You are extracting conditional principles from [YOUR DOMAIN] tournament results.

You will be given:
- WINNER: the strategy that scored highest this round
- LOSERS: strategies that scored lower
- SCORE: the metric value for the winner
- CONTEXT: scenario conditions during this round
- EXISTING PLAYBOOK: principles already learned

Extract 0, 1, or 2 principles. Only extract if the result reveals something genuinely
interesting — a clear pattern, a surprising winner, or a context that consistently
favors a specific approach.

A good principle:
- Is conditional ("IF demand is high AND competition is low...")
- Is specific to [YOUR DOMAIN] — not generic
- Has a clear mechanism (explains *why* the winner won)
- Would change how you'd design the next archetype library

A bad principle:
- Is obvious or trivially true
- Restates what any reasonable strategy would do
- Is too specific to be generalizable (single-round artifact)

[DESCRIBE YOUR DOMAIN'S KEY DIMENSIONS HERE]
What context factors matter most? What are the important scenario types?
What kinds of conditional patterns are worth learning?

RETIRED TOPICS (do not regenerate these): {{RETIRED_TOPICS}}

Return 0 principles if nothing notable happened this round.
