## Task

Evaluate this code review comment. Read the source file and determine if the issue is valid.

**Instructions:**
1. Read the file mentioned in the review: `packages/core/ai_content_platform/vimax/cli/commands.py`
2. Check line 395 and surrounding context
3. Determine if the review feedback is valid
4. If valid: Fix the issue in the code
5. If invalid: Explain why the feedback doesn't apply

**Important:** Be concise. Either fix the code or explain in 2-3 sentences why it's not applicable.

---

# Review Comment

- **Author:** gemini-code-assist[bot]
- **File:** `packages/core/ai_content_platform/vimax/cli/commands.py`
- **Line:** 395
- **Date:** 2026-02-07
- **Comment ID:** 2777640368
- **URL:** https://github.com/donghaozhang/video-agent-skill/pull/22#discussion_r2777640368

---

![medium](https://www.gstatic.com/codereviewagent/medium-priority.svg)

There's a logic issue here in how reference mappings are displayed. The `if ref_shots:` condition on line 378 means that if no shots are successfully resolved, no feedback is printed at all, even if there were characters that failed to match. This can be confusing for the user. To fix this, the feedback block should be entered if a `portrait_registry` was provided, regardless of whether any shots were resolved. This will ensure that the user is always informed about which characters could not be matched.
