### **You**

Below is a 5-year “labor + services class map” for a zero-HITL venture organism, grounded in real vendor categories and how they slot into each evolutionary phase. The intent is: your agents can procure these services like APIs (RFQ → deliverable → QA → pay), while you scale from laptop + Claude into multi-region ops.
I’m grouping by what you can realistically buy at each phase, and why it’s the right class for that phase.

Year 0–1: Bootstrap labor you can buy cheaply and repeatedly
You’re compute/automation heavy; you need small, bounded deliverables. The best sources are general freelancer marketplaces with broad categories.
Service classes

Design & Creative (brand starter kit)

Logo, minimal brand tokens, app/store screenshots, landing page hero assets

These map cleanly to Fiverr’s “Graphics & Design” and “Video & Animation” categories. Fiverr.com+1

Dev execution bursts

Landing pages, small integrations, scripts, scrapers, quick fixes

Upwork’s categorization explicitly covers the “find by skill” workflow you’ll use for procurement. Upwork Help

Copy + content

Sales pages, onboarding emails, SEO drafts (with agent review)

Fiverr includes “Writing & Translation” and “Digital Marketing.” Fiverr.com+1

Video/audio micro-assets

Short explainer clips, simple motion graphics, voiceover cleanup

Fiverr has “Video & Animation” and “Music & Audio.” Fiverr.com+1

Why this class works in Year 1: it’s modular, repeatable, and easy to QA with deterministic checks (format, resolution, brand tokens, copy lint).

Year 1–2: Add “specialists” once you have traction
At this stage, your bottleneck becomes quality and conversion, not output volume.
Service classes

Paid media / growth specialists

Campaign setup + tuning, creative iteration systems

Toptal explicitly lists paid media and broader marketing experts as available talent categories (higher quality, higher price). Toptal+1

Product/Project Management

Tight execution plans, sprint structuring, deliverable decomposition

Toptal lists PM/TPM/scrum roles. Toptal

Finance / FP&A modeling

Unit economics, cashflow modeling, pricing analysis

Toptal includes finance and management consulting categories. Toptal

Customer support “proto-outsourcing”

Start with part-time coverage, templated macros, KB drafts

Outsourced helpdesk / Zendesk-style outsourcing is a standard model (ticket handling, coverage scaling). Zenkins+1

Why this class works in Year 2: your agent org can keep building, but specialists increase ROI per dollar (ads efficiency, funnel conversion, retention).

Year 2–3: Introduce fulfillment/ops vendors (semi-physical begins)
This is where you stop being “just digital.” The key is using vendors that behave like logistics APIs.
Service classes

Print-on-demand and low-risk fulfillment

Printful is literally positioned as: you market; they produce/pack/ship; no upfront inventory. Printful+1

This is ideal “semi-physical” because you avoid working capital traps.

3PL fulfillment and integrated logistics

A 3PL like Flexport explicitly sells end-to-end logistics/fulfillment with platform integrations. Flexport+1

Use this once order volume makes self-fulfillment stupid.

Quality inspection as an externalized QC organ

SGS offers inspection services across production stages (during production, final random inspection, loading supervision, etc.). SGSCorp

This is how you keep “zero-HITL” while not trusting factories.

Why this class works in Year 3: you’re converting physical ops into “verified milestones” (inspection proofs + scan events) so agents can enforce contracts without humans babysitting.

Year 3–4: Multi-region operations + compliance throughput
Now your risk is not “can we ship,” it’s can we operate across jurisdictions/platforms without getting wrecked.
Service classes

Compliance / regulatory capacity

Not “lawyering everything manually,” but buying compliance throughput: policy templates, audits, review capacity (your own RCU concept).

Your agents treat this as a gated service with audit trail requirements (the treaty module you designed).

Scaled customer support (BPO style)

Move from part-time freelancers to SLA-based coverage (L1/L2 escalation tree).

Outsourced helpdesk services are explicitly structured as multi-tier support + SLA operations. Zenkins

Higher-grade talent network for critical functions

When a function becomes existential (security, architecture, high-stakes growth), use vetted networks like Toptal categories to reduce variance. Toptal

Why this class works in Year 4: you’re building survivability—support SLAs, compliance, and high-variance functions get “industrialized.”

Year 4–5: “Multinational” posture (distributed suppliers + distributed fulfillment + distributed talent)
At this point, “multinational” means: your system can operate across markets with modular vendors and strict contracts.
Service classes

Global logistics + replenishment planning

You’ll want end-to-end freight + fulfillment coordination rather than piecemeal vendors; Flexport explicitly positions end-to-end logistics + fulfillment. Flexport+1

Inspection networks at scale

You’ll use inspection providers repeatedly and automatically (pre-production, during production, final inspection, loading). SGSCorp

Store/platform compliance costs

If mobile is in scope, the Apple Developer Program fee is a real fixed cost ($99/yr) you model into the sovereign burn. Apple Developer+1

Compute procurement (between “subscriptions” and “datacenters”)

In practice: you’ll be buying “compute rights” from multiple providers (cloud + hosted), before you ever own racks. (This maps to the compute exchange module you built; vendor sourcing is your job, but the class is stable.)

Why this class works in Year 5: multinational = redundancy + verification + jurisdictional agility, not owning buildings.

The procurement pattern your agents should use for every class
To keep it zero-HITL, every vendor category above must be acquired through the same deterministic pipeline:

RFQ Spec (machine-readable)
Scope, acceptance criteria, format, deadline, budget cap, evidence required.

Milestone escrow (or staged payment)
Release only on verified evidence.

QA gate (automated as much as possible)
Linting for copy, asset dimensions, A/B test readiness, inspection evidence completeness, scan events, etc.

Trust event logging
Late delivery / defects / rework loop → feeds your internal trust graph and future vendor selection.

This is exactly why inspection services and 3PLs matter: they generate verifiable artifacts (inspection reports, scan events, milestone tracking) instead of “trust me.”

Minimal “service class ladder” summary

Year 1: Fiverr/Upwork-style modular freelancing categories (design/copy/dev/media). Fiverr.com+1

Year 2: Toptal-grade specialists + early support outsourcing. Toptal+1

Year 3: POD + 3PL + inspection networks (turn physical into auditable steps). Shopify App Store+2Flexport+2

Year 4: SLA support + compliance throughput + higher-grade talent. Zenkins+1

Year 5: multi-region logistics + inspection scaling + platform fixed costs modeled + compute rights procurement. Flexport+2SGSCorp+2

If you want the next increment, tell me which “service class family” to go deepest on first:

Hiring/procurement automation (Upwork/Fiverr/Toptal into your treaty-style contracts)

Fulfillment stack (POD → 3PL → freight → customs)

QC/inspection as a proof system (SGS-style proofs → penalties → vendor trust graph)

---

### **ChatGPT**

For yr1 and 2 need granular down to day or hour scale

---

### **ChatGPT**

Alright — here’s a zero-HITL, day/hour-level operating schedule for Year 1 and Year 2 assuming:

16GB laptop (control plane)

Claude Code with 15 concurrent agents

External budgets: $200/mo services + $100/mo capital

System is autonomous after Genesis (no manual steering)

Vendors/humans are procured via bounded RFQs + QA gates + escrow/milestones

I’m going to give you:

A daily/hourly cadence (the “OS loop”)

Day-by-day plan for the first 30 days (boot + first revenue engine)

Day-by-day plan for Days 31–90 (validation + scale + second engine trigger)

Year 1 months 4–12 as weekly + daily runbooks (because day-by-day for 365 days is noise)

Year 2: the same, but with added systems (internal capital market, vendor trust graph, compliance, physical/POD readiness)

0) The 15-agent workcell schedule (hour-level)
Role allocation (fixed)

Dispatcher (1): task decomposition, queue, dedupe, budgets

Strategists (2): Opus/strong model only; portfolio decisions, kill/scale, risk

Builders (6): implementation, content, outreach assets, product iteration

Operators (4): monitoring, logs, metric ingestion, vendor RFQs, publishing/scheduling

Verifiers (2): tests, QA, policy compliance, “no hallucinated claims”

Wave model (repeat every day)
Wave A (Plan) → Wave B (Build/Run) → Wave C (Verify/Ship)

1) Daily operating cadence (hour-by-hour)
This is the default daily loop, 7 days/week. (Weekend is lower intensity; same structure.)
06:00–07:00 — Metrics + Health Ingest (Operators)

Pull: revenue, signups, churn, refunds/chargebacks, uptime, spend, token burn

Update venture ledger + risk/dependency graph

07:00–08:00 — Allocation Council (Strategists + Verifiers)

Decide: today’s top 3 objectives

Decide: experiments to fund (max exploration cap)

Decide: kill/continue

Output: signed “Daily Directive” (machine-readable)

08:00–10:00 — Build Sprint 1 (Builders)

Implement highest ROI tasks

Generate content batches

Create outreach sequences

Prepare vendor RFQs if needed

10:00–11:00 — Verification Gate 1 (Verifiers)

Run tests, lint copy, validate claims, policy rules

Reject/return tasks that fail

11:00–13:00 — Execute/Publish (Operators)

Deploy code

Schedule posts

Send outreach

Push updates

Open/close vendor work orders

13:00–15:00 — Build Sprint 2 (Builders)

Secondary tasks + follow-ups

Fix issues from verification

Iterate funnel pages

15:00–16:00 — Verification Gate 2 (Verifiers)

Final checks for anything shipping today

16:00–17:00 — Closeout + Learning (Strategists)

Update priors (what worked/failed)

Adjust tomorrow’s hypothesis set

Update kill thresholds and spend caps if needed (within constitution)

17:00–06:00 — Monitoring + Alerts (Operators)

anomaly detection

incident runbooks

auto rollback triggers

That’s the daily “organism metabolism.”

YEAR 1 (Day-by-day)
Days 1–7: Genesis + Factory scaffolding (no revenue yet)
Day 1

Create Constitution (hard limits): liquidity floor, exploration cap, max spend ratios, ban-safe comms rules

Create repo templates:

Venture template (web/app + billing + analytics)

Content engine template

Outreach engine template

Create KPI schema + ledger

Day 2

Implement task queue + role permissions (who can spend, who can deploy)

Implement “Kill Switch” + rollback automation (basic)

Day 3

Build Opportunity Scanner:

scrape 10–20 niche sources

cluster pains

output top 10 opportunities with CEI estimate

Day 4

Select Venture #1 (must be: fast build, clear buyer, low liability)

Draft PRD + user journey + pricing hypothesis

Day 5

Build MVP skeleton:

landing page

Stripe checkout

onboarding

core workflow stub

Day 6

Build “Proof of Value” demo path:

one core workflow fully working

Write 10 outreach messages + 3 landing variants

Day 7

Soft launch:

outreach v1

SEO starter (3 articles)

analytics events + conversion funnel

Goal by Day 7: working checkout + at least 10 conversations started.

Days 8–14: First revenue proof
Day 8

Run outreach batch 1 (100–300 targets depending niche)

Collect responses, tag objections

Day 9

Implement top requested fix (must be <1 day)

Add FAQ + objection-handling page

Day 10

Add “activation” automation (email sequence, in-app guide)

Create 5 more SEO pages

Day 11

Pricing test A/B (2 tiers)

Add refund policy + trust signals

Day 12

More outreach batch 2

Add testimonials if any; otherwise “case study in progress” without lying

Day 13

Instrument retention:

day 1/3/7 retention events

Add lightweight support bot macros

Day 14

First weekly review:

If 0 paying customers → pivot the offer or niche immediately

If 1–3 paying → improve activation + keep outreach

If 4+ paying → begin scaling acquisition

Days 15–30: Stabilize + make it repeatable
Day 15–16

Build v2 onboarding + reduce friction

Build “one-click” value moment

Day 17

Vendor procurement (uses your $200/mo):

buy logo/hero asset OR short explainer OR UI polish

strict acceptance criteria

Day 18–19

Build content batcher:

20 posts + 5 blog drafts scheduled

Build lead list automation (if B2B)

Day 20

Add referral loop (simple)

Add “annual plan” option

Day 21

Weekly review:

If MRR < $200 by now → hard pivot (new niche or new problem)

Day 22–24

Double down on what converts:

rewrite landing with highest performing messaging

sharpen ICP

add 1 premium feature

Day 25–27

Outreach batch 3 (larger)

Add one new channel (community OR SEO OR partnerships)

Day 28–30

Tighten analytics + unit economics:

CAC proxy

time-to-value

churn reasons

Target by Day 30: $300–$1,000 MRR or clear pipeline indicating it’s imminent.
If not: Venture #1 is downgraded and you start Venture #1b.

Days 31–90: Get to operational self-sufficiency
From here, daily structure remains the hour-level loop above, but objectives change weekly.
Week 5 (Days 31–37): Scale what works or pivot fast

If traction: scale outreach + SEO + onboarding refinement

If not: pivot to Venture #1b by Day 40

Week 6 (Days 38–44): “MRR to Buffer” phase

Enforce: 50% of net margin → liquidity buffer

Only 15% max to exploration

Week 7 (Days 45–51): Start Venture #2 scouting

Don’t build yet; select 2 candidates

Venture #2 must have a different failure mode than #1

Week 8 (Days 52–58): Venture #2 MVP build

Repeat Days 4–7 process but faster (you have templates now)

Week 9 (Days 59–65): Venture #2 launch + iterate

Outreach + funnel improvements

Week 10 (Days 66–72): Add retention + support automation

Reduce churn

Make support deterministic (macros, KB, automated triage)

Week 11 (Days 73–79): Risk & dependency audit

If any single channel > 60% → start alternate channel now

Week 12 (Days 80–90): Self-sufficiency check
Pass criteria:

Monthly revenue ≥ monthly burn (Claude + hosting + vendor spend)

Liquidity ≥ 2 months burn (by end of Month 3, conservative)

If passed:

System begins autonomous reinvestment without needing your $300/mo.

Year 1 Months 4–12: Weekly playbooks (still zero-HITL)
From Month 4 onward, the system runs weekly cycles with daily cadence.
Weekly cycle structure
Mon: Portfolio council + capital allocation + kill decisions
Tue–Thu: Build/ship/market waves
Fri: Verify + finance reconciliation + vendor scoring
Sat: SEO/content batch day (cheap model heavy)
Sun: Crisis drill lite + dependency audit + backlogs
Month milestones

Month 4–5: 2 ventures stable, begin 3rd exploration

Month 6: operational self-sufficiency (no external subsidy needed)

Month 7–9: diversify channels + add external low-risk yield bucket

Month 10–12: formalize “venture boundaries” (separate accounts, separate ad accounts, separate logs)

End of Year 1 target (realistic):

2–3 revenue engines

Liquidity buffer 6 months burn

No channel dependency > 50%

Unit economics measurable

YEAR 2 (granular cadence, but with added systems)
Year 2 is when you stop being “two apps” and start being a portfolio organism.
Daily cadence stays the same hour-by-hour.
What changes is what runs automatically each day.
Daily (Year 2) additions

Venture bidding submissions generated automatically (internal capital market)

Vendor trust score updates and automatic rotation

Regime/risk detection (platform ban likelihood, ad volatility, churn spikes)

Automatic budget throttling (ads + compute)

Year 2: Week-by-week structure (repeatable)
Week 1 of every month: “Budget + Allocation Week”

Rebalance capital between ventures

Expand or kill bottom quartile

Lock exploration budget for the month

Decide compute scaling if thresholds met

Week 2: “Growth Week”

Scale winners (ads/SEO/outbound)

Increase distribution

Improve conversion

Week 3: “Reliability Week”

Reduce churn

Improve onboarding

Support automation

Incident hardening

Week 4: “Expansion Week”

Launch new micro-venture experiments

Acquire small digital assets if rules allow

Begin physical/POD only if criteria met

Year 2 “hour-level” special days
Monthly “Audit Day” (one day/month)

4 hours: finance reconciliation, spend anomalies, contractor payment integrity

2 hours: dependency graph audit

2 hours: compliance scan (claims, privacy, policy)

Monthly “Crisis Drill Day” (one day/month)

Simulate:

30% revenue drop

main channel disabled

compute cost spike

Ensure the system auto-contracts and survives

Year 2: Trigger-based compute scaling (still zero-HITL)
Because laptop is control plane, scaling means:

more subscriptions / keys

more cloud runners

later: local GPU node

Automatic triggers

If compute spend > 15% revenue for 2 months AND payback < 12 months → acquire cheaper compute tier (cloud runners first)

If continuous utilization supports it AND liquidity ≥ 9 months → buy local GPU node

If cluster needed AND liquidity ≥ 12 months → consider colo

No human.

What “success” means by end of Year 2

3–6 ventures (some will be killed)

One or two strong engines dominate revenue, but dependency caps enforced

12 months liquidity buffer (target)

Vendor trust graph stabilized (you have “go-to” execution nodes)

Now you’re ready to scale compute/hardware without risking death spiral

If you want “hour-level day plan” beyond the first 90 days
I can generate a repeatable 7-day schedule template per venture type (SaaS vs agency vs POD) and an autonomous scheduler policy that decides which template runs each day based on metrics.
Say:

“give me SaaS week template”

“give me outbound agency week template”

“give me POD week template”
and I’ll output them in hour blocks with task queues and agent assignments.

---

### **ChatGPT**

Give me agent idling patterns, how would effectively an always on office be built?

---

### **ChatGPT**

Here’s how to think about “agent idling” and an always-on office in a way that’s stable, cheap, and doesn’t melt your token budget.
1) The core mistake to avoid
If you keep 15 agents “awake” doing stuff, you get:

duplicated work

noisy logs

hallucinated actions

runaway spend

An always-on office is not 15 agents chatting all day.
It’s one tiny on-duty sentinel that wakes specialists only when there’s a reason.

2) The right mental model: office roles + shift system
A) Always-on “front desk” (Sentinel)
Always running. Cheapest model.

polls metrics + inboxes + queues

detects events

files tickets

wakes other agents with a bounded task spec

never writes code, never spends money directly

Think: receptionist + security guard + dispatcher.
B) On-call “managers” (Strategists)
Mostly asleep.

wake on: thresholds, incidents, weekly planning, big spend decisions

approve/deny actions via policy engine rules (not “judgment calls”)

C) “Workers” (Builders/Operators/Verifiers)
Burst execution only.

wake → do job → produce artifact → go idle

strict timebox and retry caps

That’s your idling pattern: sentinel idle + burst workcell.

3) Concrete agent idling patterns
Pattern 1: Heartbeat-only idle
Agent wakes every N minutes, does a single cheap check, sleeps.

N = 5–15 min for critical monitors

N = 60–360 min for noncritical

Uses:

checking revenue/ads/spend deltas

uptime checks

queue backlog checks

“did anything change?” hashes

Pattern 2: Event-driven wake (preferred)
No polling spam. The office is driven by:

webhooks (Stripe, GitHub, uptime monitor, ad platforms)

cron-generated “ticks” (daily/weekly cycles)

internal queue events (job posted / job failed)

Sentinel only wakes workers when an event hits.
Pattern 3: Budget-gated idle
When token spend is near cap, system automatically shifts into:

“monitor-only” mode

no content generation

no exploration

only incident response + revenue-critical work

Pattern 4: Cooldown after action
After any risky operation (deploy, ad spend change, vendor payment):

enforce a cooldown window (e.g., 2–6 hours)

only monitoring allowed unless severity is high

Stops oscillations and “thrash.”
Pattern 5: On-call rotation
Even if you have 15 agents, only one verifier and one operator are on-call at a time.

reduces duplicated reviews

clean accountability trail

4) “Always-on office” architecture that actually works
A 16GB laptop is a terrible always-on server (sleep, Wi-Fi drops, OS updates).
So the real always-on office is:
Always-on base layer (cheap)

$5–$20/mo VPS (or any always-on cloud instance)

runs: queue + scheduler + webhook receiver + ledger + policy engine

stores tasks and state

wakes agents as needed

Execution layer (bursty)

Claude Code agents run when dispatched

optional: cloud runners for builds/tests (cheap, ephemeral)

Your laptop

optional “console”

can join as an execution worker when online

not required for continuity

This is how you get true 24/7 without babysitting hardware.

5) The “Office Loop” (what runs forever)
Every minute (Sentinel)

check queue depth

check alert inbox

check last heartbeat of critical services

compute spend rate vs daily cap

Every 15 minutes (Sentinel)

recompute risk flags:

spend anomalies

conversion drop

churn spike

platform ban indicators

if any threshold triggers → open incident ticket + wake on-call verifier

Daily (Scheduler)

“daily directive” job:

run KPI summary

pick today’s 3 objectives (from policy rules + backlogs)

allocate work blocks

then dispatch tasks in waves

Weekly (Scheduler)

portfolio rebalance job:

update CEI scores

kill/continue decisions (rule-based)

exploration budget allocation

vendor score updates

6) How agents should idle without losing context
Don’t keep long chats open
Instead:

every agent writes outputs to an artifact store (files + structured JSON)

next wake uses:

a short “state header”

pointers to artifacts

diff of what changed

This avoids re-sending massive context and burning tokens.
Use “state snapshots”
After each job:

job\_summary.json

decisions.json

artifacts/ outputs

next\_actions.json

The sentinel reads these, not chat logs.

7) Guardrails that make the office stable
Mandatory

Timeboxing: every job has max runtime + max tokens + max retries

Spend firewall: no agent can spend money directly; only calls “money APIs” with caps

Two-man rule for irreversible actions (agent version):

proposer → verifier → executor

Backpressure:

if queue > X, stop spawning new jobs

if failure rate > Y, pause that pipeline

Nice-to-have

“quarantine mode” if weird behavior detected:

stop outreach

stop ads

stop vendor payments

only monitoring + diagnostics

8) Practical “idling schedule” for your 15-agent pool
At any moment, only these are “awake”:

1 Sentinel (always)

1 On-call Operator (rotating, heartbeat every 15 min)

1 On-call Verifier (rotating, heartbeat every 15 min)

Everyone else:

asleep until assigned a task

wake → execute → write artifacts → sleep

That’s how you get an always-on office that doesn’t burn money.

9) If you want it to feel like a real office
Add “presence behaviors”:

morning standup (automated report + priorities)

end-of-day closeout (what shipped, what broke, what’s next)

incident paging (only when severity thresholds hit)

weekly planning meeting (rule-based backlog + CEI)

All automated, no human required.

If you tell me whether you’re willing to run a small VPS (recommended), I’ll give you the exact minimal service list (queue, scheduler, ledger, webhook receiver) and the exact idling timers/thresholds I’d set for a $200–$300/mo bootstrap regime.

---

### **ChatGPT**

Research modern agent frameworks and systems + tools to assist us, saas (like stripe supabase ramp and otersb) may actually also end up useful in tandem w/ custom built solus.

Agentzero openclaw and others are notable as a baseline but pose prompt injection risks

---

