# Test Plan for CoReason Manifest

## Philosophy
The primary purpose of testing in the `coreason_manifest` package is not mere test coverage; it is to establish a rigorous framework for identifying and resolving logical contradictions, epistemic drift, and structural bypasses within the Universal Unified Ontology. As defined in `AGENTS.md`, this is an AI-Native Shared Kernel and our tests must strictly uphold cryptographic determinism and topological safety over traditional unit test paradigms.

## Strategic Objectives
1. **Cryptographic Determinism (RFC 8785 Compliance)**
   All models inheriting from `CoreasonBaseState` must enforce `frozen=True` and mathematically guarantee consistent hashing. Tests must assert that dictionaries are deterministically sorted and arrays maintain their explicitly declared sequential integrity.

2. **Epistemic Isolation and SSRF Boundaries**
   Ensure absolute validation logic around external pointers (e.g., `BrowserDOMState.current_url`). The structural boundaries must mathematically trap local/private IP traversals. Any bug in `urllib.parse` exceptions or IP range classification must be proven and rectified.

3. **Causal Integrity (Directed Acyclic Graphs)**
   Where causal nodes are explicitly declared (e.g., `DAGTopologyManifest`, `StructuralCausalGraphProfile`), tests must guarantee cycle prevention and topology sorting without silent logical collapses.

4. **Payload Exhaustion (OOM/CPU Limits)**
   Verify that epistemic limits, particularly `_validate_payload_bounds`, mathematically constrain recursion depth, string sizes, and dictionary key bounds, throwing explicit errors prior to recursive depth overflows.

5. **Semantic Anchoring**
   Assert the presence of the required "CoReason Shared Kernel Ontology" description string, preventing IP obfuscation and latent decoupling of the data plane.
