| ACDC 2019 Naturalist |
| Analysis 29 : Details |
Study type: Point transect, Radial distance, No clustering.
Units used: Meter for distances, Sq. Kilometer for areas.
Note: Most figures have been rounded for readability, but 'CoefVar Density' have been further modified : converted to %
| Echant | Espèce | Passage | Adulte | Durée | NTot Obs | Max Dist | Analyse | Mod Key Fn | Mod Adj Ser | Left Trunc Dist | Right Trunc Dist | Fit Dist Cuts | ExCod | Effort | NObs | Obs Rate | NumPars AdjSer | Delta AIC | Chi2 P | KS P | CvM Uw P | CvM Cw P | CoefVar Density | Qual Bal 3 | Qual Bal 2 | Qual Bal 1 | Qual Chi2+ | Qual KS+ | Qual DCv+ | Density | Min Density | Max Density | Number | Min Number | Max Number | EDR/ESW | Min EDR/ESW | Max EDR/ESW | PDetec | Min PDetec | Max PDetec | RunFolder | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 1 | Sylvia atricapilla | a+b | m | 10mn | 403 | 511.41 | 47 | HAZARD | POLY | 6 | 25 | 1 | 190 | 402 | 99.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.52 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 36.93 | 30.4 | 44.86 | 886 | 730 | 1077 | 135 | 125.9 | 144.9 | 0.07 | 0.061 | 0.08 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ma-7ak3cu9l |
Study type: Point transect, Radial distance, No clustering.
Units used: Meter for distances, Sq. Kilometer for areas.
Note: All values have been left untouched, as output by MCDS (no rounding, no conversion)
| Analyse | Echant | Espèce | Passage | Adulte | Durée | FonctionClé | SérieAjust | TrGche | TrDrte | NbTrchMod | Abrev. Analyse | OptimTrunc | NTot Obs | Min Dist | Max Dist | Mod Key Fn | Mod Adj Ser | Mod Chc Crit | Conf Interv | Left Trunc Dist | Right Trunc Dist | Fit Dist Cuts | ExCod | StartTime | ElapsedTime | RunFolder | NObs | NSamp | Effort | EncRate | CoefVar EncRate | Min EncRate | Max EncRate | DoF EncRate | Left Trunc | Right Trunc | Obs Rate | TotNum Pars | Delta AIC | AIC | Chi2 P | Chi2 P 1 | Chi2 P 2 | Chi2 P 3 | f/h(0) | CoefVar f/h(0) | Min f/h(0) | Max f/h(0) | DoF f/h(0) | PDetec | CoefVar PDetec | Min PDetec | Max PDetec | DoF PDetec | EDR/ESW | CoefVar EDR/ESW | Min EDR/ESW | Max EDR/ESW | DoF EDR/ESW | AICc | BIC | LogLhood | KS P | CvM Uw P | CvM Cw P | Key Fn | Adj Ser | NumPars KeyFn | NumPars AdjSer | Num Covars | EstA(1) | EstA(2) | EstA(3) | DensClu | CoefVar DensClu | Min DensClu | Max DensClu | DoF DensClu | Density | Delta CoefVar Density | CoefVar Density | Min Density | Max Density | DoF Density | Number | CoefVar Number | Min Number | Max Number | DoF Number | Qual Bal 1 | Qual Bal 2 | Qual Bal 3 | Qual Chi2+ | Qual KS+ | Qual DCv+ | Group Left Trunc | Group Right Trunc | Order Same Trunc AIC | Order Close Trunc Chi2 KS DCv | Order Close Trunc DCv | Order Close Trunc Bal 1 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal 2 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal 3 Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal Chi2+ Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal KS+ Qual | Order Close Trunc Bal DCv+ Qual | Order Global Chi2 KS DCv | Order Global Bal 1 Qual | Order Global Bal 2 Qual | Order Global Bal 3 Qual | Order Global Bal Chi2+ Qual | Order Global Bal KS+ Qual | Order Global Bal DCv+ Qual | Order Global DeltaAIC Chi2 KS DCv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 47 | 1 | Sylvia atricapilla | a+b | m | 10mn | HAZARD | POLY | 6.391710 | nan | 25.000000 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ma | 1 | 403 | 1.212094 | 511.409745 | HAZARD | POLY | AIC | 95 | 6.391710 | nan | 25.000000 | 1 | 2023-04-30 15:55:03.337000 | 1.184997 | SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ma-7ak3cu9l | 402 | 96 | 190 | 2.115789 | 0.068798 | 1.845974 | 2.425042 | 95 | 6.391710 | 511.409800 | 99.751861 | 2.000000 | 0.000000 | 4507.106000 | 0.101200 | 0.101200 | nan | nan | 0.000110 | 0.071378 | 0.000095 | 0.000126 | 400.000000 | 0.069735 | 0.071378 | 0.060616 | 0.080225 | 400.000000 | 135.049600 | 0.035689 | 125.901800 | 144.861900 | 400.000000 | 4507.137000 | 4515.100000 | -2251.553000 | 0.516043 | 0.600000 | 0.600000 | HAZARD | POLY | 2.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 100.828300 | 3.829837 | nan | 36.926330 | 0.099136 | 30.397570 | 44.857340 | 321.199400 | 36.926330 | 0.000000 | 0.099136 | 30.397570 | 44.857340 | 321.199400 | 886 | 0.099136 | 730 | 1077 | 321.199400 | 0.557162 | 0.556845 | 0.563787 | 0.465836 | 0.558271 | 0.594383 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 |
This is mcds.exe version 6.2.0 Options; Type=Point; Distance=Radial /Measure='Meter'; Area /Units='Sq. Kilometer'; Object=Single; SF=1; Selection=Sequential; Lookahead=1; Maxterms=5; Confidence=95; print=Selection; End; Data /Structure=Flat; Fields=STR_LABEL,STR_AREA,SMP_LABEL,SMP_EFFORT,DISTANCE; Infile=anlys\230430-153402\SylvAtri-ab-10mn-m-haz-pol-la-ma-7ak3cu9l\data.txt /NoEcho; Data will be input from file - [...]AZ-POL-LA-MA-7AK3CU9L\DATA.TXT End; Dataset has been stored. Estimate; Distance /Left=6.39171; Density=All; Encounter=All; Detection=All; Size=All; Estimator /Key=HAZARD /Adjust=POLY /Criterion=AIC; Monotone=Strict; Pick=AIC; GOF /NClass=25; Cluster /Bias=GXLOG; VarN=Empirical; End;
Parameter Estimation Specification
----------------------------------
Encounter rate for all data combined
Detection probability for all data combined
Density for all data combined
Distances:
----------
Analysis based on exact distances
Width: use largest measurement/last interval endpoint
Left most value set at: 6.391710
Estimators:
-----------
Estimator 1
Key: Hazard Rate
Adjustments - Function : Simple polynomials
- Term selection mode : Sequential
- Term selection criterion : Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
- Distances scaled by : W (right truncation distance)
Estimator selection: Choose estimator with minimum AIC
Estimation functions: constrained to be nearly monotone non-increasing
Variances:
----------
Variance of n: Empirical estimate from sample
(design-derived estimator R2/P2)
Variance of f(0): MLE estimate
Goodness of fit:
----------------
Based on user defined cut points
Glossary of terms
-----------------
Data items:
n - number of observed objects (single or clusters of animals)
L - total length of transect line(s)
k - number of samples
K - point transect effort, typically K=k
T - length of time searched in cue counting
ER - encounter rate (n/L or n/K or n/T)
W - width of line transect or radius of point transect
x(i) - distance to i-th observation
s(i) - cluster size of i-th observation
r-p - probability for regression test
chi-p- probability for chi-square goodness-of-fit test
Parameters or functions of parameters:
m - number of parameters in the model
A(I) - i-th parameter in the estimated probability density function(pdf)
f(0) - 1/u = value of pdf at zero for line transects
u - W*p = ESW, effective detection area for line transects
h(0) - 2*PI/v
v - PI*W*W*p, is the effective detection area for point transects
p - probability of observing an object in defined area
ESW - for line transects, effective strip width = W*p
EDR - for point transects, effective detection radius = W*sqrt(p)
rho - for cue counts, the cue rate
DS - estimate of density of clusters
E(S) - estimate of expected value of cluster size
D - estimate of density of animals
N - estimate of number of animals in specified area
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 511.4098
Left : 6.391710
# observations: 402
Model 1
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Results:
Convergence was achieved with 14 function evaluations.
Final Ln(likelihood) value = -2251.5532
Akaike information criterion = 4507.1064
Bayesian information criterion = 4515.0996
AICc = 4507.1367
Final parameter values: 100.82825 3.8298367
Model 2
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Simple polynomial adjustments of order(s) : 4
Results:
Convergence was achieved with 15 function evaluations.
Final Ln(likelihood) value = -2251.2500
Akaike information criterion = 4508.5000
Bayesian information criterion = 4520.4893
AICc = 4508.5601
Final parameter values: 99.744708 3.7170846 -0.44517352
Likelihood ratio test between models 1 and 2
Likelihood ratio test value = 0.6065
Probability of a greater value = 0.436106
*** Model 1 selected over model 2 based on minimum AIC
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 511.4098
Left : 6.391710
# observations: 402
Model
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Point Standard Percent Coef. 95 Percent
Parameter Estimate Error of Variation Confidence Interval
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
A( 1) 100.8 5.203
A( 2) 3.830 0.2109
h(0) 0.10966E-03 0.78272E-05 7.14 0.95319E-04 0.12616E-03
p 0.69735E-01 0.49775E-02 7.14 0.60616E-01 0.80225E-01
EDR 135.05 4.8198 3.57 125.90 144.86
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
Sampling Correlation of Estimated Parameters
A( 1) A( 2)
A( 1) 1.000 0.760
A( 2) 0.760 1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
-----------------------
D_n = 0.0408 p = 0.5160
Cramer-von Mises family tests
-----------------------------
W-sq (uniform weighting) = 0.1162 0.500 < p <= 0.600
Relevant critical values:
W-sq crit(alpha=0.600) = 0.0968
W-sq crit(alpha=0.500) = 0.1187
C-sq (cosine weighting) = 0.0657 0.500 < p <= 0.600
Relevant critical values:
C-sq crit(alpha=0.600) = 0.0622
C-sq crit(alpha=0.500) = 0.0769
Cell Cut Observed Expected Chi-square
i Points Values Values Values
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 6.39 26.6 20 14.69 1.921
2 26.6 46.8 31 32.68 0.086
3 46.8 67.0 45 50.60 0.620
4 67.0 87.2 72 63.50 1.139
5 87.2 107. 56 58.77 0.130
6 107. 128. 29 44.77 5.556
7 128. 148. 35 32.23 0.239
8 148. 168. 25 23.22 0.136
9 168. 188. 23 17.05 2.076
10 188. 208. 17 12.81 1.369
11 208. 229. 11 9.84 0.136
12 229. 249. 13 7.72 3.616
13 249. 269. 5 6.16 0.218
14 269. 289. 3 5.00 0.797
15 289. 309. 3 4.11 0.299
16 309. 330. 1 3.42 1.712
17 330. 350. 0 2.88 2.878
18 350. 370. 4 2.45 0.988
19 370. 390. 2 2.10 0.004
20 390. 410. 4 1.81 2.643
21 410. 431. 0 1.58 1.577
22 431. 451. 0 1.38 1.381
23 451. 471. 1 1.22 0.039
24 471. 491. 1 1.08 0.006
25 491. 511. 1 0.96 0.002
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total Chi-square value = 29.5663 Degrees of Freedom = 22.00
Probability of a greater chi-square value, P = 0.12939
The program has limited capability for pooling. The user should
judge the necessity for pooling and if necessary, do pooling by hand.
Goodness of Fit Testing with some Pooling
Cell Cut Observed Expected Chi-square
i Points Values Values Values
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 6.39 26.6 20 14.69 1.921
2 26.6 46.8 31 32.68 0.086
3 46.8 67.0 45 50.60 0.620
4 67.0 87.2 72 63.50 1.139
5 87.2 107. 56 58.77 0.130
6 107. 128. 29 44.77 5.556
7 128. 148. 35 32.23 0.239
8 148. 168. 25 23.22 0.136
9 168. 188. 23 17.05 2.076
10 188. 208. 17 12.81 1.369
11 208. 229. 11 9.84 0.136
12 229. 249. 13 7.72 3.616
13 249. 269. 5 6.16 0.218
14 269. 289. 3 5.00 0.797
15 289. 309. 3 4.11 0.299
16 309. 330. 1 3.42 1.712
17 330. 350. 0 2.88 2.878
18 350. 370. 4 2.45 0.988
19 370. 390. 2 2.10 0.004
20 390. 410. 4 1.81 2.643
21 410. 431. 0 1.58 1.577
22 431. 451. 0 1.38 1.381
23 451. 471. 1 1.22 0.039
24 471. 511. 2 2.04 0.001
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total Chi-square value = 29.5597 Degrees of Freedom = 21.00
Probability of a greater chi-square value, P = 0.10120
Effort : 190.0000
# samples : 96
Width : 511.4098
Left : 6.391710
# observations: 402
Model 1
Hazard Rate key, k(y) = 1 - Exp(-(y/A(1))**-A(2))
Point Standard Percent Coef. 95% Percent
Parameter Estimate Error of Variation Confidence Interval
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
D 36.926 3.6607 9.91 30.398 44.857
N 886.00 87.835 9.91 730.00 1077.0
--------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------------------
Measurement Units
---------------------------------
Density: Numbers/Sq. kilometers
EDR: meters
Component Percentages of Var(D)
-------------------------------
Detection probability : 51.8
Encounter rate : 48.2
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
n 402.00
k 96.000
K 190.00
n/K 2.1158 6.88 95.00 1.8460 2.4250
Left 6.3917
Width 511.41
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
Hazard/Polynomial
m 2.0000
LnL -2251.6
AIC 4507.1
AICc 4507.1
BIC 4515.1
Chi-p 0.10120
h(0) 0.10966E-03 7.14 400.00 0.95319E-04 0.12616E-03
p 0.69735E-01 7.14 400.00 0.60616E-01 0.80225E-01
EDR 135.05 3.57 400.00 125.90 144.86
Estimate %CV df 95% Confidence Interval
------------------------------------------------------
Hazard/Polynomial
D 36.926 9.91 321.20 30.398 44.857
N 886.00 9.91 321.20 730.00 1077.0