# Validation Report

**Document:** docs-bmad/sprint-artifacts/stories/1-9-get-id-tool-implementation.context.xml
**Checklist:** .bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-context/checklist.md
**Date:** 2025-12-29_11-31-53

## Summary
- Overall: 8/10 passed (80%)
- Critical Issues: 2

## Section Results

### Story Context Assembly Validation

Pass Rate: 8/10 (80%)

#### ✓ PASS - Story fields (asA/iWant/soThat) captured
**Evidence:** Lines 13-15 show complete user story format:
```xml
<asA>an AI assistant</asA>
<iWant>to retrieve complete documentation and parameter schemas for a specific operation</iWant>
<soThat>I understand how to use the operation before calling it</soThat>
```
All three story components are present and properly formatted.

#### ✓ PASS - Acceptance criteria list matches story draft exactly (no invention)
**Evidence:** Lines 32-40 contain 7 acceptance criteria that match the story draft (lines 13-68 of story draft). Cross-referenced each AC:
- AC1: Tool Registration in MCP Server (Story draft line 13)
- AC2: Operation ID Retrieval (Story draft line 19)
- AC3: Complete Operation Details Returned (Story draft line 26)
- AC4: Usage Hints and Metadata (Story draft line 41)
- AC5: Error Handling (Story draft line 49)
- AC6: Response Formatting (Story draft line 56)
- AC7: Integration with Existing Components (Story draft line 63)

No additional ACs invented; all match story draft.

#### ✓ PASS - Tasks/subtasks captured as task list
**Evidence:** Lines 16-28 contain 12 tasks mapped to acceptance criteria:
```xml
<tasks>
  - Task 1: Create OperationRegistry Class (AC: #2, #3)
  - Task 2: Implement Operation Models (AC: #3, #4)
  ... [10 more tasks]
  - Task 12: Documentation and Examples (AC: #1, #3, #4)
</tasks>
```
All tasks from story draft (lines 69-180) are captured with AC mappings.

#### ✓ PASS - Relevant docs (5-15) included with path and snippets
**Evidence:** Lines 43-74 contain 5 documentation references:
1. tech-spec-epic-1.md - AC-9: get-id Tool Requirements
2. tech-spec-epic-1.md - System Architecture Alignment
3. tech-spec-epic-1.md - Data Models and Contracts
4. architecture-decision-records-adrs.md - ADR-002: 3-Tool Semantic Discovery Pattern
5. architecture-decision-records-adrs.md - ADR-005: Stateless Server Design

All include path, title, section, and relevant snippet. Quantity meets requirement (5 docs).

#### ✓ PASS - Relevant code references included with reason and line hints
**Evidence:** Lines 76-119 contain 6 code artifacts:
1. src/tools/get_id.py (lines 63-90) - Existing implementation to enhance
2. src/tools/search_ids.py (lines 62-214) - Reference pattern
3. src/tools/openapi/operation_registry.py (lines 25-64) - Registry class
4. tests/unit/test_mcp_get_id.py (lines 56-195) - Unit test expectations
5. tests/integration/test_get_id_tool_integration.py (lines 32-176) - Integration tests
6. data/operations.json - Data file structure

Each includes path, kind, symbol, line hints, and reason for relevance.

#### ✗ FAIL - Interfaces/API contracts extracted if applicable
**Evidence:** Lines 150-180 contain interfaces section but missing critical interface details.

**Issues identified:**
1. **Missing return type detail for ToolResult**: Line 154 shows `async def handle_get_id(...) -> ToolResult` but ToolResult structure is not defined (should show dict structure with "content", "isError" fields)
2. **Missing OperationMetadata structure**: Line 160 references `OperationMetadata` but this type is not defined in interfaces (should show fields: operation_id, namespace, http_method, etc.)
3. **Incomplete operations.json contract**: Line 176-179 shows partial structure but missing critical fields like `examples`, `deprecated`, `rate_limit_exempt`, `safety_validation_required` that are referenced in AC4 and AC6

**Impact:** Developer implementing the story lacks complete contract definitions and may implement incorrect interfaces or miss required fields.

#### ✓ PASS - Constraints include applicable dev rules and patterns
**Evidence:** Lines 135-148 contain 12 constraints covering:
- Type hints (mypy --strict compliance)
- Model patterns (Pydantic/dataclass)
- Async patterns
- Constants (CACHE_SIZE, OPERATION_ID_PATTERN)
- Code style (PEP 8, black, 100 char limit)
- Documentation (Google-style docstrings)
- Error messages (actionable remediation)
- Performance (p95 < 50ms, cache size 256)

All relevant dev rules from architecture docs are included.

#### ✓ PASS - Dependencies detected from manifests and frameworks
**Evidence:** Lines 121-132 contain 8 Python dependencies:
- mcp >= 1.0.0 (MCP protocol)
- pydantic >= 2.0 (data validation)
- structlog >= 24.1 (logging)
- pytest >= 8.0 (testing)
- pytest-asyncio >= 0.23 (async tests)
- pytest-benchmark (performance)
- difflib (stdlib, fuzzy matching)
- functools (stdlib, LRU cache)

All dependencies needed for implementation are listed with version constraints and usage notes.

#### ✓ PASS - Testing standards and locations populated
**Evidence:** Lines 183-214 contain testing section with:
- Standards: pytest markers, AAA pattern, coverage ≥80%, pytest-asyncio, pytest-benchmark
- Locations: 3 test files specified (unit, integration, performance)
- Ideas: 24 test scenarios mapped to specific acceptance criteria

Testing strategy is comprehensive and aligns with project standards.

#### ✗ FAIL - XML structure follows story-context template format
**Evidence:** Lines 1-216 show XML structure but with critical deviation from template.

**Issues identified:**
1. **Missing status update in metadata**: Line 6 shows `<status>drafted</status>` but story draft (line 3) shows `Status: ready-for-dev`. The context.xml should reflect current status to indicate story is ready for development, not just drafted.
2. **Incorrect sourceStoryPath**: Line 9 shows `docs-bmad/sprint-artifacts/1-9-get-id-tool-implementation.md` but correct path based on workflow config (line 12 of workflow.yaml) should be `{sprint_artifacts}/stories/1-9-get-id-tool-implementation.md` which resolves to `docs-bmad/sprint-artifacts/stories/1-9-get-id-tool-implementation.md` (missing "stories/" subdirectory).

**Impact:** 
- Status mismatch causes confusion about whether story is ready for dev work to begin
- Incorrect source path breaks traceability and may cause tooling to fail when looking up story draft

## Failed Items

### 1. Interfaces/API contracts extracted if applicable (CRITICAL)

**Missing Details:**
- ToolResult structure definition (should include dict schema with keys: content, isError, error)
- OperationMetadata complete field list (operation_id, namespace, http_method, url_path, description, parameters array structure, request_schema, response_schema, examples, tags, requires_auth, deprecated, rate_limit_exempt, safety_validation_required)
- Complete operations.json contract with all fields referenced in acceptance criteria

**Recommendation:** Add complete interface definitions to `<interfaces>` section:
```xml
<interface>
  <name>ToolResult</name>
  <kind>type_alias</kind>
  <signature>Dict[str, Any] with keys: content (List[Dict]), isError (bool), error (Optional[str])</signature>
  <path>src/mcp_server/types.py</path>
</interface>
<interface>
  <name>OperationMetadata</name>
  <kind>dataclass</kind>
  <signature>Fields: operation_id (str), namespace (str), http_method (str), url_path (str), description (str), parameters (List[Dict]), request_schema (Optional[Dict]), response_schema (Optional[Dict]), examples (Optional[List[Dict]]), tags (List[str]), requires_auth (bool), deprecated (bool), rate_limit_exempt (bool), safety_validation_required (bool)</signature>
  <path>src/models/operations.py</path>
</interface>
```

### 2. XML structure follows story-context template format

**Issues:**
- Status should be "ready-for-dev" not "drafted" (story marked ready on line 3 of draft)
- Source path missing "stories/" subdirectory

**Recommendation:** Update metadata section:
```xml
<status>ready-for-dev</status>
<sourceStoryPath>docs-bmad/sprint-artifacts/stories/1-9-get-id-tool-implementation.md</sourceStoryPath>
```

## Partial Items

(None - all items either fully passed or failed)

## Recommendations

### Must Fix (Critical)
1. **Add complete interface definitions** for ToolResult and OperationMetadata in `<interfaces>` section with all fields
2. **Update status to "ready-for-dev"** in metadata to reflect story draft status
3. **Fix sourceStoryPath** to include "stories/" subdirectory for correct file resolution

### Should Improve (Important)
4. **Expand operations.json interface** to show all fields used in ACs (examples, deprecated, rate_limit_exempt, safety_validation_required)
5. **Add field descriptions** to interface signatures for clarity on field purpose and format

### Consider (Minor)
6. Verify that all 6 code artifacts still exist at specified paths and line ranges
7. Consider adding example usage snippets to interfaces for developer clarity
