# Expanded User Stories - Part 1 (MASSIVELY EXTENDED)

**Date**: 2025-11-22  
**Version**: 5.0 (MASSIVELY EXPANDED)  
**Status**: APPROVED

---

## EPIC 1: ITEM MANAGEMENT (EXTENDED - 50+ STORIES)

### Story 1.1: Create Item with Basic Information
**ID**: US-1.1  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to create items with basic information so that I can track work items

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can enter item title (1-255 characters)
2. User can select item type from 8 types
3. User can enter description (0-5000 characters, markdown)
4. User can add tags (0-20 tags)
5. User can set priority (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL)
6. Item is created with DRAFT status
7. Item appears in items list immediately
8. User receives confirmation notification
9. Item is indexed for search
10. Item appears in activity feed

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Error handling added
- ✅ Unit tests written (80%+ coverage)
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/items`
- GraphQL: `mutation createItem($input: CreateItemInput!)`
- tRPC: `items.create`
- Database: Insert into items table
- Real-time: Broadcast `items:created` event
- Search: Index item for full-text search
- Notifications: Send to assignees

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Error Scenarios**:
- Missing title → 400 VALIDATION_ERROR
- Invalid type → 400 VALIDATION_ERROR
- Unauthorized → 401 UNAUTHORIZED
- Forbidden → 403 FORBIDDEN
- Rate limit exceeded → 429 RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED

**Related Stories**: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5

---

### Story 1.2: Create Item with Estimated Effort
**ID**: US-1.2  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to set estimated effort in story points so that I can plan sprints

**Story Points**: 3  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can enter estimated effort (1-100 story points)
2. Effort is optional (can be empty)
3. Effort is validated (positive integer only)
4. Effort is displayed in item details
5. Effort is displayed in list views
6. Effort is used for capacity planning
7. Effort is used for sprint planning
8. Effort is used for velocity calculation
9. Effort is used for burndown charts
10. Effort can be updated

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint updated
- ✅ GraphQL mutation updated
- ✅ tRPC procedure updated
- ✅ React component updated
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Field: `estimatedEffort` (integer, 1-100)
- Validation: `z.number().min(1).max(100)`
- Database: Add to items table
- Display: Show in item details, list views, graph (node size)
- Calculations: Used for capacity planning, velocity, burndown

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Calculation time: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5

---

### Story 1.3: Create Item with Due Date
**ID**: US-1.3  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to set due dates so that I can track deadlines

**Story Points**: 3  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can select due date (future date only)
2. Due date is optional (can be empty)
3. Due date is validated (must be future date)
4. Due date is displayed in item details
5. Due date is displayed in calendar view
6. Due date is displayed in timeline view
7. Due date is used for sorting (by due date)
8. Due date is used for filtering (overdue, due soon, etc.)
9. Due date is used for notifications (reminder 1 day before)
10. Due date is used for risk assessment (overdue items)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint updated
- ✅ GraphQL mutation updated
- ✅ tRPC procedure updated
- ✅ React component updated (date picker)
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Field: `dueDate` (ISO8601 date)
- Validation: `z.date().refine(date => date > new Date())`
- Database: Add to items table
- Display: Calendar view, timeline view, item details
- Notifications: Reminder 1 day before due date
- Filtering: Overdue, due soon (within 3 days), due later

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Date calculation: <50ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5

---

### Story 1.4: Create Item with Assignees
**ID**: US-1.4  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to assign items to team members so that work is distributed

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can assign to team members (0-10 assignees)
2. Assignees are optional (can be empty)
3. Assignees are validated (must be valid user IDs)
4. Assignees are notified (email, Slack, in-app)
5. Assignees are displayed in item details
6. Assignees are displayed in list views
7. Assignees are displayed with avatars
8. Assignees can be bulk-assigned (select multiple)
9. Assignees can be added/removed after creation
10. Assignees are used for filtering (my items, team items)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint updated
- ✅ GraphQL mutation updated
- ✅ tRPC procedure updated
- ✅ React component updated (assignee selector)
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Notifications implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Field: `assignees` (array of user IDs, max 10)
- Validation: `z.array(z.string().uuid()).max(10)`
- Database: Add to items table (JSON array or separate table)
- Notifications: Email, Slack, in-app
- Display: Avatars, names, email
- Filtering: My items, team items, unassigned

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Notification sending: <1000ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5

---

### Story 1.5: Create Item with Custom Metadata
**ID**: US-1.5  
**Title**: As a developer, I want to add custom metadata so that I can track custom fields

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can add custom metadata (0-50 key-value pairs)
2. Each key is 1-50 characters
3. Each value is 1-500 characters
4. Metadata is optional (can be empty)
5. Metadata is validated (type checking)
6. Metadata supports types: String, Number, Boolean, Date, JSON
7. Metadata is mutable (can be added/removed/updated)
8. Metadata is displayed in item details
9. Metadata is searchable (full-text search)
10. Metadata is versioned (change history)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint updated
- ✅ GraphQL mutation updated
- ✅ tRPC procedure updated
- ✅ React component updated (metadata editor)
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Field: `metadata` (JSON object, max 50 pairs)
- Validation: `z.record(z.any()).refine(obj => Object.keys(obj).length <= 50)`
- Database: Store as JSON in items table
- Display: Key-value pairs in item details
- Search: Index metadata for full-text search
- Versioning: Track changes in change history

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Metadata validation: <50ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4

---

### Story 1.6: View Item Details
**ID**: US-1.6  
**Title**: As a user, I want to view item details so that I can understand the work

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can view item title, type, description
2. User can view item status (DRAFT, ACTIVE, ARCHIVED)
3. User can view item priority (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL)
4. User can view item estimated effort (story points)
5. User can view item due date (if set)
6. User can view item assignees (with avatars, names, emails)
7. User can view item tags (with colors)
8. User can view item custom metadata
9. User can view item creation timestamp and creator
10. User can view item last update timestamp and updater

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL query implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Caching implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `GET /api/items/:id`
- GraphQL: `query item($id: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `items.get`
- Caching: 5 minutes, LRU strategy
- Display: Item details panel
- Related data: Links, agents, quality checks, comments, attachments

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <200ms (p95)
- Database query: <100ms
- Cache hit rate: >80%

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5

---

### Story 1.7: Update Item Details
**ID**: US-1.7  
**Title**: As a user, I want to update item details so that I can keep information current

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can update title (1-255 chars)
2. User can update description (0-5000 chars, markdown)
3. User can update status (DRAFT → ACTIVE → ARCHIVED)
4. User can update priority (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL)
5. User can update estimated effort (1-100 story points)
6. User can update due date (future date only)
7. User can add/remove tags (max 20 tags)
8. User can add/remove assignees (max 10 assignees)
9. User can update custom metadata
10. Update timestamp recorded (UTC)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Conflict detection implemented
- ✅ Conflict resolution implemented
- ✅ Real-time sync working
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `PATCH /api/items/:id`
- GraphQL: `mutation updateItem($id: UUID!, $input: UpdateItemInput!)`
- tRPC: `items.update`
- Conflict resolution: CRDT merge
- Real-time: Broadcast `items:updated` event
- Notifications: Send to assignees, watchers
- Audit trail: Track all changes

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms
- Conflict resolution: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6

---

### Story 1.8: Delete Item (Soft Delete)
**ID**: US-1.8  
**Title**: As a user, I want to delete items so that I can remove unwanted work

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 3

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can soft-delete item (mark as archived)
2. Item status changes to ARCHIVED
3. Item remains in database (recoverable)
4. Item hidden from normal views
5. Item visible in archive view
6. Undo available for 30 days
7. Undo restores item to previous state
8. Deletion logged in audit trail
9. Deletion logged in activity feed
10. Linked items notified of deletion

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Undo mechanism implemented
- ✅ Notifications implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `DELETE /api/items/:id?hard=false`
- GraphQL: `mutation deleteItem($id: UUID!, $hard: Boolean)`
- tRPC: `items.delete`
- Soft-delete: Update status to ARCHIVED
- Undo: Generate token valid for 30 days
- Notifications: Send to assignees, watchers
- Audit trail: Track deletion

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7

---

### Story 1.9: Bulk Create Items
**ID**: US-1.9  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to create multiple items at once so that I can set up projects faster

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 3

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can upload CSV file with item data
2. User can preview items before creation
3. User can validate items (check for errors)
4. User can create all items at once
5. User can see progress indicator
6. User can see success/failure count
7. User can download error report
8. Items are created atomically (all or nothing)
9. Real-time updates for each item created
10. Notifications sent for all items

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created (CSV uploader)
- ✅ Validation implemented
- ✅ Progress tracking implemented
- ✅ Error handling implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/items/bulk`
- GraphQL: `mutation bulkCreateItems($input: [CreateItemInput!]!)`
- tRPC: `items.bulkCreate`
- CSV parsing: Parse CSV file
- Validation: Validate each item
- Atomic: All or nothing
- Progress: WebSocket updates
- Error report: Download CSV with errors

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <5 seconds (for 1000 items)
- Database write: <100ms per item
- Progress updates: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5

---

### Story 1.10: Search Items
**ID**: US-1.10  
**Title**: As a user, I want to search items so that I can find work quickly

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 3

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can search by title (full-text search)
2. User can search by description (full-text search)
3. User can search by tags (filter by tag)
4. User can search by assignee (filter by assignee)
5. User can search by status (filter by status)
6. User can search by priority (filter by priority)
7. User can search by type (filter by type)
8. Search results returned within 500ms
9. Search results highlighted
10. Search results paginated (20 per page)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL query implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created (search bar)
- ✅ Search index implemented
- ✅ Highlighting implemented
- ✅ Pagination implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `GET /api/items/search?q=query&filters=...`
- GraphQL: `query searchItems($query: String!, $filters: SearchFilters)`
- tRPC: `items.search`
- Search engine: Full-text search (PostgreSQL or Elasticsearch)
- Highlighting: Highlight matching terms
- Pagination: 20 results per page
- Performance: <500ms response time

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <500ms (p95)
- Search index: <1 second to update
- Pagination: <100ms per page

**Related Stories**: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6

---

## EPIC 2: LINK MANAGEMENT (EXTENDED - 40+ STORIES)

### Story 2.1: Create Link Between Items
**ID**: US-2.1  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to create links between items so that I can show dependencies

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 4

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can create link with type (8 types supported)
2. User can select source item (required)
3. User can select target item (required)
4. User can add link metadata (key-value pairs, max 20 pairs)
5. User can add link description (0-500 chars, optional)
6. User can set link priority (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL)
7. User can set link status (ACTIVE, INACTIVE, BLOCKED)
8. Link is assigned unique UUID (v4)
9. Link appears in graph visualization immediately
10. Link appears in both items' link lists

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Circular dependency detection implemented
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Error handling added
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/links`
- GraphQL: `mutation createLink($input: CreateLinkInput!)`
- tRPC: `links.create`
- Link types: DEPENDS_ON, BLOCKS, RELATES_TO, IMPLEMENTS, TESTS, DOCUMENTS, DUPLICATES, SUPERSEDES
- Circular dependency detection: DFS algorithm
- Real-time: Broadcast `links:created` event
- Graph: Update graph visualization

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Circular dependency detection: <100ms
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 2.2, 2.3, 2.4

---

### Story 2.2: View Link Details
**ID**: US-2.2  
**Title**: As a user, I want to view link details so that I can understand relationships

**Story Points**: 3  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 4

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can view link type (DEPENDS_ON, BLOCKS, etc.)
2. User can view source item (with link)
3. User can view target item (with link)
4. User can view link description
5. User can view link priority
6. User can view link status
7. User can view link metadata
8. User can view link creation timestamp
9. User can view link creator
10. User can view link last update timestamp

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL query implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Caching implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `GET /api/links/:id`
- GraphQL: `query link($id: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `links.get`
- Caching: 5 minutes, LRU strategy
- Display: Link details panel

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <200ms (p95)
- Database query: <100ms
- Cache hit rate: >80%

**Related Stories**: 2.1, 2.3, 2.4

---

### Story 2.3: Update Link Details
**ID**: US-2.3  
**Title**: As a user, I want to update link details so that I can keep relationships current

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 4

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can update link description (0-500 chars)
2. User can update link priority (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, CRITICAL)
3. User can update link status (ACTIVE, INACTIVE, BLOCKED)
4. User can update link metadata
5. Update timestamp recorded (UTC)
6. Update user recorded
7. Change history tracked
8. Real-time sync to all connected clients
9. Conflict detection (concurrent edits)
10. Conflict resolution (CRDT merge)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Conflict detection implemented
- ✅ Conflict resolution implemented
- ✅ Real-time sync working
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `PATCH /api/links/:id`
- GraphQL: `mutation updateLink($id: UUID!, $input: UpdateLinkInput!)`
- tRPC: `links.update`
- Conflict resolution: CRDT merge
- Real-time: Broadcast `links:updated` event
- Audit trail: Track all changes

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms
- Conflict resolution: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4

---

### Story 2.4: Delete Link
**ID**: US-2.4  
**Title**: As a user, I want to delete links so that I can remove unwanted relationships

**Story Points**: 3  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 2, Week 4

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can delete link
2. Link is removed from database
3. Link is removed from graph visualization
4. Link is removed from both items' link lists
5. Deletion logged in audit trail
6. Deletion logged in activity feed
7. Linked items notified of deletion
8. Undo available for 30 days
9. Undo restores link to previous state
10. Real-time updates to all connected clients

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Undo mechanism implemented
- ✅ Notifications implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `DELETE /api/links/:id`
- GraphQL: `mutation deleteLink($id: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `links.delete`
- Soft-delete: Mark as deleted (recoverable)
- Undo: Generate token valid for 30 days
- Notifications: Send to linked items
- Audit trail: Track deletion

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3

---

## EPIC 3: AGENT MANAGEMENT (EXTENDED - 35+ STORIES)

### Story 3.1: Register Agent
**ID**: US-3.1  
**Title**: As a developer, I want to register an agent so that it can work on items

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 3, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Agent can register with name (1-100 chars)
2. Agent can register with credentials (API key or OAuth)
3. Agent can register with capabilities (list of supported operations)
4. Agent can register with metadata (custom key-value pairs)
5. Agent receives unique agent ID (UUID)
6. Agent receives API key (for authentication)
7. Agent status set to IDLE
8. Agent connection tracked (IP, user agent, timestamp)
9. Agent heartbeat monitored (every 30 seconds)
10. Agent registration logged in audit trail

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ Heartbeat mechanism implemented
- ✅ API key generation implemented
- ✅ Validation added
- ✅ Error handling added
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/agents/register`
- GraphQL: `mutation registerAgent($input: RegisterAgentInput!)`
- tRPC: `agents.register`
- API key: Random 32-character string
- Heartbeat: Every 30 seconds, 5-minute timeout
- Capabilities: read:items, write:items, delete:items, etc.
- Audit trail: Track registration

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- API key generation: <10ms

**Related Stories**: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4

---

### Story 3.2: View Agent Status
**ID**: US-3.2  
**Title**: As a project manager, I want to view agent status so that I can see who is working

**Story Points**: 3  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 3, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can view agent status (IDLE, WORKING, ERROR, OFFLINE, PAUSED, MAINTENANCE)
2. User can view agent last_seen timestamp
3. User can view agent current_item (if working)
4. User can view agent error details (if error)
5. User can view agent metrics (items completed, errors, uptime)
6. User can view agent health status (HEALTHY, WARNING, CRITICAL)
7. User can view agent status history (last 100 status changes)
8. Status visible in real-time (all connected clients)
9. Status changes broadcast in real-time (<100ms)
10. Status history tracked

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL query implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Real-time updates implemented
- ✅ Caching implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `GET /api/agents/:id/status`
- GraphQL: `query agentStatus($id: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `agents.getStatus`
- Real-time: WebSocket updates
- Caching: 1 minute, LRU strategy
- Status history: Last 100 changes

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <200ms (p95)
- Database query: <100ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 3.1, 3.3, 3.4

---

### Story 3.3: Claim Work
**ID**: US-3.3  
**Title**: As an agent, I want to claim work so that I can start working on items

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 3, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Agent can claim work item
2. Item status changes to ACTIVE
3. Agent status changes to WORKING
4. Agent current_item set to claimed item
5. Other agents notified (item is claimed)
6. Agent receives confirmation
7. Time tracking started
8. Progress tracking started
9. Real-time updates to all connected clients
10. Audit trail recorded

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ Time tracking implemented
- ✅ Progress tracking implemented
- ✅ Notifications implemented
- ✅ Real-time updates implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/agents/:id/work`
- GraphQL: `mutation claimWork($agentId: UUID!, $itemId: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `agents.claimWork`
- Time tracking: Start timestamp
- Progress tracking: Initialize progress
- Notifications: Send to other agents
- Real-time: Broadcast `agent:status-changed` event

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 3.1, 3.2, 3.4

---

### Story 3.4: Complete Work
**ID**: US-3.4  
**Title**: As an agent, I want to complete work so that I can mark items as done

**Story Points**: 5  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 3, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Agent can complete work item
2. Item status changes to ACTIVE (done)
3. Agent status changes to IDLE
4. Time tracking stopped
5. Progress tracking completed
6. Next item notified (if dependent)
7. Agent receives confirmation
8. Summary displayed (time spent, quality score, etc.)
9. Real-time updates to all connected clients
10. Audit trail recorded

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ API endpoint implemented
- ✅ GraphQL mutation implemented
- ✅ tRPC procedure implemented
- ✅ Time calculation implemented
- ✅ Quality metrics calculated
- ✅ Notifications implemented
- ✅ Real-time updates implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- API: `POST /api/agents/:id/complete`
- GraphQL: `mutation completeWork($agentId: UUID!, $itemId: UUID!)`
- tRPC: `agents.completeWork`
- Time calculation: End timestamp - start timestamp
- Quality metrics: Quality score, issues fixed, tests passed
- Notifications: Send to next item assignee
- Real-time: Broadcast `agent:status-changed` event

**Performance Requirements**:
- Response time: <100ms (p95)
- Database write: <50ms
- Metrics calculation: <500ms
- Real-time broadcast: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3

---

## EPIC 4: REAL-TIME COLLABORATION (EXTENDED - 45+ STORIES)

### Story 4.1: Real-Time Item Sync
**ID**: US-4.1  
**Title**: As a user, I want items to sync in real-time so that I see changes immediately

**Story Points**: 13  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 4, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Changes sync within 100ms
2. Offline sync working
3. Conflict resolution working
4. Consistency maintained
5. All connected clients updated
6. No data loss
7. Undo/redo working
8. Version history tracked
9. Change log maintained
10. Audit trail recorded

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Real-time sync implemented
- ✅ Conflict detection implemented
- ✅ Conflict resolution implemented (CRDT)
- ✅ Offline support implemented
- ✅ Undo/redo implemented
- ✅ Version history implemented
- ✅ Change log implemented
- ✅ Audit trail implemented
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Load tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Real-time: WebSocket + Supabase Realtime
- Sync: CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type)
- Offline: Legend State + local storage
- Conflict resolution: Last write wins for scalars, union for arrays
- Undo/redo: Version history
- Change log: All changes tracked
- Audit trail: All actions logged

**Performance Requirements**:
- Sync latency: <100ms
- Conflict resolution: <500ms
- Undo/redo: <100ms
- Throughput: 1000+ changes/second

**Related Stories**: 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5

---

### Story 4.2: User Presence
**ID**: US-4.2  
**Title**: As a user, I want to see who else is viewing items so that I can collaborate

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 4, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User presence shown (online users)
2. User avatars displayed
3. User cursor positions shown (real-time)
4. User selections shown (real-time)
5. User status shown (IDLE, WORKING, etc.)
6. User last_seen timestamp shown
7. Presence updates in real-time (<500ms)
8. Presence history tracked
9. Offline users marked as offline
10. Presence cleared on disconnect

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Presence tracking implemented
- ✅ Real-time updates implemented
- ✅ Cursor tracking implemented
- ✅ Selection tracking implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Presence: Supabase Realtime
- Cursor tracking: Mouse position updates
- Selection tracking: Selected text/items
- Real-time: WebSocket updates
- Display: Avatars, names, cursor positions
- Offline: Mark as offline after 5-minute timeout

**Performance Requirements**:
- Presence update: <500ms
- Cursor update: <100ms
- Selection update: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5

---

### Story 4.3: Offline-First Support
**ID**: US-4.3  
**Title**: As a user, I want to work offline so that I can continue working without internet

**Story Points**: 13  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 4, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can continue working offline
2. Changes queued locally
3. Offline status visible
4. Pending changes shown
5. Sync when online (automatic)
6. Conflicts resolved on sync
7. No data loss
8. Undo/redo working offline
9. Search working offline
10. All views working offline

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Offline support implemented
- ✅ Local storage implemented
- ✅ Change queue implemented
- ✅ Sync on reconnect implemented
- ✅ Conflict resolution implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Offline: Legend State + local storage
- Change queue: Store changes locally
- Sync: Automatic on reconnect
- Conflict resolution: CRDT merge
- Undo/redo: Working offline
- Search: Local search index
- Views: All views working offline

**Performance Requirements**:
- Offline detection: <1 second
- Sync on reconnect: <5 seconds
- Conflict resolution: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5

---

### Story 4.4: Collaborative Editing
**ID**: US-4.4  
**Title**: As a user, I want to edit items with others so that we can collaborate

**Story Points**: 13  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 4, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Multiple users can edit simultaneously
2. Changes sync in real-time (<100ms)
3. No conflicts (CRDT merge)
4. Cursor positions shown
5. Selections shown
6. Comments supported
7. Mentions supported (@user)
8. Emoji reactions supported
9. Change highlighting
10. Undo/redo working

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Collaborative editing implemented
- ✅ CRDT merge implemented
- ✅ Cursor tracking implemented
- ✅ Selection tracking implemented
- ✅ Comments implemented
- ✅ Mentions implemented
- ✅ Emoji reactions implemented
- ✅ Change highlighting implemented
- ✅ Undo/redo implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Collaborative editing: CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type)
- Cursor tracking: Real-time position updates
- Selection tracking: Real-time selection updates
- Comments: Threaded comments
- Mentions: @user mentions
- Emoji reactions: Emoji picker
- Change highlighting: Highlight changed text
- Undo/redo: Version history

**Performance Requirements**:
- Sync latency: <100ms
- Cursor update: <100ms
- Selection update: <100ms
- Conflict resolution: <500ms

**Related Stories**: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5

---

### Story 4.5: Conflict Resolution
**ID**: US-4.5  
**Title**: As a user, I want conflicts resolved automatically so that I don't lose work

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P0 (Critical)  
**Sprint**: Phase 4, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. Conflicts detected automatically
2. Conflicts resolved using CRDT
3. User notified of conflicts
4. Merge options provided (local, remote, manual)
5. Merged version shown
6. Undo available
7. Conflict history tracked
8. Audit trail recorded
9. No data loss
10. Consistency maintained

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Conflict detection implemented
- ✅ CRDT merge implemented
- ✅ Conflict notification implemented
- ✅ Merge options implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Conflict detection: Version mismatch
- CRDT merge: Last write wins for scalars, union for arrays
- Notification: Show conflict dialog
- Merge options: Local, remote, manual
- Merged version: Show merged result
- Undo: Revert to previous version
- Conflict history: Track all conflicts
- Audit trail: Log all conflicts

**Performance Requirements**:
- Conflict detection: <100ms
- CRDT merge: <500ms
- Notification: <100ms

**Related Stories**: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4

---

## EPIC 5: ADVANCED FEATURES (EXTENDED - 50+ STORIES)

### Story 5.1: Node Editor
**ID**: US-5.1  
**Title**: As a developer, I want to use a node editor so that I can design workflows

**Story Points**: 13  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 5, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can create nodes (input, output, process, decision, custom)
2. User can create edges (connections between nodes)
3. User can drag nodes to reposition
4. User can delete nodes and edges
5. User can undo/redo
6. User can save workflow
7. User can load workflow
8. User can export workflow (JSON, PNG, SVG)
9. User can preview workflow
10. User can run workflow

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ React Flow integrated
- ✅ Node types implemented
- ✅ Edge types implemented
- ✅ Drag and drop implemented
- ✅ Undo/redo implemented
- ✅ Save/load implemented
- ✅ Export implemented
- ✅ Preview implemented
- ✅ Run implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Node editor: React Flow
- Node types: Input, output, process, decision, custom
- Edge types: Straight, curved, animated, conditional
- Drag and drop: React Flow built-in
- Undo/redo: Version history
- Save/load: Store workflow in database
- Export: JSON, PNG, SVG formats
- Preview: Show workflow visualization
- Run: Execute workflow

**Performance Requirements**:
- Node creation: <100ms
- Edge creation: <100ms
- Drag and drop: 60 FPS
- Save: <500ms
- Export: <2 seconds

**Related Stories**: 5.2, 5.3, 5.4

---

### Story 5.2: Code Editor
**ID**: US-5.2  
**Title**: As a developer, I want to write code so that I can implement features

**Story Points**: 13  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 5, Week 1

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can write code (multiple languages)
2. User can see syntax highlighting
3. User can see auto-completion suggestions
4. User can see error detection (real-time)
5. User can format code (Ctrl+Shift+F)
6. User can save code
7. User can preview code (live preview)
8. User can run code
9. User can see console output
10. User can see errors

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Monaco Editor integrated
- ✅ Syntax highlighting implemented
- ✅ Auto-completion implemented
- ✅ Error detection implemented
- ✅ Code formatting implemented
- ✅ Save implemented
- ✅ Live preview implemented
- ✅ Run implemented
- ✅ Console output implemented
- ✅ Error display implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Code editor: Monaco Editor
- Languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, etc.
- Syntax highlighting: Built-in
- Auto-completion: Built-in
- Error detection: Real-time linting
- Code formatting: Prettier
- Save: Store code in database
- Live preview: Execute code in sandbox
- Console output: Capture console.log
- Error display: Show errors in editor

**Performance Requirements**:
- Syntax highlighting: <100ms
- Auto-completion: <500ms
- Error detection: <1 second
- Code formatting: <500ms
- Live preview: <2 seconds

**Related Stories**: 5.1, 5.3, 5.4

---

### Story 5.3: Quality Checks
**ID**: US-5.3  
**Title**: As a developer, I want to run quality checks so that I can ensure code quality

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 5, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can run quality checks (on-demand)
2. User can see quality check results
3. User can see quality check recommendations
4. User can see quality score
5. User can see issues (completeness, consistency, performance, security)
6. User can fix issues
7. User can re-run checks
8. User can see check history
9. User can export check results
10. User can integrate with CI/CD

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Quality check engine implemented
- ✅ Check types implemented (completeness, consistency, performance, security)
- ✅ Results display implemented
- ✅ Recommendations implemented
- ✅ Quality score calculated
- ✅ Issue tracking implemented
- ✅ Fix tracking implemented
- ✅ Check history implemented
- ✅ Export implemented
- ✅ CI/CD integration implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Quality checks: Completeness, consistency, performance, security
- Results: Pass/fail/warning
- Recommendations: Actionable suggestions
- Quality score: 0-100
- Issue tracking: Track all issues
- Fix tracking: Track fixes
- Check history: Last 100 checks
- Export: JSON, CSV, PDF formats
- CI/CD integration: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.

**Performance Requirements**:
- Quality check: <5 seconds
- Results display: <500ms
- Export: <2 seconds

**Related Stories**: 5.1, 5.2, 5.4

---

### Story 5.4: Conflict Resolver
**ID**: US-5.4  
**Title**: As a user, I want to resolve conflicts so that I can merge changes

**Story Points**: 8  
**Priority**: P1 (High)  
**Sprint**: Phase 5, Week 2

**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. User can see conflicts (concurrent edits)
2. User can see conflict details (local vs remote)
3. User can choose resolution (local, remote, manual)
4. User can merge changes (manual merge)
5. User can see merged result
6. User can undo merge
7. User can see conflict history
8. User can export conflict report
9. User can integrate with version control
10. User can see conflict statistics

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Conflict detection implemented
- ✅ Conflict display implemented
- ✅ Resolution options implemented
- ✅ Manual merge implemented
- ✅ Merged result display implemented
- ✅ Undo implemented
- ✅ Conflict history implemented
- ✅ Export implemented
- ✅ Version control integration implemented
- ✅ Statistics implemented
- ✅ React component created
- ✅ Unit tests written
- ✅ Integration tests written
- ✅ E2E tests written
- ✅ Documentation written

**Technical Details**:
- Conflict detection: Version mismatch
- Conflict display: Show local vs remote
- Resolution options: Local, remote, manual
- Manual merge: Merge editor
- Merged result: Show merged version
- Undo: Revert to previous version
- Conflict history: Last 100 conflicts
- Export: JSON, CSV, PDF formats
- Version control integration: Git, GitHub, GitLab
- Statistics: Conflict count, resolution time, etc.

**Performance Requirements**:
- Conflict detection: <100ms
- Manual merge: <500ms
- Merged result display: <100ms
- Export: <2 seconds

**Related Stories**: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3

---

This is just the beginning. Each epic should have 40-50 stories with similar depth and granularity.


