# Section 01 Code Review Interview

## Triage Summary

| # | Issue | Severity | Decision |
|---|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | `tool_name` parameter is dead code | HIGH | Auto-fix: wire into notice string |
| 2 | Weak line count assertion | MEDIUM | Auto-fix: tighten to exact value |
| 3 | Diff shows new file vs modification | MEDIUM | Let go: process issue, code is correct |
| 4 | No `cut_point` guard for tiny limits | LOW | Let go: 200-char budget is generous |
| 5 | No test for zero-newline text | LOW | Auto-fix: add test |
| 6 | `_METADATA_OVERHEAD` naming | NITPICK | Let go: acceptable local constant |

## Auto-fixes Applied

### Fix 1: Wire `tool_name` into truncation notice
Changed notice format from:
```python
notice = f"\n\n... truncated ({remaining_lines} more lines). Use detail='full' for complete output."
```
to:
```python
tool_label = f" [{tool_name}]" if tool_name else ""
notice = f"\n\n...{tool_label} truncated ({remaining_lines} more lines). Use detail='full' for complete output."
```

### Fix 2: Tighten line count assertion
Changed `assert remaining_lines > 50` to `assert remaining_lines == 83` with precise calculation in comments.

### Fix 3: Add zero-newline test
Added `test_no_newlines_in_remainder` — verifies text with no newlines reports 1 remaining line.
