# Review by Linus Torvalds (Round 2)

---

## Review Complete — Linus Torvalds Perspective

**VERDICT: approve**

### Summary

This is clean, boring infrastructure code — the highest compliment I can give. The decomposition is right: `maintenance.py` is stateless utility functions, the daemon does thin orchestration. No premature abstractions, no class hierarchies where functions suffice.

### What's Done Right
- **Data structures are correct**: `BranchStatus` and `CIFixCandidate` are frozen dataclasses with exactly the fields needed
- **Error discipline is excellent**: Every subprocess call catches exceptions, returns sentinels, logs — maintenance never crashes the daemon
- **Circuit breaker is correct**: Doesn't reset when HEAD == last_good_commit (rollback case)
- **Budget tracking works**: Daily reset, gates CI-fix enqueueing, spend tracked per ci-fix item
- **All 6 FRs implemented**, all tasks complete, **457 tests pass**

### Non-blocking Findings (v2 hardening)
1. **SHA not validated before `git checkout`** — `read_last_good_commit()` returns raw file contents; a hex validation regex would prevent corrupted-file bugs
2. **`_BRANCH_SYNC_COOLDOWN` defined inside method body** — should be class/module constant
3. **Two redundant `gh pr list` calls** — branch sync and CI fix could share one API call
4. **Missing structured `SELF_UPDATE_RESTART` event** — uses plain `logger.info` instead of structured event matching the daemon's existing patterns
5. **`os.execv` FD inheritance** — known v1 trade-off per PRD

Review artifact written to `cOS_reviews/reviews/linus_torvalds/20260402_003710_round1_maintenance_cycle.md`.
