# Valorant Performance Analysis — SayGG#11111

---

## ⚠️ Important Disclaimer

The match data provided **does not include player-specific identifiers** (like a `puuid` or tagged username tied to individual entries). I cannot definitively determine which player slot belongs to **SayGG#11111** across these matches. The analysis below is based on **team-level patterns and aggregate match data**, and I'll flag assumptions clearly.

---

## 📊 Match Overview

| # | Map | Date | Result | Score |
|---|-----|------|--------|-------|
| 1 | Haven | Mar 26 | ✅ Win | 13–2 |
| 2 | Pearl | Mar 26 | ❌ Loss | 9–13 |
| 3 | Bind | Mar 25 | ✅ Win | 13–9 |
| 4 | Split | Mar 25 | ✅ Win | 13–11 |
| 5 | Pearl | Mar 23 | ❌ Loss | 9–13 |

**Record: 3W – 2L** | Both losses occurred on **Pearl**

---

## 🔁 Win/Loss Patterns

### Key Observations

**Wins were team-dominant performances:**
- Haven was a **near-perfect stomp** (13–2), suggesting strong early-round momentum and likely a surrender situation or full team coordination
- Bind and Split were competitive but consistently controlled (13–9, 13–11)

**Losses share a common thread — Pearl:**
- Pearl Match 1 (Mar 26): Lost 9–13 — Blue team had a **Platinum Phoenix** leading with 21K/20D but still lost, indicating individual carry attempts couldn't overcome structural issues
- Pearl Match 2 (Mar 23): Lost 9–13 — Red team had superior individual scores (Gekko: 21/13, Chamber: 20/14) while Blue's top performers were dragged down by deaths (Omen: 18/20)

> 🔴 **Pearl appears to be a consistent problem map** — 0W/2L across both appearances

---

## 🗺️ Map-Specific Trends

### Haven ✅ (1W – 0L)
- Blue team achieved a dominant 13–2 scoreline
- Balanced team scoring: KAY/O (4777), Omen (3817), Reyna (3772)
- **No single point of failure** — every Blue player contributed positively
- Red team collapsed entirely (KAY/O: 2/13, Neon: 6/14)

### Bind ✅ (1W – 0L)
- Notable outlier: A **Platinum 1 Reyna** dropped an extraordinary **38 kills / 12 deaths / 9926 score**
- This is a statistical anomaly — likely a smurf or extraordinary performance
- Win was carried heavily by one player, which is a fragile win condition

### Split ✅ (1W – 0L)
- Closest win at 13–11 — tight, back-and-forth match
- Blue team was balanced (scores 4795–6272 range)
- Red team had a Miks with 21/17 and Reyna 20/20 — competitive lobby

### Pearl ❌ (0W – 2L)
- **Consistent pattern**: Blue team (the losing side in both games) had high death counts
- Mar 26: Blue's highest scorer had 21 kills but 20 deaths — not tradeable enough
- Mar 23: Blue's Omen went 18/20, Jett 13/18 — negative K/D across most players
- Pearl's longer site distances and mid-control dependency may be exposing positional weaknesses

---

## 👤 Agent Performance Comparison

*Since individual identity isn't tagged, this reflects the player's likely team compositions and recurring agent patterns:*

### Notable Agent Performances Across All Matches

| Agent | Appearances | Avg K/D Trend | Context |
|-------|-------------|---------------|---------|
| Reyna | 5 | Varies wildly | Bind Reyna: godlike (38/12); Pearl/Split: breakeven |
| Omen