# **Decoupling Infrastructure Defects from Model Capability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Runtime Degradation in Large Language Model Inference**

The rapid scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed a fundamental shift in artificial intelligence deployment, necessitating the development of highly complex, specialized inference engines designed to optimize computational throughput, memory footprint, and latency. As these serving stacks—such as vLLM, Text Generation Inference (TGI), MLX, and llama.cpp—evolve, they introduce sophisticated mechanisms including continuous batching, PagedAttention, speculative decoding, and low-bit quantization. However, this infrastructural complexity creates a critical observability gap: performance degradation, output hallucination, and apparent reasoning failures are frequently misattributed to the model's learned weights when the root cause fundamentally lies within the inference runtime.

The prevailing paradigm in LLM evaluation often treats the inference engine as a transparent, deterministic conduit for the model's weights. Empirical evidence severely contradicts this assumption. The hypothesis under examination is that inference and runtime defects—specifically quantization artifacts, memory management behaviors, caching mechanisms, and batch scheduling—can effectively mimic model-quality defects. This necessitates a decoupled testing methodology that isolates the underlying infrastructure from the neural network weights, with particular scrutiny applied to the distinct behaviors of the Apple Silicon unified memory architecture and the MLX framework. This report systematically dissects systems papers, issue postmortems, and engineering diagnostics to map the precise mechanisms by which infrastructure defects masquerade as model degradation, providing a comprehensive framework for diagnostic isolation.

## **The Epidemiology of Inference Engine Defects**

To understand how runtime infrastructure mimics model degradation, one must first recognize that modern inference engines are highly complex, bug-prone software systems. An extensive analysis of 929 real-world bugs across five widely adopted LLM inference engines—including vLLM, DeepSpeed, llama.cpp, Mlc-llm, and TensorRT-llm—reveals a fragile ecosystem driven by the immense resource demands of LLMs and the inherent challenges of cross-platform hardware compatibility.1

The integration of complex optimizations—such as memory paging, asynchronous scheduling, tensor parallelism, and cross-node communication—frequently compromises the availability, performance, and accuracy of the deployed application.1 These infrastructure-induced errors manifest in ways that are virtually indistinguishable from inherent model deficiencies, such as a lack of alignment training, poor reasoning capabilities, or catastrophic forgetting. To systematically diagnose these issues, it is imperative to classify the symptoms and their infrastructural root causes.

| Defect Category | Infrastructural Root Cause | Symptom Mimicking Model Degradation | Frameworks Most Affected |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **State Corruption** | Key-Value (KV) Cache poisoning via numerical instability (NaNs) or sequence block overlaps. | Spontaneous output of gibberish, endless repetitions, or context amnesia. | vLLM, TGI, vLLM-Ascend |
| **Arithmetic Drift** | Shader compilation non-determinism, C++ type-casting failures, or mixed-precision drift. | Deterioration in mathematical reasoning, formatting errors, logic collapse. | MLX (Metal), TorchAir |
| **Tokenization Desync** | Stop-token (EOS) mishandling, parser enforcement overrides, grammar state machine faults. | Runaway generation, premature truncation, structured output failures. | All (Configuration dependent) |
| **Scheduling Paradoxes** | Continuous batching synchronization failures, ragged tensor alignment in speculative decoding. | Severe time-to-first-token (TTFT) degradation, cohort-specific quality drops. | vLLM, TGI |
| **Quantization Faults** | Integer overflow in dimension calculation, asymmetric group-wise scaling artifacts. | Catastrophic generation failures, infinite loops on specific prompts, OOM crashes. | MLX, llama.cpp |

The compounding nature of these defects means that seemingly innocuous changes, such as altering the order of operations in the computational graph to take advantage of data caching, can silently degrade the quality of the output without triggering systemic crash alerts.4 This determinism loss is exacerbated when models are subjected to variable batch sizes, dynamic memory allocations, and asynchronous kernel executions.6 Consequently, engineers evaluating an LLM's capability to perform complex reasoning or multi-step mathematical proofs may incorrectly conclude that a specific quantization level or model parameter size is inadequate, when the failure is entirely localized to a race condition in the inference engine's memory allocator.

## **Memory Management and Key-Value Cache Corruption**

The Key-Value (KV) cache is one of the largest pieces of mutable state in LLM inference, growing dynamically with sequence length, concurrent requests, and decoding strategies.8 Efficiently managing this state is critical, as the computational bottleneck in autoregressive generation frequently shifts from pure arithmetic compute to High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) access patterns and KV residency limits.8

### **PagedAttention vs. Unified Memory Architectures**

In traditional CUDA-based stacks like vLLM, memory management relies heavily on the concept of PagedAttention. Inspired by operating system virtual memory management, PagedAttention fragments each sequence's logical KV cache into fixed-size, physically non-contiguous blocks that are dynamically allocated and referenced through per-sequence block tables.9 Each block typically contains the KV pairs for 16 to 128 tokens and can reside anywhere in the device memory.9 This approach mitigates internal and external fragmentation, enabling up to 24x higher throughput than naive monolithic allocation schemes.9 When a sequence completes, the physical blocks registered in its table are immediately released back to a free block queue, supporting both LRU and reference-count-based eviction policies.9

Conversely, the MLX framework operates on Apple Silicon's unique unified memory architecture, which allows CPU and GPU cores to share up to 192GB of RAM with memory bandwidths exceeding 400 GB/s.12 Operations run on either processor without requiring explicit data transfers across a PCIe bus, eliminating the traditional host-to-device transfer bottleneck.13 While this architectural distinction allows consumer-grade hardware to run models that would otherwise require multi-GPU server clusters, it introduces unique memory pressure behaviors. Unified memory bandwidth and CPU/GPU cache hierarchies still necessitate memory layouts that minimize strided accesses and support coalesced loads within the Metal GPU kernels.15

### **The Pathology of Cache Poisoning**

When the complex abstraction layers managing the KV cache fail, the resulting output mimics a model that has completely lost its reasoning capabilities or alignment training. In highly concurrent serving environments, decode workers can enter invalid request states, leading to inconsistent pod reattachment and KV cache corruption within the prefill-decode pipeline.16 This occasionally produces gibberish responses or triggers error cascades due to malformed token IDs reaching the inference layer.16

A profound and documented example of this infrastructure failure was observed in the vLLM-Ascend plugin running the Qwen3-VL-32B-Thinking model. Engineering reports detailed a critical numerical stability bug where a single request containing a long text prompt (approximately 8,600 tokens) combined with an image reliably triggered a severe mathematical fault during the backend graph generation.17 The model would output streams of exclamation marks (\!\!\!\!, indicating Not a Number or NaN generation).17 More critically, this single, complex request caused permanent KV Cache Pollution.17 Subsequent simple requests (e.g., prompting the model with "Hello") processed by the same worker would also output \!\!\!\!, regardless of whether float16 or bfloat16 precision was utilized.17

To an application developer or an end-user, this behavior appears as a catastrophic model collapse or a complete safety-alignment failure. The model seems to have suddenly and permanently forgotten how to generate human language. In reality, it is purely a state management and numerical stability failure in the underlying Ascend graph compiler, entirely decoupled from the neural network's learned weights.17 If an evaluation framework passes a suite of tests through this polluted worker, the model will receive a score of zero, falsely indicating that the Qwen3-VL-32B-Thinking model is incapable of basic language generation.

## **MLX-Specific Anomalies: Quantization, Memory Boundaries, and Type Safety**

Apple's MLX framework, designed by machine learning researchers for machine learning researchers, provides a NumPy-like array framework tailored for the Metal Performance Shaders (MPS) and native GPU/CPU execution on Apple Silicon.13 While it is highly optimized for unified memory and supports lazy computation and dynamic graph construction, it is a rapidly evolving framework that exhibits highly specific edge cases, particularly when handling highly compressed quantized models.14

Extensive diagnostic testing of 38 distinct vision-language models using the MLX-VLM server implementation revealed critical failures directly attributable to the MLX core library, completely unrelated to the quality of the downloaded model weights.18 These failures underscore the necessity of decoupling the infrastructure layer from the model evaluation layer.

### **Memory Calculation Errors and Metal Buffer Limits**

Quantization is one of the highest-leverage tools available on Apple Silicon because it simultaneously relieves both memory capacity constraints and memory bandwidth pressure.15 However, calculating the precise memory requirements for sub-byte quantization (such as 4-bit or 3-bit group-wise quantization) introduces strict arithmetic prerequisites.15

During the execution of the 4-bit quantized mlx-community/Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct-4bit model, the MLX core suffered an immediate Out of Memory (OOM) crash during the generation phase (mx.async\_eval).18 The diagnostic logs revealed that the MLX core attempted to allocate a contiguous memory buffer of approximately 126 GB, significantly exceeding the Apple Metal API's maximum allowed buffer size of approximately 80.6 GB (on a system equipped with 128 GB of unified RAM).18

A 2-billion parameter model stored in 4-bit precision should mathematically require only 1 to 2 GB of memory for its weights, plus a small overhead for the dynamic KV cache. The 126 GB allocation request points to a severe underlying integer overflow, an incorrect dimension multiplication, or a fundamental failure in the memory calculation logic for quantized dimensions within the MLX C++ core.18 This bug manifests as a complete failure of the model to execute. An engineer without deep systems knowledge might misinterpret this OOM error as a corrupted model file, an inadequacy in the unified memory hardware, or an inability of the Qwen2 architecture to function on Mac, rather than recognizing it as a framework arithmetic error.

### **Type Safety and C++ Casting Failures**

The integration between Python's high-level execution API and the C++ Metal execution backend introduces profound risks regarding strict type safety. During the generation forward pass of the mlx-community/deepseek-vl2-8bit model, MLX threw a RuntimeError: std::bad\_cast exception.18 This C++ type casting failure occurred deep within the tensor indexing and slicing operations (specifically during the execution of total\_tiles.append(pixel\_values\[idx, : batch\_num\_tiles\[idx\]\])).18

The diagnostic analysis indicated that the 8-bit quantization process was producing unexpected data types that the Python-to-C++ type conversion system failed to cast at runtime.18 Consequently, perfectly valid model weights were rendered unusable due to a lack of type validation for array indexing operations in the infrastructure layer.18 This type of error mimics a broken or incompatible model architecture, masking the fact that the failure is purely an artifact of the infrastructure failing to enforce type safety across language bindings.

### **Weight Mismatches and Loading Validations**

A third category of MLX core issues involves the weight loading pipeline itself. When attempting to instantiate the microsoft/Florence-2-large-ft model, the system failed with a ValueError: Missing 1 parameters: language\_model.lm\_head.weight at the load\_weights() stage.18 Despite the Hugging Face cache containing the complete 1472.1 MB of necessary files, the framework detected a mismatch between the instantiated model architecture in Python and the available weight files parsed by the core.18 This failure suggests an incomplete framework conversion from PyTorch to MLX, or an architecture mapping mismatch where the expected weight structure does not perfectly align with the loaded tensors.18 The model itself is fully capable, but the infrastructure acts as a flawed gatekeeper.

### **Quantization Artifacts and Kernel Loops**

Not all quantization implementations are functionally equivalent, and the specific algorithms used to decompress weights during inference can drastically alter the model's output quality. Aggressive activation quantization can severely destabilize output quality, and developers are often advised to rely strictly on weight-only quantization at 4-bit or 8-bit for generative models on Mac.15 Grouped quantization—where weights are quantized in blocks of 64 or 128 channels to balance compression and accuracy—introduces metadata scaling factors that interact complexly with the GPU's Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) granularity.15

An infrastructure bug in MLX's qmv (quantized matrix-vector) kernels caused specific models, such as the mlx-community/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-4bit, to enter an infinite generation loop at the end of long prompts, whereas the 8-bit version of the exact same model processed the prompt flawlessly.20 Interestingly, modifying the prompt length by mere hundreds of tokens temporarily bypassed the looping behavior, demonstrating a high sensitivity to specific KV cache sizes and matrix boundaries interacting with the Metal kernel.20 This looping—often perceived by end-users as the model "hallucinating," repeating itself endlessly, or failing to comprehend its generation objective—was purely an artifact of a flawed Metal kernel calculating quantized vectors inaccurately at specific tensor dimensions.

## **Metal Shader Compilation and Arithmetic Drift**

Unlike CUDA, where NVIDIA's nvcc compiler often emits parallel Thread Execution IR (PTX) or raw GPU shader code ahead of time, Apple's Metal framework compiles shader source code during program runtime.21 This Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, combined with the nuances of the Metal Shading Language (MSL) and the lack of explicit, low-level scheduling controls over the GPU cores, introduces potential numerical instability and non-determinism that directly impacts the geometric space of the model's embeddings.21

### **Precision Drift and Sub-layer Implementation**

LLM inference relies heavily on a standard suite of mathematical operations, most notably Root Mean Square Normalization (RMSNorm) and Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE).24 However, the specific implementation of these operations across different compute shaders varies drastically between inference engines. For instance, in vLLM's out-of-tree plugin ecosystem, custom operators must be explicitly dispatched for different hardware backends (e.g., CUDA, ROCm, Ascend, Metal).26 When an engine applies RoPE or RMSNorm using computationally distinct algebraic refactorizations optimized for speed rather than numerical stability, it can introduce significant precision drift.26

If RoPE is calculated with reduced floating-point precision (e.g., standard Float16 instead of maintaining Float32 or BFloat16 for the critical positional accumulation), the model loses its capacity to accurately track token distance over long contexts.25 A user evaluating the model will observe a severe degradation in long-context retrieval (e.g., the "Needle in a Haystack" test) or complex reasoning tasks. The natural conclusion is to assume the model lacks context capacity or attention span, when in reality, the inference engine's custom shader is mathematically mangling the attention vectors before they even reach the multi-head attention layers.

### **First-Token vs. Subsequent-Token Computation**

The computational graph for generating the first token (the prefill phase) is fundamentally different from the graph utilized for autoregressive token generation (the decode phase). The prefill phase must process the entire input prompt simultaneously, exhibiting quadratic complexity with sequence length ![][image1], while the decode phase utilizes the established KV cache, requiring operations that grow only linearly ![][image2].29

Because these two phases represent vastly different computational workloads, they are handled by different underlying Metal shaders or CUDA kernels. Consequently, severe numerical differences can arise between the phases. A known issue in MLX configurations highlights that the tensor shapes and execution paths for the first token can yield slight numerical deviations compared to the generation of subsequent tokens.30 When generating autoregressive output, these slight floating-point deviations accumulate exponentially. In multi-step mathematical reasoning or code generation, a minor floating-point error in the prefill shader can alter the logit distribution just enough to change the most probable token selected at step one. This single divergent token alters the context for step two, diverging the entire subsequent autoregressive trajectory into a hallucination.30 The model's weights remain perfect, but the shifting arithmetic foundations of the inference engine guarantee failure.

## **Batching and Scheduling Paradigms**

To maximize GPU utilization and system throughput, modern inference engines have largely abandoned static request-level batching in favor of Continuous Batching (also known as iteration-level scheduling).32 Continuous batching evaluates the active request pool after every single token generation step, evicting completed sequences the moment they generate a stop token, and inserting new requests from the queue without waiting for the entire cohort to finish.32

### **The Latency Paradox and Performance Degradation**

While continuous batching drastically improves aggregate throughput and resource utilization, it can paradoxically increase latency and degrade output quality under high request rates or when processing heterogeneous workloads.34 The inference system must constantly balance the Time-To-First-Token (TTFT) requirements of the computationally heavy prefill phase against the Inter-Token Latency (ITL) of the memory-bound decode phase.36

When hybrid batches (combining chunked prefills of new requests with ongoing decodes of existing requests) are poorly scheduled, the inference engine may throttle sequence lengths, evict vital KV cache blocks prematurely, or default to suboptimal hardware execution paths to maintain concurrency.37 A notable observability gap occurs when severe quality drops persist in production environments—such as the multi-week degradation observed in Anthropic's Claude models—because internal corporate telemetry primarily tracks latency and uptime rather than semantic output quality.38 Engineers attempting to maintain strict low-latency Service Level Objectives (SLOs) may unknowingly implement aggressive server-side batching or dynamic rejection thresholds that trade reasoning depth and output quality for raw speed.38 Users perceive this as the model being "neutered" or degraded, while the model weights remain entirely unchanged.

### **The Ragged Tensor Problem in Speculative Decoding**

Speculative decoding attempts to accelerate inference by using a smaller, highly efficient draft model to generate multiple candidate tokens, which the large target model then verifies in parallel in a single forward pass.12 However, combining continuous batch parallelism with speculative decoding introduces the "ragged tensor" problem: different sequences within the same batch will accept different numbers of drafted tokens per step, creating asymmetric tensor shapes that GPUs inherently struggle to process.40

If the inference infrastructure fails to perfectly synchronize these ragged boundaries, it breaks the multiplicative relationship between batching and speculation, leading to severe throughput degradation or, worse, token alignment errors in the output.40 When an LLM evaluates complex code or solves logic puzzles poorly under load, it is frequently the speculative scheduling mechanism silently misaligning tokens, rather than the model weights losing their reasoning capacity. The draft model and target model fall out of sync, and the system accepts hallucinated tokens as ground truth.

## **Parsers, Grammars, and Token Constraints**

A significant, yet frequently overlooked, source of model degradation stems from the parsers and token-enforcement mechanisms injected at the serving layer. Modern AI application development relies heavily on structured data extraction, requiring LLMs to output valid JSON, XML, or executable code formats.41

### **Constrained Decoding and Token Probability Corruption**

The evolution of structured output has moved from simple prompt engineering ("Output valid JSON only") to strict Constrained Decoding.41 Modern serving frameworks (such as vLLM and TGI) utilize Constrained Decoding techniques driven by Finite State Machines (FSM) or Context-Free Grammars (CFG).41 These mechanisms dynamically mask the logits of the LLM at every single generation step, mathematically forcing the probability of any token that violates the predefined schema to absolute zero.41

While this infrastructural intervention mathematically guarantees valid syntax and eliminates the need for retry loops, it introduces a profound and highly destructive interference with the model's natural statistical distribution. Enforcing rigid format compliance compromises the model's performance regardless of its inherent ability to follow instructions.43 Empirical experiments demonstrate that when forced into strict parsing constraints, highly capable models exhibit measurable performance degradation in logic benchmarks. For instance, the implementation of grammar constraints caused a 3.2% drop in Pass@1 for C++ generation in the Deepseek-Coder model, and a 4.2% drop for the Phi-3.5 model.44

The underlying mechanism for this quality drop is profound: the model's optimal cognitive path to solving a problem may require generating a specific sequence of "thinking" tokens, transitional phrases, or chain-of-thought formatting that technically violates the rigid JSON schema. Because the infrastructure ruthlessly blocks these transitional tokens, the model is forced down a suboptimal, lower-probability generation path, resulting in hallucinated facts, truncated logic, or degraded reasoning.41 The defect is strictly infrastructural: the serving stack's grammar state machine is suffocating the model's latent capabilities.

### **Stop-Token Mishandling and Runaway Generation**

LLM architectures define specific, specialized tokens to indicate the end of a sequence, the end of a conversational turn, or the end of a tool call. For instance, the LLaMA 3 architecture relies on tokens like \<|eot\_id|\> and \<|end\_of\_text|\>.46 User-friendly, encapsulated frameworks like Ollama automatically configure and monitor these model-specific stop tokens during inference.46 However, bare-metal inference engines like vLLM or llama.cpp often require explicit configuration via API parameters or rely on imperfect tokenizer mappings.46

If the serving stack's parser fails to correctly map or inject these stop tokens into the termination loop, the model will experience catastrophic runaway generation. The inference engine will simply continue predicting the next mathematically probable token ad infinitum—often resulting in endless repetitions, hallucinatory trailing text, or the model beginning to output its own prompt structure and internal conversational markers.46 Furthermore, if the engine relies on generic text parsers instead of checking exact token IDs, specific formatting elements like \</answer\> might trigger premature truncation, cutting off valid reasoning.39 What appears to an observer as an incoherent, rambling neural network is simply an infrastructure loop lacking its termination signal.

### **Order of Operations and Explicit Synchronization**

In complex serving stacks, Fallacy of Composition manifests when engineers assume that an LLM can essentially "generate the whole application" if given a large enough context window.48 A model might ingest a thousand files, but its attention mechanism degrades if the prompt order is chaotic.48 Infrastructure that enforces a strict order of operations—where Step B cannot start until Step A is complete and verified—prevents non-determinism and drastically improves the quality of the LLM output.6 Changes to the LLM stack that make the order of operations deterministic often result in users praising the sudden "return" of missing intelligence, proving that the infrastructure's orchestration is as critical to perceived intelligence as the model's weights.6

## **Comparative Analysis: MLX vs. vLLM vs. llama.cpp**

The most definitive proof that infrastructure dictates apparent model capability is observing the exact same neural network weights produce wildly different performance characteristics, perplexity scores, and latency metrics across different inference engines.

| Feature / Engine Characteristic | MLX (Apple Silicon Focus) | vLLM (CUDA / Multi-Platform) | llama.cpp (CPU / Edge / GGUF) |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **Primary Architecture Paradigm** | Unified Memory, native Metal Performance Shaders (MPS), Python/C++ integration. | Discrete GPU, PagedAttention memory management, Python heavy. | C/C++ core, highly portable, CPU-first philosophy, minimal dependencies. |
| **Batching & Scheduling Strategy** | Emerging vllm-mlx dynamic batching; historically static. | Aggressive Continuous Batching; optimized for high concurrency. | Static batching; minimal queuing overhead for single requests. |
| **Primary Quantization Formats** | Native MLX formats (e.g., MXFP4, 4-bit, 8-bit). | AWQ, GPTQ, FP8, squeezed tensors. | GGUF (Custom memory-mapped format supporting Q2\_K to Q8\_0). |
| **Performance & Use-Case Profile** | Superior Apple integration; high efficiency and lowest power draw on M-series chips. | Supreme aggregate throughput and concurrent scale; near-instant TTFT at scale. | Highly consistent single-stream ITL; scales poorly with high concurrency workloads. |

### **Throughput vs. Single-Stream Consistency**

The architectural philosophies of these engines dictate their performance profiles. llama.cpp is renowned for its lightweight C++ core and the adoption of the GGUF format, which enables rapid memory-mapped execution with virtually no external dependencies.36 In single-stream, low-concurrency environments, llama.cpp processes requests using 93.6% to 100.2% of the time required by vLLM.50 Its design prioritizes predictable, static-batching performance, making it highly reliable but computationally inflexible under heavy concurrent load.36

vLLM, conversely, is built exclusively for scale. Its PagedAttention architecture virtually eliminates memory fragmentation, allowing it to dynamically batch hundreds of concurrent requests.9 Throughput increases linearly up to 100-150 concurrent requests before plateauing.52 However, vLLM's aggressive continuous batching strategy results in highly variable completion times and longer tail latencies for unlucky requests.52 HuggingFace's TGI framework shows more variance in overall completion times but enforces better fairness scheduling, ensuring requests have predictable latency regardless of arrival time.52

Recently, the development of vllm-mlx has sought to bridge the gap on Apple Silicon, bringing continuous batching and PagedAttention logic to the native MLX framework. For text models, vllm-mlx achieves 21% to 87% higher throughput than standard llama.cpp across models ranging from 0.6B to 30B parameters, scaling up to 4.3x aggregate throughput at 16 concurrent requests.12

### **Weight Representation and Output Consistency**

The chosen inference engine heavily dictates the specific quantization algorithm utilized, which directly alters the perplexity (a measure of how well a probability model predicts a sample) and overall model fidelity. For the exact same baseline weights, AWQ quantization (frequently favored in vLLM setups) often exhibits higher perplexity—indicating lower reasoning quality—than the highly optimized GGUF quants used in llama.cpp.39

Conversely, MLX users have documented that native MLX 4-bit quantization can yield significant visual artifacts and lower textual quality compared to llama.cpp's Q4\_K\_M GGUF implementation, while newer formats like MXFP4 on MLX demonstrate lower perplexity and up to 6.4% faster generation than GGUF.54

When a developer switches an application from a local llama.cpp instance to a cloud-hosted vLLM cluster to handle higher traffic, the resulting drop in application intelligence or the sudden inability to follow complex instructions is not a degradation of the AI itself. It is purely a manifestation of the specific quantization math, grammar constraints, and memory paging tradeoffs employed by the new serving stack.39

## **Methodology for Isolating Infrastructure from Model Defects**

Given that infrastructure defects seamlessly and convincingly mimic model degradation, organizations cannot rely on end-to-end qualitative "vibe-checks" to assess model capability. A rigorous, decoupled testing methodology is required to isolate the computational runtime layer from the statistical weight layer.

### **1\. Deterministic Testing and Verification Frameworks**

To isolate runtime defects, systems engineers must establish a baseline of expected model behavior via strict deterministic testing. This involves explicitly disabling all non-deterministic optimization flags within the inference engine: turning off CUDA Graphs, disabling prefix caching, bypassing chunked prefill mechanisms, and hardcoding fixed random seeds.27 By enforcing eager-mode execution and standardizing the KV cache state, engineers can measure per-token probability differences across different inference stacks (e.g., comparing vLLM output distributions directly against a HuggingFace Transformers baseline).27 If the logit distributions diverge at a fixed seed with a temperature setting of ![][image3], an arithmetic infrastructure bug (such as precision drift in the RoPE kernel or non-determinism in the Metal shader compilation) is definitively confirmed.24

### **2\. Standardized Evaluation Harness Deployment**

Deploying standardized evaluation frameworks, such as the lm-evaluation-harness developed by EleutherAI, is critical for decoupled testing.57 This harness provides a tokenization-agnostic interface that integrates directly with various backends, including transformers, vLLM, and Apple's MPS via MLX.58 By running the exact same benchmark (such as MMLU, MT-Bench, or HumanEval) across different inference engine configurations loaded with the exact same base weights, organizations can quantitatively isolate and measure the specific quality loss induced by the serving stack.57

### **3\. Monitoring Logit Scale and Gradient Outliers**

During both training and advanced serving configurations (such as speculative decoding), the numerical scale of the output logits must be continuously monitored. "Logit scale explosion" occurs when the output layer produces increasingly extreme values (![][image4]), causing severe numerical overflow and vanishing gradients.61 Even if the model produces the correct token output initially, the underlying mathematical property of the softmax function, where ![][image5], actively masks the drift toward numerical chaos.61 Implementing Z-loss monitoring and detecting gradient outliers caused by rare tokens (such as specific code delimiters or non-English characters) separates true neural network divergence from catastrophic mathematical overflow occurring within the GPU memory buffers.61

### **4\. Hardware-Decoupled Infrastructure for Verification**

For complex, agentic AI pipelines, the data generation (inference) must be completely decoupled from the training or evaluation loops. Systems like slime implement fully decoupled infrastructures where rollout engines and training engines operate independently on distinctly separated hardware.62 This architectural pattern allows the deployment of mixed-precision inference (e.g., highly efficient FP8 for rapid data generation) while strictly retaining the stability of BF16 for the critical evaluation and training loops, isolating the artifacts introduced by extreme quantization from the model's core logic.62 Furthermore, implementing decoupled verification servers allows security and quality teams to reconstruct fixed-seed sampling, defending against anomalous behaviors and verifying that the infrastructure's grammar parsers are not silently injecting prompt structures that corrupt the final output.63

## **Conclusion**

The pervasive assertion that a Large Language Model's capability is solely defined by its pre-trained weights is fundamentally flawed in modern production environments. This comprehensive analysis definitively confirms that infrastructural components—spanning MLX memory calculation integer overflows, Apple Silicon Metal shader non-determinism, vLLM PagedAttention KV cache poisoning, continuous batching synchronization failures, and parser-induced probability manipulation—exert profound and highly destructive effects on the final generated output.

When a deployed model generates infinite loops, spits out formatting tags, hallucinates established facts, or suddenly fails at basic logical reasoning, it is frequently the victim of C++ type-casting failures, arithmetic drift in quantization, or constrained decoding state machines that actively mask valid token pathways. The model is effectively lobotomized by its host environment. To build reliable, secure, and performant AI systems, engineering teams must abandon the black-box treatment of inference engines. A methodology centered on decoupled testing, utilizing deterministic baselines, structured evaluation harnesses, and precise numerical monitoring, is strictly required to differentiate the bugs residing within the machine's infrastructure from the actual limitations of the neural network itself.

#### **Works cited**

1. A First Look at Bugs in LLM Inference Engines \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2506.09713v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2506.09713v1)  
2. A First Look at Bugs in LLM Inference Engines \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.09713](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.09713)  
3. A First Look at Bugs in LLM Inference Engines | Request PDF \- ResearchGate, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392597236\_A\_First\_Look\_at\_Bugs\_in\_LLM\_Inference\_Engines](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392597236_A_First_Look_at_Bugs_in_LLM_Inference_Engines)  
4. WHEN LLMS GET SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE: A STATIS- TICAL, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://openreview.net/pdf/f1c71d12248a7588ec55d2ac2331d0214b797faf.pdf](https://openreview.net/pdf/f1c71d12248a7588ec55d2ac2331d0214b797faf.pdf)  
5. Traffic Flow Prediction on Overloaded Highways Using LLM-Enhanced Cellular Network Data | Code Ocean, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://codeocean.com/explore/0b8afe7e-d27a-4027-a426-4b0bfa8ebcae?query=IEEE%20Data%20Descriptions\&page=1\&filter=all\&refine=journal](https://codeocean.com/explore/0b8afe7e-d27a-4027-a426-4b0bfa8ebcae?query=IEEE+Data+Descriptions&page=1&filter=all&refine=journal)  
6. \[SWE-bench co-author here\] It seems like they run this test on a subset of 50 ta... | Hacker News, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46811319](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46811319)  
7. Claude Code daily benchmarks for degradation tracking \- Hacker News, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810282](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810282)  
8. The Hidden Memory Architecture of LLMs | Microsoft Community Hub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/educatordeveloperblog/the-hidden-memory-architecture-of-llms/4485367](https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/educatordeveloperblog/the-hidden-memory-architecture-of-llms/4485367)  
9. PagedAttention: Efficient Memory Management for LLMs \- Emergent Mind, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/pagedattention](https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/pagedattention)  
10. vLLM: Easy, Fast, and Cheap LLM Serving with PagedAttention, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://blog.vllm.ai/2023/06/20/vllm.html](https://blog.vllm.ai/2023/06/20/vllm.html)  
11. Understanding vllm kv cache, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://discuss.vllm.ai/t/understanding-vllm-kv-cache/2061](https://discuss.vllm.ai/t/understanding-vllm-kv-cache/2061)  
12. Native LLM and MLLM Inference at Scale on Apple Silicon \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2601.19139v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2601.19139v1)  
13. Exploring LLMs with MLX and the Neural Accelerators in the M5 GPU, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/exploring-llms-mlx-m5](https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/exploring-llms-mlx-m5)  
14. ml-explore/mlx: MLX: An array framework for Apple silicon \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx](https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx)  
15. MLX \+ Exo: Unlocking Apple Silicon's ML Performance \- Petronella Technology Group, Inc., accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://petronellatech.com/blog/cybersecurity/mlx-exo-unlocking-apple-silicon-s-ml-performance/](https://petronellatech.com/blog/cybersecurity/mlx-exo-unlocking-apple-silicon-s-ml-performance/)  
16. The invisible architecture behind great chat apps \- Nebius, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://nebius.com/blog/posts/the-invisible-architecture-behind-great-chat-apps](https://nebius.com/blog/posts/the-invisible-architecture-behind-great-chat-apps)  
17. \[Bug\]: Qwen3-VL with long text \+ image causes NaN (\!\!\!\!) output and KV Cache Pollution on both float16 and bfloat16 \#3934 \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3934](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3934)  
18. MLX Issues \- 3 Model Failures, running through MlLX-VLM · Issue ..., accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx/issues/3054](https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx/issues/3054)  
19. Model Testing Report 2026-01-23 · Issue \#682 · Blaizzy/mlx-vlm, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/Blaizzy/mlx-vlm/issues/682](https://github.com/Blaizzy/mlx-vlm/issues/682)  
20. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-4bit keeps looping at the end. · Issue \#1059 ..., accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx-examples/issues/1059](https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx-examples/issues/1059)  
21. Whispering Pixels: Exploiting Uninitialized Register Accesses in Modern GPUs \- arXiv.org, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2401.08881v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2401.08881v1)  
22. state-of-open-source-ai/hardware.md at main \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/premAI-io/state-of-open-source-ai/blob/main/hardware.md](https://github.com/premAI-io/state-of-open-source-ai/blob/main/hardware.md)  
23. Flux 2 Klein pure C inference \- Hacker News, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46670279](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46670279)  
24. Read-ME: Refactorizing LLMs as Router-Decoupled Mixture of Experts with System Co-Design \- NIPS, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper\_files/paper/2024/file/d298cf34e4539f9134db7f38b42f69fe-Paper-Conference.pdf](https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/d298cf34e4539f9134db7f38b42f69fe-Paper-Conference.pdf)  
25. Compass: Large Multilingual Language Model for South-east Asia \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2404.09220v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2404.09220v1)  
26. \[RFC\]: Enhancing vLLM Plugin Architecture · Issue \#19161 \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/19161](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/19161)  
27. 1 Introduction \- arXiv.org, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2511.17826](https://arxiv.org/html/2511.17826)  
28. Release Notes — vllm-ascend, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://docs.vllm.ai/projects/ascend/en/v0.11.0/user\_guide/release\_notes.html](https://docs.vllm.ai/projects/ascend/en/v0.11.0/user_guide/release_notes.html)  
29. A short survey on Attention Sparsity methods | by Shitanshu Bhushan | Data Science Collective | Medium, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://medium.com/data-science-collective/a-short-survey-on-attention-sparsity-methods-2a96cba54b4e](https://medium.com/data-science-collective/a-short-survey-on-attention-sparsity-methods-2a96cba54b4e)  
30. Fine-tuned Qwen2 model inference error · Issue \#19 · ml-explore/mlx-swift-examples, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx-swift-examples/issues/19](https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx-swift-examples/issues/19)  
31. Apple shows how much faster the M5 runs local LLMs compared to the M4 \- 9to5Mac, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://9to5mac.com/2025/11/20/apple-shows-how-much-faster-the-m5-runs-local-llms-compared-to-the-m4/](https://9to5mac.com/2025/11/20/apple-shows-how-much-faster-the-m5-runs-local-llms-compared-to-the-m4/)  
32. The Architecture of Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis of Continuous Batching in Large Language Model Inference | Uplatz Blog, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://uplatz.com/blog/the-architecture-of-efficiency-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-continuous-batching-in-large-language-model-inference/](https://uplatz.com/blog/the-architecture-of-efficiency-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-continuous-batching-in-large-language-model-inference/)  
33. Building a Production-Grade Enterprise AI Platform with vLLM: A Complete Guide from the Trenches \- Shahzad Bhatti, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://weblog.plexobject.com/archives/7210](https://weblog.plexobject.com/archives/7210)  
34. 人工智能2024\_6\_21 \- arXiv每日学术速递, accessed on February 25, 2026, [http://arxivdaily.com/thread/56641](http://arxivdaily.com/thread/56641)  
35. BucketServe: Bucket-Based Dynamic Batching for Smart and Efficient LLM Inference Serving \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2507.17120v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2507.17120v1)  
36. vLLM or llama.cpp: Choosing the right LLM inference engine for your use case, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2025/09/30/vllm-or-llamacpp-choosing-right-llm-inference-engine-your-use-case](https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2025/09/30/vllm-or-llamacpp-choosing-right-llm-inference-engine-your-use-case)  
37. FairBatching: Fairness-Aware Batch Formation for LLM Inference \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2510.14392v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2510.14392v1)  
38. not much happened today | AINews \- Smol AI, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://news.smol.ai/issues/25-09-09-not-much/](https://news.smol.ai/issues/25-09-09-not-much/)  
39. Vllm vs. llama.cpp : r/LocalLLaMA \- Reddit, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1m1au28/vllm\_vs\_llamacpp/](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1m1au28/vllm_vs_llamacpp/)  
40. Batch Speculative Decoding Done Right \- arXiv.org, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2510.22876v3](https://arxiv.org/html/2510.22876v3)  
41. How Structured Outputs and Constrained Decoding Work | Let's Data Science, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://letsdatascience.com/blog/structured-outputs-making-llms-return-reliable-json](https://letsdatascience.com/blog/structured-outputs-making-llms-return-reliable-json)  
42. ruvector/docs/adr/ADR-009-structured-output.md at main \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ruvnet/ruvector/blob/main/docs/adr/ADR-009-structured-output.md](https://github.com/ruvnet/ruvector/blob/main/docs/adr/ADR-009-structured-output.md)  
43. Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation | OpenReview, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://openreview.net/forum?id=XMb9poL2Mo](https://openreview.net/forum?id=XMb9poL2Mo)  
44. The Hidden Cost of Readability: How Code Formatting Silently Consumes Your LLM Budget, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2508.13666v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2508.13666v1)  
45. \[Feature\]\[Tools\]: Complete Redesign of Tool Calling · Issue \#22918 · vllm-project/vllm \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/22918](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/22918)  
46. Why Llama 3.x Repeats Responses in vLLM But Not Ollama | by S.N. Tiwari \- Medium, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://medium.com/@sachtiwari8/why-llama-3-x-repeats-responses-in-vllm-but-not-ollama-cfc823e3e1f7](https://medium.com/@sachtiwari8/why-llama-3-x-repeats-responses-in-vllm-but-not-ollama-cfc823e3e1f7)  
47. Potential problem with streaming and unicode · Issue \#372 · abetlen/llama-cpp-python, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python/issues/372](https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python/issues/372)  
48. Easy AWS: Agentic Systems. Current methods for leveraging… | by Antonella Blasetti, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://aws.plainenglish.io/easy-aws-agentic-systems-c78482f97be7](https://aws.plainenglish.io/easy-aws-agentic-systems-c78482f97be7)  
49. Tool-Supported Mini-App Extraction to Facilitate Program Analysis and Parallelization | Request PDF \- ResearchGate, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353357189\_Tool-Supported\_Mini-App\_Extraction\_to\_Facilitate\_Program\_Analysis\_and\_Parallelization](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353357189_Tool-Supported_Mini-App_Extraction_to_Facilitate_Program_Analysis_and_Parallelization)  
50. llama.cpp vs vllm performance comparison \#15180 \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/15180](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/15180)  
51. LLM Inference Performance Engineering: Best Practices | Databricks Blog, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.databricks.com/blog/llm-inference-performance-engineering-best-practices](https://www.databricks.com/blog/llm-inference-performance-engineering-best-practices)  
52. Comparative Analysis of Large Language Model Inference Serving Systems: A Performance Study of vLLM and HuggingFace TGI \- arXiv.org, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2511.17593v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2511.17593v1)  
53. Research: vllm-mlx on Apple Silicon achieves 21% to 87% higher throughput than llama.cpp : r/LocalLLaMA \- Reddit, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1qssxhx/research\_vllmmlx\_on\_apple\_silicon\_achieves\_21\_to/](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1qssxhx/research_vllmmlx_on_apple_silicon_achieves_21_to/)  
54. Benchmarks for Quantized Models? (for users locally running Q8/Q6/Q2 precision) \- Reddit, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1pyrjke/benchmarks\_for\_quantized\_models\_for\_users\_locally/](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1pyrjke/benchmarks_for_quantized_models_for_users_locally/)  
55. I found that MXFP4 has lower perplexity than Q4\_K\_M and Q4\_K\_XL. \- Reddit, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1qrzyaz/i\_found\_that\_mxfp4\_has\_lower\_perplexity\_than\_q4\_k/](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1qrzyaz/i_found_that_mxfp4_has_lower_perplexity_than_q4_k/)  
56. LM Studio 0.4 \- Hacker News, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799477](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799477)  
57. Evalverse: Unified and Accessible Library for Large Language Model Evaluation \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2404.00943v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2404.00943v1)  
58. EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness: A framework for few-shot evaluation of language models., accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)  
59. insait-institute/lm-evaluation-harness-bg: A framework for few-shot evaluation of language models, extended with benchmarks by https://insait.ai \- GitHub, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://github.com/insait-institute/lm-evaluation-harness-bg](https://github.com/insait-institute/lm-evaluation-harness-bg)  
60. LM-Evaluation-Harness Framework Practical Guide: A Comprehensive Analysis of Large Language Model Benchmark Testing \- Oreate AI Blog, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://www.oreateai.com/blog/lmevaluationharness-framework-practical-guide-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-large-language-model-benchmark-testing/61c5a24cb54a553b582544987195a9d4](https://www.oreateai.com/blog/lmevaluationharness-framework-practical-guide-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-large-language-model-benchmark-testing/61c5a24cb54a553b582544987195a9d4)  
61. Chronicals: A High-Performance Framework for LLM Fine-Tuning with 3.51x Speedup over Unsloth \- arXiv.org, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2601.02609v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2601.02609v1)  
62. GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties \- Z.ai, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://z.ai/blog/glm-4.5](https://z.ai/blog/glm-4.5)  
63. Verifying LLM Inference to Prevent Model Weight Exfiltration \- arXiv, accessed on February 25, 2026, [https://arxiv.org/html/2511.02620v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2511.02620v1)

[image1]: <data:image/png;base64, >

[image2]: <data:image/png;base64, >

[image3]: <data:image/png;base64, >

[image4]: <data:image/png;base64, >

[image5]: <data:image/png;base64, >