from inline_snapshot import snapshot

from mirascope.llm import (
    AssistantMessage,
    Text,
    Thought,
    UserMessage,
)

sync_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "params": {"thinking": {"level": "minimal"}},
            "finish_reason": None,
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "raw": "ResponseUsage(input_tokens=62, input_tokens_details=InputTokensDetails(cached_tokens=0), output_tokens=10, output_tokens_details=OutputTokensDetails(reasoning_tokens=0), total_tokens=72)",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finding primes containing "79"**

I'm looking for primes under 400 that contain "79" as a substring. For two-digit primes, 79 fits the bill — it’s prime and under 400, so that's one.

For three-digit primes, I consider those that begin with "79," which would be from 790 to 799. However, those aren't prime since they're even or end in 0 or 5. But I also find three-digit numbers ending in "79," which are 179, 279, and 379. Among these, I'll need to check which of the three-digit numbers are actually prime.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Clarifying prime candidates**

I need to double-check my range for primes under 400. I miscalculated those from 790-799, which are definitely over 400, so they don't count. We’re only considering three-digit numbers up to 399.

The three-digit candidates are x79, where x is 1 to 3. That gives me 179, 279, and 379. While 79 is included as a two-digit prime. I should now check if 179 is prime by testing divisibility with primes up to around 13.38, like 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Checking the primality of candidates**

I’ve tested 179 and confirmed it’s prime since it isn’t divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, or 13.

Next, 279 is clearly ruled out as not prime because its digits sum to 18, which is divisible by 3.

Now, for 379, I estimate the square root is around 19.4. I check it against primes up to 19 and find it likely prime since none are divisors.

As for any other numbers under 400 that contain "79," I see two-digit 79 and check if 197 includes "79" but it doesn't.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing primes with "79"**

I'm examining the digits of 197; it contains "97" but not "79." Similarly, numbers like 297 also contain "97," and 790 is above 400, so it doesn't count.

The primes I've found with "79" under 400 are 79, 179, and 379—three in total. I've confirmed 97, 197, 279, and others don't contain "79," while 397 and 739 also lack the necessary pairing. Since no three-digit configurations determine "79," I'm sticking with those three primes.\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_04b3ed1b4d394a320069605174aa6c81969e01eab60273a785",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finding primes containing "79"**

I'm looking for primes under 400 that contain "79" as a substring. For two-digit primes, 79 fits the bill — it’s prime and under 400, so that's one.

For three-digit primes, I consider those that begin with "79," which would be from 790 to 799. However, those aren't prime since they're even or end in 0 or 5. But I also find three-digit numbers ending in "79," which are 179, 279, and 379. Among these, I'll need to check which of the three-digit numbers are actually prime.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Clarifying prime candidates**

I need to double-check my range for primes under 400. I miscalculated those from 790-799, which are definitely over 400, so they don't count. We’re only considering three-digit numbers up to 399.

The three-digit candidates are x79, where x is 1 to 3. That gives me 179, 279, and 379. While 79 is included as a two-digit prime. I should now check if 179 is prime by testing divisibility with primes up to around 13.38, like 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Checking the primality of candidates**

I’ve tested 179 and confirmed it’s prime since it isn’t divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, or 13.

Next, 279 is clearly ruled out as not prime because its digits sum to 18, which is divisible by 3.

Now, for 379, I estimate the square root is around 19.4. I check it against primes up to 19 and find it likely prime since none are divisors.

As for any other numbers under 400 that contain "79," I see two-digit 79 and check if 197 includes "79" but it doesn't.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing primes with "79"**

I'm examining the digits of 197; it contains "97" but not "79." Similarly, numbers like 297 also contain "97," and 790 is above 400, so it doesn't count.

The primes I've found with "79" under 400 are 79, 179, and 379—three in total. I've confirmed 97, 197, 279, and others don't contain "79," while 397 and 739 also lack the necessary pairing. Since no three-digit configurations determine "79," I'm sticking with those three primes.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_04b3ed1b4d394a32006960518ed5cc8196b3081ebf3f40019f",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_04b3ed1b4d394a3200696051905fd481969675b1760b8f9d9e",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_04b3ed1b4d394a32006960519097188196817e0ea9dd78d929",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
        }
    }
)
async_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "params": {"thinking": {"level": "minimal"}},
            "finish_reason": None,
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "raw": "ResponseUsage(input_tokens=62, input_tokens_details=InputTokensDetails(cached_tokens=0), output_tokens=10, output_tokens_details=OutputTokensDetails(reasoning_tokens=0), total_tokens=72)",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Counting primes with 79 substring**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain "79" as a substring, which refers to contiguous digits. The candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Oh, but 790-799 are above 400, so they don’t count. 79 and 179 are confirmed primes. However, 279 isn’t prime because it's divisible by 3. Now for 379, I need to check if it's prime by testing divisibility against primes up to about 19. I'll keep investigating!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming prime status of 379**

I’m checking if 379 is prime, so I calculated some multiplication and found out that it is indeed prime. I also confirmed 79, 179, and 279 in relation to the "79" substring. The only numbers that fit are 79, 179, 279, and 379. The range of 790-799 exceeds 400, so I can't include them. I realize "79" must be contiguous, whether in the tens and ones or hundreds and tens places. This makes it clear!\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Verifying prime numbers containing "79"**

I'm analyzing three-digit numbers and confirming that combinations containing "79" at the start or end, like 790-799, are not allowed. The only eligible numbers are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Among these, I confirm that 79, 179, and 379 are prime, while 279 isn’t. So, that gives me a count of 3. I checked primality for each. 79 and 379 are confirmed, and 179 checks out too. Now, I’ll ensure there aren’t any other primes containing "79."\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming the count of primes**

I previously included 279, which isn’t prime, but 379 is. I'm checking other numbers to see if they contain "79." Numbers like 197 and 297 don't qualify. For 397, it has "97," so still not it. However, 179 does contain "79." I realize there aren't any instances of "79" repeating or leading zeros to consider. Ultimately, I’m supposed to return just the number of confirmed primes, which is 3. I double-check everything to be safe. So, I’ll return 3.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Verifying the primality of 379**

I'm checking whether 379 is a prime number by dividing it with smaller primes. I find that it doesn't divide evenly by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, or 19. All checks show it's not divisible by any of these primes, confirming that 379 is indeed prime. I previously verified 179 is prime as well. So, my final count of primes containing "79" is 3. I'll just return "3" as the answer.\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_02b016ad78836c87006960522974a48194a7e8e5b2a764cf1a",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Counting primes with 79 substring**

I need to find prime numbers less than 400 that contain "79" as a substring, which refers to contiguous digits. The candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Oh, but 790-799 are above 400, so they don’t count. 79 and 179 are confirmed primes. However, 279 isn’t prime because it's divisible by 3. Now for 379, I need to check if it's prime by testing divisibility against primes up to about 19. I'll keep investigating!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming prime status of 379**

I’m checking if 379 is prime, so I calculated some multiplication and found out that it is indeed prime. I also confirmed 79, 179, and 279 in relation to the "79" substring. The only numbers that fit are 79, 179, 279, and 379. The range of 790-799 exceeds 400, so I can't include them. I realize "79" must be contiguous, whether in the tens and ones or hundreds and tens places. This makes it clear!\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Verifying prime numbers containing "79"**

I'm analyzing three-digit numbers and confirming that combinations containing "79" at the start or end, like 790-799, are not allowed. The only eligible numbers are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Among these, I confirm that 79, 179, and 379 are prime, while 279 isn’t. So, that gives me a count of 3. I checked primality for each. 79 and 379 are confirmed, and 179 checks out too. Now, I’ll ensure there aren’t any other primes containing "79."\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming the count of primes**

I previously included 279, which isn’t prime, but 379 is. I'm checking other numbers to see if they contain "79." Numbers like 197 and 297 don't qualify. For 397, it has "97," so still not it. However, 179 does contain "79." I realize there aren't any instances of "79" repeating or leading zeros to consider. Ultimately, I’m supposed to return just the number of confirmed primes, which is 3. I double-check everything to be safe. So, I’ll return 3.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Verifying the primality of 379**

I'm checking whether 379 is a prime number by dividing it with smaller primes. I find that it doesn't divide evenly by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, or 19. All checks show it's not divisible by any of these primes, confirming that 379 is indeed prime. I previously verified 179 is prime as well. So, my final count of primes containing "79" is 3. I'll just return "3" as the answer.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_02b016ad78836c87006960523daedc81949c7c4fe2559245a2",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_02b016ad78836c87006960523e6248819485b4d4ed155c0195",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_02b016ad78836c87006960523e8ff88194a5d679229d27a960",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
        }
    }
)
stream_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "finish_reason": None,
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finding primes with substring**

I’m looking for prime numbers below 400 that contain the substring “79.” First, I can confirm that 79 itself is a prime. Then there are 179, 279, and 379, which are also candidates. I considered three-digit numbers like 790-799, but those exceed 400, so they’re not included. I need to remember that the substring must be in order, which rules out any numbers like 97. Overall, my primary candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Refining cases for substring**

I’m exploring how the substring “79” fits into three-digit numbers. I figured out that we can represent them as x79 and 79x. The forms like 790-799 were excluded since they exceed 400, but I want to make sure I’m not missing anything. So far, the candidates I’ve identified are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Numbers like 297 and 197 don’t count because they contain “97” rather than “79.” Overall, I think I have the valid primes sorted. Four-digit numbers aren’t relevant here.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Checking primality of candidates**

I’ve narrowed it down to four numbers: 79, 179, 279, and 379. I need to check which of these are prime. Starting with 79, it's prime! For 179, I check divisibility against primes up to about 13 and confirm it’s prime too. Then I check 279, and since it’s divisible by 3, it’s not prime. Lastly, I check 379 and find it’s also prime after checking against primes up to 19. So, my final primes are 79, 179, and 379.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing prime candidates**

I’ve confirmed my primes: 79, 179, and 379, making three in total. I briefly thought about 97, but since it doesn't contain "79," it’s out. Numbers like 297 and 197 also don’t fit because they have the digits reversed. I confirmed that there are no other two-digit numbers, and larger groups like 790-799 exceed 400. I double-checked 379’s primality, and since I verified it against all primes up to 19, I’m confident it's prime. So the final count remains three.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Confirming the final count**

I’ve confirmed my interpretation is correct, so the answer here is definitely 3. I've reviewed the edge cases: 179, 379, and 79 are all fine as primes, while 97 doesn’t count, and 279 is composite. Therefore, the final count of prime numbers that contain the substring "79" is indeed 3. I’ll keep it straightforward and just return the number without any extra text. So, the answer is 3.\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0d25b3badaaf1bb800696051d47ba48196a6a41574a39ab48f",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finding primes with substring**

I’m looking for prime numbers below 400 that contain the substring “79.” First, I can confirm that 79 itself is a prime. Then there are 179, 279, and 379, which are also candidates. I considered three-digit numbers like 790-799, but those exceed 400, so they’re not included. I need to remember that the substring must be in order, which rules out any numbers like 97. Overall, my primary candidates are 79, 179, 279, and 379.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Refining cases for substring**

I’m exploring how the substring “79” fits into three-digit numbers. I figured out that we can represent them as x79 and 79x. The forms like 790-799 were excluded since they exceed 400, but I want to make sure I’m not missing anything. So far, the candidates I’ve identified are 79, 179, 279, and 379. Numbers like 297 and 197 don’t count because they contain “97” rather than “79.” Overall, I think I have the valid primes sorted. Four-digit numbers aren’t relevant here.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Checking primality of candidates**

I’ve narrowed it down to four numbers: 79, 179, 279, and 379. I need to check which of these are prime. Starting with 79, it's prime! For 179, I check divisibility against primes up to about 13 and confirm it’s prime too. Then I check 279, and since it’s divisible by 3, it’s not prime. Lastly, I check 379 and find it’s also prime after checking against primes up to 19. So, my final primes are 79, 179, and 379.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing prime candidates**

I’ve confirmed my primes: 79, 179, and 379, making three in total. I briefly thought about 97, but since it doesn't contain "79," it’s out. Numbers like 297 and 197 also don’t fit because they have the digits reversed. I confirmed that there are no other two-digit numbers, and larger groups like 790-799 exceed 400. I double-checked 379’s primality, and since I verified it against all primes up to 19, I’m confident it's prime. So the final count remains three.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Confirming the final count**

I’ve confirmed my interpretation is correct, so the answer here is definitely 3. I've reviewed the edge cases: 179, 379, and 79 are all fine as primes, while 97 doesn’t count, and 279 is composite. Therefore, the final count of prime numbers that contain the substring "79" is indeed 3. I’ll keep it straightforward and just return the number without any extra text. So, the answer is 3.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0d25b3badaaf1bb800696051eb13d48196bb82d4a6e07260eb",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_0d25b3badaaf1bb800696051ec3a288196a29800d2929bd079",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_0d25b3badaaf1bb800696051ec694481969563030f07779377",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "raw": "None",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "n_chunks": 6,
        }
    }
)
async_stream_snapshot = snapshot(
    {
        "response": {
            "provider_id": "openai",
            "model_id": "openai/gpt-5:responses",
            "provider_model_name": "gpt-5:responses",
            "finish_reason": None,
            "messages": [
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="How many primes below 400 contain 79 as a substring? Answer ONLY with the number, not sharing which primes they are."
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Counting primes with 79**

I need to count primes less than 400 that contain "79" as a substring. The possibilities include 79 itself, 179, 279, and 379. I know that numbers like 790-799 exceed 400, so those are out. Among the candidates, 179 and 379 are confirmed primes, while 279 is composite. 79 itself is prime as well. So, the only primes containing "79" under 400 are 79, 179, and 379.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Identifying primes with 79**

I'm checking for any numbers of the form x79, where x is 1, 2, or 3, to stay under 400. That means I need to evaluate 179, 279, and 379. I know 279 is composite, but both 179 and 379 are prime. So, I can confirm there are three primes: 79, 179, and 379. I also consider if there are any non-contiguous numbers containing "79"—but they don't qualify based on my substring definition. My likely answer is three primes, which I will double-check for primality.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Verifying primes and composites**

I'm checking for primes up to 13. After going through numbers like 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, I've confirmed that 13 is prime. \n\

Next, for 279, it's not even, but its digits add up to 18, which means it's divisible by 3 and thus composite. \n\

Now, looking at 379, it checks out as prime after verifying with smaller primes. \n\

I’ve found that there aren’t any other qualifying numbers with "79." So, the total count remains three primes, including 79.\
"""
                        ),
                        Thought(
                            thought="""\
**Finalizing count of primes with 79**

I briefly considered the number 297, but it doesn't meet the criteria. I need to ensure that 379 is confirmed as prime—yes, it is. I've looked through other potential numbers that might form with "79" and determined that 79 works with 379 and 179, but 279 is composite. \n\

I checked 97 and found it doesn’t qualify either. Numbers like 397 and 795 don’t meet our conditions either. After everything, I'm confident the answer is just "3".\
"""
                        ),
                        Text(text="3"),
                    ],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_070229d1723681c2006960527930d88195bc7f33214161e67d",
                            "summary": [
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Counting primes with 79**

I need to count primes less than 400 that contain "79" as a substring. The possibilities include 79 itself, 179, 279, and 379. I know that numbers like 790-799 exceed 400, so those are out. Among the candidates, 179 and 379 are confirmed primes, while 279 is composite. 79 itself is prime as well. So, the only primes containing "79" under 400 are 79, 179, and 379.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Identifying primes with 79**

I'm checking for any numbers of the form x79, where x is 1, 2, or 3, to stay under 400. That means I need to evaluate 179, 279, and 379. I know 279 is composite, but both 179 and 379 are prime. So, I can confirm there are three primes: 79, 179, and 379. I also consider if there are any non-contiguous numbers containing "79"—but they don't qualify based on my substring definition. My likely answer is three primes, which I will double-check for primality.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Verifying primes and composites**

I'm checking for primes up to 13. After going through numbers like 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, I've confirmed that 13 is prime. \n\

Next, for 279, it's not even, but its digits add up to 18, which means it's divisible by 3 and thus composite. \n\

Now, looking at 379, it checks out as prime after verifying with smaller primes. \n\

I’ve found that there aren’t any other qualifying numbers with "79." So, the total count remains three primes, including 79.\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                                {
                                    "text": """\
**Finalizing count of primes with 79**

I briefly considered the number 297, but it doesn't meet the criteria. I need to ensure that 379 is confirmed as prime—yes, it is. I've looked through other potential numbers that might form with "79" and determined that 79 works with 379 and 179, but 279 is composite. \n\

I checked 97 and found it doesn’t qualify either. Numbers like 397 and 795 don’t meet our conditions either. After everything, I'm confident the answer is just "3".\
""",
                                    "type": "summary_text",
                                },
                            ],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_070229d1723681c2006960528bccb88195ac718c52f86035e0",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "3",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
                UserMessage(
                    content=[
                        Text(
                            text="If you remember what the primes were, then share them, or say 'I don't remember.'"
                        )
                    ]
                ),
                AssistantMessage(
                    content=[Text(text="I don't remember.")],
                    provider_id="openai",
                    model_id="openai/gpt-5:responses",
                    provider_model_name="gpt-5:responses",
                    raw_message=[
                        {
                            "id": "rs_070229d1723681c2006960528c99a0819599276d1365d33bde",
                            "summary": [],
                            "type": "reasoning",
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "msg_070229d1723681c2006960528d580c8195941c8f829a61d944",
                            "content": [
                                {
                                    "annotations": [],
                                    "text": "I don't remember.",
                                    "type": "output_text",
                                    "logprobs": [],
                                }
                            ],
                            "role": "assistant",
                            "status": "completed",
                            "type": "message",
                        },
                    ],
                ),
            ],
            "format": None,
            "tools": [],
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 62,
                "output_tokens": 10,
                "cache_read_tokens": 0,
                "cache_write_tokens": 0,
                "reasoning_tokens": 0,
                "raw": "None",
                "total_tokens": 72,
            },
            "n_chunks": 6,
        }
    }
)
