---
docType: review
layer: project
reviewType: tasks
slice: codex-agent-integration
project: squadron
verdict: CONCERNS
sourceDocument: project-documents/user/tasks/124-tasks.codex-agent-integration.md
aiModel: minimax/minimax-m2.7
status: complete
dateCreated: 20260326
dateUpdated: 20260326
---

# Review: tasks — slice 124

**Verdict:** CONCERNS
**Model:** minimax/minimax-m2.7

## Findings

### [CONCERN] T11 (Full Validation Pass) lacks a commit and test task

T11 performs the critical validation step (full test suite, lint, format, type check) but has no associated commit. This breaks the commit-per-task pattern established throughout T1-T10. Additionally, T11 has no test task following it (unlike T2→T3, T4→T5, T6→T7, T8→T9 pattern). While the task itself is completable and necessary, the missing commit checkpoint means the implementation phase has no clear "green" state before documentation. Recommend splitting into T11a (tests/lint/format/type check) with a commit, followed by T11b (regression verification).

### [PASS] All functional success criteria are covered by tasks

- `sq spawn --provider codex` → T4 (CodexAgent), T6 (CodexProvider), T8 (registration)
- `sq task` → T4 (handle_message implementation)
- `sq auth status` shows Codex → T8 (auth status CLI update)
- Error on missing Codex → T4 (ImportError handling with ProviderError)
- Error on not authenticated → T2/T3 (ProviderAuthError with message)
- Reviews still work via API → T10 (keeps `codex` alias with `profile: "openai"`)

### [PASS] All technical success criteria are covered by tasks

- CodexProvider/CodexAgent implement Protocols → T4, T6
- CodexAuthStrategy implements AuthStrategy → T2
- Client cleanup on shutdown → T4 (shutdown() method)
- No regression → T11 (full test suite run)
- New test coverage → T3 (auth), T5 (agent), T7 (provider), T9 (registration)

### [PASS] Test-after-implementation pattern maintained except for T11

T3 immediately follows T2, T5 follows T4, T7 follows T6, T9 follows T8. T10 (model aliases) and T11 (validation) are configuration/verification tasks where a separate test task is less applicable.

### [PASS] Tasks are appropriately sized and independently completable

Each task has clear boundaries: auth strategy (T2/T3), agent (T4/T5), provider (T6/T7), registration (T8/T9), aliases (T10), validation (T11), docs (T12). A junior AI could complete any task independently given the context.

### [PASS] No scope creep detected

The `codex-spark` alias in T10 is explicitly called out in the slice design (under "Model Alias Updates" section). T8's update to `sq auth status` is a natural part of registration. All tasks trace to the slice design.

### [PASS] No gaps: success criteria have corresponding tasks

All six functional requirements and five technical requirements from the slice design have traceable tasks. No orphaned success criteria.

### [PASS] Sequencing is correct with proper dependencies

T2 depends on T1's transport decision (implicit). T4 (agent) builds on T2 (auth). T6 (provider) uses T2+T4. T8 (registration) uses T6. T10 (aliases) is independent but logically follows registration. T11 (validation) depends on all prior. T12 (docs) depends on T11. No circular dependencies.
