## Task

Evaluate this code review comment. Read the source file and determine if the issue is valid.

**Instructions:**
1. Read the file mentioned in the review: `packages/core/ai_content_platform/vimax/agents/storyboard_artist.py`
2. Check line 193 and surrounding context
3. Determine if the review feedback is valid
4. If valid: Fix the issue in the code
5. If invalid: Explain why the feedback doesn't apply

**Important:** Be concise. Either fix the code or explain in 2-3 sentences why it's not applicable.

---

# Review Comment

- **Author:** coderabbitai[bot]
- **File:** `packages/core/ai_content_platform/vimax/agents/storyboard_artist.py`
- **Line:** 193
- **Date:** 2026-02-07
- **Comment ID:** 2777644870
- **URL:** https://github.com/donghaozhang/video-agent-skill/pull/22#discussion_r2777644870

---

_⚠️ Potential issue_ | _🟡 Minor_

**Align `resolved_count` with the docstring definition.**  
Line 184–188 increments only when `primary_reference_image` exists, but the docstring says “shots that received at least one reference.” Count any shot where `selected_references` or `primary_reference` is set, and add Cost/Example sections to this public method’s docstring.
