| ACDC 2019 Naturalist |
| Analysis 28 : Details |
Study type: Point transect, Radial distance, No clustering.
Units used: Meter for distances, Sq. Kilometer for areas.
Note: Most figures have been rounded for readability, but 'CoefVar Density' have been further modified : converted to %
| Echant | Espèce | Passage | Adulte | Durée | NTot Obs | Max Dist | Analyse | Mod Key Fn | Mod Adj Ser | Left Trunc Dist | Right Trunc Dist | Fit Dist Cuts | ExCod | Effort | NObs | Obs Rate | NumPars AdjSer | Delta AIC | Chi2 P | KS P | CvM Uw P | CvM Cw P | CoefVar Density | Qual Bal 3 | Qual Bal 2 | Qual Bal 1 | Qual Chi2+ | Qual KS+ | Qual DCv+ | Density | Min Density | Max Density | Number | Min Number | Max Number | EDR/ESW | Min EDR/ESW | Max EDR/ESW | PDetec | Min PDetec | Max PDetec | RunFolder | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 1 | Sylvia atricapilla | a+b | m | 10mn | 403 | 511.41 | 49 | HAZARD | POLY | 5 | 492 | 13 | 1 | 190 | 401 | 99.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 10 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 37.58 | 30.87 | 45.75 | 902 | 741 | 1098 | 133.7 | 124.4 | 143.6 | 0.074 | 0.064 | 0.085 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ra-ma-90vq_6nr |
Study type: Point transect, Radial distance, No clustering.
Units used: Meter for distances, Sq. Kilometer for areas.
Note: All values have been left untouched, as output by MCDS (no rounding, no conversion)
| Analyse | Echant | Espèce | Passage | Adulte | Durée | FonctionClé | SérieAjust | TrGche | TrDrte | NbTrchMod | Abrev. Analyse | OptimTrunc | NTot Obs | Min Dist | Max Dist | Mod Key Fn | Mod Adj Ser | Mod Chc Crit | Conf Interv | Left Trunc Dist | Right Trunc Dist | Fit Dist Cuts | ExCod | StartTime | ElapsedTime | RunFolder | NObs | NSamp | Effort | EncRate | CoefVar EncRate | Min EncRate | Max EncRate | DoF EncRate | Left Trunc | Right Trunc | Obs Rate | TotNum Pars | Delta AIC | AIC | Chi2 P | Chi2 P 1 | Chi2 P 2 | Chi2 P 3 | f/h(0) | CoefVar f/h(0) | Min f/h(0) | Max f/h(0) | DoF f/h(0) | PDetec | CoefVar PDetec | Min PDetec | Max PDetec | DoF PDetec | EDR/ESW | CoefVar EDR/ESW | Min EDR/ESW | Max EDR/ESW | DoF EDR/ESW | AICc | BIC | LogLhood | KS P | CvM Uw P | CvM Cw P | Key Fn | Adj Ser | NumPars KeyFn | NumPars AdjSer | Num Covars | EstA(1) | EstA(2) | EstA(3) | DensClu | CoefVar DensClu | Min DensClu | Max DensClu | DoF DensClu | Density | Delta CoefVar Density | CoefVar Density | Min Density | Max Density | DoF Density | Number | CoefVar Number | Min Number | Max Number | DoF Number | Qual Bal 1 | Qual Bal 2 | Qual Bal 3 | Qual Chi2+ | Qual KS+ | Qual DCv+ | Group Left Trunc | Group Right Trunc | Order Same Trunc AIC | Order Close Trunc Chi2 KS DCv | Order Close Trunc DCv | Order Close Trunc Bal 1 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal 2 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal 3 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal Chi2+ Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal KS+ Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal DCv+ Qual | Order Global Chi2 KS DCv | Order Global Bal 1 Qual | Order Global Bal 2 Qual | Order Global Bal 3 Qual | Order Global Bal Chi2+ Qual | Order Global Bal KS+ Qual | Order Global Bal DCv+ Qual | Order Global DeltaAIC Chi2 KS DCv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 49 | 1 | Sylvia atricapilla | a+b | m | 10mn | HAZARD | POLY | 4.553960 | 492.328316 | 13.000000 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ra-ma | 1 | 403 | 1.212094 | 511.409745 | HAZARD | POLY | AIC | 95 | 4.553960 | 492.328316 | 13.000000 | 1 | 2023-04-30 15:55:03.377000 | 1.300000 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ra-ma-90vq_6nr | 401 | 96 | 190 | 2.110526 | 0.068677 | 1.841824 | 2.418429 | 95 | 4.553960 | 492.328000 | 99.503722 | 2.000000 | 0.000000 | 4488.174000 | 0.250081 | 0.250081 | nan | nan | 0.000112 | 0.073005 | 0.000097 | 0.000129 | 399.000000 | 0.073743 | 0.073005 | 0.063896 | 0.085108 | 399.000000 | 133.695000 | 0.036502 | 124.440000 | 143.638200 | 399.000000 | 4488.205000 | 4496.162000 | -2242.087000 | 0.550075 | 0.600000 | 0.700000 | HAZARD | POLY | 2.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 99.033550 | 3.760158 | nan | 37.584680 | 0.100231 | 30.874110 | 45.753800 | 330.520400 | 37.584680 | 0.000000 | 0.100231 | 30.874110 | 45.753800 | 330.520400 | 902 | 0.100231 | 741 | 1098 | 330.520400 | 0.653611 | 0.640192 | 0.648279 | 0.583173 | 0.636554 | 0.672710 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
This is mcds.exe version 6.2.0 Options; Type=Point; Distance=Radial /Measure='Meter'; Area /Units='Sq. Kilometer'; Object=Single; SF=1; Selection=Sequential; Lookahead=1; Maxterms=5; Confidence=95; print=Selection; End; Data /Structure=Flat; Fields=STR_LABEL,STR_AREA,SMP_LABEL,SMP_EFFORT,DISTANCE; Infile=anlys\230430-153402\SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ra-ma-90vq_6nr\data.txt /NoEcho; Data will be input from file - [...]POL-LA-RA-MA-90VQ_6NR\DATA.TXT End; Dataset has been stored. Estimate; Distance /Left=4.55396 /Width=492.328; Density=All; Encounter=All; Detection=All; Size=All; Estimator /Key=HAZARD /Adjust=POLY /Criterion=AIC; Monotone=Strict; Pick=AIC; GOF /NClass=13; Cluster /Bias=GXLOG; VarN=Empirical; End;
Parameter Estimation Specification
----------------------------------
Encounter rate for all data combined
Detection probability for all data combined
Density for all data combined
Distances:
----------
Analysis based on exact distances
Width specified as: 492.3280
Left most value set at: 4.553960
Estimators:
-----------
Estimator 1
Key: Hazard Rate
Adjustments - Function : Simple polynomials
- Term selection mode : Sequential
- Term selection criterion : Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
- Distances scaled by : W (right truncation distance)
Estimator selection: Choose estimator with minimum AIC
Estimation functions: constrained to be nearly monotone non-increasing
Variances:
----------
Variance of n: Empirical estimate from sample
(design-derived estimator R2/P2)
Variance of f(0): MLE estimate
Goodness of fit:
----------------
Based on user defined cut points
Glossary of terms
-----------------
Data items:
n - number of observed objects (single or clusters of animals)
L - total length of transect line(s)
k - number of samples
K - point transect effort, typically K=k
T - length of time searched in cue counting
ER - encounter rate (n/L or n/K or n/T)
W - width of line transect or radius of point transect
x(i) - distance to i-th observation
s(i) - cluster size of i-th observation
r-p - probability for regression test
chi-p- probability for chi-square goodness-of-fit test
Parameters or functions of parameters:
m - number of parameters in the model
A(I) - i-th parameter in the estimated probability density function(pdf)
f(0) - 1/u = value of pdf at zero for line transects
u - W*p = ESW, effective detection area for line transects
h(0) - 2*PI/v
v - PI*W*W*p, is the effective detection area for point transects
p - probability of observing an object in defined area
ESW - for line transects, effective strip width = W*p
EDR - for point transects, effective detection radius = W*sqrt(p)
rho - for cue counts, the cue rate
DS - estimate of density of clusters
E(S) - estimate of expected value of cluster size
D - estimate of density of animals
N - estimate of number of animals in specified area
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 492.3280
Left : 4.553960
# observations: 401
Model 1
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Results:
Convergence was achieved with 19 function evaluations.
Final Ln(likelihood) value = -2242.0870
Akaike information criterion = 4488.1743
Bayesian information criterion = 4496.1621
AICc = 4488.2046
Final parameter values: 99.033556 3.7601583
Model 2
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Simple polynomial adjustments of order(s) : 4
Results:
Convergence was achieved with 15 function evaluations.
Final Ln(likelihood) value = -2241.4494
Akaike information criterion = 4488.8989
Bayesian information criterion = 4500.8809
AICc = 4488.9595
Final parameter values: 99.547349 3.6794809 -0.56949598
Likelihood ratio test between models 1 and 2
Likelihood ratio test value = 1.2753
Probability of a greater value = 0.258774
*** Model 1 selected over model 2 based on minimum AIC
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 492.3280
Left : 4.553960
# observations: 401
Model
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Point Standard Percent Coef. 95 Percent
Parameter Estimate Error of Variation Confidence Interval
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
A( 1) 99.03 5.275
A( 2) 3.760 0.2116
h(0) 0.11189E-03 0.81687E-05 7.30 0.96951E-04 0.12914E-03
p 0.73743E-01 0.53836E-02 7.30 0.63896E-01 0.85108E-01
EDR 133.69 4.8802 3.65 124.44 143.64
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
Sampling Correlation of Estimated Parameters
A( 1) A( 2)
A( 1) 1.000 0.762
A( 2) 0.762 1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
-----------------------
D_n = 0.0398 p = 0.5501
Cramer-von Mises family tests
-----------------------------
W-sq (uniform weighting) = 0.1107 0.500 < p <= 0.600
Relevant critical values:
W-sq crit(alpha=0.600) = 0.0968
W-sq crit(alpha=0.500) = 0.1187
C-sq (cosine weighting) = 0.0619 0.600 < p <= 0.700
Relevant critical values:
C-sq crit(alpha=0.700) = 0.0499
C-sq crit(alpha=0.600) = 0.0622
Cell Cut Observed Expected Chi-square
i Points Values Values Values
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 4.55 42.1 42 39.25 0.192
2 42.1 79.6 96 100.21 0.177
3 79.6 117. 102 104.55 0.062
4 117. 155. 61 61.01 0.000
5 155. 192. 41 33.99 1.447
6 192. 230. 22 20.35 0.134
7 230. 267. 18 13.08 1.847
8 267. 305. 6 8.91 0.952
9 305. 342. 1 6.35 4.512
10 342. 380. 6 4.70 0.361
11 380. 417. 4 3.58 0.050
12 417. 455. 0 2.79 2.791
13 455. 492. 2 2.22 0.022
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total Chi-square value = 12.5475 Degrees of Freedom = 10.00
Probability of a greater chi-square value, P = 0.25008
The program has limited capability for pooling. The user should
judge the necessity for pooling and if necessary, do pooling by hand.
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 492.3280
Left : 4.553960
# observations: 401
Model 1
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Point Standard Percent Coef. 95% Percent
Parameter Estimate Error of Variation Confidence Interval
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
D 37.585 3.7671 10.02 30.874 45.754
N 902.00 90.408 10.02 741.00 1098.0
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
Measurement Units
---------------------------------
Density: Numbers/Sq. kilometers
EDR: meters
Component Percentages of Var(D)
-------------------------------
Detection probability : 53.1
Encounter rate : 46.9
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
n 401.00
k 96.000
K 190.00
n/K 2.1105 6.87 95.00 1.8418 2.4184
Left 4.5540
Width 492.33
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
Hazard/Polynomial
m 2.0000
LnL -2242.1
AIC 4488.2
AICc 4488.2
BIC 4496.2
Chi-p 0.25008
h(0) 0.11189E-03 7.30 399.00 0.96951E-04 0.12914E-03
p 0.73743E-01 7.30 399.00 0.63896E-01 0.85108E-01
EDR 133.69 3.65 399.00 124.44 143.64
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
Hazard/Polynomial
D 37.585 10.02 330.52 30.874 45.754
N 902.00 10.02 330.52 741.00 1098.0