title = "Restoration vs. Renovation Decision Frameworks"

content = """
Distinguishing between restoration and renovation approaches is fundamental to heritage
preservation, guiding treatment decisions that balance historical authenticity with contemporary
functionality. This framework helps determine when to preserve original features, when to
repair existing elements, and when to introduce modern interventions.

**Treatment Philosophy Hierarchy:** Apply the Secretary of the Interior's Standards hierarchy
that prioritizes preservation of existing historic materials over repair, rehabilitation over
restoration, and reconstruction only as a last resort. Evaluate each building element according
to its historical significance, condition, and contribution to architectural character.

**Authenticity Assessment:** Determine the level of historical authenticity required for each
building component based on its significance and interpretive importance. Identify character-
defining features that must be preserved in their original state versus secondary elements that
can accommodate more flexible treatment approaches.

**Functional Necessity Evaluation:** Assess whether modern functional requirements necessitate
changes to historic fabric or if adaptive solutions can maintain authenticity. Identify
opportunities to integrate contemporary needs through discreet interventions that respect
historical integrity. Prioritize solutions that minimize visual and physical impact.

**Material Condition Analysis:** Evaluate the physical condition of existing materials to
determine appropriate treatment strategies. Distinguish between stable historic materials
that can be preserved, deteriorated elements requiring repair, and failed components needing
replacement. Document condition assessments with clear rationales for treatment decisions.

**Reversibility Considerations:** Design interventions that can be reversed in the future,
allowing for changing preservation philosophies or new historical information. Avoid permanent
alterations that compromise future restoration opportunities. Document treatment methods to
facilitate future reversibility.

**Economic Impact Assessment:** Evaluate the cost implications of different treatment approaches,
balancing preservation ideals with practical financial constraints. Consider long-term costs
of maintenance and potential resale value impacts. Develop cost-benefit analyses that support
treatment decisions with economic justification.

**Stakeholder Value Alignment:** Align treatment decisions with stakeholder priorities including
owner preferences, regulatory requirements, and community expectations. Facilitate discussions
that balance competing interests while maintaining preservation standards. Document decision-
making processes for transparency and accountability.

**Documentation Standards:** Maintain comprehensive records of treatment decisions with
photographic documentation, condition assessments, and rationale statements. Create treatment
plans that clearly distinguish between restoration and renovation approaches. Preserve decision
frameworks for future reference and consistency in preservation practice.
"""

version = "0.0.1"
