map each test to module and behavior" |
| TC-061 | AC-053-12h | Phase 3 uses test-derived knowledge from Phase 2 | P1 | ✅ Pass | playbook ln57: "extract test-derived knowledge feeds Phase 3"; Phase 3 sections: "DEPENDS: Phase 1 scan + Phase 2 test knowledge" |
| TC-062 | AC-053-12i | Section 8 output: _index.md, tests/, coverage-report.md | P1 | ✅ Pass | playbook §8 (lines 68-76): _index.md, screenshots/, tests/, coverage-report.md |

### Group 13: Complexity Gate

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-063 | AC-053-13a | Thresholds: ≥10 files, ≥500 LOC, ≥3 dirs | P0 | ✅ Pass | SKILL.md ln39 + config defaults (ln73-76/119/174): min_files=10, min_loc=500, min_dirs=3 |
| TC-064 | AC-053-13b | Below threshold → skip recommendation | P2 | ✅ Pass | Error table ln439: BELOW_COMPLEXITY_GATE → "Skip reverse engineering; document rationale" |

### Group 14: Design Pattern Confidence

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-065 | AC-053-14a | Confidence: 🟢 high, 🟡 medium, 🔴 low | P1 | ✅ Pass | collection §2 ln128: "🟢🟡🔴"; playbook ln118: "🟢 High, 🟡 Medium, 🔴 Low" |
| TC-066 | AC-053-14b | High confidence → file:line evidence | P1 | ✅ Pass | collection §2 ln127: "Cite evidence with file:line references" |
| TC-067 | AC-053-14c | Each pattern needs confidence + evidence | P1 | ✅ Pass | AC §2: [REQ] confidence(ln25) + [REQ] file:line(ln26) |

### Group 15: Architecture Recovery Multi-Level

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-068 | AC-053-15a | 4-level: conceptual, logical, physical, data flow | P0 | ✅ Pass | collection §1 lines 95-99: 4 levels documented |
| TC-069 | AC-053-15b | Levels 1-2 → Architecture DSL | P1 | ✅ Pass | collection ln100 + playbook ln90-91: Architecture DSL for conceptual + logical |
| TC-070 | AC-053-15c | Levels 3-4 → Mermaid (classDiagram, sequenceDiagram) | P1 | ✅ Pass | collection ln101-102 + playbook ln92-93: Mermaid for physical + data flow |
| TC-071 | AC-053-15d | DSL rendering delegated to x-ipe-tool-architecture-dsl | P2 | ✅ Pass | playbook ln106: "Use `x-ipe-tool-architecture-dsl` for conceptual and logical levels" |

### Group 16: Extractor Category Registration

| TC | AC | Criterion | Priority | Status | Evidence |
|----|-----|-----------|----------|--------|----------|
| TC-072 | AC-053-16a | Extractor lists application-reverse-engineering as category | P0 | ✅ Pass | Extractor SKILL.md ln31: "application-reverse-engineering" in supported categories |
| TC-073 | AC-053-16b | Extractor accepts purpose: "application-reverse-engineering" | P0 | ✅ Pass | Extractor SKILL.md ln57: purpose param; step 1.2 (ln181-191) validates |
| TC-074 | AC-053-16c | Extractor calls get_artifacts on discovered skill | P0 | ✅ Pass | Extractor step 1.3 (ln194-204): globs tool skills, extracts artifacts |

---

## Test Execution Summary

| Test Case | AC | Group | Priority | Status |
|-----------|-----|-------|----------|--------|
| TC-001 | AC-053-01a | 01 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-002 | AC-053-01b | 01 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-003 | AC-053-01c | 01 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-004 | AC-053-01d | 01 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-005 | AC-053-02a | 02 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-006 | AC-053-02b | 02 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-007 | AC-053-02c | 02 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-008 | AC-053-03a | 03 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-009 | AC-053-03b | 03 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-010 | AC-053-03c | 03 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-011 | AC-053-03d | 03 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-012 | AC-053-03e | 03 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-013 | AC-053-03f | 03 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-014 | AC-053-04a | 04 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-015 | AC-053-04b | 04 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-016 | AC-053-04c | 04 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-017 | AC-053-04d | 04 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-018 | AC-053-04e | 04 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-019 | AC-053-05a | 05 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-020 | AC-053-05b | 05 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-021 | AC-053-05c | 05 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-022 | AC-053-05d | 05 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-023 | AC-053-06a | 06 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-024 | AC-053-06b | 06 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-025 | AC-053-07a | 07 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-026 | AC-053-07b | 07 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-027 | AC-053-07c | 07 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-028 | AC-053-08a | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-029 | AC-053-08b | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-030 | AC-053-08c | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-031 | AC-053-08d | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-032 | AC-053-08e | 08 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-033 | AC-053-08f | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-034 | AC-053-08g | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-035 | AC-053-08h | 08 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-036 | AC-053-08i | 08 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-037 | AC-053-08j | 08 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-038 | AC-053-08k | 08 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-039 | AC-053-08l | 08 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-040 | AC-053-08m | 08 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-041 | AC-053-09a | 09 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-042 | AC-053-09b | 09 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-043 | AC-053-09c | 09 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-044 | AC-053-10a | 10 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-045 | AC-053-10b | 10 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-046 | AC-053-10c | 10 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-047 | AC-053-10d | 10 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-048 | AC-053-10e | 10 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-049 | AC-053-11a | 11 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-050 | AC-053-11b | 11 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-051 | AC-053-11c | 11 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-052 | AC-053-11d | 11 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-053 | AC-053-11e | 11 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-054 | AC-053-12a | 12 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-055 | AC-053-12b | 12 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-056 | AC-053-12c | 12 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-057 | AC-053-12d | 12 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-058 | AC-053-12e | 12 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-059 | AC-053-12f | 12 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-060 | AC-053-12g | 12 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-061 | AC-053-12h | 12 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-062 | AC-053-12i | 12 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-063 | AC-053-13a | 13 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-064 | AC-053-13b | 13 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-065 | AC-053-14a | 14 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-066 | AC-053-14b | 14 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-067 | AC-053-14c | 14 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-068 | AC-053-15a | 15 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-069 | AC-053-15b | 15 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-070 | AC-053-15c | 15 | P1 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-071 | AC-053-15d | 15 | P2 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-072 | AC-053-16a | 16 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-073 | AC-053-16b | 16 | P0 | ✅ Pass |
| TC-074 | AC-053-16c | 16 | P0 | ✅ Pass |

---

## Execution Results

**Execution Date:** 2026-03-31
**Executed By:** Cipher 🔐
**Environment:** Development (structured review)

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total Tests | 74 |
| Passed | 74 |
| Failed | 0 |
| Blocked | 0 |
| Pass Rate | 100% |

### Results by Test Type

| Test Type | Passed | Failed | Blocked | Total |
|-----------|--------|--------|---------|-------|
| structured-review | 74 | 0 | 0 | 74 |

### Results by Group

| Group | Description | Passed | Total |
|-------|-------------|--------|-------|
| 01 | Skill Discovery & Structure | 4 | 4 |
| 02 | get_artifacts Operation | 3 | 3 |
| 03 | Playbook Template | 6 | 6 |
| 04 | Collection Template | 5 | 5 |
| 05 | Acceptance Criteria Template | 4 | 4 |
| 06 | get_collection_template Operation | 2 | 2 |
| 07 | validate_section Operation | 3 | 3 |
| 08 | Mixin System | 13 | 13 |
| 09 | pack_section Operation | 3 | 3 |
| 10 | score_quality Operation | 5 | 5 |
| 11 | test_walkthrough Operation | 5 | 5 |
| 12 | Source Code Tests Pipeline | 9 | 9 |
| 13 | Complexity Gate | 2 | 2 |
| 14 | Design Pattern Confidence | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | Architecture Recovery Multi-Level | 4 | 4 |
| 16 | Extractor Category Registration | 3 | 3 |

### Defects Found & Fixed During Testing

| TC | AC | Issue | Fix Applied |
|----|-----|-------|-------------|
| TC-024 | AC-053-06b | `get_collection_template` with invalid section_id had no documented error | Added `INVALID_SECTION_ID` error entry to SKILL.md error table; expanded `MISSING_SECTION_ID` scope to include get_collection_template |

---

## Notes

- All 74 acceptance criteria verified via structured-review (agent self-review reading deliverable files)
- 1 defect found and fixed during testing: missing INVALID_SECTION_ID error handling for get_collection_template
- After fix, all 74/74 TCs pass (100% pass rate)
- No frontend-ui, backend-api, unit, or integration tests applicable (skills/non-code feature)
- Verification covered: SKILL.md (7 operations), 3 core templates, 9 mixin files, references, extractor registration
