# Backend Engineer Journey - Evaluate FraiseQL for Production

**Time to Complete:** 2 hours
**Prerequisites:** 3+ years backend development, PostgreSQL experience, GraphQL knowledge
**Goal:** Make an informed evaluation decision for your team's GraphQL framework migration

## Overview

As a senior backend engineer evaluating FraiseQL for production use, you need concrete answers about performance, architecture, migration effort, and operational complexity. This journey focuses on the technical deep-dive you need to make a confident recommendation.

By the end, you'll have:
- Reproducible performance benchmarks (7-10x claims verified)
- Clear migration path from your current framework
- Understanding of Rust pipeline architecture
- Production readiness assessment
- Risk analysis for your team

## Step-by-Step Evaluation

### Step 1: Quick Architecture Overview (15 minutes)

**Goal:** Understand FraiseQL's core design principles

**Read:** [FraiseQL Philosophy](../core/fraiseql-philosophy/)

**Key Questions Answered:**
- Why "database-first" approach?
- How does zero-copy JSONB work?
- What's the trinity pattern and why?

**Success Check:** You can explain "FraiseQL generates GraphQL from PostgreSQL views, not the other way around"

### Step 2: Performance Deep-Dive (30 minutes)

**Goal:** Verify the 7-10x JSON performance claims

**Read:** [Rust Pipeline Integration](../core/rust-pipeline-integration/)

**Key Concepts:**
- Zero-copy JSONB processing
- Rust JSON serialization (7-10x faster than Python)
- How the Rust pipeline integrates with Python GraphQL layer

**Explore Existing Benchmarks:**
```bash
# Review available benchmarks in the repository
cd benchmarks/
ls -la  # See available benchmark scripts
python rust_vs_python_benchmark.py  # Rust vs Python JSON performance
```

> **Note:** Internal benchmarks validate Rust pipeline performance. Framework comparison benchmarks (FraiseQL vs Strawberry vs Graphene) are maintained in a separate benchmarking project.

**Success Check:** You understand why Rust improves performance and have reviewed benchmark methodology

### Step 3: Migration Assessment (25 minutes)

**Goal:** Estimate migration effort from your current framework

**Read:**
- [Migration Guides Overview](../migration/README/)
- Framework-specific guides:
  - [From Strawberry](../migration/from-strawberry/) - 2-3 weeks
  - [From Graphene](../migration/from-graphene/) - 1-2 weeks
  - [From PostGraphile](../migration/from-postgraphile/) - 3-4 days
- [Migration Checklist](../migration/migration-checklist/) - Generic 10-phase process

**Migration Assessment:**

Choose your framework-specific guide for detailed migration steps, code examples, and common pitfalls:

| Current Framework | Difficulty | Time Estimate | Key Challenge |
|------------------|-----------|---------------|---------------|
| **PostGraphile** | ⭐ Low | 3-4 days (1 engineer) | Language switch (TS → Python) |
| **Graphene** | ⭐⭐ Medium | 1-2 weeks (2 engineers) | ORM → Database-first |
| **Strawberry** | ⭐⭐ Medium | 2-3 weeks (2 engineers) | Database restructuring |

**Key Migration Steps (All Frameworks):**
1. Audit your current schema (types, resolvers, mutations)
2. Create PostgreSQL views using trinity pattern (tb_/v_/tv_)
3. Convert resolvers to FraiseQL decorators
4. Test thoroughly with side-by-side comparison
5. Deploy using blue-green strategy

**Migration Effort Breakdown:**
- Schema mapping: 20% of effort
- Resolver conversion: 50% of effort
- Testing: 30% of effort

**Success Check:** You have a concrete time estimate for your team's migration

### Step 4: Enterprise Features Evaluation (30 minutes)

**Goal:** Assess advanced features for production use

**Read:** [Advanced Patterns](../advanced/database-patterns/)

**Key Features to Evaluate:**

1. **Row-Level Security (RLS):**
   ```sql
   -- Automatic tenant isolation
   ALTER TABLE tb_user ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
   CREATE POLICY tenant_isolation ON tb_user
   USING (tenant_id = current_setting('app.tenant_id')::UUID);
   ```

2. **Computed Views:**
   ```sql
   -- Pre-computed aggregations
   CREATE VIEW tv_user_stats AS
   SELECT u.id, u.name, COUNT(p.id) as post_count
   FROM tb_user u LEFT JOIN tb_post p ON p.user_id = u.id
   GROUP BY u.id, u.name;
   ```

3. **Connection Pooling:**
   ```python
   # Production-ready connection pool configuration
   app = create_fraiseql_app(
       database_url="postgresql://user:pass@localhost/mydb",
       connection_pool_size=30,  # Base pool size
       connection_pool_max_overflow=20,  # Additional connections for spikes
       connection_pool_timeout=60.0,  # Connection wait timeout
       connection_pool_recycle=3600,  # Recycle connections after 1 hour
       production=True
   )
   ```
   **Defaults:** 10 connections (dev), 20 connections (production)
   **For detailed tuning:** See [Database Configuration](../core/configuration/)

**Success Check:** You understand how RLS and computed views reduce application complexity

### Step 5: Production Operations Review (20 minutes)

**Goal:** Assess operational complexity and monitoring

**Read:** [Production Deployment](../production/deployment/)

**Key Operational Aspects:**
- **Monitoring:** Prometheus metrics, Grafana dashboards
- **Logging:** Structured logs with correlation IDs
- **Health Checks:** Built-in `/health` endpoint
- **Incident Response:** Runbook for common issues

**Deployment Commands:**
```bash
# Health check (liveness probe)
curl http://localhost:8000/health

# Metrics endpoint
curl http://localhost:8000/metrics

# Readiness probe (in development - WP-029)
# For now, use /health for both liveness and readiness
```

**Success Check:** You know how to monitor and troubleshoot production deployments

### Step 6: Security & Compliance Assessment (15 minutes)

**Goal:** Evaluate security features for regulated environments

**Read:** [Security Configuration](../security/configuration/)

**Security Features:**
- **Cryptographic Audit Trails:** SHA-256 + HMAC chains
- **KMS Integration:** AWS KMS, GCP KMS, Vault
- **SLSA Provenance:** Supply chain security verification
- **Security Profiles:** STANDARD/REGULATED/RESTRICTED modes

**Compliance Evidence:**
- **FedRAMP:** Security profiles map to FedRAMP controls
- **NIST 800-53:** Control mappings available
- **SOC 2:** Audit trails and access logging

**Success Check:** You can explain how FraiseQL meets compliance requirements

### Step 7: Risk Analysis & Decision (15 minutes)

**Goal:** Weigh pros/cons and make recommendation

**Risk Assessment:**

**✅ Advantages:**
- 7-10x JSON performance → Lower infrastructure costs
- Zero-copy architecture → Predictable scaling
- Built-in security → Faster compliance audits
- Database-first → Easier schema evolution

**⚠️ Risks:**
- Smaller community than Strawberry/Graphene
- Rust toolchain required in CI/CD
- Team learning curve: Trinity pattern, Rust integration
- Vendor lock-in (PostgreSQL + specific patterns)

**Decision Framework:**
- **Adopt if:** Performance-critical, PostgreSQL shop, need compliance features
- **Consider alternatives if:** Small team, simple API, multi-database support needed

**Success Check:** You can present a clear recommendation with evidence

## Evaluation Summary

**Performance:** ✅ Verified 7-10x improvement over pure Python GraphQL
**Migration:** ✅ Clear path with time estimates for major frameworks
**Architecture:** ✅ Zero-copy JSONB, Rust pipeline well-documented
**Operations:** ✅ Standard monitoring, health checks, incident runbooks
**Security:** ✅ Enterprise-grade features, compliance mappings
**Risks:** ⚠️ Smaller community, learning curve, PostgreSQL-specific

## Next Steps

**If recommending FraiseQL:**
1. **Pilot Project:** Start with 1 service, 2-week timeline
2. **Team Training:** 1-day workshop on trinity pattern + Rust pipeline
3. **Migration Plan:** Use Confiture tool for schema migration
4. **Production Setup:** Follow deployment checklist

**If not recommending:**
1. **Keep Monitoring:** Community growth, enterprise adoption
2. **Alternative Evaluation:** Graphene-Python, Strawberry, PostGraphile

**Resources:**
- [Performance Benchmarks](../../benchmarks/)
- [Production Runbooks](../production/)

## Questions for the Team

**Technical Questions:**
- Do we need the performance gains for our scale?
- Can we commit to PostgreSQL-only architecture?
- Is the team comfortable with Rust in the stack?

**Business Questions:**
- What's our timeline for GraphQL framework decision?
- Do we have compliance requirements (FedRAMP, SOC 2)?
- What's the cost of current performance issues?

**Organizational Questions:**
- Can we allocate 2-3 weeks for migration?
- Do we have Rust experience on the team?
- What's our risk tolerance for newer frameworks?</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/journeys/backend-engineer.md
