---
docType: review
layer: project
reviewType: slice
slice: sq-slash-command
project: squadron
verdict: PASS
sourceDocument: project-documents/user/slices/116-slice.sq-slash-command.md
aiModel: minimax/minimax-m2.7
status: complete
dateCreated: 20260331
dateUpdated: 20260331
findings:
  - id: F001
    severity: pass
    category: scope-management
    summary: "Slice scope is well-contained and appropriately scoped"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md
  - id: F002
    severity: pass
    category: dependency-management
    summary: "Dependencies and integration points are correctly documented"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md:dependencies, interfaces
  - id: F003
    severity: pass
    category: layer-responsibilities
    summary: "Proper layering — commands live in Interface Layer only"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md:Package Structure
  - id: F004
    severity: pass
    category: antipatterns-over-engineering
    summary: "Thin-wrapper pattern avoids over-engineering"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md:Command Content Pattern
  - id: F005
    severity: pass
    category: implementation-approach
    summary: "Package bundling approach follows Python conventions"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md:Bundling Command Files in the Package
  - id: F006
    severity: pass
    category: integration-points
    summary: "No-daemon design is architecturally sound"
    location: 116-slice.sq-slash-command.md:No Daemon Required
---

# Review: slice — slice 116

**Verdict:** PASS
**Model:** minimax/minimax-m2.7

## Findings

### [PASS] Slice scope is well-contained and appropriately scoped

The slice clearly defines what is included (eight command files, install/uninstall CLI commands, tests) and explicitly excludes what is not in scope (composed workflows, project-level installation, auto-install hooks, additional commands). This discipline prevents scope creep and aligns with the architecture's focus on experimentation over UI polish.

### [PASS] Dependencies and integration points are correctly documented

The dependencies declare:
- `project-rename` (parent): CLI entry point is `sq`
- `composed-workflows` (interface/consumed): Establishes the command infrastructure that slice 117 builds upon

This correctly documents the relationship where slice 116 provides foundational infrastructure for slice 117's composed workflow commands. The slice properly consumes from prior slices (CLI Foundation 103, Review Templates 105, Auth Strategy 114) while providing to future slices.

### [PASS] Proper layering — commands live in Interface Layer only

The command files are maintained in `commands/sq/` and installed to `~/.claude/commands/sq/`. The CLI commands (`install-commands`, `uninstall-commands`) live in `src/squadron/cli/commands/`. No changes are made to Core Engine (`src/squadron/core/`) or Provider Layer (`src/squadron/providers/`). This maintains the architecture's four-layer separation.

### [PASS] Thin-wrapper pattern avoids over-engineering

The design correctly avoids duplicating CLI functionality. Command files:
- Delegate execution to Claude Code's Bash tool
- Pass arguments through transparently
- Reference `--help` for usage rather than duplicating flag documentation
- Provide graceful error handling without reinventing error messages

This "thin wrapper" philosophy aligns with the architecture's stated priority: "functionality through CLI, MCP server, and REST+WebSocket API."

### [PASS] Package bundling approach follows Python conventions

Using `importlib.resources.files()` to locate bundled command files at runtime is the modern, stdlib approach. The `pyproject.toml` configuration for `hatch` wheel inclusion follows current best practices. This ensures command files are properly packaged in distribution wheels.

### [PASS] No-daemon design is architecturally sound

The design correctly notes that:
- Agent management commands (`spawn`, `task`, `list`, `shutdown`) produce clear error messages if the daemon isn't running
- Review commands use the SDK directly and don't require the daemon
- No command file logic needs to handle daemon lifecycle

This aligns with the architecture's separation of concerns where daemon state management is handled by the core engine, not the interface layer.
