### **ChatGPT**

Got it: one 16GB laptop, and Claude Code can run ~15 concurrent agents (and you’re treating that as your “labor capacity” multiplier).
That means your “compute scaling” in years 0–2 is mostly:

parallelism + orchestration discipline

not local heavy inference (16GB laptop is not a serious local LLM box)

Here’s how you design the zero-HITL loop around 15 concurrent agents.

1) Treat “15 agents” as a fixed worker pool with a scheduler
You don’t let all 15 do big-brain work. You stratify:

2× Strategists (Opus / best model)
Only: architecture decisions, risk decisions, capital allocation, kill decisions.

6× Builders (mid model)
Only: implement tasks, write code, ship artifacts, generate content.

4× Operators (cheap model)
Only: run checklists, update ledgers, monitor metrics, prepare reports, run playbooks.

2× Verifiers (independent)
Only: validate outputs, run tests, sanity-check claims, policy compliance.

1× Dispatcher (cheap model, tiny prompts)
Only: break down work, enqueue tasks, de-duplicate, rate-limit.

That’s your operating system. Concurrency is worthless without role discipline.

2) Enforce a hard “token burn budget” per role
Your biggest failure mode with 15 agents is runaway token spend.
So you set budgets like:

Strategists: 10–15% of monthly tokens total

Builders: 50–60%

Operators + Dispatcher: 10–20%

Verifiers: 10–15%

And you force every task to declare:

expected token cost

max retries

success criteria

If the task can’t explain its cost, it doesn’t run.

3) Your laptop is a control plane, not a compute plane
On a 16GB laptop, your reliable zero-HITL usage is:

orchestration

git operations

lightweight tests

packaging

deploying small services

running scrapers (careful) and ETL

But you do not do heavy local inference or heavy builds if you can avoid it.
So the system’s next “compute upgrades” should be:

More Claude capacity / more keys (parallel runs, more throughput)

Cheap cloud runners (CI builds, E2E tests, scraping jobs)

Later: local GPU machine(s) or rented GPUs

The laptop stays the “brain terminal.”

4) With 15 agents, your bottleneck becomes coordination + verification
So you run waves:
Wave A: Plan + Spec (2–3 agents)

1 strategist drafts plan

1 verifier checks feasibility + risk

dispatcher turns into tasks

Wave B: Build (6–8 agents)

builders implement in parallel

operators maintain logs + metrics

Wave C: Verify + Release (2–3 agents)

verifiers run tests, check policy, check regression

release agent deploys

operator writes postmortem if needed

No wave overlap unless the task is independent.
That alone prevents chaos.

5) “Labor factoring” means you price agent work like labor hours
You can literally treat agent throughput as “virtual labor” and allocate it like a budget:

Each task gets a max agent-minutes allocation

Each retry consumes budget

If it exceeds, it auto-escalates to:

either a strategist review

or auto-kill the task

This is how you prevent infinite loops.

6) Minimal zero-HITL operating loop (daily)
Even fully autonomous, you need a deterministic cadence:
Daily

Pull metrics (revenue, churn, spend, compute burn, ads, incidents)

Update venture scores (CEI, risk clusters, runway)

Generate 3–10 proposals (small experiments)

Fund only those under exploration cap

Execute build/marketing/sales tasks via the agent pool

Verify outputs + ship

Enforce kill thresholds

Weekly

rebalance portfolio allocations

prune bottom quartile experiments

increase spend only if ROI proven

run “crisis drill lite” simulation

7) What “scaling compute” looks like with 15 agents
You scale in this order:

Concurrency efficiency (better scheduling, less duplication)

API redundancy (more keys/plans/providers)

Cloud execution workers (cheap runners for CI, scraping, rendering)

Local GPU nodes (only once you have stable cashflow)

Colo/rack (only when utilization is consistently high)

So the first scaling step is almost always “more orchestration + more keys,” not hardware.

8) The concrete constraint this adds to the 5-year story
With 15 agents, Year 1–2 becomes far more plausible without hiring humans, because:

you can run parallel outbound, content, product iterations, and support automation.

But you must keep:

verification strict

spend bounded

wave scheduling enforced

Otherwise 15 agents just means 15 ways to light money on fire.

If you want the next piece, I’d write the exact role cards + task schema for the 15-agent pool (what each agent is allowed to do, what tools they can call, max retries, max token spend, and the required output format).

---

