from inline_snapshot import snapshot

from mirascope.llm import (
    AssistantMessage,
    Text,
    Thought,
    UserMessage,
)

sync_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "params": {"thinking": {"level": "minimal"}},
            "finish_reason": None,
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 11,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "provider_tool_usage": None,
                "raw": "ResponseUsage(input_tokens=62, input_tokens_details=InputTokensDetails(cached_tokens=0), output_tokens=11, output_tokens_details=OutputTokensDetails(reasoning_tokens=0), total_tokens=73)",
                "total_tokens": 73,
            },
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Counting prime numbers with "79"**

I need to find all prime numbers below 400 that have "79" in their decimal representation. This includes two-digit and three-digit primes, starting with 79 itself. \n\

I'll check three-digit numbers that can potentially contain "79," which can only appear at the end when x79 (where x is 1, 2, or 3). I’ll also consider other configurations like 7x9. The primes I’m focusing on include 79, with 179 and 379 as possibilities, but 197 doesn't work because "79" isn’t contiguous there.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Checking candidates for primality**

I need to focus on numbers that contain "79." The only valid formats are x79 where x is 1, 2, or 3, leading to candidates: 79, 179, 279, and 379. 97 doesn’t count, and I won't consider combinations like 7x9 because they're not contiguous.

Now, I’ll check for primality. 79 and 179 are both prime; I confirmed 179 by testing divisibility against primes up to its square root. 279 isn’t prime since it’s divisible by 3. Lastly, for 379, it seems likely prime after testing smaller primes with no remainders.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing prime checks for "79"**

After checking for divisibility of 379 by small primes, I confirmed it's a prime number. So the primes below 400 containing the substring "79" are 79, 179, and 379—making a total of three.

I also wanted to ensure there were no other configurations for three-digit numbers with "79" that I overlooked. The contiguous substring must appear as "79." I've confirmed that 79 itself counts and does not exceed 400, so the final answer remains three primes. I double-checked—97 doesn’t qualify either.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming the count of primes with "79"**

I realized that I should check for any numbers like 079, but they don't exist—so I'm still at three. I made sure 379 is prime by testing its divisibility against primes up to 19, confirming it’s not divisible by any of them.

We already verified 179 as well. Thus, the count of primes below 400 containing "79" remains three. I double-checked to ensure I didn't miss anything, confirming there's no "79" in negative numbers either. Final answer: 3.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Delivering the final answer**

The instruction is clear: I need to answer only with the number itself, without any additional context. So, I'll provide "3" as my response. I just want to make sure I'm following the guidelines perfectly by delivering just the integer—no spaces or extra details. Alright, here it goes: 3.\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0c6fe76bfb6817d700696afa0fdfb48197aa1316339d7ef345",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Counting prime numbers with "79"**

I need to find all prime numbers below 400 that have "79" in their decimal representation. This includes two-digit and three-digit primes, starting with 79 itself. \n\

I'll check three-digit numbers that can potentially contain "79," which can only appear at the end when x79 (where x is 1, 2, or 3). I’ll also consider other configurations like 7x9. The primes I’m focusing on include 79, with 179 and 379 as possibilities, but 197 doesn't work because "79" isn’t contiguous there.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Checking candidates for primality**

I need to focus on numbers that contain "79." The only valid formats are x79 where x is 1, 2, or 3, leading to candidates: 79, 179, 279, and 379. 97 doesn’t count, and I won't consider combinations like 7x9 because they're not contiguous.

Now, I’ll check for primality. 79 and 179 are both prime; I confirmed 179 by testing divisibility against primes up to its square root. 279 isn’t prime since it’s divisible by 3. Lastly, for 379, it seems likely prime after testing smaller primes with no remainders.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing prime checks for "79"**

After checking for divisibility of 379 by small primes, I confirmed it's a prime number. So the primes below 400 containing the substring "79" are 79, 179, and 379—making a total of three.

I also wanted to ensure there were no other configurations for three-digit numbers with "79" that I overlooked. The contiguous substring must appear as "79." I've confirmed that 79 itself counts and does not exceed 400, so the final answer remains three primes. I double-checked—97 doesn’t qualify either.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming the count of primes with "79"**

I realized that I should check for any numbers like 079, but they don't exist—so I'm still at three. I made sure 379 is prime by testing its divisibility against primes up to 19, confirming it’s not divisible by any of them.

We already verified 179 as well. Thus, the count of primes below 400 containing "79" remains three. I double-checked to ensure I didn't miss anything, confirming there's no "79" in negative numbers either. Final answer: 3.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Delivering the final answer**

The instruction is clear: I need to answer only with the number itself, without any additional context. So, I'll provide "3" as my response. I just want to make sure I'm following the guidelines perfectly by delivering just the integer—no spaces or extra details. Alright, here it goes: 3.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0c6fe76bfb6817d700696afa218dd88197962b4ac041b6ef86",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don’t remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0c6fe76bfb6817d700696afa2274948197b94d9f86f30a6422",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0c6fe76bfb6817d700696afa22a50c8197ad47821730afcc6f",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don’t remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
        }
    }
)
async_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "params": {"thinking": {"level": "minimal"}},
            "finish_reason": None,
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "provider_tool_usage": None,
                "raw": "ResponseUsage(input_tokens=62, input_tokens_details=InputTokensDetails(cached_tokens=0), output_tokens=10, output_tokens_details=OutputTokensDetails(reasoning_tokens=0), total_tokens=72)",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Counting prime numbers with "79"**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain the substring "79." So, I’m looking for consecutive digits "79" in prime numbers. First, I'll enumerate primes under 400 and check each one. \n\

The relevant primes I identified are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Numbers like 790-799 exceed 400 and don’t count. Only 79 and 179 qualify. It's also crucial that "79" must appear consecutively. So the count is just 4 numbers: 79, 179, 279, and 379.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Determining primes with "79"**

I need to determine valid numbers containing "79" as a substring and check if they're prime. Numbers starting with "79X" like 790-799 exceed 400, so they don’t count. \n\

I should check three-digit configurations ending with "79," such as 179, 279, and 379, and also include 79 itself. My check reveals that 79 is prime, and when I check 179, it's also prime since it isn’t divisible by 3, 5, or 7. I’m examining their primality closely!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Verifying prime numbers with "79"**

I’m checking the primes containing "79." First, I confirm that 179 is prime since it has no divisors up to its square root. However, 279 isn’t prime because it’s divisible by 3. \n\

For 379, after checking up to its square root, I find it's also prime. Other potential candidates like 197 and 297 contain "97," not "79." So my list of primes with "79" is {79, 179, 379}, totaling 3. I’ll double-check to ensure there are no other possibilities under 400.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming primes with "79"**

I’m confirming the prime numbers that contain "79." So far, I’ve established that 79, 179, and 379 are prime while 279 is not. \n\

I checked if there are any three-digit numbers with "79," but options like 297 and 397 don’t work since they contain "97" instead. I double-checked the primality of 179 and 379, finding no divisors up to their respective limits. I’ve confirmed 79 is prime as well. Therefore, my final count of primes with "79" is 3!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing the count of primes with "79"**

I need to confirm that 397 doesn’t contain "79" since it has digits "3, 9, 7." I realize 97 is just a reversed sequence, so it doesn't count either. The only valid candidates are still 79, 179, and 379. I double-checked that "79" only appears in numbers ending with 79, meaning the only primes are 179, 279, and 379. I’ve confirmed they’re all primes. So, the final count remains at 3!\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_01e0511ce015177b00696afa357de48194bb09bd5224ea7904",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Counting prime numbers with "79"**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain the substring "79." So, I’m looking for consecutive digits "79" in prime numbers. First, I'll enumerate primes under 400 and check each one. \n\

The relevant primes I identified are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Numbers like 790-799 exceed 400 and don’t count. Only 79 and 179 qualify. It's also crucial that "79" must appear consecutively. So the count is just 4 numbers: 79, 179, 279, and 379.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Determining primes with "79"**

I need to determine valid numbers containing "79" as a substring and check if they're prime. Numbers starting with "79X" like 790-799 exceed 400, so they don’t count. \n\

I should check three-digit configurations ending with "79," such as 179, 279, and 379, and also include 79 itself. My check reveals that 79 is prime, and when I check 179, it's also prime since it isn’t divisible by 3, 5, or 7. I’m examining their primality closely!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Verifying prime numbers with "79"**

I’m checking the primes containing "79." First, I confirm that 179 is prime since it has no divisors up to its square root. However, 279 isn’t prime because it’s divisible by 3. \n\

For 379, after checking up to its square root, I find it's also prime. Other potential candidates like 197 and 297 contain "97," not "79." So my list of primes with "79" is {79, 179, 379}, totaling 3. I’ll double-check to ensure there are no other possibilities under 400.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming primes with "79"**

I’m confirming the prime numbers that contain "79." So far, I’ve established that 79, 179, and 379 are prime while 279 is not. \n\

I checked if there are any three-digit numbers with "79," but options like 297 and 397 don’t work since they contain "97" instead. I double-checked the primality of 179 and 379, finding no divisors up to their respective limits. I’ve confirmed 79 is prime as well. Therefore, my final count of primes with "79" is 3!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing the count of primes with "79"**

I need to confirm that 397 doesn’t contain "79" since it has digits "3, 9, 7." I realize 97 is just a reversed sequence, so it doesn't count either. The only valid candidates are still 79, 179, and 379. I double-checked that "79" only appears in numbers ending with 79, meaning the only primes are 179, 279, and 379. I’ve confirmed they’re all primes. So, the final count remains at 3!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_01e0511ce015177b00696afa49d26c8194ae3a8d87d6ba7433",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_01e0511ce015177b00696afa4ad1848194aef23e20a1b46ef2",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_01e0511ce015177b00696afa4af39c819483814dcdac363aad",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
        }
    }
)
stream_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "finish_reason": None,
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Exploring prime numbers**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain the substring "79" in their decimal representation. First, 79 itself is a candidate. Then there's 179, 279, and 379 — all of which are under 400. However, no three-digit numbers with "79" fit since they exceed 400. Now, I need to test the primality of these candidates — starting with 79, which is prime, then checking 179 by testing it against small primes.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Testing prime candidates**

I’m checking the primality of my candidates. For 179, I see it’s odd, not divisible by 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, so it's prime! Next, 279 is definitely not prime since it's divisible by 3. Now, for 379, after testing against several primes, I conclude that it’s also prime. I’m also confirming there aren’t any other numbers with "79" under 400 — only 79 itself works, and 97 has the digits reversed, which doesn't count. So, 179 and 379 are my primes!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Final count of primes**

I’ve confirmed the primes with the substring "79." The candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379. I’ve established that 79, 179, and 379 are prime, which gives us a total of three primes. I rechecked 379 against small primes and verified its primality, so that’s settled. I also ruled out numbers like 3979 since they’re over 400. Lastly, I considered whether leading zeros affect the substring, but I believe they don’t, so I’m finalizing my answer as "3."\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0a1097cbfef27a8c00696afa2459008196a08a4261aba00f56",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Exploring prime numbers**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain the substring "79" in their decimal representation. First, 79 itself is a candidate. Then there's 179, 279, and 379 — all of which are under 400. However, no three-digit numbers with "79" fit since they exceed 400. Now, I need to test the primality of these candidates — starting with 79, which is prime, then checking 179 by testing it against small primes.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Testing prime candidates**

I’m checking the primality of my candidates. For 179, I see it’s odd, not divisible by 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, so it's prime! Next, 279 is definitely not prime since it's divisible by 3. Now, for 379, after testing against several primes, I conclude that it’s also prime. I’m also confirming there aren’t any other numbers with "79" under 400 — only 79 itself works, and 97 has the digits reversed, which doesn't count. So, 179 and 379 are my primes!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Final count of primes**

I’ve confirmed the primes with the substring "79." The candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379. I’ve established that 79, 179, and 379 are prime, which gives us a total of three primes. I rechecked 379 against small primes and verified its primality, so that’s settled. I also ruled out numbers like 3979 since they’re over 400. Lastly, I considered whether leading zeros affect the substring, but I believe they don’t, so I’m finalizing my answer as "3."\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0a1097cbfef27a8c00696afa33407081969902b1b1da52f678",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0a1097cbfef27a8c00696afa340cac81969cbdf59ae7fcc4d7",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0a1097cbfef27a8c00696afa34411c8196842111c511fa629f",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "provider_tool_usage": None,
                "raw": "None",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "n_chunks": 6,
        }
    }
)
async_stream_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "finish_reason": None,
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Counting primes with substring "79"**

I need to find the count of prime numbers below 400 that have the substring "79". The prime number 79 counts, as do 179, and any three-digit combinations that include "79", such as "79x" or "x79". \n\

I'm thinking I should systematically look at all primes less than 400. For three-digit numbers, I'll check to see if either digit arrangement holds '79' together. I just need to keep the count accurate!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Identifying valid primes with "79"**

If AB = ‘79’, then A=7 and B=9, which positions the hundreds digit at 7 and the tens at 9, making numbers like 790-799 outside the limit of 400. So, this scenario isn't valid. \n\

Now, if I flip it to BA='79', this gives B=7 and C=9, so we’re looking at A79 where A can be 1, 2, or 3, leading to 179, 279, and 379. \n\

I realize that 79 itself is included, but 297 doesn't work as it has "97" instead. So the valid numbers below 400 that contain '79’ are just 79, 179, 279, and 379!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Verifying the primes with "79"**

Looking at the numbers 79, 179, 279, and 379, I notice that for 379 and 279, they both have "79" as digits two and three. \n\

Now, checking for primality:
- 79 is known as a prime number.
- For 179, I confirm it's prime after checking divisibility against primes up to around 13.
- Then for 279, the digit sum shows it's divisible by 3, so not prime.
- Finally, 379 is confirmed to be prime after checking against primes up to about 19. \n\

So, the primes in the set are 79, 179, and 379!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming primes and checking for additional candidates**

After checking divisibility, I confirm that 379 is prime, alongside 79 and 179, giving me three valid primes. Now, I want to ensure I haven't missed any other numbers below 400 that contain the substring '79'. \n\

It's clear that I should only consider consecutive digits in the decimal representation. In the two-digit realm, that leaves me only with 79. For three digits, I’m looking at numbers formatted like x79, which lead me back to 179, 279, and 379. \n\

So, those four numbers are all the valid findings, and I feel confident about it!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing the answer**

I've concluded that the count of primes under 400 with the substring "79" is 3. I shouldn’t forget that single-digit numbers wouldn't work for this substring anyway, so it’s safe to focus on multi-digit primes. \n\

Now, I can confidently say that the final answer is just "3." I'll deliver that succinctly without any extra commentary!\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_038738faec0c718d00696afa4c22588193ad89b9ef04ebec45",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Counting primes with substring "79"**

I need to find the count of prime numbers below 400 that have the substring "79". The prime number 79 counts, as do 179, and any three-digit combinations that include "79", such as "79x" or "x79". \n\

I'm thinking I should systematically look at all primes less than 400. For three-digit numbers, I'll check to see if either digit arrangement holds '79' together. I just need to keep the count accurate!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Identifying valid primes with "79"**

If AB = ‘79’, then A=7 and B=9, which positions the hundreds digit at 7 and the tens at 9, making numbers like 790-799 outside the limit of 400. So, this scenario isn't valid. \n\

Now, if I flip it to BA='79', this gives B=7 and C=9, so we’re looking at A79 where A can be 1, 2, or 3, leading to 179, 279, and 379. \n\

I realize that 79 itself is included, but 297 doesn't work as it has "97" instead. So the valid numbers below 400 that contain '79’ are just 79, 179, 279, and 379!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Verifying the primes with "79"**

Looking at the numbers 79, 179, 279, and 379, I notice that for 379 and 279, they both have "79" as digits two and three. \n\

Now, checking for primality:
- 79 is known as a prime number.
- For 179, I confirm it's prime after checking divisibility against primes up to around 13.
- Then for 279, the digit sum shows it's divisible by 3, so not prime.
- Finally, 379 is confirmed to be prime after checking against primes up to about 19. \n\

So, the primes in the set are 79, 179, and 379!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming primes and checking for additional candidates**

After checking divisibility, I confirm that 379 is prime, alongside 79 and 179, giving me three valid primes. Now, I want to ensure I haven't missed any other numbers below 400 that contain the substring '79'. \n\

It's clear that I should only consider consecutive digits in the decimal representation. In the two-digit realm, that leaves me only with 79. For three digits, I’m looking at numbers formatted like x79, which lead me back to 179, 279, and 379. \n\

So, those four numbers are all the valid findings, and I feel confident about it!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing the answer**

I've concluded that the count of primes under 400 with the substring "79" is 3. I shouldn’t forget that single-digit numbers wouldn't work for this substring anyway, so it’s safe to focus on multi-digit primes. \n\

Now, I can confidently say that the final answer is just "3." I'll deliver that succinctly without any extra commentary!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_038738faec0c718d00696afa6331648193bab40bd65ed1751c",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_038738faec0c718d00696afa63e1608193b0e59a92440a6570",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_038738faec0c718d00696afa644a4881938e6f9cee36c24270",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "provider_tool_usage": None,
                "raw": "None",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "n_chunks": 6,
        }
    }
)
