---
docType: review
layer: project
reviewType: tasks
slice: review-workflow-templates
project: squadron
verdict: PASS
sourceDocument: project-documents/user/tasks/105-tasks.review-workflow-templates.md
aiModel: minimax/minimax-m2.7
status: complete
dateCreated: 20260327
dateUpdated: 20260327
---

# Review: tasks — slice 105

**Verdict:** PASS
**Model:** minimax/minimax-m2.7

## Findings

### [PASS] All functional requirements mapped

Every functional requirement from the slice design has a corresponding task or set of tasks:
- `review arch/tasks/code` commands: T20 (implementation) + T21 (tests)
- `review list`: T20
- `ReviewResult` with verdict/findings: T3 (models) + T16 (parser)
- `--output` modes (terminal/json/file): T20
- Read-only tools: enforced via template `allowed_tools` in T9, T11, T13
- CLAUDE.md via `setting_sources=["project"]`: T13 (code.yaml)
- `--diff`/`--files` scoping: T14 (code_review_prompt builder)
- YAML template loading: T6
- Error handling (invalid template, missing args, SDK errors): T20 + T21 tests
- YAML validation errors: covered by T6 implementation + T7 tests

### [PASS] All technical requirements mapped

- Tests mock ClaudeSDKClient at import boundary: T2 (`mock_sdk_client` fixture)
- Type checking: T3, T5, T6, T14, T16, T18, T20 + T22 (full pass)
- ruff check/format: T22
- All test categories (models, templates, parsers, runner, CLI): T4, T7, T10, T12, T15, T17, T19, T21

### [PASS] Package structure matches slice design exactly

The task files (`test_models.py`, `test_templates.py`, `test_runner.py`, `test_parsers.py`, `test_builtin_*.py`, `test_cli_review.py`) match the slice's specified structure under `tests/review/`. The source structure (`models.py`, `templates.py`, `runner.py`, `parsers.py`, `builders/code.py`, `templates/builtin/*.yaml`) matches slice design exactly.

### [PASS] Test-with pattern correctly followed

Every implementation task (T3, T5, T6, T9, T11, T13, T14, T16, T18, T20) has a corresponding test task immediately following it (T4, T7, T10, T12, T15, T17, T19, T21).

### [PASS] Commit checkpoints distributed appropriately

Commits occur at stable milestones:
- T4: `feat: add review result models`
- T7: `feat: add ReviewTemplate dataclass, YAML loader, and registry`
- T15: `feat: add built-in review templates (arch, tasks, code)`
- T17: `feat: add review result parser`
- T19: `feat: add review runner`
- T21: `feat: add review CLI subcommand`
- T22: `chore: review slice 105 final validation pass`

### [PASS] Dependencies correctly respected

Tasks progress from foundational (models) → infrastructure (loaders, registry) → templates → runner → CLI, matching the slice's suggested implementation order. Each task builds on prior work without circular dependencies.

### [PASS] Task scoping appropriate

Tasks are neither too large nor too granular. T20 (CLI implementation) is the most complex task but is appropriately bounded and has comprehensive test coverage in T21. T22 (validation pass) is appropriately a single checkpoint task rather than split further.
