# Test Execution Summary: x-ipe-task-based-feature-breakdown v3 Candidate

**Date:** 2025-07-14
**Candidate:** `x-ipe-docs/skill-meta/x-ipe-task-based-feature-breakdown/candidate/`

---

## Overall Result: ✅ ALL PASS (21/21)

| Category | Tests | Passed | Failed |
|----------|-------|--------|--------|
| Structure (AC-S01..S03) | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Content (AC-C01..C13) | 14 | 14 | 0 |
| Behavior (AC-B01..B02) | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| **Total** | **21** | **21** | **0** |

---

## Structure Tests (AC-S01 – AC-S03)

| ID | Name | Status | Evidence |
|----|------|--------|----------|
| TC-001 | SKILL.md exists with valid frontmatter | ✅ PASS | Frontmatter has `name` and `description` fields |
| TC-002 | references/examples.md exists with ≥1 example | ✅ PASS | 6 examples with 20 headings |
| TC-003 | SKILL.md body under 500 lines | ✅ PASS | 498 lines (< 500) |

---

## Content Tests (AC-C01 – AC-C13)

| ID | Name | Status | Key Evidence |
|----|------|--------|--------------|
| TC-004 | Required sections in cognitive flow order | ✅ PASS | All 11 sections present in correct order |
| TC-005 | Execution Flow table has 10 steps | ✅ PASS | 10 rows: Analyze → Complete |
| TC-006 | Step 2 evaluates four scope signals | ✅ PASS | feature count, domain diversity, dependency clusters, team boundaries |
| TC-007 | Step 2 references decision matrix thresholds | ✅ PASS | ≤7, 8-15, 4+/\>15 thresholds present |
| TC-008 | Step 3 operates per-Epic | ✅ PASS | "For each Epic from Step 2" |
| TC-009 | Step 4 operates per-Epic | ✅ PASS | "For each Epic, apply feature identification criteria" |
| TC-010 | Output includes epic_ids and epic_count | ✅ PASS | `epic_ids: [array]` and `epic_count: 2` in YAML |
| TC-011 | DoD has Epic structure checkpoint | ✅ PASS | `<checkpoint required="true">` with "Epic structure assessed" |
| TC-012 | Step 9 compares parent FRs/ACs vs sub-features | ✅ PASS | 100% → remove parent; partial → keep & flag gap |
| TC-013 | Anti-patterns include Epic-specific rows | ✅ PASS | "Skipping Epic assessment" and "All features in one Epic" rows present |
| TC-014 | Examples include multi-Epic scenario | ✅ PASS | Example 1: E-Commerce with EPIC-001/002/003 |
| TC-015 | breakdown-guidelines.md has decision matrix | ✅ PASS | Table with Domains/Features/Decision/Rationale columns |
| TC-016 | Input Initialization subsection present | ✅ PASS | `### Input Initialization` at L77 with `<input_init>` XML block |
| TC-017 | patterns.md has Epic Grouping pattern | ✅ PASS | "Pattern: Epic Grouping" with single/multi-Epic decision logic |

---

## Behavioral Tests (AC-B01 – AC-B02)

These are simulation-based tests verifying that the decision matrix rules in the skill would produce the expected Epic outcomes.

| ID | Name | Status | Scenario → Expected |
|----|------|--------|---------------------|
| TC-018 | Single-domain, few features → single Epic | ✅ PASS | 1 domain, ~5 features → matrix yields single Epic |
| TC-019 | Borderline 2 domains, ≤7 features → single Epic | ✅ PASS | 2 domains, 7 features → "Few features despite multiple domains" |
| TC-020 | Multi-domain, many features → multiple Epics | ✅ PASS | 3 domains, ~12 features → 2-3 Epics (confirmed by Example 1) |
| TC-021 | 4+ domains or \>15 features → multiple Epics | ✅ PASS | 5 domains, ~20 features → "4+ domains → Multiple Epics" |

---

## Conclusion

The candidate skill files fully satisfy all 21 test cases across structural, content, and behavioral acceptance criteria. The Epic granularity assessment (Steps 2-4), decision matrix thresholds, parent feature deduplication (Step 9), and anti-patterns are all correctly implemented and documented.

**Recommendation:** Candidate is ready for promotion to production.
