<!-- markdownlint-disable-file MD013 -->

# ADR Evaluation Scorecard

```text
ADR EVALUATION SCORECARD
═══════════════════════════

ADR: ADR-0.0.5-evaluation-infrastructure
Evaluator: Claude Opus 4.6
Date: 2026-03-26

─── ADR-Level Scores ───────────────────────────

| # | Dimension              | Weight | Score (1-4) | Weighted |
|---|------------------------|--------|-------------|----------|
| 1 | Problem Clarity        | 15%    | 4           | 0.60     |
| 2 | Decision Justification | 15%    | 4           | 0.60     |
| 3 | Feature Checklist      | 15%    | 3           | 0.45     |
| 4 | OBPI Decomposition     | 15%    | 4           | 0.60     |
| 5 | Lane Assignment        | 10%    | 3           | 0.30     |
| 6 | Scope Discipline       | 10%    | 4           | 0.40     |
| 7 | Evidence Requirements  | 10%    | 3           | 0.30     |
| 8 | Architectural Alignment| 10%    | 4           | 0.40     |

WEIGHTED TOTAL: 3.65/4.0
THRESHOLD: 3.0 (GO), 2.5 (CONDITIONAL GO), <2.5 (NO GO)

─── ADR Dimension Detail ──────────────────────

1. Problem Clarity (4/4): Concrete before/after/so-what with evidence. Cites
   instruction_eval.py 10-case baseline as proof of concept. Names 5 AI-sensitive
   surfaces with gap analysis table.

2. Decision Justification (4/4): 4 decisions, each with independent rationale,
   8 alternatives rejected with specific reasoning, codebase precedents cited
   with line numbers (instruction_eval.py:73-178, gates.py:57-82).

3. Feature Checklist (3/4): 4 items at consistent granularity, each maps to one
   OBPI, logically ordered (data->runner->gate->detection). Minor gap: no mention
   of eval result visualization for operators, but reasonable to defer.

4. OBPI Decomposition (4/4): 4 briefs with full template structure. Explicit
   Allowed/Denied paths, 5-6 FAIL-CLOSED requirements each, REQ-numbered
   acceptance criteria. Dependency graph documented and acyclic with 2-stage
   parallel execution.

5. Lane Assignment (3/4): Lite is defensible -- all internal tooling. OBPI-03
   (gate integration) is borderline since it changes Gate 2 behavior, but adds
   signals within an existing gate rather than creating a new external contract.
   Rationale is provided.

6. Scope Discipline (4/4): 5 explicit non-goals with rationale. Each fences off
   an adjacent concern (runtime monitoring, LLM-as-judge, cost tracking, model
   training, gate expansion). Self-contained with no unresolved dependencies.

7. Evidence Requirements (3/4): Each OBPI has Verification section with concrete
   commands and 4-5 REQ-numbered acceptance criteria. Minor weakness: some
   verification commands reference modules that don't exist yet (speculative).

8. Architectural Alignment (4/4): 6-row integration table with exact module paths.
   References 5 exemplar files. Non-goals fence off anti-patterns. Follows
   established Pydantic, unittest, and quality.py patterns.

─── OBPI-Level Scores ──────────────────────────

| OBPI | Independence | Testability | Value | Size | Clarity | Avg |
|------|-------------|-------------|-------|------|---------|-----|
| 01   | 4           | 4           | 4     | 3    | 3       | 3.6 |
| 02   | 3           | 4           | 4     | 3    | 3       | 3.4 |
| 03   | 3           | 4           | 3     | 3    | 4       | 3.4 |
| 04   | 3           | 3           | 3     | 3    | 3       | 3.0 |

OBPI AVERAGE: 3.35/4.0
OBPI THRESHOLD: Average >= 3.0 per OBPI. Any OBPI scoring 1 on
any dimension must be revised.

All OBPIs above threshold. No dimension scores 1.

─── Red-Team Challenges ────────────────────────

Not requested for this evaluation.

| # | Challenge      | Result | Notes                                    |
|---|----------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| 1 | So What?       | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 2 | Scope          | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 3 | Alternative    | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 4 | Dependency     | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 5 | Gold Standard  | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 6 | Timeline       | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 7 | Evidence       | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 8 | Consumer       | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 9 | Regression     | --     | Not evaluated                            |
| 10| Parity         | --     | Not evaluated                            |

─── Overall Verdict ────────────────────────────

[X] GO - Ready for proposal/defense review

ADR-0.0.5 is a well-structured foundation ADR with concrete problem framing,
evidence-backed decisions, explicit scope boundaries, and 4 independently
completable OBPIs with full brief templates.

ACTION ITEMS:
1. Consider whether OBPI-03 (gate integration) warrants Heavy lane given it
   changes Gate 2 behavior for operators. Current Lite assignment is defensible
   but borderline.
2. Define "golden path" more precisely per AI-sensitive surface in OBPI-01
   brief to reduce implementation ambiguity.
3. Speculative verification commands in briefs should be updated to real
   commands once modules are created during implementation.
```
