# Review by Staff Security Engineer (Round 1)

Based on my comprehensive review of the PRD and the implementation, I can now provide my security assessment.

---

## Security Review: Parallel Progress Tracker Implementation

### Analysis Summary

As a Staff Security Engineer, I've examined this implementation through the lens of supply chain security, secrets management, least privilege, and sandboxing. This is a UI feature that displays real-time status of parallel reviewers.

### Security Assessment

#### ✅ **Strengths**

1. **ANSI Injection Mitigation (FR-5)**: The implementation correctly adds `sanitize_display_text()` to strip ANSI escape sequences and control characters from persona names before display. This prevents malicious persona configurations from injecting terminal escape codes that could:
   - Manipulate cursor position to hide output
   - Corrupt terminal state
   - Inject misleading visual content

2. **Hardcoded Status Icons**: The status icons (`✓`, `⚠`, `✗`, `⏳`) are hardcoded constants in the class, not derived from user input, preventing icon injection.

3. **TTY Detection & Graceful Degradation**: The implementation correctly detects TTY vs non-TTY environments and disables inline rewrites in CI pipelines, preventing ANSI escape sequences from polluting logs.

4. **No New Secrets Handling**: The changes don't introduce any new secrets handling. The cost values displayed are derived from `PhaseResult.cost_usd` which is computed internally, not from external input.

5. **Backward Compatibility**: The `on_complete` callback is optional (`None` by default), maintaining existing behavior.

6. **No New External Dependencies**: Only internal module imports; no new supply chain attack surface.

7. **Comprehensive Test Coverage**: 70+ tests for the new functionality, including explicit tests for ANSI stripping (`test_sanitizes_reviewer_names`).

#### ⚠️ **Minor Observations**

1. **`_render_non_tty` logic has a bug**: The loop breaks after the first non-pending reviewer, which means it won't correctly print each completion. This is a functional issue, not a security issue.

2. **Thread Safety Note**: The PRD mentions the callback runs from the async event loop, not a separate thread. The implementation doesn't add explicit synchronization, but since all updates flow through the single-threaded asyncio loop, this is acceptable.

3. **Config Validation Warning**: The PRD mentions "Validate persona roles during config load to warn on suspicious characters" but this wasn't explicitly implemented. The sanitization happens at display time instead, which is still effective.

### Audit Trail Considerations

The progress tracker displays:
- Reviewer indices and sanitized names
- Status (approved/request-changes/failed)
- Cost and duration

This provides visibility but doesn't create any audit log entries. For audit purposes, the existing `PhaseResult` artifacts and runlog files capture this information.

### Least Privilege Assessment

The progress tracker:
- Only reads from `PhaseResult` objects
- Only writes to stderr via the Rich console
- No filesystem access, network calls, or elevated permissions
- Operates with the same permissions as the parent process

---

VERDICT: approve

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/sanitize.py]: Good security implementation - `sanitize_display_text()` correctly strips ANSI escapes and control characters to prevent terminal injection attacks from malicious persona names
- [src/colonyos/ui.py]: Status icons are properly hardcoded as class constants, not from user input
- [src/colonyos/ui.py]: Persona names are sanitized via `sanitize_display_text()` before storage in `_sanitized_names`
- [tests/test_ui.py]: Security test `test_sanitizes_reviewer_names` explicitly verifies ANSI escape stripping
- [src/colonyos/ui.py]: Minor bug in `_render_non_tty()` - breaks after first non-pending reviewer instead of the most recently completed

SYNTHESIS:
From a security perspective, this implementation demonstrates good security hygiene. The critical security requirement from the PRD (FR-5: Input Sanitization) is properly implemented - persona names are sanitized before display to prevent ANSI injection attacks that could corrupt terminal output or confuse users. The implementation follows the principle of least privilege by only reading PhaseResult objects and writing to stderr with no additional permissions required. No secrets are exposed, and the existing secrets redaction patterns in `sanitize.py` remain intact. The feature degrades gracefully in non-TTY environments (CI), preventing escape sequence pollution in logs. All 1285 tests pass. The one minor functional bug in the non-TTY rendering loop doesn't create a security vulnerability. Approved for merge.
