# Framework Comparisons

This directory contains comprehensive comparative analyses between Kaizen Framework and other AI agent frameworks.

## Available Comparisons

### Claude Agent SDK vs Kaizen Framework
**Document**: [CLAUDE_AGENT_SDK_VS_KAIZEN_PARITY_ANALYSIS.md](CLAUDE_AGENT_SDK_VS_KAIZEN_PARITY_ANALYSIS.md)

**Executive Summary**:
A comprehensive parity comparison between using Claude Agent SDK directly vs Kaizen Framework for building autonomous AI agents.

**Key Insights**:

**Overall Scores**:
- Claude Agent SDK: 79/100
- Kaizen Framework: 89/100

**Claude Agent SDK Strengths**:
- Native Claude optimization (prompt caching, context management)
- Session management excellence (resume, fork_session)
- Fine-grained permission system (allowed_tools, canUseTool)
- File-heavy operations (code editing, bash, debugging)
- Lightweight and fast (<10ms init, <10MB memory)

**Kaizen Framework Strengths**:
- Enterprise-grade infrastructure (monitoring, audit trails, compliance)
- Advanced multi-agent coordination (Google A2A, 5 patterns)
- Sophisticated memory system (5 tiers, vector storage, knowledge graphs)
- Multi-provider abstraction (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, etc.)
- Database-first workflows (DataFlow auto-generated nodes)
- Multi-channel deployment (Nexus: API + CLI + MCP)

**Decision Guide**:
- **Claude-Specific, Code-Heavy Agents** → Claude Agent SDK
- **Multi-Provider, Enterprise AI Workflows** → Kaizen Framework
- **Hybrid Coordination Systems** → Both (Kaizen orchestrates Claude SDK agents)

**Use Case Recommendations**:

| Use Case | Recommended Framework | Rationale |
|----------|----------------------|-----------|
| Code Generation Platform (e.g., GitHub Copilot) | Claude Agent SDK | Optimized file tools, low latency, session management |
| Enterprise CRM with AI | Kaizen Framework | DataFlow CRUD, multi-agent, compliance, multi-channel |
| Research Assistant (Specialized Sub-Agents) | Hybrid (Scenario C) | Code expert (Claude SDK) + Data/Writing (Kaizen) |
| Customer Support with Long-Term Memory | Kaizen Framework | 5-tier memory, multi-channel, compliance |
| Rapid Prototype (Claude-Only) | Claude Agent SDK | Minimal setup, fast iteration |

**Cost-Benefit Analysis**:
- Claude Agent SDK TCO (3-year): $342,000
- Kaizen Framework TCO (3-year): $117,000
- **Savings with Kaizen**: $225,000 (66%)

Key drivers: No custom enterprise feature development, multi-provider cost optimization, lower maintenance.

**Integration Scenarios**:
1. **Scenario A**: Kaizen wraps Claude SDK (facade) - Best for migration from Claude SDK
2. **Scenario B**: Kaizen reimplements Claude SDK patterns - Best for greenfield Kaizen projects
3. **Scenario C**: Hybrid (Kaizen orchestrates Claude SDK workers) - Best-of-breed strategy

**Key Takeaway**: For most enterprise production deployments, Kaizen offers better TCO and built-in enterprise features. For rapid prototypes and code-centric tools, Claude Agent SDK offers faster time-to-market.

---

## Future Comparisons

Planned comparative analyses:
- Kaizen vs LangChain LCEL
- Kaizen vs DSPy
- Kaizen vs CrewAI
- Kaizen vs AutoGen

---

**Last Updated**: 2025-10-18
**Maintainer**: Kaizen Framework Team
