Metadata-Version: 2.1
Name: rest-framework-roles
Version: 1.1.1
Summary: Role-based permissions for Django REST Framework and vanilla Django.
Home-page: https://github.com/Pithikos/rest-framework-roles
Author: Johan Hanssen Seferidis
Author-email: manossef@gmail.com
License: LICENSE
Keywords: permissions,roles,users,django,rest,drf,acl,security,rest framework,access control
Platform: UNKNOWN
Classifier: Framework :: Django
Classifier: Topic :: Security
Requires-Python: >=3
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
License-File: LICENSE
Requires-Dist: djangorestframework

REST Framework Roles
====================

[![rest-framework-roles](https://circleci.com/gh/Pithikos/rest-framework-roles.svg?style=svg)](https://circleci.com/gh/Pithikos/rest-framework-roles) [![PyPI version](https://badge.fury.io/py/rest-framework-roles.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/py/rest-framework-roles)

A Django REST Framework security-centric plugin aimed at decoupling permissions from your models and views.

Features:

  - Least privilege by default.
  - Guard your API **before** a request reaches a view.
  - Redirections are guarded automatically.
  - Backwards compatible with DRF's `permission_classes`.

The framework provides `view_permissions` as an alternative to DRF's `permission_classes`, with the aim to move permission logic away from views and models so that views can focus on the business logic.

Installation
============

Install

    pip install rest-framework-roles

Edit your *settings.py* file

```python
INSTALLED_APPS = {
    ..
    'rest_framework',
    'rest_framework_roles',  # Must be after rest_framework
}

REST_FRAMEWORK_ROLES = {
  'ROLES': 'myproject.roles.ROLES',
  'DEFAULT_EXCEPTION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.exceptions.NotFound',
}
```

At this point all your views are protected and trying to access an endpoint will default to `DEFAULT_EXCEPTION_CLASS`.

Endpoints from *django.contrib* are not patched. If you wish to explicitly set what modules are patched you can edit the SKIP_MODULES setting like below.

```python
REST_FRAMEWORK_ROLES = {
  'ROLES': 'myproject.roles.ROLES',
  'SKIP_MODULES': [
    'django.*',
    'myproject.myapp55.*',
  ],
}
```


Roles example
===========================

Create a file *roles.py* in your project to hold the defined roles in your application. Below we use the defacto Django roles and also add a few new ones for demonstration purposes.


*roles.py*
```python
from rest_framework_roles.roles import is_anon, is_user, is_admin, is_staff

def is_buyer(request, view):
    return is_user(request, view) and request.user.usertype == 'buyer'

def is_seller(request, view):
    return is_user(request, view) and request.user.usertype == 'seller'


ROLES = {
    # Django vanilla roles
    'anon': is_anon,
    'user': is_user,
    'admin': is_admin,
    'staff': is_staff,

    # Some custom role examples
    'buyer': is_buyer,
    'seller': is_seller,
}
```

Every role needs to have a role checker function returning `True` or `False`. Role checkers take a `request` and `view` as parameters, similar to [DRF's behaviour](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/permissions/). Some simple ones for Django's default roles are already included - you can see the [source code here](https://github.com/Pithikos/rest-framework-roles/blob/master/rest_framework_roles/roles.py).


View example
===========================

Once roles are defined, they can be used directly in `view_permissions`.

A real-life `/users/` endpoint could look like below.

*views.py*
```python
from rest_framework.exceptions import PermissionDenied, NotAuthenticated
from rest_framework.viewsets import ModelViewSet
from rest_framework.decorators import action
from rest_framework_roles.granting import is_self


class UserViewSet(ModelViewSet):
    serializer_class = UserSerializer
    queryset = User.objects.filter(is_archived=False)
    view_permissions = {
        'destroy,retrieve,update,partial_update': {'user': is_self, 'admin': True},  # 1
        'create': {'anon': True, 'user': PermissionDenied},  # 2
        'list': {'admin': True, 'anon': NotAuthenticated},   # 3
        'me': {'user': True, 'anon': NotAuthenticated},      # 4
    }

    @action(detail=False, methods=['GET', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])
    def me(self, request):
        self.kwargs['pk'] = request.user.pk
        if request.method == 'PATCH':
            return self.partial_update(request)
        elif request.method == 'GET':
            return self.retrieve(request)
        elif request.method == 'DELETE':
            return self.destroy(request)
        raise NotImplementedError
```

Since we've set `DEFAULT_EXCEPTION_CLASS` to *404 Not Found*, we only need to care about cases where we want something different.

Explanation:

1. Any endpoints of the pattern `GET /users/<id>/` need to be hidden to avoid giving hints of existing users to attackers. We use `is_self` which simply checks if `request.user == view.get_object()`. Unauthorized access will fallback to 404 (and hence hiding the existence of a specific user).
2. `POST /users/` is a public endpoint. However we want to avoid logged-in users creating second accounts so 403 is returned.
3. `GET /users/` should only be accessible to admin. 404 is not required since there's not any special information, so a simple 401 is more informative to requests.
4. `GET /users/me/` is a redirection to `GET /users/<id>/`. We know the latter already uses `is_self` which is correct. However for a better experience we return a 401 for anonymous requests here instead of the default 404.

> Redirections are supported and have minimal performance impact. You still need to explicitly state access to them in `view_permissions` or you'll get the exception from `DEFAULT_EXCEPTION_CLASS`.

> The granting algorithm is **greedy**. If a request matches multiple roles, it will go through all of the roles until it reaches one that grants it access. This allows flexibility in case you have several overlapping roles (e.g. admin is also a user and staff).

> In a view you can always check `_view_permissions` to see what permissions are in effect.


Advanced setup
==============

Bypassing the framework
-----------------------
By default the framework patches DRF's `permission_classes` with `DefaultPermission` which simply raises the exception you defined in `DEFAULT_EXCEPTION_CLASS`. You can bypass this behaviour by simply setting `permission_classes` in your view class.

```python
class MyViewSet():
    permission_classes = [AllowAny]  # default DRF behaviour
```


Granting permission
-------------------

You can use the helper functions `allof` or `anyof` when deciding if a matched role should be granted access

```python
from rest_framework_roles.granting import allof

def not_updating_email(request, view):
    return 'email' not in request.data

class UserViewSet(ModelViewSet):
    view_permissions = {
        'update,partial_update': {
            'user': allof(is_self, not_updating_email),
            'admin': True,
        },
    }
```

In the above example the user can only update their information only while not trying to update their email.

> Ideally keep the grant checking functions in a file like *granting.py* or above your viewsets. Keep in mind; (1) a request can get matched to a role (2) but granting determines if the role will be granted access.


Optimizing role checking
------------------------

You can change the order of how roles are checked. This makes sense if you want
less frequent or expensive checks to happen prior to infrequent and slower ones.


```python
from rest_framework_roles.decorators import role_checker


@role_checker(cost=0)
def is_freebie_user(request, view):
    return request.user.is_authenticated and request.user.plan == 'freebie'


@role_checker(cost=0)
def is_payed_user(request, view):
    return request.user.is_authenticated and not request.user.plan


@role_checker(cost=50)
def is_creator(request, view):
    obj = view.get_object()
    if hasattr(obj, 'creator'):
        return request.user == obj.creator
    return False
```

In this example, roles with cost 0 would be checked first, and lastly the *creator* role would be checked since it has the highest cost.

> Note this is similar to Django REST's `check_permissions` and `check_object_permissions` but more generic & flexible since it allows an arbitrary number of costs.


