Based on the visual comparison of the provided screenshots, here is a detailed report of the differences.

---

1.  **Location**: Top-right of the header area vs. bottom-center of the screen
    **Change**: The `+ Add` button has been moved from a full-width element at the bottom of the screen to a smaller, pill-shaped button in the top-right header area. Its style has also changed from a button with only a text label and icon to one with a solid yellow background and white text/icon.
    **Type**: Position/Movement, Style Change, Size Change
    **Impact**: This is a major structural change to the page layout. The primary call-to-action is in a completely different location, which fundamentally alters the user's interaction pattern with the screen.
    **Recommendation**: The development team should align with the design team on the intended placement and style of this critical action button. This change is too significant to be accidental and suggests a disconnect between design and implementation requirements.

2.  **Location**: Page title area, below the `X` icon.
    **Change**: The page title text is misspelled as "Languges" in the implementation, whereas the design specifies "Languages".
    **Type**: Text Change
    **Impact**: Introduces a spelling error on a primary screen title, which appears unprofessional.
    **Recommendation**: Correct the typo in the title to "Languages".

3.  **Location**: Subtitle area, directly below the page title.
    **Change**: The text casing for the subtitle has been changed from sentence case ("You are learning") to title case ("You are Learning").
    **Type**: Text Change / Style Change
    **Impact**: A minor visual inconsistency that deviates from the typographic style defined in the design.
    **Recommendation**: Update the subtitle text to use sentence case ("You are learning") to match the design specification.

4.  **Location**: Bottom half of the screen.
    **Change**: The implemented screen includes a large illustration of a yellow robot character that is not present in the expected design.
    **Type**: Added Element
    **Impact**: This new element significantly alters the visual hierarchy and feel of the screen, consuming a large amount of whitespace and adding a strong branding element not specified in the design.
    **Recommendation**: Verify with the product/design team if this illustration is an intended addition. If not, it should be removed to match the figma design.

5.  **Location**: Second item in the language list ("Norwegian").
    **Change**: One of the language list items in the implementation includes a gray sub-label ("from French") below the language name. The design for list items shows only a single line of text for the language.
    **Type**: Added Element (within a component)
    **Impact**: The implemented list item component has a different structure than designed, supporting two lines of text instead of one. This affects component height and internal layout.
    **Recommendation**: Clarify if this two-line state is a required feature. If so, the design should be updated to include this variant. If not, the sub-label should be removed.

6.  **Location**: Bottom-right corner of the screen.
    **Change**: The expected design includes a small, red "M" character/logo in the bottom-right corner. This element is missing from the implemented screen.
    **Type**: Removed Element
    **Impact**: A subtle branding or UI element has been omitted from the final implementation.
    **Recommendation**: Add the "M" element back to the screen in the position specified by the design.

---

### Summary

- **Total differences found**: 6
- **Overall "match score"**: 50/100
