## Findings

1. **High — Quick start status command is invalid as written**  
   `README.md:30` uses `lattice status LAT-1 in_progress --actor human:me`, but `in_progress` is not a valid default workflow status. Valid defaults are `backlog`, `in_planning`, `planned`, `in_implementation`, `implemented`, `in_review`, `done`, `cancelled` (`src/lattice/core/config.py:70`). This makes the quick start fail.

2. **High — Quick start assumes short IDs without enabling them**  
   `README.md:21` shows `lattice init` with no project code, but `README.md:30` then uses short ID `LAT-1`. Short IDs require a configured project code (set during init) and resolution through `.lattice/ids.json` (`src/lattice/cli/main.py:105`, `src/lattice/cli/helpers.py:110`). As written, users can end up with only ULID task IDs and `LAT-1` won’t resolve.

3. **Medium — Relationship type examples don’t match implementation**  
   `README.md:42` lists relationship names `blocks`, `blocked_by`, `relates_to`, `parent`, but supported relationship types are `blocks`, `depends_on`, `subtask_of`, `related_to`, `spawned_by`, `duplicate_of`, `supersedes` (`src/lattice/core/relationships.py:9`). This is a factual mismatch.

4. **Medium — Dashboard image link is broken**  
   `README.md:48` references `docs/images/dashboard.png`, but that file/path is not present in the repo (only `docs/user-guide.md` exists). The section says “screenshot coming soon,” but the current markdown still renders a broken image.

5. **Low — “Read-only” dashboard claim is not fully accurate**  
   `README.md:40` says the dashboard is read-only, but dashboard writes are enabled on loopback hosts and only forced read-only on non-loopback binds (`src/lattice/cli/dashboard_cmd.py:23`).

## Verdict

**Changes Requested**

## Requested-check summary

- 10 required sections present and in expected order: **Yes** (plus an extra `Status` section, which is useful).  
- Tone technical/no fluff: **Mostly yes**, but `README.md:7` is somewhat marketing-styled.  
- Install commands (`lattice-tracker`): **Correct** (`pyproject.toml:6`).  
- Quick start quick + functional: **No** (broken status value + implicit short-ID assumption).  
- Architecture/capability factual correctness: **Mostly**, with relationship-type mismatch and dashboard read-only overstatement.  
- Grammar/clarity/markdown: **Generally good**, but broken screenshot path should be fixed.  
- Honest about alpha/v0.1.0: **Yes** (`README.md:107`).
