## Task

Evaluate this code review comment. Read the source file and determine if the issue is valid.

**Instructions:**
1. Read the file mentioned in the review: `packages/core/ai_content_pipeline/ai_content_pipeline/__main__.py`
2. Check line 291 and surrounding context
3. Determine if the review feedback is valid
4. If valid: Fix the issue in the code
5. If invalid: Explain why the feedback doesn't apply

**Important:** Be concise. Either fix the code or explain in 2-3 sentences why it's not applicable.

---

# Review Comment

- **Author:** gemini-code-assist[bot]
- **File:** `packages/core/ai_content_pipeline/ai_content_pipeline/__main__.py`
- **Line:** 291
- **Date:** 2026-02-07
- **Comment ID:** 2777108460
- **URL:** https://github.com/donghaozhang/video-agent-skill/pull/20#discussion_r2777108460

---

![critical](https://www.gstatic.com/codereviewagent/critical.svg)

There's a critical issue in the `run_chain` confirmation logic for non-interactive environments like CI. The `confirm()` function is called with its `default` parameter as `False`. In a non-interactive session, `confirm()` returns this default value, causing `if not confirm(...)` to evaluate to `True` and cancel the execution. This breaks the intended behavior of auto-proceeding in CI. To fix this, the `confirm` call should specify `default=True` to ensure it auto-accepts in non-interactive environments.

```suggestion
            if not confirm("\nProceed with execution?", default=True):
```
