# Review by Staff Security Engineer (Round 2)

Now I have a thorough understanding of the implementation. Here is my review:

---

## Staff Security Engineer Review

### Checklist Assessment

**Completeness**
- [x] All functional requirements from the PRD are implemented (FR-1 through FR-6)
- [x] All tasks in the task file are marked complete
- [x] No placeholder or TODO code remains

**Quality**
- [x] All tests pass (71 passed, 0 failures)
- [x] Code follows existing project conventions
- [x] No unnecessary dependencies added (uses stdlib sqlite3)
- [x] TUI/styles changes are unrelated but minor cleanup

**Safety**
- [x] No secrets or credentials in committed code
- [x] `.gitignore` updated for `memory.db`
- [x] Error handling present with graceful degradation

---

### Security-Specific Analysis

**Sanitization (Mixed — mostly good):**
The PRD specifies `sanitize_untrusted_content()` for memory writes. The implementation uses `sanitize_ci_logs()` instead, which is actually *stronger* — it calls `sanitize_untrusted_content()` (XML tag stripping) AND applies secret-pattern redaction (GitHub tokens, AWS keys, Bearer tokens, etc.). This is a positive deviation from the PRD. Good defense-in-depth.

**SQL Injection:** All SQL queries use parameterized statements (`?` placeholders). No string interpolation into SQL. FTS5 keyword input is sanitized via `_sanitize_fts_keyword()` which strips boolean operators, wildcards, and escapes quotes. This is solid.

**Prompt Injection via Persisted Memory:** The PRD's core security invariant is that memory writes happen ONLY in the orchestrator process, never inside agent sessions. The implementation respects this — `_capture_phase_memory()` is called only from `_run_pipeline()` in the orchestrator. The `add_memory()` method sanitizes all text before storage. However, the *content* being captured (`phase_result.artifacts["result"]`) is agent-generated output. While it passes through `sanitize_ci_logs()` (strips XML tags + secrets), a sophisticated prompt injection could craft text that doesn't use XML tags but still manipulates future agent behavior when injected back as `## Memory Context`. This is a known limitation acknowledged in the PRD's non-goals ("Memory during agent execution") but worth flagging.

**Resource Leak — `memory_store.close()` pattern:** The `_run_pipeline()` function has manual `memory_store.close()` calls at 5 separate early-return points. This is fragile — any new early return added in the future could leak the connection. The store supports context managers (`with MemoryStore(...) as store:`) — using `try/finally` in `run()` or `_run_pipeline()` would be safer. The CLI commands correctly use `with` statements.

**Silent failure swallowing:** `except Exception: pass` at `cli.py:423` silently swallows memory injection errors in the direct-agent path. While the comment says "graceful degradation," this hides potentially important failures (e.g., corrupt DB, disk full). At minimum, a `logger.debug()` or `logger.warning()` call should be present, consistent with the orchestrator's `_get_memory_store()` which does log a warning.

**Tags not sanitized:** The `tags` parameter in `add_memory()` is a `list[str]` that gets joined with commas and stored. While tags are currently only set by the orchestrator (hardcoded values like `["failure", phase_name]`), the function's public API doesn't sanitize tag values. If a future caller passes agent-generated tags, they'd be stored unsanitized. Low risk today, but worth noting.

**FTS5 availability:** The code assumes FTS5 is available in the Python sqlite3 module. While FTS5 is included in standard CPython builds, some minimal/custom builds may not include it. The `_init_db()` method doesn't handle this gracefully — it would crash on first use.

---

VERDICT: approve

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/orchestrator.py]: Memory store uses manual `.close()` at 5 early-return points instead of `try/finally` or context manager — fragile against future code changes that add new return paths. Resource leak risk.
- [src/colonyos/cli.py:423]: `except Exception: pass` silently swallows memory injection errors with no logging. Should at minimum log at debug/warning level for operational visibility, consistent with `_get_memory_store()` pattern.
- [src/colonyos/memory.py]: Agent-generated content (`phase_result.artifacts["result"]`) is sanitized via `sanitize_ci_logs()` (XML tags + secrets) but could still contain carefully crafted text that influences future agent behavior when re-injected. This is an inherent limitation of any memory-from-agent-output system; the PRD acknowledges it. The orchestrator-only write boundary is the right mitigation.
- [src/colonyos/memory.py]: `tags` parameter in `add_memory()` is not sanitized. Currently only called with hardcoded values, but the public API surface allows unsanitized input. Low risk today.
- [src/colonyos/memory.py]: FTS5 availability is assumed but not all Python builds include it. No graceful fallback if `CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE ... USING fts5` fails.

SYNTHESIS:
From a security perspective, this implementation is well-considered and follows the PRD's security model faithfully. The critical invariant — that only the orchestrator process writes memories, never agent sessions — is correctly enforced. The choice to use `sanitize_ci_logs()` over the PRD-specified `sanitize_untrusted_content()` is a positive security decision, adding secret-pattern redaction on top of XML tag stripping. SQL injection is mitigated through parameterized queries throughout, and FTS5 input is properly escaped. The main concerns are operational: the manual resource cleanup pattern in the orchestrator is fragile (should use `try/finally`), and one silent exception handler in the CLI path should log for observability. The inherent risk of re-injecting agent-generated content as memory context is acknowledged and reasonably mitigated by sanitization, though it cannot be fully eliminated without semantic analysis. Overall, this is a solid implementation that respects least privilege and defense-in-depth principles. Approving with the recommendation to address the resource cleanup pattern and add logging to the silent exception handler in a follow-up.
