# AI-Assisted Manual Review Plan for Soil Science Content

## Overview

This document outlines a systematic approach for AI-assisted manual review of all soil science subject matter content in the py-soildb codebase. The review will validate the accuracy, completeness, and scientific correctness of soil science concepts, terminology, and logic across examples, documentation, and internal code.

## Objectives

1. **Validate Scientific Accuracy**: Ensure all soil science concepts, terminology, and relationships are scientifically correct
2. **Identify Knowledge Gaps**: Find areas where soil science understanding could be improved
3. **Standardize Terminology**: Ensure consistent use of soil science terminology throughout the codebase
4. **Enhance Documentation**: Improve clarity and completeness of soil science explanations
5. **Verify Logic**: Confirm that internal algorithms and data processing logic align with soil science principles

## Scope of Review

### 1. Documentation Files (`docs/`)
- `tutorial.qmd` - Basic workflows and soil data concepts
- `usage.qmd` - General usage patterns and soil science applications
- `awdb.qmd` - Soil moisture, temperature, and weather data concepts
- `api.qmd` - API documentation with soil science context
- `troubleshooting.qmd` - Error handling and soil data issues
- `async.qmd` - Asynchronous operations with soil data
- `error-handling.qmd` - Soil data error patterns

### 2. Example Files (`examples/`)
- `01_basic_usage.py` - Basic soil data queries and concepts
- `02_spatial_analysis.py` - Spatial soil data relationships
- `03_metadata_example.py` - Survey metadata and soil survey concepts
- `04_schema_inference.py` - Soil data schema and relationships
- `05_awdb_example.py` - Soil moisture and weather data
- `06_awdb_data_availability.py` - AWDB data availability concepts
- `soil_water_availability.qmd` - Integrated soil-water analysis
- `spc_*.py` - SoilProfileCollection conversions and soil profile concepts
- `08_metadata_discovery.ipynb` - Survey area metadata workflows

### 3. Source Code (`src/soildb/`)
- `query.py` - SQL query building and column sets (soil properties)
- `metadata.py` - Survey metadata parsing and soil survey concepts
- `spatial.py` - Spatial queries and geographic soil relationships
- `awdb_integration.py` - Soil moisture and weather data integration
- `convenience.py` - High-level soil data functions
- `fetch.py` - Bulk data retrieval and soil data processing
- `response.py` - Data response handling and soil data structures
- `exceptions.py` - Error handling for soil data operations

## Key Soil Science Subject Areas

### 1. Soil Classification and Taxonomy
- USDA Soil Taxonomy (orders, suborders, great groups, subgroups)
- Soil series and component relationships
- Map unit concepts and interpretations
- Diagnostic horizons and characteristics

### 2. Soil Physical Properties
- Texture (sand, silt, clay percentages)
- Bulk density and particle density
- Porosity and water retention
- Hydraulic conductivity (Ksat)

### 3. Soil Chemical Properties
- pH and soil reaction
- Cation exchange capacity (CEC)
- Organic matter content
- Nutrient availability
- Salinity and sodicity (SAR)

### 4. Soil Morphology
- Horizon designation and nomenclature
- Soil profile development
- Diagnostic features
- Color, structure, and consistence

### 5. Soil Spatial Concepts
- Survey area boundaries and metadata
- Map unit polygons and spatial relationships
- Geographic coordinate systems
- Spatial query relationships (intersects, contains, within)

### 6. Soil-Plant-Water Relationships
- Available water capacity (AWC)
- Field capacity and wilting point
- Soil moisture monitoring depths
- Plant-available water calculations

### 7. Soil Survey and Data Concepts
- SSURGO database structure and relationships
- Survey area metadata and quality
- Data collection methods and accuracy
- Temporal aspects of soil data

## AI-Assisted Review Methodology

### Phase 1: Content Inventory and Categorization
**Goal**: Create comprehensive catalog of soil science content

**AI Role**: 
- Scan all files and identify soil science terminology
- Categorize content by subject area
- Flag potentially problematic or unclear content

**Manual Role**:
- Review AI categorization for accuracy
- Add context about intended audience and complexity level
- Prioritize content for detailed review

### Phase 2: Terminology Validation
**Goal**: Ensure consistent and accurate use of soil science terms

**AI Role**:
- Cross-reference terminology against authoritative sources
- Identify inconsistent usage across files
- Suggest standardized terminology

**Manual Role**:
- Validate AI findings against domain expertise
- Make final decisions on terminology standardization
- Update code and documentation accordingly

### Phase 3: Conceptual Accuracy Review
**Goal**: Verify scientific correctness of soil science concepts

**AI Role**:
- Analyze logical relationships between soil properties
- Check mathematical calculations and algorithms
- Validate units and conversions
- Review data processing logic

**Manual Role**:
- Confirm AI-identified issues
- Provide domain expertise for complex relationships
- Validate algorithmic correctness

### Phase 4: Documentation Enhancement
**Goal**: Improve clarity and completeness of explanations

**AI Role**:
- Suggest clearer explanations for complex concepts
- Identify missing context or background information
- Propose additional examples or analogies

**Manual Role**:
- Review and approve AI suggestions
- Add soil science domain expertise
- Ensure appropriate level for target audience

### Phase 5: Example Validation
**Goal**: Ensure examples demonstrate correct soil science usage

**AI Role**:
- Analyze example workflows for scientific validity
- Check data interpretation and presentation
- Validate query logic and results interpretation

**Manual Role**:
- Test examples with real data
- Verify scientific accuracy of interpretations
- Confirm examples represent best practices

## Review Process Workflow

### Step 1: File-by-File Review Preparation
For each file in scope:
1. AI scans file for soil science content
2. AI categorizes content by subject area
3. AI flags potential issues or unclear content
4. Manual reviewer adds context and priority level

### Step 2: Cross-File Analysis
1. AI identifies terminology inconsistencies across files
2. AI maps relationships between concepts across the codebase
3. Manual reviewer validates relationships and resolves inconsistencies

### Step 3: Subject Area Deep Dives
For each key subject area:
1. AI compiles all related content
2. AI analyzes for scientific accuracy
3. Manual reviewer provides domain expertise validation

### Step 4: Integration Testing
1. AI suggests test cases for soil science logic
2. Manual reviewer creates and runs validation tests
3. AI analyzes test results for scientific correctness

## Quality Assurance Measures

### 1. Authoritative Source Validation
- Cross-reference against USDA-NRCS official documentation
- Validate against peer-reviewed soil science literature
- Consult with soil science domain experts

### 2. Consistency Checks
- Ensure consistent terminology across all files
- Verify consistent units and formatting
- Check consistent data interpretation patterns

### 3. Logic Validation
- Verify mathematical calculations are correct
- Confirm algorithmic logic aligns with soil science principles
- Validate data transformation logic

### 4. User Experience Validation
- Ensure explanations are appropriate for target audience
- Verify examples work with real data
- Confirm error messages are scientifically accurate

## Tools and Resources Needed

### AI Tools
- Code analysis and documentation review capabilities
- Scientific literature search and summarization
- Terminology validation against authoritative sources
- Logic and algorithm analysis

### Manual Resources
- Soil science domain experts
- USDA-NRCS documentation and standards
- SSURGO database documentation
- Peer-reviewed soil science references

### Technical Resources
- Access to SSURGO database for testing
- AWDB API access for validation
- GIS tools for spatial data validation
- Statistical analysis tools for data validation

## Deliverables

### 1. Review Report
- Summary of findings by subject area
- List of issues identified and resolved
- Recommendations for future improvements

### 2. Updated Documentation
- Enhanced explanations with improved clarity
- Additional context and background information
- Corrected scientific inaccuracies

### 3. Code Improvements
- Fixed algorithmic issues
- Improved data processing logic
- Enhanced error handling with scientific context

### 4. Validation Tests
- Test suite for soil science logic validation
- Example validation scripts
- Performance and accuracy benchmarks

## Timeline and Milestones

### Phase 1 (Week 1-2): Content Inventory
- Complete AI-assisted content cataloging
- Manual review and prioritization
- Establish review criteria and standards

### Phase 2 (Week 3-4): Terminology Review
- Complete terminology validation
- Implement terminology standardization
- Update inconsistent usage

### Phase 3 (Week 5-6): Conceptual Review
- Review all major soil science concepts
- Validate algorithms and calculations
- Fix identified issues

### Phase 4 (Week 7-8): Documentation Enhancement
- Improve documentation clarity
- Add missing scientific context
- Enhance examples and tutorials

### Phase 5 (Week 9-10): Final Validation
- Complete integration testing
- Final review and sign-off
- Documentation of improvements

## Risk Mitigation

### 1. AI Limitations
- AI may not catch nuanced scientific errors
- Manual validation required for complex relationships
- Domain expertise essential for final decisions

### 2. Scope Creep
- Clearly defined scope and priorities
- Regular check-ins and milestone reviews
- Flexible approach for important findings outside scope

### 3. Resource Constraints
- Prioritize high-impact areas first
- Use iterative approach with feedback loops
- Scale review depth based on available resources

## Success Criteria

1. **Scientific Accuracy**: All soil science content validated against authoritative sources
2. **Terminology Consistency**: Standardized terminology throughout codebase
3. **Documentation Quality**: Clear, accurate explanations for target audience
4. **Code Correctness**: Algorithms and logic validated for scientific accuracy
5. **User Experience**: Examples work correctly and demonstrate best practices

## Communication Plan

- Weekly progress updates with key findings
- Monthly stakeholder reviews of major changes
- Final report with comprehensive findings and recommendations
- Documentation of all changes and rationale

---

*This plan will be implemented following approval and resource allocation.*