# **Blueprint for a Causal-Multimodal Engine: Leveraging Gemini Embedding 2 for Creative Performance Attribution and Brand Identity RAG**

## **The Paradigm Shift in Advertising Analytics**

In the contemporary digital advertising ecosystem, understanding the precise drivers of creative performance represents a persistent, high-value challenge. Historically, marketing analytics has relied heavily on predictive machine learning and classical A/B testing to identify which advertising assets generate the highest return on ad spend, click-through rates, or conversion velocities. However, these traditional approaches suffer from fundamental limitations when confronted with the high-dimensional, multimodal reality of modern digital content, such as high-definition video, complex imagery, and dynamic audio tracks.  
A/B testing, while universally considered the gold standard for causal inference in strictly controlled and isolated environments, rapidly succumbs to the mathematical reality of combinatorial explosion when applied to complex media. A standard digital video advertisement comprises thousands of interacting variables—actor demographics, background scenery, typography, logo placement, audio pacing, voiceover tone, and color grading. Testing every permutation to isolate the exact driver of performance is both mathematically infeasible and financially ruinous. Conversely, predictive machine learning models, such as Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Machines, or Deep Neural Networks, are exceptionally proficient at identifying historical correlations but possess no inherent understanding of causation. The dangers of applying purely predictive models to causal business questions are well-documented. If a predictive machine learning model observes that advertisements featuring Christmas trees historically yield high sales volumes, it may erroneously assign a high feature importance to the tree itself, entirely ignoring the underlying temporal confounder, which is the holiday shopping season. Optimizing future ad creatives based on such spurious correlations—for example, by inserting Christmas trees into summer advertising campaigns—inevitably leads to misallocated budgets, degraded brand equity, and perplexed target audiences.  
To successfully transition from asking the rudimentary question "Which creative performed best?" to the significantly more valuable question "Why did this creative perform better?", the analytical framework must undergo a paradigm shift from predictive correlation to rigorous causal inference. This transition requires a highly sophisticated system capable of parsing unstructured multimodal assets into structured, quantifiable variables and subsequently applying advanced econometric frameworks to isolate the true causal effect of specific creative features. The advent of native multimodal foundation models, specifically Google's Gemini Embedding 2, provides the critical computational infrastructure required to bridge the massive gap between unstructured visual media and precise causal econometrics. By integrating the native multimodal extraction and embedding capabilities of Gemini with advanced causal inference techniques such as Double Machine Learning and Causal Representation Learning, organizations can construct an engine that not only attributes performance to specific visual metadata but also enforces brand consistency through an automated multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation ecosystem.

## **Foundation: The Gemini Embedding 2 Multimodal Architecture**

The architectural core of this proposed analytical engine relies exclusively on the Gemini Embedding 2 model, which represents a fundamental departure from prior generations of embedding technology. Traditional multimodal systems, such as Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining, utilize late-fusion architectures where entirely separate encoders process text and images independently before attempting to align them in a shared vector space via a contrastive loss function. This distinct separation often results in the loss of nuanced cross-modal connections that are formed when different modalities interact naturally in the intermediate layers of a neural network.  
Gemini Embedding 2 is built directly upon the Gemini foundation model itself, inheriting its multimodal understanding from the ground up. It projects text, images, video, audio, and documents into a single joint embedding space through a shared, natively multimodal transformer architecture. This foundational design enables the model to process interleaved modalities within a single API request, capturing the deep semantic relationships between a spoken narration, on-screen dynamic text, and background visuals, ultimately producing a unified dense vector representation that truly captures the holistic meaning of the advertisement.

### **Technical Specifications and Modality Processing Capabilities**

The model's capacity to ingest raw marketing assets without requiring intermediate translation layers—such as the historically necessary step of transcribing audio tracks to text before generating embeddings—drastically reduces technical debt and prevents the loss of critical semantic and prosodic context. The technical specifications dictate its unparalleled utility in an enterprise-scale creative attribution engine. The model supports a substantially expanded text context window of up to 8,192 input tokens, representing a massive four-fold increase over the previous generation's 2,048 token limit. This extended context window is critical for processing dense document chunks without succumbing to context fragmentation, ensuring that long-range dependencies within comprehensive creative briefs, historical campaign data, or exhaustive brand style guides are perfectly preserved within the embedding space.  
Furthermore, the model is fully capable of processing up to six images per request in standard formats, and natively supports up to 120 seconds of video input. For video advertising analysis, this means that dense frame sequences are processed to capture both the visual content and the complex temporal dynamics, enabling the extraction of narrative arcs, scene transition frequencies, and pacing metrics. Audio data is natively ingested and embedded without any intermediate text transcription required, preserving tonal, prosodic, and acoustic features—such as the energy level of a voiceover or the emotional resonance of a background track—that are frequently the hidden drivers of ad performance. Additionally, the engine can directly embed PDF documents of up to six pages, allowing for the seamless ingestion of corporate brand books and highly formatted visual style guides directly into the active vector space.

### **Matryoshka Representation Learning for Vector Optimization**

A critical architectural feature of Gemini Embedding 2 for large-scale enterprise applications is the native incorporation of Matryoshka Representation Learning. High-dimensional dense vectors capture vast amounts of semantic nuance but incur significant computational and storage costs when housed in enterprise vector databases, particularly when scaling to millions of historical ad impressions. Matryoshka Representation Learning addresses this fundamental scaling challenge by architecting the model to store the most critical semantic information within the earliest dimensions of the generated vector.  
While the model outputs a massive default dimension of 3,072, developers and data engineers can dynamically truncate the vector down to 1,536, 768, or even 128 dimensions with minimal loss in overall retrieval accuracy. In the specific context of a creative performance engine analyzing millions of video frames, audio waveforms, and historical ad units, this flexible dimensionality allows the system architecture to perfectly balance the extreme precision required for causal feature attribution against the strict latency limits and storage cost constraints of real-time production retrieval systems.

## **Deconstructing the Creative: Structured Metadata Extraction**

To perform mathematically rigorous causal inference, raw unstructured creative assets must first be transformed into discrete, measurable, and highly structured variables. An advertising asset inherently contains both the specific variables being actively tested and the background variables that simply exist within the environment. While the raw Gemini 2 embeddings capture the holistic semantic meaning of the ad in a dense vector, isolating the precise attributes responsible for driving performance requires extracting structured metadata directly from the pixels and sound waves. Gemini 2.0 facilitates this massive data transformation through its highly reliable Structured Output capabilities, which enforce deterministic data extraction using developer-defined schemas.

### **Schema Definition for Visual and Auditory Attribution**

By defining a strict, statically typed schema utilizing tools like Pydantic in Python, the causal engine can force the Vision-Language Model to evaluate every single ingested ad asset against a standardized corporate taxonomy. This taxonomy ensures that the downstream causal inference models receive clean, uniform, and perfectly formatted data matrices devoid of hallucinated variables. The extraction schema must be explicitly designed by domain experts to capture the precise elements known to influence consumer psychology, brand recall, and conversion likelihood.  
The structured output payload is designed to classify variables across multiple interacting modalities, creating a comprehensive digital twin of the creative asset.

| Modality Category | Extracted Metadata Features (Variables) | Analytical Purpose in Causal Engine |
| :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **Visual Elements** | Object detection (products, faces, animals), spatial ratios (screen percentage dedicated to logo), background setting (indoor, abstract), color grading (dominant hex codes, contrast ratios). | To determine if specific visual stimuli or color temperatures drive higher engagement across different audience segments. |
| **Temporal & Pacing** | Scene transition frequency, time-to-first-logo (measured in exact seconds), total duration of product exposure, dynamic motion intensity scoring. | To evaluate the causal impact of narrative velocity and the optimal timing for brand introduction before user drop-off. |
| **Textual Elements** | On-screen text density, Call-to-action (CTA) classification (e.g., urgency, passive, inquisitive), specific promotional phrasing, typography styles. | To isolate the effect of specific copywriting choices independently of the visual aesthetics carrying the text. |
| **Auditory Elements** | Audio genre classification, voiceover demographic estimation, emotional tone of voiceover (authoritative, conversational, energetic), music tempo. | To measure the subconscious impact of auditory pacing and emotional resonance on final conversion rates. |

*Table 1: Comprehensive Metadata Extraction Schema mapping unstructured multimodal inputs to discrete analytical variables for causal modeling.*  
When an MP4 file or high-resolution image is passed to the Gemini API alongside this specific Pydantic schema, the model's native multimodal processing evaluates the complex interplay of all these elements and returns a type-safe JSON object. These extracted attributes subsequently become the highly discrete treatment vectors and observed covariates utilized in the subsequent econometric modeling phases.

## **The Causal Inference Engine: Theoretical Foundations**

With the massive library of creative assets successfully decomposed into structured metadata and dense embeddings, the system must employ rigorous mathematics to separate true causation from mere correlation. The core challenge in analyzing observational data—such as historical ad performance records scraped from social media platforms—is the ubiquitous presence of confounding variables. These variables obscure the true relationship because they systematically influence both the creative choices made by designers and the final performance outcomes generated by consumers.  
To systematically address this, the engine employs a Structural Causal Modeling approach, utilizing established programmatic frameworks such as the DoWhy library to explicitly formalize assumptions, map dependencies, and estimate true effects. The causal analysis pipeline follows a rigorous four-stage architectural flow: Model, Identify, Estimate, and Refute.

### **Formulating the Directed Acyclic Graph**

The foundational step requires the algorithmic construction of a Directed Acyclic Graph to explicitly map the assumed causal mechanisms inherent in the advertising ecosystem. In this structural graph, the components are meticulously defined to isolate the variables of interest from the background noise.  
The treatment represents the specific creative feature under investigation, such as the strategic decision to display the company logo within the first three seconds of a video. The outcome represents the hard business performance metric, strictly defined as Return on Ad Spend or Click-Through Rate. The confounders represent the vast array of variables that affect both the treatment decision and the outcome, encompassing seasonal trends, target audience demographics, platform ad placement, and baseline production quality.  
The engine must strictly satisfy the unconfoundedness assumption, which dictates that all variables that jointly influence both the treatment and the outcome are fully observed and mathematically accounted for within the model. Variables that act as colliders or mediators within the Directed Acyclic Graph must be carefully excluded from the control set. Failing to exclude colliders leads to the introduction of M-bias and over-controlling, which severely distorts the final causal effect estimation and leads to highly flawed business insights.

### **The Four-Stage Causal Pipeline**

The application of the DoWhy framework provides the engine with a standardized, programmatic methodology for advancing from raw assumptions to validated causal insights.

| Causal Stage | System Operation & Algorithmic Process | Output & Validation Mechanism |
| :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **1\. Model** | The engine constructs the Directed Acyclic Graph based on domain knowledge and historical metadata extracted by Gemini. | A formalized mathematical graph representing all assumed causal relationships. |
| **2\. Identify** | The system automatically scans the graph to identify the target estimand, utilizing backdoor criterion approaches to map a valid pathway for isolation. | A mathematical formula defining exactly what needs to be calculated to find the true effect. |
| **3\. Estimate** | Advanced statistical methods, including Double Machine Learning, are applied to compute the exact numerical value of the causal effect. | The specific Average Treatment Effect or Conditional Average Treatment Effect. |
| **4\. Refute** | The system subjects the estimate to intense robustness tests, including randomizing the treatment (placebo testing) and dropping data subsets. | A validated confidence score confirming the insight is highly resistant to statistical noise. |

*Table 2: The Four-Stage DoWhy Framework implemented within the causal engine to guarantee the validity of creative performance insights.*

## **High-Dimensional Causal Inference: Double Machine Learning**

Traditional econometric models, such as standard linear regression, completely fail when the confounding variables are extremely high-dimensional, complex, and highly non-linear—a scenario that perfectly describes the dense vector embeddings of multimodal text and imagery extracted from video advertisements. To accurately estimate the causal effect in this immensely complex environment, the engine leverages the power of Double Machine Learning, specifically implementing the Partially Linear Model framework.  
Double Machine Learning represents a major breakthrough in causal AI by combining the extreme predictive power of modern machine learning algorithms with the rigorous, unbiased inference properties of classical econometrics. It neutralizes the intense bias caused by high-dimensional confounders through a complex mathematical process known as Neyman Orthogonalization. This procedure isolates the pure effect by removing the influence of all other variables in a systematic, multi-stage manner.

### **The Stages of Neyman Orthogonalization**

The mathematical procedure within the Double Machine Learning framework operates across three distinct and highly orchestrated stages. In the first stage, known as Residualization, the system deploys two entirely separate machine learning models, frequently utilizing high-performance gradient-boosted trees such as LightGBM, XGBoost, or deep neural networks. The first model functions as the propensity model, attempting to predict the specific creative treatment using only the vast array of confounders. Concurrently, the second model functions as the outcome model, attempting to predict the final ad performance utilizing the exact same set of confounders.  
Following the training of these dual models, the engine moves to the Orthogonalization stage. The predictions generated in the first stage are mathematically subtracted from the actual, real-world observed values to calculate the final residuals for both the treatment and the outcome. This critical step geometrically projects the entire dataset into a mathematical subspace that is perfectly orthogonal to the confounders. By calculating these residuals, the engine effectively "partials out" and completely neutralizes the overarching influence of all background variables, lighting conditions, and audience demographics. What remains in the data are the pure, entirely unconfounded variances in both the creative treatment and the performance outcome.  
In the final Estimation stage, a terminal model is fitted by strictly regressing the purified outcome residuals directly onto the purified treatment residuals. To achieve the highest level of business value, the engine must estimate Heterogeneous Treatment Effects, which involves understanding exactly how a specific creative feature performs differently across highly varied audience segments. To accomplish this, the system applies Causal Forests via the Microsoft EconML library. By utilizing Double Machine Learning, the engine fundamentally answers the ultimate question of "WHY." It moves far beyond the basic predictive statement that "Ads with fast pacing do better" to providing precise, rigorously robust estimates: "Increasing video pacing in the first three seconds causes a definitive 12% uplift in conversion rates specifically for the 18-24 demographic, entirely independent of the ad's production quality, platform placement, or seasonal timing".

## **Advanced Visual Causality: DICE-DML and Causal Representation Learning**

While standard Double Machine Learning using the EconML library is extraordinarily effective when applied to discrete structured metadata—such as the Pydantic JSON outputs detailing object counts and exact text classifications—analyzing the raw, high-dimensional visual embeddings directly presents a uniquely severe methodological hurdle known as visual treatment leakage.  
When standard vision encoders, including the foundational layers of powerful models like Gemini, process an image or video frame, they inherently map both the specific treatment attribute and all the surrounding visual confounders into a single, highly entangled dense vector representation. For example, if the system is attempting to measure the causal impact of a specific product's color within an ad, the standard embedding vector will fuse the product color data with the background lighting, the shadow dynamics, and the overall aesthetic composition. If this highly entangled vector is used directly in a Double Machine Learning pipeline, the foundational assumption of unconfoundedness is fundamentally violated because the treatment and the confounders cannot be mathematically separated, leading to severely biased and ultimately useless causal estimates.  
To solve this critical problem and enable true visual causality, the engine incorporates Causal Representation Learning, a cutting-edge frontier in machine learning that seeks to successfully disentangle latent factors hidden within high-dimensional data while perfectly preserving the underlying causal semantics. Specifically, the engine architecture integrates a highly specialized framework modeled entirely on the DICE-DML methodology, which stands for Deepfake-Informed Control Encoder for Double Machine Learning.

### **Disentangling Latent Space via Deepfake Supervision**

The DICE-DML mechanism represents a brilliant synthesis of generative AI and causal econometrics, allowing the analytical engine to successfully isolate pure treatment variations from incredibly complex visual backgrounds. The methodology operates through a highly structured sequence of adversarial learning.  
The process begins with the generation of Deepfake Counterfactuals. Generative AI models are systematically used to create perfectly paired images. For a given historical ad creative, a highly modified deepfake version is generated where only the specific treatment attribute is altered. For example, the generative model might alter the specific typography of a call-to-action overlay while ensuring that absolutely all other visual elements—including the precise background lighting, styling, actor positioning, and environmental context—remain completely identical. These highly controlled pairs are not used as actual data points for the final estimation; rather, they provide structured, weak supervision to forcefully teach the encoder how to differentiate between treatment data and confounding data.  
Following generation, the system employs Adversarial Representation Learning. The engine carefully analyzes the exact mathematical difference between the dense embedding of the original image and the embedding of the deepfake modified image. Because the visual background is mathematically identical in both assets, subtracting one vector from the other causes the background signals and confounding factors to perfectly cancel out, thereby isolating and revealing the "pure treatment fingerprint" in the high-dimensional space.  
Finally, the framework utilizes Orthogonal Projection. The primary embedding network is trained adversarially to become entirely invariant to this newly discovered treatment fingerprint while simultaneously retaining all other information that is relevant to the final outcome. Through rigorous orthogonal projection, the treatment-axis components are geometrically ripped out of the representation space. The resulting vector serves as a pristine, entirely unconfounded control representation. When this perfectly disentangled vector is finally fed into the Double Machine Learning pipeline, the engine can estimate the causal effect of highly nuanced visual attributes with extreme accuracy, proving in simulations to reduce Root Mean Squared Error by an astonishing 73% to 97% when compared directly to naive embedding approaches.

## **Multimodal RAG for Brand Identity and Compliance Validation**

Beyond the incredibly complex task of causal performance attribution, the native multimodal capabilities of the Gemini Embedding 2 model allow the analytical engine to serve a dual purpose, functioning simultaneously as a highly sophisticated Retrieval-Augmented Generation system specifically optimized for corporate brand compliance. Global organizations generate thousands of marketing assets monthly, and maintaining strict visual consistency across disparate global teams, external agencies, and the rapid proliferation of generative AI tools is a massive operational challenge.  
Standard text-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipelines are entirely inadequate for design and marketing teams because brand identity is inherently visual. A purely textual description of a corporate logo, specific typography, or a designated color palette cannot capture the spatial relationships, the exact hex color codes, or the nuanced aesthetic moods required for compliance.

### **Constructing the Visual Brand Knowledge Base**

The engine utilizes Gemini Embedding 2 to ingest the organization's entire historical repository of official brand guidelines, previously validated high-performing creatives, specialized font files, and primary color palettes directly into the database. Because the Gemini 2 model projects text, high-resolution images, and formatting-rich PDFs into a single joint vector space natively, the resulting knowledge base becomes inherently cross-modal without requiring fragile translation pipelines.  
A human designer or an automated agent can issue a highly descriptive textual query—such as requesting examples of high-contrast, professional lifestyle photography that perfectly aligns with the Q3 brand campaign rules—and the system will accurately retrieve the most mathematically relevant images, video segments, and specific PDF pages. Furthermore, the system possesses the capability to perform direct image-to-image or image-to-text retrieval, seamlessly identifying the specific textual brand rules and compliance guidelines associated with any newly uploaded graphic.

### **Vector Database Architecture and Integration**

To support incredibly fast, highly scalable similarity calculations across these massive multimodal datasets, the dense embeddings must be housed within a robust vector database specifically optimized for enterprise-scale high-dimensional data. The system architecture must meticulously evaluate dedicated vector databases based on specific corporate workload requirements and scalability demands.

| Vector Database Platform | Core Architecture & Deployment Model | Key Strengths for Multimodal RAG Workflows | Ideal Engine Implementation Fit |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **Pinecone** | Fully managed SaaS | Zero-ops management, extreme scalability, exceptional capabilities for pure, high-volume vector retrieval. | Best suited for massive, real-time creative asset retrieval requiring absolute maximum availability across global teams. |
| **Qdrant** | Open-source \+ Managed (Rust-based) | High performance architecture, incredibly advanced payload filtering mechanisms, robust local and cloud deployment flexibility. | The optimal choice when highly complex metadata filtering (e.g., isolating creatives strictly by deployment date, region, and language) is absolutely required alongside dense vector search. |
| **Milvus** | Open-source / Managed (Zilliz Cloud) | Explicitly built for massive enterprise scale (handling billions of vectors), natively supports high-speed GPU acceleration. | A fundamental necessity for global advertising agencies processing millions of high-framerate video embeddings on a daily basis. |
| **Weaviate** | Open-source \+ Managed Cloud | Built-in native vectorization tools, exceptional hybrid search capabilities combining dense vector proximity and sparse keyword relevance. | Excellent for enterprise implementations requiring the combination of highly nuanced visual similarity searches with highly specific, text-based brand guideline queries. |

*Table 3: Comprehensive Vector Database Selection Matrix detailing the optimal deployment environments for multimodal creative embeddings.*

### **The Automated Brand Review Pipeline**

By ingeniously combining the causal performance data with the multimodal brand RAG system, the engine acts as an impenetrable, automated gatekeeper for all new creative production. When a new advertising asset is generated—whether by human design teams or autonomous AI agents—it is instantly routed through the engine's validation protocols before deployment.  
The pipeline heavily leverages Gemini's profound reasoning capabilities to deeply analyze the visual output directly against the specific brand guidelines retrieved from the vector database. The system executes highly concrete rule checks, such as rigorously verifying precise hex color codes and ensuring minimum pixel clear space around corporate logos. Simultaneously, it performs highly subjective semantic checks, such as verifying that the imagery perfectly aligns with the "warm, contemporary" aesthetic tone explicitly defined in the brand documentation. If an asset violates the established visual vocabulary of the brand, the engine instantly flags the content, providing a detailed, ground-truth explanation directly retrieved from the RAG database, thereby effectively preventing brand degradation at a massive scale.

## **System Blueprint: Architectural Design of the Causal Engine**

To successfully build this comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution, the software architecture must seamlessly and flawlessly orchestrate massive data pipelines, high-throughput inference endpoints, and immensely complex mathematical frameworks. The official blueprint for the Causal-Multimodal Engine is structured precisely across five distinct, highly specialized operational layers.

### **Layer 1: Multimodal Ingestion and Transformation**

The foundational layer of the engine is solely responsible for handling the massive intake of raw creative assets, including terabytes of high-definition video files, imagery, audio tracks, and text copy, alongside their associated historical performance data such as total impressions, granular clicks, and final conversions. Video files are systematically chunked into specific keyframes or precise time windows to ensure strict adherence to the Gemini 120-second API limit. Massive corporate PDFs and brand books are similarly segmented.  
The raw assets are processed directly through the Gemini 2.0 API utilizing strict Pydantic schemas. The Vision-Language Model extracts definitive, highly structured variables, determining the exact presence of humans, the prevailing emotional tone, the on-screen text density, and the audio clarity. This intense extraction process perfectly populates the structured covariates table and the required treatment table. Simultaneously, the unaltered raw assets are passed to the gemini-embedding-2-preview endpoint. The model instantly generates the dense vectors. Depending entirely on the organization's specific storage constraints, Matryoshka Representation Learning is systematically applied to dynamically truncate the massive vectors from 3,072 down to 1,536 dimensions, carefully preserving the critical semantic richness while aggressively optimizing retrieval latency.

### **Layer 2: Vector and Relational Storage Architecture**

The massive volume of processed data must be indexed appropriately to support both complex mathematical retrieval and high-speed semantic search. The generated Gemini embeddings are rapidly ingested into a highly tuned vector database, such as Pinecone or Qdrant, alongside robust metadata payloads containing exact asset IDs and specific timestamp data. This precise indexing enables the rapid cross-modal semantic search that is absolutely required for the complex RAG workflows. Concurrently, the structured ad performance data, the meticulously extracted metadata, and the linking asset IDs are securely stored in a highly scalable relational cloud data warehouse. This relational storage serves as the absolute primary data source for the complex econometric models.

### **Layer 3: The Causal Discovery and Estimation Core**

This critical mathematical layer is what definitively separates the proposed engine from standard, purely predictive marketing analytics platforms. Utilizing the highly respected DoWhy Python library, a complex causal Directed Acyclic Graph is explicitly defined, carefully mapping the intricate relationships between the newly structured creative elements, the vast array of confounders, and the ultimate performance outcome.  
For the analysis of raw image embeddings, the highly advanced DICE-DML framework is automatically triggered. This utilizes intense orthogonal projection algorithms to aggressively strip out all treatment leakage, successfully generating pure, unconfounded control representations for the visual data. Following this purification, the EconML library systematically executes the Double Machine Learning pipeline. Powerful machine learning regressors are deployed to fit the complex nuisance parameters during the first stage, and highly advanced causal forests are utilized to estimate the exact Conditional Average Treatment Effect for specific creative features across widely different audience segments. To absolutely guarantee analytical validity, the engine automatically executes intense robustness checks, applying placebo treatments by randomly shuffling the treatment column, and conducting subset validation by deliberately dropping random parts of the data. If the estimated causal effect remains statistically significant under a placebo attack, the engine immediately flags the insight as entirely spurious.

### **Layer 4: Orchestration and RAG Execution**

The orchestration layer handles the real-time interaction between the users, the models, and the databases. When a brand-new creative asset is uploaded by a designer, the core orchestrator, utilizing modern frameworks like LangChain or LangGraph, instantly converts the asset into a dense multimodal embedding. It rapidly queries the highly optimized Vector Database for the absolute most relevant brand guidelines, and explicitly prompts the Gemini model to rigorously evaluate the new asset against those specific, retrieved corporate rules.  
Simultaneously, the orchestration layer handles insight synthesis. The purely quantitative causal estimations generated by the econometric models—for example, the data point showing "+1.2% CTR for fast-paced audio in the 18-24 demographic"—are passed directly to a Large Language Model. The LLM then generates highly readable natural language explanations and formats them into highly actionable design briefs for the creative production teams.

### **Layer 5: Application Interface and the Generative Loop**

The final output is presented to marketing executives and creative design stakeholders through a highly intuitive interface. Diagnostic dashboards provide vivid visualizations of the true, mathematically proven causal lift of specific visual assets, carefully controlling for all seasonal and placement biases.  
Crucially, the architecture fully supports a closed-loop generative ecosystem, frequently referred to in advanced research as the NextAds paradigm. The rigorously proven causal insights and the strictly enforced brand rules are used to directly parameterize downstream content generation tools. Instead of relying on flawed human intuition or trial-and-error prompting, the system automatically feeds proven, causally validated prompts—such as "Generate a 16:9 lifestyle image, utilizing a warm visual tone, with the primary product placement specifically restricted to the upper right quadrant"—back into the generative AI engines. This creates a state-of-the-art framework that ensures continuous, mathematically optimized, and feedback-driven creative evolution.

## **The Future of Marketing Attribution**

The deep integration of highly advanced multimodal foundation models with the rigorous mathematical methodologies of causal inference represents a monumental, unprecedented leap in the fields of marketing science and digital asset management. Predictive machine learning has historically constrained analysts to merely observing what happens, frequently leading to highly misguided optimization efforts based entirely on spurious, non-causal correlations. By fully leveraging the native capabilities of Google Gemini Embedding 2, enterprise organizations can now accurately ingest, deeply understand, and perfectly map the incredibly complex, high-dimensional reality of digital video, complex image, and dynamic audio assets into a cohesive, highly searchable mathematical space.  
When this profound multimodal understanding is explicitly coupled with the intense econometric rigor of Double Machine Learning and Causal Representation Learning, the analytical engine effectively unlocks the ultimate goal of marketing analytics: the ability to definitively answer "WHY." The system successfully disentangles the incredibly complex web of visual confounders, perfectly isolating the true causal drivers of audience engagement and conversion. Furthermore, the immense computational capacity to query these multimodal representations creates a highly robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation ecosystem, actively safeguarding brand identity and ensuring that all newly generated assets adhere strictly to corporate visual guidelines.  
This comprehensive blueprint outlines an architectural system that does not merely parse raw data; it fundamentally transforms unstructured human creativity into a rigorously quantifiable, highly interpretable, and strategically actionable exact science. By brilliantly bridging the massive gap between unstructured visual semantics and strict causal reality, global enterprises can achieve unprecedented levels of optimization in their advertising strategies, moving confidently from flawed, intuition-based design to mathematically proven, evidence-based creative engineering.

#### **Works cited**

1\. Causal Inference in Practice at CreativeLift: Finding Creative ..., https://medium.com/@marie.garkavenko/causal-inference-in-practice-at-creativelift-finding-creative-insights-for-video-ads-6462d2e0764a 2\. DoubleML Deep : Estimation of Causal Effects with Multimodal Data \- arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2402.01785v1 3\. Gemini Embedding 2: Our first natively multimodal embedding model \- Google Blog, https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-embedding-2/ 4\. What you need to know about the Gemini Embedding 2 model, https://medium.com/google-cloud/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-gemini-embedding-2-model-c7721a89a067 5\. Gemini Embedding 2: Direct Multimodal Search Without Text Conversion | by My Social | 𝐀𝐈 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐤𝐬.𝐢𝐨 | Mar, 2026, https://medium.com/aimonks/gemini-embedding-2-direct-multimodal-search-without-text-conversion-970a52de2efa 6\. Google Unveils Gemini Embedding 2, Its First AI Model to Map Text, Images and Video Together, https://www.gadgets360.com/ai/news/google-gemini-embedding-2-first-natively-multimodal-ai-model-map-text-images-videos-released-11198672 7\. Google AI Introduces Gemini Embedding 2: A Multimodal Embedding Model that Lets Your Bring Text, Images, Video, Audio, and Docs into the Embedding Space, https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/03/11/google-ai-introduces-gemini-embedding-2-a-multimodal-embedding-model-that-lets-your-bring-text-images-video-audio-and-docs-into-the-embedding-space/ 8\. What Is Gemini Embedding 2? Google's First Natively Multimodal Embedding Model, https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/what-is-gemini-embedding-2 9\. Google AI Introduces Gemini Embedding 2: A Multimodal Embedding Model that Lets Your Bring Text, Images, Video, Audio, and Docs into the Embedding Space \- Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/machinelearningnews/comments/1rqn60f/google\_ai\_introduces\_gemini\_embedding\_2\_a/ 10\. Gemini Embedding 2 model | Gemini API \- Google AI for Developers, https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models/gemini-embedding-2-preview 11\. Estimating Visual Attribute Effects in Advertising from ... \- arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.02359 12\. Structured outputs | Gemini API \- Google AI for Developers, https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/structured-output 13\. From PDFs to Insights: Structured Outputs from PDFs with Gemini 2.0 \- Philschmid, https://www.philschmid.de/gemini-pdf-to-data 14\. How to Use Pydantic for LLMs: Schema, Validation & Prompts description, https://pydantic.dev/articles/llm-intro 15\. Structured output | Generative AI on Vertex AI \- Google Cloud Documentation, https://docs.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/multimodal/control-generated-output 16\. Causal Inference — Double Machine Learning | by Arun Subramanian | Medium, https://medium.com/@arun.subram456/causal-inference-double-machine-learning-f419a4812add 17\. Causal Inference in Decision Intelligence — Part 9: DoWhy Library as a Causal Inference Framework | by Eugene Zinoviev | Medium, https://medium.com/@ievgen.zinoviev/causal-inference-in-decision-intelligence-part-9-dowhy-library-as-a-causal-inference-framework-1f66c2bc4558 18\. Casual Machine Learning \- GeeksforGeeks, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/machine-learning/casual-machine-learning/ 19\. Causal Inference in Decision Intelligence — Part 10: Applying Causal Inference for Feature Selection | by Eugene Zinoviev | Medium, https://medium.com/@ievgen.zinoviev/causal-inference-in-decision-intelligence-part-10-applying-causal-inference-for-feature-49503d25bee2 20\. HIGH-DIMENSIONAL PERCEPTION WITH THE DOUBLE MACHINE LEARNING LENS MODEL EQUATION by Raymond Li \- Open Collections, https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/24/1.0449943/4 21\. Book Review \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12660016/ 22\. Emulate randomized clinical trials using heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for personalized treatments: Methodology review and benchmark \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9845190/ 23\. Introduction to causal inference using Double Machine Learning | by Kaixin Wang \- Medium, https://medium.com/data-science-at-microsoft/introduction-to-causal-inference-using-double-machine-learning-5daa642321f3 24\. Causal Inference based on ML \- Double ML, https://docs.doubleml.org/tutorial/stable/slides/part1/Lect1\_uai\_Introduction\_to\_DML.html 25\. EconML \- Microsoft Research, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/econml/ 26\. CausalML with Python in AI: Decision-Making with Causal Inference | PySquad, https://pysquad.com/blogs/causalml-with-python-in-ai-decision-making-with-ca 27\. Introduction to Causal ML and Double ML, https://docs.doubleml.org/tutorial/stable/lectures/L1/introduction\_part1.html 28\. ICLR Poster Causal Representation Learning for Instantaneous and Temporal Effects in Interactive Systems, https://iclr.cc/virtual/2023/poster/12009 29\. UAI 2023 Tutorial: Causal Representation Learning \- YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8JrbaTR1vg 30\. Causal AI: Current State-of-the-Art & Future Directions | by Alex G. Lee | Medium, https://medium.com/@alexglee/causal-ai-current-state-of-the-art-future-directions-c17ad57ff879 31\. Getting Started with Multimodal RAG: A Hands-On Guide \- Medium, https://medium.com/@ashutoshsharmaengg/revolutionizing-ai-a-deep-dive-into-building-multimodal-rag-3cb4aa756dcc 32\. What is Multimodal RAG? \- IBM, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/multimodal-rag 33\. Closing the creative gap: How Gemini supports brand consistency | Google Cloud Blog, https://cloud.google.com/transform/closing-the-creative-gap-how-gemini-supports-brand-consistency 34\. Multi-Modal RAG Strategy: Optimizing Visual Assets for AI Retrieval \- Cubitrek, https://cubitrek.com/blog/multi-modal-rag-strategy-optimizing-visual-assets-for-ai-retrieval/ 35\. GitHub \- HKUDS/RAG-Anything: "RAG-Anything: All-in-One RAG Framework", https://github.com/HKUDS/RAG-Anything 36\. Create a brand style guide for your business. \- Adobe, https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/business/teams/resources/how-to/brand-guide.html 37\. Best Vector Databases in 2026: Complete Comparison Guide \- Encore, https://encore.dev/articles/best-vector-databases 38\. Best Vector Databases in 2026: A Complete Comparison Guide \- Firecrawl, https://www.firecrawl.dev/blog/best-vector-databases 39\. Google AI \- How we're making AI helpful for everyone, https://ai.google/ 40\. What is Multimodal RAG? Complete Guide 2026 \- Articsledge, https://www.articsledge.com/post/multimodal-retrieval-augmented-generation-rag 41\. How to Build a Multimodal Vector Database with Gemini Embedding 2 and Pinecone, https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/multimodal-vector-database-gemini-embedding-2-pinecone 42\. Top 5 Tools for RAG Evaluation in 2026 \- GetMaxim.ai, https://www.getmaxim.ai/articles/top-5-tools-for-rag-evaluation-in-2026/ 43\. Generative AI on Vertex AI Cookbook | Google Cloud Documentation, https://docs.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/cookbook 44\. Collaborative Causal Inference and Multi-Agent Dynamic Intervention for “Dual Carbon” Public Opinion Driven by Reinforced Large Language Models and Diffusion Models \- MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/8/689 45\. NextAds: Towards Next-generation Personalized Video Advertising \- arXiv.org, https://arxiv.org/html/2603.02137v1 46\. VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384106139\_VBench\_Comprehensive\_Benchmark\_Suite\_for\_Video\_Generative\_Models 47\. Explainable AI-Driven Content Optimization for 2D Character Merchandise Marketing: A Causal Feature Attribution and Attention-Guided Framework \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398700433\_Explainable\_AI-Driven\_Content\_Optimization\_for\_2D\_Character\_Merchandise\_Marketing\_A\_Causal\_Feature\_Attribution\_and\_Attention-Guided\_Framework