# DAO Decisions — Refactor

| Entry ID | Timestamp | Task ID | Calling Skill | Disposition | Confidence | Summary |
|----------|-----------|---------|---------------|-------------|------------|---------|
| DAO-081 | 2026-03-16T03:15:46Z | TASK-888 | N/A | instruction | 0.90 | Phase 1 cleanup: replace legacy auto_proceed references with interaction_mode in safe locations |
| DAO-082 | 2026-03-16T03:28:20Z | TASK-889 | N/A | instruction | 0.88 | Phase 2 cleanup: remove legacy auto_proceed migration layer from backend, frontend, and tests |

## DAO-081
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-16T03:15:46Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-888
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** N/A
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.90

### Message
> go for phase 1

### Guidance Returned
> Proceed with Phase 1 of auto_proceed cleanup: replace legacy `auto_proceed` references with `interaction_mode` in backend initialization (line 942), list_workflows() (lines 272-281), task board templates (2 files), and skill-creator templates. Use x-ipe-task-based-code-refactor skill.

### Rationale
> User explicitly authorized Phase 1 from a prior analysis. The scope is well-defined: safe replacements with no behavioral change. Code-refactor skill is the strong match — this is legacy-to-new field renaming across backend, templates, and documentation.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-code-refactor"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Replacing legacy auto_proceed with interaction_mode across multiple files is a refactoring task"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. Analyze Scope"
>         step: "1.1 Identify refactoring targets"
>       - phase: "2. Execute Refactoring"
>         step: "2.1 Apply changes"
>       - phase: "3. Validate"
>         step: "3.1 Run tests"

### Follow-up
> None
