# DAO Decisions — Ideation

## Registry

| Entry ID | Timestamp | Task ID | Calling Skill | Disposition | Confidence | Summary |
|----------|-----------|---------|---------------|-------------|------------|---------|
| DAO-007 | 2026-03-09T03:59:19Z | TASK-792 | N/A (initial) | instruction | 0.92 | Refine idea 034 CR-'道' for x-ipe using ideation skill — based on UIUX feedback Feedback-20260309-111628 |
| DAO-008 | 2026-03-09T05:57:09Z | TASK-792 | N/A (continuation) | instruction | 0.93 | Continuation — refine idea 034 with ideation skill, same request as DAO-007 in new session |
| DAO-009 | 2026-03-09T06:22:33Z | TASK-792 | x-ipe-task-based-ideation | instruction | 0.90 | User says "continue" — proceed with ideation using best-judgment defaults for 3 open questions |
| DAO-010 | 2026-03-09T07:00:48Z | TASK-792 | x-ipe-task-based-ideation | instruction | 0.95 | User feedback: enum keys too terse — AI needs semantic clarity over brevity. Update idea-summary-v1.md with meaningful keys |
| DAO-011 | 2026-03-09T07:07:48Z | TASK-792 | x-ipe-task-based-ideation | approval | 0.95 | User proposes final keys: dao-represent-human-to-interact, dao-represent-human-to-interact-for-questions-in-skill, interact-with-human — accepted |
| DAO-012 | 2026-03-09T07:10:31Z | TASK-792 | x-ipe-task-based-ideation | instruction | 0.95 | User says "move on" — ideation complete, proceed to x-ipe-task-based-change-request |
| DAO-016 | 2026-03-10T02:19:16Z | TASK-803 | N/A (initial) | instruction | 0.90 | Route UIUX feedback on code-implementation tool config to ideation skill |
| DAO-017 | 2026-03-10T02:42:47Z | TASK-804 | x-ipe-task-based-feature-refinement | instruction | 0.93 | FEATURE-045-A refinement complete (spec v1.1) — proceed to Technical Design |
| DAO-018 | 2026-03-10T02:53:06Z | TASK-805 | x-ipe-task-based-technical-design | instruction | 0.94 | FEATURE-045-A technical design v1.1 complete (16/16 DoD) — proceed to Code Implementation |

---

## DAO-007
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T03:59:19Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** N/A (initial user message)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.92

### Message
> refine the idea x-ipe-docs/ideas/034. CR-'道' for x-ipe/new idea.md with ideation skill

### Guidance Returned
> Proceed with ideation refinement. The idea file references UIUX feedback (Feedback-20260309-111628) proposing to rename "auto_proceed" mode to "End-User Representative Mode" with new interaction_mode enum values, UI label changes, and logic verification. Strong match for x-ipe-task-based-ideation skill to brainstorm and produce structured idea summary.

### Rationale
> User explicitly requests ideation refinement on a sparse idea file backed by concrete UIUX feedback. Direction aligns (early-stage ideation), timing is right (new idea, no conflicts), environment allows it. Smallest useful intervention: instruct agent to proceed with ideation skill.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "User explicitly asks to refine an idea — direct match to ideation triggers"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. Absorb"
>         step: "1.1 Read all files in idea folder"
>       - phase: "2. Clarify"
>         step: "2.1 Ask clarifying questions"
>       - phase: "3. Synthesize"
>         step: "3.1 Produce structured idea summary"

### Follow-up
> None

---

## DAO-009
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T06:22:33Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-ideation (mid-execution)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.90

### Message
> continue

### Guidance Returned
> Proceed with ideation — use best-judgment defaults for 3 open questions: (1) use shorter internal keys with longer UI labels, (2) support backward compat during transition, (3) label dropdown as "Interaction Mode". These are easily revisable in a CR document.

### Rationale
> "Continue" in context of pending clarifying questions means "use your best judgment." This is an idea document, not code — naming defaults are low-risk and reversible. Direction aligns (mid-ideation), timing is right (momentum matters), environment allows it. Smallest useful intervention: instruct with defaults.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Already in-progress — continue to Phase 3 (Synthesize)"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "3. Synthesize"
>         step: "3.1 Produce structured idea summary"

### Follow-up
> None
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T05:57:09Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** N/A (continuation from new session)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.93

### Message
> refine the idea x-ipe-docs/ideas/034. CR-'道' for x-ipe/new idea.md with ideation skill

### Guidance Returned
> Continuation of DAO-007. Proceed with ideation refinement for idea 034 — the idea file is sparse, referencing Feedback-20260309-111628 which proposes renaming auto_proceed to End-User Representative Mode. TASK-792 already exists on board. Load x-ipe-task-based-ideation skill and execute.

### Rationale
> Same request as DAO-007 in a new session. TASK-792 is already in_progress on board. Direction aligns (ideation stage), timing is right (continuation), environment allows it. Instruction: proceed with ideation skill.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "User explicitly asks to refine an idea with ideation skill"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. Absorb"
>         step: "1.1 Read all files in idea folder"
>       - phase: "2. Clarify"
>         step: "2.1 Ask clarifying questions"
>       - phase: "3. Synthesize"
>         step: "3.1 Produce structured idea summary"

### Follow-up
> None

---

## DAO-010
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T07:00:48Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-ideation (post-synthesis feedback)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.95

### Message
> can we have more meaningful keys? dao-represent, dao-inner-only is short but not meaningful, since ai requirement accurate semantic understanding to work. so meaningful is over simplicity

### Guidance Returned
> Update idea-summary-v1.md enum keys from terse (dao-represent, dao-inner-only, human-direct) to semantically rich (interact-with-dao-representative, interact-with-dao-representative-inner-skill-only, interact-with-human). AI agents parse these keys to determine behavior — self-documenting keys prevent misinterpretation without requiring lookup tables.

### Rationale
> User explicitly states "meaningful is over simplicity" — a clear design principle for AI-consumed keys. The original proposal was directionally correct; terse keys were an over-correction toward brevity. Since keys appear in YAML/JSON/CLI (not inner loops), readability and semantic accuracy outweigh brevity. Low risk: this is an idea document refinement.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Refinement of in-progress idea summary — update enum values"

### Follow-up
> None

---

## DAO-011
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T07:07:48Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-ideation (post-synthesis feedback)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** approval
- **Confidence:** 0.95

### Message
> how about dao-represent-human-to-interact, dao-represent-human-to-interact-for-questions-in-skill, interact-with-human

### Guidance Returned
> Accept the user's proposed keys. They follow a consistent subject-verb-object pattern and are semantically clear for AI consumption. Updated idea-summary-v1.md with: dao-represent-human-to-interact, dao-represent-human-to-interact-for-questions-in-skill, interact-with-human.

### Rationale
> User is the product owner iterating on naming — this is their domain decision. The keys are meaningful, consistent, and readable. Minor length concern on the middle key is acceptable given the "meaningful over simplicity" principle established in DAO-010.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Same refinement cycle — updating enum values per user feedback"

### Follow-up
> None

---

## DAO-012
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-09T07:10:31Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-792
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-ideation (completed)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.95

### Message
> move on

### Guidance Returned
> Ideation complete. Proceed to x-ipe-task-based-change-request skill to analyze impact and classify the CR for IDEA-034.

### Rationale
> Idea is refined (v1 with 3 rounds of user feedback on enum naming). This is explicitly a CR (folder named "034. CR-'道' for x-ipe"), so the change-request skill is the correct next step. Direction aligns, timing is right, environment allows.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-change-request"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Idea 034 is a CR — next step is change-request analysis"

### Follow-up
> None

## DAO-016
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-10T02:19:16Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-803
- **Feature ID:** N/A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** N/A (initial user message)
- **Source:** human
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.90

### Message
> Get uiux feedback, please visit feedback folder x-ipe-docs/uiux-feedback/Feedback-20260309-184047 to get details. Feedback content: "for code-implementation in feature stage, let's also like brainstorming in ideation stage that, since we have many tool-implementation-* skills, let's having can be enable or disabled in the toolbox config, so when task-based-code-implementation been called, just like ideation skill it can choose the best enabled tools for it's work."

### Guidance Returned
> Route to x-ipe-task-based-ideation for idea refinement. The user proposes extending the tools.json enable/disable pattern (already used in ideation stage) to the code-implementation stage, so tool-implementation-* skills can be configured. This follows the established Feedback → Ideation → CR pipeline seen in prior tasks (e.g., TASK-792).

### Rationale
> User explicitly references brainstorming pattern ("let's also like brainstorming in ideation stage"). The idea is well-framed but needs refinement — which tool-implementation-* skills exist, how should selection logic work, what config structure to use. Ideation is the right entry point to scope this properly before committing to a change request. Confidence 0.90 — clear intent, established pattern.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-ideation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "User proposes new capability with brainstorming framing — needs idea refinement before CR"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. 博学之 — Study Broadly"
>         step: "1.1 Understand Idea"
>       - phase: "2. 审问之 — Question Deeply"
>         step: "2.1 Generate Questions"
>       - phase: "3. 慎思之 — Reflect Carefully"
>         step: "3.1 Synthesize Summary"
>       - phase: "4. 明辨之 — Distinguish Clearly"
>         step: "4.1 Human Review"
>       - phase: "5. 笃行之 — Act Decisively"
>         step: "5.1 Finalize and Complete"

### Follow-up
> None — proceed to task creation and ideation skill execution

---

## DAO-017
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-10T02:42:47Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-804
- **Feature ID:** FEATURE-045-A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-feature-refinement
- **Source:** ai
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.93

### Message
> Feature Refinement for FEATURE-045-A is complete (spec v1.1). The skill's defined next step is Technical Design. Should we proceed to Technical Design for FEATURE-045-A, or take a different action?

### Guidance Returned
> Proceed to x-ipe-task-based-technical-design for FEATURE-045-A. The spec v1.1 is complete and DoD-verified with substantial scope (11 ACs in AC-3, 10-step routing procedure in FR-3, 5 new edge cases). Technical design is the correct next gate — it will define internal architecture and surface any remaining spec ambiguities before implementation begins.

### Rationale
> Three perspectives assessed: (1) Supporting — spec complete, pipeline established, design needed before complex implementation; (2) Opposing — spec expanded significantly, but design phase is itself a review mechanism; (3) Neutral — routine pipeline transition in DAO mode. Direction aligned (refinement→design), timing correct (DoD verified, no blockers), environment clear (DAO mode active). Smallest useful intervention: instruct forward to technical design.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-technical-design"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Declared next_task_based_skill from feature-refinement output — direct match to 'design feature' trigger"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. Research"
>         step: "1.1 Query feature board for full Feature Data Model"
>       - phase: "2. Design"
>         step: "2.1 Read feature specification and design solution"
>       - phase: "3. Document"
>         step: "3.1 Create two-part technical design document"

### Follow-up
> None — Quill 🪶 should create a new task on task-board.md for Technical Design and execute x-ipe-task-based-technical-design for FEATURE-045-A

---

## DAO-018
- **Timestamp:** 2026-03-10T02:53:06Z
- **Task ID:** TASK-805
- **Feature ID:** FEATURE-045-A
- **Workflow:** N/A
- **Calling Skill:** x-ipe-task-based-technical-design
- **Source:** ai
- **Disposition:** instruction
- **Confidence:** 0.94

### Message
> Technical Design for FEATURE-045-A is complete (v1.1). The skill's defined next step is Code Implementation. Should we proceed to Code Implementation for FEATURE-045-A?

### Guidance Returned
> Proceed to x-ipe-task-based-code-implementation for FEATURE-045-A. The technical design v1.1 is complete with all 16 DoD checkpoints verified. It specifies config-aware routing: read tools.json → filter enabled → force-enable general → semantic match enabled only. The 8-step discovery procedure, ConfigFilter component, updated sequence diagram, and 7 new edge cases provide sufficient architectural clarity for implementation. Code implementation is the declared and correct next gate.

### Rationale
> Three perspectives assessed: (1) Supporting — design v1.1 complete with 16/16 DoD, CR-001 additions fully integrated (8-step config-aware procedure, ConfigFilter, 7 edge cases, tools.json file changes), implementation is the natural next gate; (2) Opposing — design expanded significantly from v1.0 to v1.1, but the design phase itself served as the review mechanism and all checkpoints passed; (3) Neutral — routine pipeline transition in DAO mode, identical pattern to DAO-017 (refinement→design). Direction aligned (design→implementation), timing correct (DoD verified, no blockers), environment clear (DAO mode active). Smallest useful intervention: instruct forward to code implementation.

### Suggested Skills
> suggested_skills:
>   - skill_name: "x-ipe-task-based-code-implementation"
>     match_strength: "strong"
>     reason: "Declared next_task_based_skill from technical-design output — direct match to 'implement feature' trigger"
>     execution_steps:
>       - phase: "1. Prepare"
>         step: "1.1 Read feature specification and technical design"
>       - phase: "2. Test"
>         step: "2.1 Generate AAA test scenarios from specification"
>       - phase: "3. Implement"
>         step: "3.1 Route to language-specific tool skills via semantic matching"
>       - phase: "4. Validate"
>         step: "4.1 Run tests and verify implementation"

### Follow-up
> None — Quill 🪶 should create a new task on task-board.md for Code Implementation and execute x-ipe-task-based-code-implementation for FEATURE-045-A
