# Code Review: LAT-28 — `pyproject.toml` metadata

**Verdict: LGTM**

## Findings
1. **Requested metadata is present and correct.**
   - `license = "MIT"`
   - `readme = "README.md"`
   - `authors` includes Stage 11 Agentics (`hello@stage11agentics.com`)
   - `keywords` list is present
   - `classifiers` list includes Alpha, Console, Developers, MIT, Python 3/3.12, Libraries, and Build Tools
   - `[project.urls]` includes `Homepage`, `Repository`, and `Issues` pointing to `github.com/stage11-agentics/lattice`

2. **TOML is valid and well-formatted.**
   - Parsed successfully with Python `tomllib` (`python3`).

3. **Classifiers are consistent with the stated project positioning.**
   - `Development Status :: 3 - Alpha` and Python 3.12 classifier align with `requires-python = ">=3.12"`.

## Notes
1. I could not verify an actual before/after diff in the current working tree (no `git diff` output for this file), so the “existing fields untouched” check is based on the current file structure/content. In this state, `name`, `version`, `description`, `dependencies`, and `scripts` are present and internally consistent.

## Optional (non-blocking) PyPI metadata improvements
1. Consider adding `Programming Language :: Python :: 3 :: Only` for stricter interpreter signaling.
2. Consider adding a `Documentation` URL in `[project.urls]` if/when docs are published.
