# Review by Principal Systems Engineer (Google/Stripe caliber) (Round 1)

Now I have a thorough understanding of the implementation. Let me write the review.

---

## Review: Principal Systems Engineer Perspective

I've reviewed the full implementation on branch `colonyos/right_now_the_pipeline_always_runs_this_huge_planner_implementation_orchestratio` against the PRD. Here's my assessment:

### Completeness

- **FR-1 (Intent Classification)**: ✅ Four categories implemented (`CODE_CHANGE`, `QUESTION`, `STATUS`, `OUT_OF_SCOPE`) with proper enum in `RouterCategory`.
- **FR-2 (Reuse Slack Triage)**: ✅ `triage_message()` in slack.py now delegates to `route_query()` and maps back via `TriageResult`. Legacy fallback preserved for `triage_scope`.
- **FR-3 (Two-Stage Q&A)**: ✅ `route_query()` (haiku, no tools, $0.05) + `answer_question()` (configurable model, read-only tools, $0.50).
- **FR-4 (Entry Point Integration)**: ✅ Integrated into both `colonyos run` and REPL. Slack updated. Correctly excluded from `--from-prd`, `--issue`, and other explicit commands.
- **FR-5 (Fallback Behavior)**: ✅ Confidence threshold check with fail-open. Audit log written. User-visible message printed.
- **FR-6 (CLI Flag)**: ✅ `--no-triage` flag added to `colonyos run`.
- **FR-7 (Configuration)**: ✅ `RouterConfig` dataclass with all specified fields plus `qa_model`. Parsing and serialization implemented.
- **FR-8 (Audit Logging)**: ✅ `log_router_decision()` writes to `.colonyos/runs/triage_<timestamp>.json` with all required fields.

### Quality

- **Tests**: All 90 router/config/model tests pass. The one failing test (`TestUI::test_default_port`) is pre-existing on main.
- **No TODOs/FIXMEs**: Clean.
- **Code conventions**: Follows existing patterns (dataclasses, lazy imports, `run_phase_sync` usage, error handling style).
- **No unnecessary dependencies**: Only uses existing project infrastructure.

### Findings

VERDICT: request-changes

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/router.py:404-410]: **Timestamp race condition in audit log** — `datetime.now()` is called twice: once for the filename (line 404) and once for the JSON payload (line 410). Under normal conditions this is a sub-second gap, but these will produce different timestamps. Use a single `now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)` variable for both to ensure consistency and make log correlation reliable at 3am.
- [src/colonyos/router.py:405]: **Filename collision risk** — `triage_{timestamp}.json` uses second-level granularity (`%Y%m%d_%H%M%S`). Two rapid routing decisions in the same second (e.g., concurrent Slack messages) will silently overwrite each other since `write_text` doesn't use exclusive-create mode. Either add microseconds to the filename or use a UUID suffix.
- [src/colonyos/cli.py:718]: **Missing error handling for Q&A in `run()` command** — The REPL path (line 448-464) wraps `answer_question()` in a `try/except KeyboardInterrupt`, but the `run()` command path (line 718-728) does not. If the Q&A agent hangs or the user Ctrl+C's during `colonyos run "what does X do?"`, the exception will propagate uncaught and produce a stack trace instead of a clean exit.
- [src/colonyos/slack.py:830]: **Slack question routing drops the answer** — When Slack receives a `QUESTION` category, `triage_message()` maps it to `actionable=False`, which means the Slack watcher will silently ignore it. The user asked a question and gets no response. The PRD (User Story 4) says "when I @ the bot with a question about the codebase, I want an answer, not a PR." This path needs to either invoke `answer_question()` and post the result back, or surface the category in `TriageResult` so the Slack watcher can handle it.
- [src/colonyos/router.py:244-246]: **Fragile artifact extraction** — `next(iter(result.artifacts.values()), "")` assumes the first artifact value is the text response. If `run_phase_sync` ever returns artifacts in a different order (dicts are insertion-ordered in Python 3.7+ but the agent SDK could change), this breaks silently. Consider using a well-known key or checking for a `"response"` / `"output"` key explicitly.

SYNTHESIS:
This is a solid, well-structured implementation that follows existing codebase patterns closely. The router module is cleanly separated, the two-stage design is architecturally sound (zero-tool classifier → scoped executor), and the fail-open behavior is correctly implemented. The test coverage is thorough at 90 tests with good edge-case coverage. However, there are a few operational reliability issues that would bite in production: the Slack Q&A path is effectively broken (questions are silently dropped), the `run()` command lacks Ctrl+C handling for the Q&A path, and the audit log has a timestamp collision risk under concurrent load. The timestamp double-call and fragile artifact extraction are minor but worth fixing for debuggability. I'd request changes on the Slack Q&A gap (it's a PRD requirement miss) and the missing error handling in `run()`, then approve.
