# Conversation 1140b3c5-4188-42d4-8fa0-b2eec3a0de67

- Source: `cursor`
- User: `pascal`
- System: `Pascals-MBP.local`
- Started: `2026-02-19T18:48:08.815000Z`
- CWD: `/Users/pascal/Code/business/convx`

## User

anything awkward in the @convx/history/ folders that I should be mindful of before sharing with the world? Can you search for any embarassing things, secrets etc That I may have left in there?

## Agent

Here’s what stands out in `history/`:

## No secrets found

- No API keys, passwords, or tokens (e.g. `sk-`, `ghp_`, `AKIA`).
- Redaction is doing its job; the only `[REDACTED]` mentions are in docs about how redaction works.

## Personal / environment info

1. **Full paths** – `/Users/pascal/...` appears in many files (CWD, source paths, tool output).
2. **Hostname** – `Pascals-MBP.local` in metadata.
3. **Username** – `pascal` in user/system fields and `ls` output.

## Other project references

In the Codex JSON (`.2026-02-15-1642-can-you-check--history-codex-for-the-previous-conversation-w.json`), tool output lists:

- `history/pascal/codex/Pascals-MBP.local/Code/business/newcohorts.com`

So another project workspace (`newcohorts.com`) is referenced.

## Content

Conversations are technical (convx design, secret redaction, TUI, gitignore, etc.). Nothing embarrassing or obviously sensitive in the text.

---

## Summary

| Category        | Status |
|----------------|--------|
| API keys/tokens| None found |
| Passwords      | None found |
| Personal paths | `/Users/pascal/...` in many places |
| Hostname       | `Pascals-MBP.local` |
| Other projects | `newcohorts.com` referenced |
| Embarrassing   | None found |

If you want to share this publicly, consider:

1. **Path normalization** – Optional feature to replace `/Users/pascal/...` with something like `~` or `$HOME` in exports.
2. **Project name** – `newcohorts.com` is only in tool output; you can decide if that’s acceptable.
3. **`.json` files** – They contain more raw data (paths, permissions, tool output). Consider keeping them out of `.git` if you’re worried about path exposure, or add path normalization.
