Agent Runtime Log - Production Microservice Deployment (ATTEMPT 2 - FAILURE)
================================================================================
Session ID: deploy-agent-20241121-0930-attempt2
Task: "Deploy recommendation microservice to production with zero downtime"
Agent: DeploymentAgent v3.2
Start Time: 2024-11-21 09:30:00 UTC
Attempt: 2/3
Previous Attempt: FAILED (database connection pool exhaustion)

[09:30:00] [INIT] Agent initialization started
[09:30:00] [INFO] Task: Deploy recommendation-service v2.5.0 to production (RETRY)
[09:30:00] [INFO] Applying lessons from Attempt 1
[09:30:01] [INFO] Fixed issues:
  - ✓ Database max_connections increased: 100 → 250
  - ✓ Connection pool per pod increased: 20 → 30
  - ✓ Added connection pool monitoring alerts
  - ✓ Verified capacity calculation: (3 blue + 3 green) × 30 = 180 connections (72% of 250)
[09:30:01] [SUCCESS] Agent initialized with fixes applied

[09:30:01] [PLANNING] Creating deployment plan (improved from attempt 1)
[09:30:02] [THOUGHT] Key improvements for this attempt:
  1. Pre-deployment connection pool validation
  2. Monitor connection utilization during traffic shift
  3. More gradual traffic ramp (10% → 25% → 50% → 75% → 100%)
  4. Longer monitoring windows between increments (5 min instead of 3 min)

[09:30:02] [ACTION] Step 1: Pre-deployment validation
[09:30:02] [TOOL] Executing: validate_database_capacity()
[09:30:05] [OBSERVATION] Database capacity check:
  - Current connections (blue only): 42/250 (17% utilization)
  - Projected at 100% blue + 100% green: ~180/250 (72% utilization)
  - Safety margin: 28%
  - ✓ PASS: Sufficient capacity for blue-green deployment

[09:30:05] [THOUGHT] Connection pool capacity validated. Safe to proceed.

[09:30:05] [ACTION] Step 2: Building and pushing Docker image
[09:30:05] [TOOL] Executing: build_and_push_image(tag="v2.5.0")
[09:30:55] [OBSERVATION] Image ready: gcr.io/company/recommendation-service:v2.5.0

[09:30:55] [ACTION] Step 3: Deploying green environment
[09:30:55] [TOOL] Executing: deploy_kubernetes(environment="green", replicas=3)
[09:31:15] [OBSERVATION] Green environment deployed:
  - All 3 pods running and healthy
  - Health checks passing
  - Ready for traffic

[09:31:15] [ACTION] Step 4: Starting gradual traffic shift with enhanced monitoring
[09:31:15] [TOOL] Executing: traffic_shift(percentage=10, monitor_connections=true)
[09:31:20] [OBSERVATION] Traffic at 10%:
  - Blue: 90%, Green: 10%
  - Monitoring connection pools...

[09:32:20] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 1 minute at 10%:
  - Request rate: 150 req/s to green
  - Average latency: 118ms (good)
  - Error rate: 0.1% (normal)
  - DB connections: Blue 40, Green 15, Total 55/250 (22%)
  - ✓ All metrics healthy

[09:36:20] [ACTION] Increasing traffic to 25% (after 5 minute monitoring)
[09:36:21] [TOOL] Executing: traffic_shift(percentage=25)
[09:36:25] [OBSERVATION] Traffic at 25%:
  - Blue: 75%, Green: 25%

[09:37:25] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 1 minute at 25%:
  - Request rate: 375 req/s to green
  - Average latency: 122ms
  - Error rate: 0.1%
  - DB connections: Blue 35, Green 28, Total 63/250 (25%)
  - ✓ All metrics healthy

[09:41:25] [ACTION] Increasing traffic to 50%
[09:41:26] [TOOL] Executing: traffic_shift(percentage=50)
[09:41:30] [OBSERVATION] Traffic at 50%:
  - Blue: 50%, Green: 50%

[09:42:30] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 1 minute at 50%:
  - Request rate: 750 req/s to green
  - Average latency: 125ms
  - Error rate: 0.2%
  - DB connections: Blue 58, Green 62, Total 120/250 (48%)
  - ✓ No connection issues! (Fixed from Attempt 1)

[09:43:30] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 2 minutes at 50%:
  - Latency: 128ms
  - Error rate: 0.2%
  - DB connections: 125/250 (50%)
  - ✓ Stable performance

[09:46:30] [ACTION] Increasing traffic to 75%
[09:46:31] [TOOL] Executing: traffic_shift(percentage=75)
[09:46:35] [OBSERVATION] Traffic at 75%:
  - Blue: 25%, Green: 75%

[09:47:35] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 1 minute at 75%:
  - Request rate: 1125 req/s to green
  - Average latency: 132ms
  - Error rate: 0.3%

[09:48:35] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 2 minutes at 75%:
  - Request rate: 1125 req/s
  - Average latency: 145ms (increasing trend)
  - Error rate: 0.4% (slight increase)

[09:49:35] [OBSERVATION] Metrics after 3 minutes at 75%:
  - Request rate: 1125 req/s
  - Average latency: 178ms (significant increase!)
  - Error rate: 0.6%
  - DB connections: 155/250 (62%)

[09:50:00] [WARNING] Latency threshold exceeded: 178ms (threshold: 150ms)
[09:50:01] [ACTION] Investigating latency spike
[09:50:01] [TOOL] Executing: analyze_performance_bottleneck()
[09:50:05] [OBSERVATION] Performance analysis:
  - CPU utilization: 45% (normal)
  - Memory utilization: 58% (normal)
  - Network I/O: Normal
  - Database query time: 85ms (elevated from baseline 40ms)
  - Database CPU: 78% (high!)
  - Database connections: 155 (healthy)

[09:50:05] [THOUGHT] Database performance degrading under load, but not connection related.

[09:51:00] [OBSERVATION] Continued monitoring:
  - Average latency: 215ms (getting worse)
  - P95 latency: 450ms
  - P99 latency: 780ms (SLO violation: >500ms)
  - Error rate: 1.2% (increasing)

[09:51:00] [ERROR] SLO violation: P99 latency exceeds 500ms threshold

[09:51:00] [ACTION] Deep dive into database performance
[09:51:00] [TOOL] Executing: analyze_database_queries()
[09:51:10] [OBSERVATION] Query performance analysis:
  - Slow query detected: recommendation_candidates lookup
  - Query time: 200-400ms (baseline: 30-50ms)
  - Cause: Missing database index on new query pattern
  - New v2.5.0 feature uses "user_segment" field in WHERE clause
  - Index exists on "user_id" but NOT on "user_segment"
  - Full table scan on 50M row table causing slowdown

[09:51:10] [THOUGHT] ROOT CAUSE: Missing database index for new query pattern!
  - V2.5.0 introduced new recommendation algorithm
  - Uses user_segment field not previously indexed
  - Works fine at low traffic but degrades at high volume
  - This was not caught in staging (smaller data volume)

[09:51:10] [ERROR] CRITICAL: Cannot fix index during deployment (requires DB downtime or long rebuild)

[09:51:10] [ACTION] Initiating rollback to prevent further SLO violations
[09:51:10] [TOOL] Executing: rollback_traffic(to_env="blue")
[09:51:15] [OBSERVATION] Rolling back traffic:
  - Green: 75% → 50% → 25% → 10% → 0%

[09:52:00] [OBSERVATION] Rollback progress:
  - Traffic: 100% on blue
  - Latency dropping: 215ms → 145ms → 110ms
  - Error rate: 1.2% → 0.5% → 0.2%
  - Service stabilizing

[09:52:30] [OBSERVATION] Rollback complete:
  - Blue environment: 100% traffic, stable
  - Green environment: 0% traffic, shutting down
  - Average latency: 108ms (back to normal)
  - Error rate: 0.2% (baseline)
  - Service fully restored

[09:52:30] [FAILURE] Deployment failed - Root cause analysis:

PRIMARY ISSUE: Missing database index for new query pattern
  - V2.5.0 code uses new WHERE clause on "user_segment" field
  - No index exists for this field
  - Full table scan on 50M rows causes 200-400ms queries
  - Acceptable at low traffic, degrades at high volume

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS:
  1. Code review did not flag new query pattern requiring index
  2. Staging environment has smaller dataset (5M rows vs 50M in prod)
  3. Performance testing in staging didn't reveal the issue
  4. Database indexing not part of deployment checklist
  5. No query performance monitoring during deployment

WHY ATTEMPT 1 FIX WASN'T ENOUGH:
  - Fixed connection pool issue ✓
  - But didn't discover the index issue ✗
  - Different root causes require different solutions

LESSONS LEARNED (New from Attempt 2):
  1. ⚠️ CRITICAL: Analyze ALL new query patterns for index requirements
  2. ⚠️ Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on new queries before deployment
  3. ⚠️ Performance test with production-scale data volumes
  4. ⚠️ Monitor query execution time during deployment
  5. ⚠️ Create required indexes BEFORE deploying code that needs them
  6. ⚠️ Staging must have production-like data volume for realistic testing

REMEDIATION PLAN:
  1. Create index: CREATE INDEX idx_user_segment ON users(user_segment)
  2. Wait for index build to complete (~2 hours on 50M rows)
  3. Add index creation to deployment prerequisites checklist
  4. Update staging database to match production size
  5. Add query performance monitoring to deployment pipeline

DEPLOYMENT STATUS: FAILED
ROLLBACK STATUS: SUCCESSFUL
TIME TO DETECT: 5 minutes at 75% traffic
TIME TO ROLLBACK: 1.5 minutes
CUSTOMER IMPACT: 5 minutes of degraded performance (P99 latency 500-780ms, 1.2% errors)

[09:52:30] [EXPORT] Saving failure report: reports/deployment-attempt2-failure.json
[09:52:31] [NOTIFICATION] Alerting team: Index required before retry
[09:52:31] [SHUTDOWN] Agent session terminated

=================================================================================
KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR NEXT ATTEMPT:
=================================================================================
1. Database index on user_segment MUST be created before retry
2. Verify index exists: SELECT * FROM pg_indexes WHERE indexname = 'idx_user_segment'
3. Add query performance monitoring to catch slow queries early
4. Test with production-scale data before deploying
5. Include "Database Schema Changes" section in deployment checklist

CUMULATIVE LESSONS (From Both Attempts):
- Connection pool sizing for dual environments (Attempt 1)
- Database index requirements for new queries (Attempt 2)
- Both are critical and both must be fixed for success
