Metadata-Version: 2.4
Name: infer-ci
Version: 0.2.1
Summary: Model evaluation and confidence interval validation
Author-email: HumbleBeeAI <services@humblebee.ai>
Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci
Project-URL: Documentation, https://infer.humblebee.ai
Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci.git
Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci/issues
Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
Keywords: infer-ci,template,module,python,package
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries
Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
Requires-Python: <4.0,>=3.10
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
License-File: LICENSE.txt
Requires-Dist: python-dotenv<2.0.0,>=1.0.1
Requires-Dist: pydantic[email,timezone]<3.0.0,>=2.0.3
Requires-Dist: pydantic-settings<3.0.0,>=2.2.1
Requires-Dist: statsmodels==0.14.5
Requires-Dist: scikit-learn==1.7.2
Requires-Dist: scipy==1.15.3
Requires-Dist: numpy==2.2.6
Requires-Dist: setuptools==68.2.2
Requires-Dist: pandas==2.3.3
Requires-Dist: pytest==8.4.2
Requires-Dist: matplotlib==3.10.6
Requires-Dist: seaborn==0.13.2
Requires-Dist: xgboost==3.0.5
Requires-Dist: tqdm==4.67.1
Requires-Dist: PyYAML==6.0.2
Provides-Extra: test
Requires-Dist: pytest<10.0.0,>=8.0.2; extra == "test"
Requires-Dist: pytest-cov<8.0.0,>=5.0.0; extra == "test"
Requires-Dist: pytest-xdist<4.0.0,>=3.6.1; extra == "test"
Requires-Dist: pytest-benchmark<6.0.0,>=5.0.1; extra == "test"
Provides-Extra: build
Requires-Dist: setuptools<81.0.0,>=70.3.0; extra == "build"
Requires-Dist: wheel<1.0.0,>=0.43.0; extra == "build"
Requires-Dist: build<2.0.0,>=1.1.1; extra == "build"
Requires-Dist: twine<7.0.0,>=6.0.1; extra == "build"
Provides-Extra: docs
Requires-Dist: pylint<4.0.0,>=3.0.4; extra == "docs"
Requires-Dist: mkdocs-material<10.0.0,>=9.5.50; extra == "docs"
Requires-Dist: mkdocs-awesome-nav<4.0.0,>=3.0.0; extra == "docs"
Requires-Dist: mkdocstrings[python]<1.0.0,>=0.24.3; extra == "docs"
Requires-Dist: mike<3.0.0,>=2.1.3; extra == "docs"
Provides-Extra: dev
Requires-Dist: pytest<10.0.0,>=8.0.2; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pytest-cov<8.0.0,>=5.0.0; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pytest-xdist<4.0.0,>=3.6.1; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pytest-benchmark<6.0.0,>=5.0.1; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: setuptools<81.0.0,>=70.3.0; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: wheel<1.0.0,>=0.43.0; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: build<2.0.0,>=1.1.1; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: twine<7.0.0,>=6.0.1; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pylint<4.0.0,>=3.0.4; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: mkdocs-material<10.0.0,>=9.5.50; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: mkdocs-awesome-nav<4.0.0,>=3.0.0; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: mkdocstrings[python]<1.0.0,>=0.24.3; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: mike<3.0.0,>=2.1.3; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pyright<2.0.0,>=1.1.392; extra == "dev"
Requires-Dist: pre-commit<5.0.0,>=4.0.1; extra == "dev"
Dynamic: license-file

# Confidence Intervals for evaluation metrics
![logo](logo.png)

[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[![Python 3.10+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10+-blue.svg)](https://www.python.org/downloads/)

This is a standardized evaluation tool that computes common machine learning metrics like Accuracy, MSE, and returns their confidence intervals using bootstraping and other methods. 

## The motivation

 Computing Confidence Intervals when providing performance estimates has not been sufficiently studied. Over the years, researchers have proposed multiple CI estimation methods in different fields, including medical statistics, AutoML, and text classification. Each method has specific assumptions, strengths, and limitations. However, most approaches are designed for a single metric or a narrow class of models, which limits their applicability. 
 
 We have developed a standardized evaluation tool that computes model performance metrics with their confidence intervals (CIs), including multiple CI calculation methods (bootstrapping, Wald, Wilson, etc.), and generating clear visualization graphs. It supports ML, CV, LLMs. 


## Installation

### From PyPI (Recommended)

```bash
pip install infer-ci
```

### From Source (Development)

```bash
git clone https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci.git
cd infer-ci
pip install -e ".[dev]"
```

## Getting started

```python
# All the possible imports:
from infer_ci import MetricEvaluator
from infer_ci import accuracy_score, precision_score, tpr_score, f1_score
from infer_ci import mae, mse, rmse, r2_score, iou

# Classification example:
evaluator = MetricEvaluator()

accuracy, ci = evaluator.evaluate(
    y_true=y_true,
    y_pred=y_pred,
    task='classification',
    metric='accuracy',
    method='wilson'
    # plot=True  # Supported in Bootstrap methods
)
```

## All methods can do an analytical computation, but do a bootsrapping computation by default
By default all the methods return an Bootstrap Bias-Corrected and Accelerated computation of the confidence intervals (CI). It is an advanced version of the basic bootstrap method that corrects for both bias and skewness in the estimate.

For other computation of the CI for any of the methods below, just specify method='jackknife_ci', or method='bootstrap_percentile'. These are different ways of doing the bootstrapping, but method='bootstrap_bca' is the generalibly reccomended method.

## Supported Methods
- **Analytical Methods**: Wilson, Normal, Agresti-Coull, Beta, Jeffreys, Binomial test
- **Bootstrap Methods**: Bootstrap Basic, Bootstrap Percentile, Bootstrap Bias-Corrected and Accelerated (Default)
- **Jackknife Method**: Jackknife

**Core Metrics Available via MetricEvaluator:**

**Classification:**
- `accuracy`: Overall classification accuracy
- `precision`: Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 
- `recall`: True Positive Rate/Sensitivity (TPR)
- `specificity`: True Negative Rate (TNR)
- `npv`: Negative Predictive Value
- `fpr`: False Positive Rate
- `f1`: F1 Score (supports averaging)
- `precision_takahashi`: Precision using Takahashi method
- `recall_takahashi`: Recall using Takahashi method
- `auc`: ROC AUC Score

**Regression:**
- `mae`: Mean Absolute Error
- `mse`: Mean Squared Error
- `rmse`: Root Mean Squared Error
- `r2`: Coefficient of Determination
- `mape`: Mean Absolute Percentage Error
- `iou`: Intersection Over Union

**Object Detection (overall + per-class support):**
- `map`: mean Average Precision 0.5:0.95
- `map50`: mean Average Precision 0.5
- `precision`: Precision
- `recall`: Recall

📖 **For object detection metrics usage examples, see:** [Object Detection Metrics Usage Guide](docs/object-detection-metrics-usage.md)

📚 **Try Online version** [https://infer.humblebee.ai](https://infer.humblebee.ai)

You can also get available methods and metrics programmatically

```python
# Get available methods
classification_methods = evaluator.get_available_methods('classification')
regression_methods = evaluator.get_available_methods('regression')

print("Classification methods:", classification_methods)
print("Regression methods:", regression_methods)

# Get available metrics
classification_metrics = evaluator.get_available_metrics('classification')
regression_metrics = evaluator.get_available_metrics('regression')

print("Classification metrics:", classification_metrics)
print("Regression metrics:", regression_metrics)

```

The analytical computation here is using the (amazing) 2022 paper of Takahashi et al (reference below). The paper derived recall and precision only for micro averaging. We derive the recall and precision confidence intervals for macro F1 as well using the delta method.


## Get a Classification Report

The `classification_report_with_ci` function builds a text report showing the main classification metrics and their confidence intervals.
Each class will be first treated as a binary classification problem, the default CI for P and R used being Wilson, and Takahashi-binary for F1. Then the 
micro and macro multi-class metric will be calculated using the Takahashi-methods.

```python
from infer_ci import classification_report_with_ci

y_true = [0, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 2, 1, 0, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1]
y_pred = [0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1]

classification_report_with_ci(y_true, y_pred)

     Class  Precision  Recall  F1-Score    Precision CI       Recall CI     F1-Score CI  Support
0  Class 0      0.600   1.000     0.750  (0.231, 0.882)    (0.439, 1.0)  (0.408, 1.092)        3
1  Class 1      0.889   1.000     0.941   (0.565, 0.98)    (0.676, 1.0)  (0.796, 1.086)        8
2  Class 2      1.000   0.667     0.800     (0.61, 1.0)  (0.354, 0.879)  (0.562, 1.038)        9
3    micro      0.850   0.850     0.850  (0.694, 1.006)  (0.694, 1.006)  (0.694, 1.006)       20
4    macro      0.830   0.889     0.830  (0.702, 0.958)  (0.775, 1.002)  (0.548, 1.113)       20
```

## Support for binary, macro and micro averaging for F1, Precision and Recall.
```python
from infer_ci import precision_score, recall_score, f1_score
binary_f1, ci = f1_score(y_true, y_pred, confidence_interval=0.95, average='binary')
macro_f1, ci = f1_score(y_true, y_pred, confidence_interval=0.95, average='macro')
micro_f1, ci = f1_score(y_true, y_pred, confidence_interval=0.95, average='micro')
bootstrap_binary_f1, ci = f1_score(y_true, y_pred, confidence_interval=0.95, average='binary', method='bootstrap_bca', n_resamples=5000)

```


----------

Citation
If you use this for research, please cite. Here is an example BibTeX entry:

```
@misc{infer-ci,
  title={Confidence intervals for evaluation metrics},
  author={Humblebee ai},
  year={2025},
  publisher={GitHub},
  howpublished={\url{https://github.com/humblebeeai/infer-ci}},
}
```

----------

## References
A python library for confidence intervals:
https://github.com/jacobgil/confidenceinterval

Confidence Interval Estimation of Predictive Performance in the Context of AutoML:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08099v1

The binomial confidence interval computation uses the statsmodels package:
https://www.statsmodels.org/dev/generated/statsmodels.stats.proportion.proportion_confint.html

Yandex data school implementation of the fast delong method:
https://github.com/yandexdataschool/roc_comparison

X. Sun and W. Xu, "Fast Implementation of DeLong’s Algorithm for Comparing the Areas Under Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves," in IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1389-1393, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1109/LSP.2014.2337313:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6851192

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936911/#APP2

Confidence interval for micro-averaged F1 and macro-averaged F1 scores
`Kanae Takahashi,1,2 Kouji Yamamoto,3 Aya Kuchiba,4,5 and Tatsuki Koyama6`

B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA (1993)

http://users.stat.umn.edu/~helwig/notes/bootci-Notes.pdf
`Nathaniel E. Helwig, “Bootstrap Confidence Intervals”`


Bootstrapping (statistics), Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_%28statistics%29
