execution_log:
  timestamp: "2025-07-14"
  candidate: "x-ipe-docs/skill-meta/x-ipe-task-based-feature-breakdown/candidate/"
  total_tests: 21
  passed: 21
  failed: 0
  skipped: 0
  results:
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Structure (AC-S01 .. AC-S03)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-001
      name: "SKILL.md exists with valid frontmatter"
      ac_ref: AC-S01
      status: PASS
      evidence: "File exists. YAML frontmatter contains 'name: x-ipe-task-based-feature-breakdown' and 'description: Break requirements into Epics and features...'"

    - id: TC-002
      name: "references/examples.md exists with at least 1 example"
      ac_ref: AC-S02
      status: PASS
      evidence: "File exists with 20 headings (## and ###). Contains 6 examples: E-Commerce Platform, API Integration, Change Request, Granularity Guidelines, Parent Feature Dedup, Epic Grouping Borderline Case."

    - id: TC-003
      name: "SKILL.md body under 500 lines"
      ac_ref: AC-S03
      status: PASS
      evidence: "Line count = 498 (< 500 threshold)"

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Sections & Flow (AC-C01 .. AC-C02)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-004
      name: "All required sections present in cognitive flow order"
      ac_ref: AC-C01
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Sections found in order at lines: Purpose(8), Important Notes(19),
        Input Parameters(48), Input Initialization(77 as ###),
        Definition of Ready(120), Execution Flow(133),
        Execution Procedure(157), Output Result(390),
        Definition of Done(423), Patterns & Anti-Patterns(472), Examples(494)

    - id: TC-005
      name: "Execution Flow table has exactly 10 steps"
      ac_ref: AC-C02
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        10 data rows found: 1-Analyze, 2-Assess Epic Granularity,
        3-Evaluate Complexity, 4-Identify Features, 5-Process Mockups,
        6-Create Summary, 7-Update Board, 8-Update Index,
        9-Dedup Check, 10-Complete

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Epic Granularity Assessment (AC-C03..C04)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-006
      name: "Step 2 evaluates four scope signals"
      ac_ref: AC-C03
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        All four signals found in <step_2>:
        'Estimated feature count', 'Domain diversity',
        'Dependency clusters', 'Team boundaries'

    - id: TC-007
      name: "Step 2 references decision matrix with thresholds"
      ac_ref: AC-C04
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Thresholds found in <step_2>: '≤7 estimated features → Single Epic',
        '2-3 domains, 8-15 estimated features → 2-3 Epics',
        '4+ domains OR >15 estimated features → Multiple Epics'

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Per-Epic Operation (AC-C05)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-008
      name: "Step 3 operates per-Epic"
      ac_ref: AC-C05
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        <step_3> contains: 'For each Epic from Step 2',
        'per Epic' (5 occurrences), 'within each Epic'

    - id: TC-009
      name: "Step 4 operates per-Epic"
      ac_ref: AC-C05
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        <step_4> contains: 'For each Epic, apply feature identification criteria',
        'first feature in each Epic', 'features per Epic maximum',
        'dependencies per Epic'

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Output Result (AC-C06)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-010
      name: "Output Result includes epic_ids and epic_count"
      ac_ref: AC-C06
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Found in Output Result YAML block:
        'epic_ids: ["EPIC-001", "EPIC-002"]' (array) and
        'epic_count: 2' (integer)

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – DoD Epic Checkpoint (AC-C07)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-011
      name: "DoD has Epic structure assessment checkpoint"
      ac_ref: AC-C07
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Found inside <definition_of_done>:
        '<checkpoint required="true"><name>Epic structure assessed and documented</name>'

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Dedup Coverage (AC-C08)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-012
      name: "Step 9 compares parent FRs/ACs against sub-features"
      ac_ref: AC-C08
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        <step_9> describes: 'List the parent FRs/ACs',
        'List the union of all sub-features FRs/ACs',
        'Compare coverage and produce coverage table',
        'IF 100% coverage: Remove parent',
        'IF partial coverage: Keep parent, flag gap for human review'

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Anti-Patterns (AC-C09)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-013
      name: "Anti-patterns include Epic-specific rows"
      ac_ref: AC-C09
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Anti-Patterns table contains both rows:
        '| Skipping Epic assessment | Features lack cohesion...' and
        '| All features in one Epic | Monolithic, hard to manage...'

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Multi-Epic Example (AC-C10)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-014
      name: "Examples include multi-Epic breakdown scenario"
      ac_ref: AC-C10
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        references/examples.md Example 1 titled 'E-Commerce Platform (Multi-Epic Breakdown)'
        shows 3 Epics: EPIC-001, EPIC-002, EPIC-003 with cross-Epic dependencies

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Breakdown Guidelines Decision Matrix (AC-C11)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-015
      name: "breakdown-guidelines.md has Epic grouping decision matrix"
      ac_ref: AC-C11
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Found '### Epic Grouping Decision Matrix' heading with table:
        '| Domains | Est. Features | Decision | Rationale |'
        Rows include domain counts (1, 2-3, 4+), feature thresholds (≤7, 8-15, >15),
        and outcomes (Single Epic, 2-3 Epics, Multiple Epics)

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – Input Initialization (AC-C12)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-016
      name: "Input Initialization subsection present"
      ac_ref: AC-C12
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        '### Input Initialization' heading found at line 77 under '## Input Parameters' (line 48).
        Contains <input_init> XML block (2 occurrences of 'input_init' tag).

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Content – patterns.md Epic Grouping Pattern (AC-C13)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-017
      name: "patterns.md has Epic Grouping pattern"
      ac_ref: AC-C13
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Found '### Pattern: Epic Grouping' with description:
        'When: Assessing whether to use single or multiple Epics'.
        Contains rules: single Epic (1 domain ≤7 features),
        2-3 Epics (2-3 domains 8-15 features), multiple Epics (4+ domains OR >15 features).

    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
    # Behavior – Simulation (AC-B01 .. AC-B02)
    # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

    - id: TC-018
      name: "Single-domain, few features → single Epic"
      ac_ref: AC-B01
      type: behavioral-simulation
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Simulated: 1 domain (User Authentication), ~5 features.
        Step 2 decision matrix rule '1 domain, ≤7 features → Single Epic' applies.
        SKILL.md step_2 explicitly states this rule. epic_count would be 1.
        Example 2 (API Integration) in examples.md confirms single-domain/5-feature → single Epic pattern.

    - id: TC-019
      name: "Borderline 2 domains but ≤7 features → single Epic"
      ac_ref: AC-B01
      type: behavioral-simulation
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Simulated: 2 domains (Auth + Profile), 7 features total.
        Decision matrix row '2-3 domains, ≤7 features → Single Epic' in
        breakdown-guidelines.md applies. epic_count would be 1.
        Rationale: 'Few features despite multiple domains'.

    - id: TC-020
      name: "Multi-domain, many features → multiple Epics"
      ac_ref: AC-B02
      type: behavioral-simulation
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Simulated: 3 domains, ~12 features.
        Decision matrix row '2-3 domains, 8-15 features → 2-3 Epics (one per domain)' applies.
        Example 1 in examples.md confirms: 3 domains, ~13 features → 3 Epics with
        domain-level dependencies (EPIC-001, EPIC-002, EPIC-003).

    - id: TC-021
      name: "4+ domains or >15 features → multiple Epics with boundaries"
      ac_ref: AC-B02
      type: behavioral-simulation
      status: PASS
      evidence: >
        Simulated: 5 domains, ~20 features.
        Decision matrix row '4+ domains, Any → Multiple Epics' in
        breakdown-guidelines.md applies. Step 2 states:
        '4+ domains OR >15 estimated features → Multiple Epics with clear boundaries'.
        Each Epic gets named domain ownership per step_2 instruction 4.
