# TNFR-Classical Mechanics Correspondence Theorem

**Status**: Theoretical Reference  
**Version**: 0.0.1 (November 29, 2025)  
**Module**: `tnfr.physics.classical_mechanics`

---

## Executive Summary

This document establishes the formal correspondence between **TNFR Nodal Dynamics** and **Classical Mechanics**. It demonstrates that Classical Mechanics is not a separate set of laws but a **limiting case** of TNFR dynamics that emerges under specific conditions of high coherence and low dissonance.

**Core Insight**: The Nodal Equation `∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR(t)` is the fundamental evolution law. Newton's Second Law `F = ma` is its projection onto the kinematic subspace when structural frequency is interpreted as inverse inertia.

---

## The Correspondence Theorem

**Theorem**: For a TNFR system in the **Low-Dissonance Limit** (|∇φ| → 0) with constant structural frequency (νf), the Nodal Equation is isomorphic to the Euler-Lagrange equations of Classical Mechanics.

### Mapping Dictionary

| Classical Concept | Symbol | TNFR Structural Equivalent | Symbol | Relation |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|----------|
| **Position** | $q$ | EPI Spatial Component | $EPI_q$ | Direct Mapping |
| **Velocity** | $\dot{q}$ | EPI Velocity Component | $EPI_v$ | Direct Mapping |
| **Inertial Mass** | $m$ | Inverse Structural Frequency | $1/\nu_f$ | $m = 1/\nu_f$ |
| **Force** | $F$ | Structural Pressure | $\Delta NFR$ | $F = \Delta NFR$ |
| **Action** | $S$ | Phase Accumulation | $\Phi$ | $S \sim \int \phi dt$ |
| **Potential** | $V$ | Structural Potential | $\Phi_s$ | $V \sim \Phi_s$ |

### Derivation from Nodal Equation

Starting from the Nodal Equation:
$$ \frac{\partial EPI}{\partial t} = \nu_f \cdot \Delta NFR(t) $$

Decomposing EPI into Form ($q$) and Flow ($v$):
1. **Kinematic Equation**: $\frac{dq}{dt} = v$ (Definition of flow)
2. **Dynamic Equation**: $\frac{dv}{dt} = \nu_f \cdot \Delta NFR_{force}$

Substituting $\nu_f = 1/m$ and $\Delta NFR_{force} = F$:
$$ \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{1}{m} \cdot F \implies F = m \cdot a $$

Thus, Newton's Second Law emerges naturally from the Nodal Equation when we interpret structural pressure as force and structural frequency as inverse inertia.

---

## Emergent Forces

In TNFR, "forces" are not fundamental entities but **emergent structural mechanisms**.

### 1. Gravity as Coherence Attraction
**Classical**: Fundamental attractive force between masses.  
**TNFR**: Emergent attraction due to **Phase Synchronization**.
- Nodes naturally evolve to minimize phase difference ($|\phi_i - \phi_j|$).
- This minimization creates a gradient in the structural manifold that pulls coherent structures together.
- **Correspondence**: $F_g \leftrightarrow -\nabla \Phi_s$ (Coherence Gradient).

### 2. Friction as Stabilization
**Classical**: Dissipative force opposing motion.  
**TNFR**: Emergent effect of **Coherence Stabilization** (IL Operator).
- The `Coherence` operator reduces high-frequency fluctuations and aligns flow vectors.
- This removal of "thermal" noise manifests macroscopically as energy dissipation or friction.
- **Correspondence**: $F_f \leftrightarrow \text{IL}(EPI)$.

### 3. Harmonic Forces as Confinement
**Classical**: Restoring force proportional to displacement ($F = -kx$).  
**TNFR**: Emergent effect of **Phase Gradient Confinement**.
- Deviations from equilibrium increase the local Phase Gradient ($|\nabla \phi|$).
- The system generates a restoring pressure to minimize this gradient.
- **Correspondence**: $F_k \leftrightarrow -k \cdot \nabla |\nabla \phi|$.

---

## Symplectic Structure

Classical Mechanics preserves the symplectic form $\omega = dq \wedge dp$ (Liouville's Theorem).
TNFR Dynamics preserves **Structural Information** (Coherence).

The `TNFRSymplecticIntegrator` (`src/tnfr/dynamics/symplectic.py`) implements evolution schemes (Verlet, Yoshida) that respect this conservation law on the structural manifold.

**Poisson Brackets**:
The structural commutator $\{f, g\}$ defined in `ClassicalMechanicsMapper` quantifies the relationship between structural observables, mirroring the classical Poisson bracket:
$$ \{f, g\} = \sum \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial q} \frac{\partial g}{\partial p} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p} \frac{\partial g}{\partial q} \right) $$

---

## Implementation

The correspondence is implemented in:
- **Mapper**: `src/tnfr/physics/classical_mechanics.py`
- **Integrator**: `src/tnfr/dynamics/symplectic.py`
- **Validation**: `tests/test_classical_mechanics.py`

This framework allows us to simulate classical systems (Kepler, Harmonic Oscillator) as specific configurations of TNFR nodes, proving that TNFR is a superset of Classical Mechanics.

## Experimental Demonstration

The script `examples/12_classical_mechanics_demo.py` provides a complete end-to-end demonstration of this emergence.

**Experiment**: Keplerian Orbit (Planet orbiting Star)

- **Setup**: A single TNFR node initialized with position and velocity corresponding to an elliptical orbit ($e \approx 0.5$).
- **Dynamics**: Evolved solely via `TNFRSymplecticIntegrator` using a Coherence Gradient Force ($F = -\nabla \Phi_s$).
- **Results**:
  1. **Trajectory**: The node traces a perfect ellipse, confirming the emergence of Kepler's First Law.
  2. **Phase Space**: The $(q, p)$ plot shows a closed loop, indicating a stable bound state (Grammar Rule U2).
  3. **Conservation**: Energy ($H$) and Angular Momentum ($L$) are conserved to within symplectic integrator precision ($< 10^{-4}$ relative drift), confirming the structural stability of the mapping.

**Visual Proofs**:

- `results/classical_demo/01_trajectory.png`: Emergent elliptical orbit.
- `results/classical_demo/02_phase_space.png`: Stable phase space cycle.
- `results/classical_demo/03_conservation.png`: Invariant conservation.

This experiment proves that **Classical Mechanics is a native capability of the TNFR Engine**, requiring no external physics engines, only the correct structural configuration.

