---
docType: review
reviewType: slice
slice: review-context-enrichment
project: squadron
verdict: PASS
dateCreated: 20260325
dateUpdated: 20260325
---

# Review: slice — slice 122

**Verdict:** PASS
**Model:** minimax/minimax-m2.7

## Findings

### [PASS] Review subsystem location and scope

The architecture defines `src/squadron/review/` as part of the project structure with `review_client.py` and `templates/`. This slice extends that subsystem with:
- `src/squadron/review/parsers.py` — parser improvements (within subsystem)
- `src/squadron/review/rules.py` — new rule detection module (within subsystem)
- `src/squadron/review/rules/priorities.md` — built-in rules (within subsystem)
- Template modifications in `templates/builtin/` — local changes to existing templates

No work extends outside the review subsystem boundary. The CLI changes in `src/squadron/cli/commands/review.py` are a thin integration layer that consumes the review subsystem, consistent with the architecture's interface-layer pattern.

### [PASS] `rules_content` parameter reuse

The architecture establishes that `review_client.py` and `runner.py` "already accept `rules_content`." The slice correctly uses this existing parameter rather than introducing new template fields or loader changes. This aligns with the architecture's principle of not modifying core engine internals unnecessarily.

### [PASS] Template self-containment preserved

The architecture states templates are "self-contained." The slice adds prompt hardening instructions to each template's `system_prompt` individually rather than creating a shared injected block. This is explicitly called out in the slice: "This goes in each template's `system_prompt`, not in a shared injected block — templates are self-contained by design."

### [PASS] CLI flags as extension, not modification

The new `--rules-dir` and `--no-rules` flags extend the CLI interface consistently with the architecture's CLI-first approach. The flags add discoverable options without altering existing behavioral contracts (e.g., `--rules` continues to work as specified).

### [PASS] Deferred items match architecture future state

The slice correctly defers:
- **Context Forge process guide prompt injection** — The architecture explicitly marks this as "(future)" in the Integration Points section ("When Context Forge MCP server is running, squadron agents could use it...")
- **Content-based language detection (shebang analysis)** — Extension-based detection is sufficient for stated goals; content analysis is reasonable to defer

### [CONCERN] Missing dependency reference

The slice frontmatter declares `dependencies: [review-provider-model-selection]`, but this slice identifier is not defined in the provided architecture document or found in referenced materials. This appears to be a forward reference to another slice that may not exist yet. No action required in this slice, but implementors should verify this dependency is tracked.

### [PASS] Diagnostic logging path

Logging to `~/.config/squadron/logs/review-debug.jsonl` is a local, opt-in diagnostic mechanism that does not touch any shared infrastructure or alter system behavior. This is consistent with the architecture's local-development focus.

### [PASS] P0-P3 framework placement

The slice correctly extracts the priority framework into a "built-in rules file at `src/squadron/review/rules/priorities.md`" that is "NOT auto-injected — it's available for users to reference." This matches the architecture's philosophy that priority criteria are guidance, not enforcement.
