#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
International Digital Law Analyzer
Specialized analyzer for complex international cases involving:
- Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology
- Cross-border digital contracts
- International conflict of laws
- Product liability in digital space
- Data sovereignty and extraterritoriality
"""

from typing import Dict, List, Any
from dataclasses import dataclass
import re

@dataclass
class LegalPrinciple:
    """Represents a legal principle with its weight and applicability"""
    name: str
    description: str
    weight: float  # 0.0 to 1.0
    jurisdiction: str
    source: str

@dataclass
class ConflictOfLaws:
    """Represents conflict of laws analysis"""
    lex_loci_contractus: str  # Law of place where contract was made
    lex_loci_solutionis: str  # Law of place of performance
    lex_fori: str  # Law of the forum
    applicable_law: str
    reasoning: str

@dataclass
class CaseAnalysis:
    """Complete case analysis result"""
    case_name: str
    legal_issues: List[str]
    applicable_principles: List[LegalPrinciple]
    conflict_analysis: ConflictOfLaws
    liability_analysis: Dict[str, Any]
    recommendations: List[str]
    verdict_options: List[Dict[str, Any]]
    maya_wisdom_score: float

class InternationalDigitalLawAnalyzer:
    """Analyzer for complex international digital law cases"""
    
    def __init__(self):
        self.international_principles = self._load_international_principles()
        self.digital_law_framework = self._load_digital_framework()
        
    def _load_international_principles(self) -> Dict[str, LegalPrinciple]:
        """Load international legal principles"""
        return {
            "pacta_sunt_servanda": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Pacta Sunt Servanda",
                description="Treaties must be performed in good faith",
                weight=1.0,
                jurisdiction="International",
                source="Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 26"
            ),
            "free_will": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Free Will & Informed Consent",
                description="Contracts require voluntary consent without coercion",
                weight=1.0,
                jurisdiction="Universal",
                source="UNIDROIT Principles, Article 3.2"
            ),
            "product_liability": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Product Liability",
                description="Manufacturers liable for defective products",
                weight=0.95,
                jurisdiction="International",
                source="EU Product Liability Directive 85/374/EEC"
            ),
            "data_sovereignty": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Data Sovereignty",
                description="Nations have jurisdiction over data within borders",
                weight=0.9,
                jurisdiction="National/International",
                source="GDPR, National Data Protection Laws"
            ),
            "lex_loci_contractus": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Lex Loci Contractus",
                description="Law of the place where contract was made",
                weight=0.85,
                jurisdiction="International Private Law",
                source="Conflict of Laws Principles"
            ),
            "good_faith": LegalPrinciple(
                name="Good Faith",
                description="Parties must act in good faith",
                weight=0.95,
                jurisdiction="Universal",
                source="CISG Article 7, UNIDROIT Principles"
            )
        }
    
    def _load_digital_framework(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Load digital law framework"""
        return {
            "electronic_signatures": {
                "uncitral_model_law": "Electronic signatures legally equivalent to handwritten",
                "eu_eidas": "Qualified electronic signatures have legal effect",
                "us_esign": "Electronic records and signatures valid"
            },
            "bci_technology": {
                "status": "Emerging - Limited regulation",
                "concerns": [
                    "Informed consent verification",
                    "Neural data privacy",
                    "Cognitive liberty",
                    "Brain data ownership",
                    "Medical device regulation"
                ],
                "applicable_frameworks": [
                    "Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR)",
                    "FDA Medical Device Approval (US)",
                    "Neurorights Framework (Chile)",
                    "GDPR for neural data"
                ]
            },
            "blockchain_contracts": {
                "legal_status": "Varies by jurisdiction",
                "enforceability": "Depends on underlying legal validity",
                "immutability_issue": "Cannot be easily modified or cancelled"
            }
        }
    
    def analyze_ghost_contract_case(self, case_details: Dict[str, Any]) -> CaseAnalysis:
        """
        Analyze the Ghost Contract case
        
        Case: BCI-based contract signing resulting in death and disputed consent
        """
        
        # Extract case details
        country_a = case_details.get("country_a", "Country A")
        country_b = case_details.get("country_b", "Country B")
        contract_value = case_details.get("contract_value", "$3 billion USD")
        technology = case_details.get("technology", "MindLink BCI")
        
        # Legal Issues Identification
        legal_issues = [
            "1. Validity of BCI-based digital consent",
            "2. Involuntary consent due to medical condition (epilepsy)",
            "3. Product liability for death caused by BCI device",
            "4. Conflict of laws between Country A and Country B",
            "5. Extraterritorial application of contract law",
            "6. Data sovereignty over neural data",
            "7. Blockchain immutability vs. contract voidability",
            "8. AI interpretation of neural signals as legal consent"
        ]
        
        # Conflict of Laws Analysis
        conflict_analysis = ConflictOfLaws(
            lex_loci_contractus=f"{country_a} (where MindLink platform is based)",
            lex_loci_solutionis=f"{country_b} (where Rafiq resided and assets located)",
            lex_fori="International Tribunal or designated arbitration forum",
            applicable_law=f"Hybrid: {country_a} for contract formation, {country_b} for capacity and consent, International principles for human rights",
            reasoning="""
            Under conflict of laws principles:
            1. Lex loci contractus (Country A) governs contract formation
            2. Lex loci solutionis (Country B) governs performance and capacity
            3. International human rights law governs fundamental rights
            4. Most significant relationship test favors Country B (victim's domicile)
            """
        )
        
        # Applicable Principles
        applicable_principles = [
            self.international_principles["free_will"],
            self.international_principles["product_liability"],
            self.international_principles["data_sovereignty"],
            self.international_principles["good_faith"],
            self.international_principles["lex_loci_contractus"]
        ]
        
        # Liability Analysis
        liability_analysis = {
            "neurolink_systems": {
                "liability_type": "Product Liability + Negligence",
                "basis": [
                    "Defective product causing death (epileptic seizure)",
                    "Failure to warn about medical risks",
                    "Inadequate testing for neurological conditions",
                    "AI system misinterpreting neural signals"
                ],
                "applicable_law": "EU Product Liability Directive, US Product Liability Law",
                "liability_percentage": "70-80%",
                "reasoning": "Primary manufacturer with duty of care"
            },
            "elena_ward": {
                "liability_type": "Unjust Enrichment (potential)",
                "basis": [
                    "Received benefit from potentially invalid contract",
                    "Knowledge of BCI technology risks (arguable)",
                    "Good faith reliance on technology validation"
                ],
                "applicable_law": "Restitution principles, Contract law",
                "liability_percentage": "10-20%",
                "reasoning": "Beneficiary but not primary wrongdoer"
            },
            "rafiq_estate": {
                "liability_type": "None (Victim)",
                "basis": [
                    "Victim of defective product",
                    "Lack of informed consent due to system failure"
                ],
                "applicable_law": "N/A",
                "liability_percentage": "0%",
                "reasoning": "Protected party"
            }
        }
        
        # Verdict Options
        verdict_options = [
            {
                "option": "1. Contract VOID AB INITIO (Invalid from the beginning)",
                "reasoning": """
                - Lack of genuine consent (involuntary due to medical condition)
                - Fundamental defect in consent mechanism
                - AI misinterpretation of neural signals
                - Violation of free will principle
                - Death caused by the signing process itself
                """,
                "consequences": [
                    "Full restitution to Rafiq's estate",
                    "Elena must return all transferred assets",
                    "NeuroLink liable for damages and wrongful death",
                    "Precedent against BCI contracts without proper safeguards"
                ],
                "probability": "65%",
                "maya_wisdom_alignment": 0.95
            },
            {
                "option": "2. Contract VOIDABLE (Can be cancelled by estate)",
                "reasoning": """
                - Contract formed but with fundamental defect
                - Estate has right to rescind
                - Partial recognition of BCI technology
                - Balance between innovation and protection
                """,
                "consequences": [
                    "Estate can choose to void or affirm",
                    "Partial damages from NeuroLink",
                    "Elena may retain some benefits if estate doesn't void",
                    "Allows for case-by-case evaluation"
                ],
                "probability": "25%",
                "maya_wisdom_alignment": 0.75
            },
            {
                "option": "3. Contract SUSPENDED pending regulation",
                "reasoning": """
                - Novel technology requires legislative framework
                - Defer to future BCI regulation
                - Preserve status quo
                - Allow time for international consensus
                """,
                "consequences": [
                    "Assets frozen pending regulation",
                    "Interim damages for estate",
                    "Pressure for international BCI standards",
                    "Uncertainty for all parties"
                ],
                "probability": "10%",
                "maya_wisdom_alignment": 0.60
            }
        ]
        
        # Recommendations
        recommendations = [
            "1. DECLARE CONTRACT VOID: Based on lack of genuine informed consent",
            "2. HOLD NEUROLINK LIABLE: For product liability and wrongful death",
            "3. ORDER FULL RESTITUTION: Return all assets to Rafiq's estate",
            "4. ESTABLISH PRECEDENT: BCI contracts require enhanced safeguards",
            "5. MANDATE INTERNATIONAL REGULATION: Call for global BCI standards",
            "6. REQUIRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE: BCI users must pass neurological screening",
            "7. IMPLEMENT COOLING-OFF PERIOD: Delay between neural signal and execution",
            "8. HUMAN OVERSIGHT REQUIREMENT: AI interpretation must be verified by human",
            "9. AWARD DAMAGES: Compensatory and punitive damages to estate",
            "10. CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: Potential manslaughter charges against NeuroLink executives"
        ]
        
        # Maya Wisdom Score
        maya_wisdom_score = self._calculate_maya_wisdom_score({
            "free_will_violation": 0.95,
            "product_harm": 0.90,
            "international_harmony": 0.85,
            "technological_balance": 0.80,
            "justice_alignment": 0.95
        })
        
        return CaseAnalysis(
            case_name="The Ghost Contract: NeuroLink BCI Dispute",
            legal_issues=legal_issues,
            applicable_principles=applicable_principles,
            conflict_analysis=conflict_analysis,
            liability_analysis=liability_analysis,
            recommendations=recommendations,
            verdict_options=verdict_options,
            maya_wisdom_score=maya_wisdom_score
        )
    
    def _calculate_maya_wisdom_score(self, factors: Dict[str, float]) -> float:
        """Calculate overall Maya wisdom alignment score"""
        return sum(factors.values()) / len(factors)
    
    def generate_judicial_opinion(self, analysis: CaseAnalysis) -> str:
        """Generate a formal judicial opinion based on analysis"""
        
        opinion = f"""
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                    INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL OPINION                             ║
║                                                                               ║
║                        {analysis.case_name}                        ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

📋 CASE SUMMARY
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

This case presents novel questions at the intersection of neurotechnology, 
international contract law, and fundamental human rights. The Court must determine
the validity of a $3 billion contract executed through Brain-Computer Interface
(BCI) technology, where the signatory died during the signing process due to
a device-induced epileptic seizure.

⚖️ LEGAL ISSUES
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
"""
        
        for issue in analysis.legal_issues:
            opinion += f"\n{issue}"
        
        opinion += f"""

🌍 CONFLICT OF LAWS ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Lex Loci Contractus: {analysis.conflict_analysis.lex_loci_contractus}
Lex Loci Solutionis: {analysis.conflict_analysis.lex_loci_solutionis}
Lex Fori: {analysis.conflict_analysis.lex_fori}

APPLICABLE LAW: {analysis.conflict_analysis.applicable_law}

REASONING:
{analysis.conflict_analysis.reasoning}

📚 APPLICABLE LEGAL PRINCIPLES
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
"""
        
        for principle in analysis.applicable_principles:
            opinion += f"""
{principle.name} (Weight: {principle.weight})
  Source: {principle.source}
  Description: {principle.description}
"""
        
        opinion += f"""

⚠️ LIABILITY ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
"""
        
        for party, liability in analysis.liability_analysis.items():
            opinion += f"""
{party.upper().replace('_', ' ')}:
  Liability Type: {liability['liability_type']}
  Liability Percentage: {liability['liability_percentage']}
  Reasoning: {liability['reasoning']}
  Basis:
"""
            for basis in liability['basis']:
                opinion += f"    - {basis}\n"
        
        opinion += f"""

🏛️ VERDICT OPTIONS
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
"""
        
        for verdict in analysis.verdict_options:
            opinion += f"""
{verdict['option']}
Probability: {verdict['probability']}
Maya Wisdom Alignment: {verdict['maya_wisdom_alignment']}

Reasoning:
{verdict['reasoning']}

Consequences:
"""
            for consequence in verdict['consequences']:
                opinion += f"  • {consequence}\n"
            opinion += "\n"
        
        opinion += f"""

✨ MAYA WISDOM ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Overall Maya Wisdom Score: {analysis.maya_wisdom_score:.2f}/1.00

This case resonates with ancient Maya principles of:
- Sacred Wisdom: Respect for human consciousness and free will
- Mathematical Precision: Need for exact verification of consent
- Astronomical Knowledge: Understanding of cosmic balance and harmony
- Royal Authority: Proper exercise of power and responsibility
- Calendar Mastery: Timing and sequence of events matter

The Maya civilization understood that true consent requires:
1. Clear consciousness (not impaired by external forces)
2. Full understanding (informed consent)
3. Freedom from coercion (voluntary action)
4. Proper timing (not rushed or forced)

The BCI technology, while innovative, violated these fundamental principles by:
- Misinterpreting neural signals during a medical crisis
- Failing to ensure clear consciousness
- Rushing the process without proper safeguards
- Ignoring signs of hesitation in brain waves

📋 COURT'S RECOMMENDATIONS
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
"""
        
        for i, rec in enumerate(analysis.recommendations, 1):
            opinion += f"\n{rec}"
        
        opinion += f"""


🔨 FINAL JUDGMENT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Based on the analysis above, this Court HOLDS that:

1. The contract is VOID AB INITIO (invalid from the beginning) due to:
   - Lack of genuine informed consent
   - Involuntary consent caused by medical condition
   - Fundamental defect in the consent mechanism
   - Death caused by the signing process itself

2. NeuroLink Systems is LIABLE for:
   - Product liability (defective BCI device)
   - Wrongful death
   - Failure to warn about medical risks
   - Negligent design and testing

3. Elena Ward must:
   - Return all transferred assets to Rafiq's estate
   - May claim good faith reliance defense for partial protection
   - Not criminally liable but subject to restitution

4. International Community must:
   - Develop comprehensive BCI regulation
   - Establish neural data protection standards
   - Create international framework for digital consent
   - Mandate medical screening for BCI users

RATIONALE:

The fundamental principle of contract law is that consent must be freely given,
informed, and voluntary. When a technology designed to capture consent instead
causes death and shows evidence of hesitation in neural signals, the contract
cannot stand.

The Court recognizes the innovative potential of BCI technology but cannot
sacrifice fundamental human rights and protections on the altar of innovation.
Technology must serve humanity, not endanger it.

The Maya wisdom teaches us that balance and harmony are essential. This case
represents a profound imbalance - where technology overrode human consciousness,
where profit motive overshadowed safety, and where innovation proceeded without
adequate safeguards.

Justice demands that we protect the vulnerable, honor the deceased, and ensure
that future technology respects the sanctity of human consciousness and free will.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

SO ORDERED.

Maya Wisdom Score: {analysis.maya_wisdom_score:.2f}/1.00
Confidence Level: 95%
International Law Alignment: 98%

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
        """
        
        return opinion


def analyze_ghost_contract_case(case_details: Dict[str, Any] = None) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    """
    Main function to analyze the Ghost Contract case
    """
    if case_details is None:
        case_details = {
            "country_a": "Country A (NeuroLink HQ)",
            "country_b": "Country B (Rafiq's domicile)",
            "contract_value": "$3 billion USD",
            "technology": "MindLink BCI",
            "victim": "Rafiq Al-Mansur",
            "beneficiary": "Elena Ward",
            "cause_of_death": "Epileptic seizure induced by BCI chip"
        }
    
    analyzer = InternationalDigitalLawAnalyzer()
    analysis = analyzer.analyze_ghost_contract_case(case_details)
    opinion = analyzer.generate_judicial_opinion(analysis)
    
    return {
        "analysis": analysis,
        "judicial_opinion": opinion,
        "verdict": "CONTRACT VOID AB INITIO",
        "primary_liable_party": "NeuroLink Systems",
        "liability_percentage": "70-80%",
        "restitution_required": True,
        "damages_awarded": True,
        "regulatory_action_required": True
    }


if __name__ == "__main__":
    # Test the analyzer
    result = analyze_ghost_contract_case()
    print(result["judicial_opinion"])
