# Review by Staff Security Engineer (Round 2)

---

## Staff Security Engineer — Round 2 Review

**Branch:** `colonyos/when_you_output_followups_in_the_thread_on_slack_a938599349`

### Summary

All Round 1 security gaps have been closed. The two issues I flagged — non-HTTP link scheme bypass and user mention injection — are now covered by expanded regexes with dedicated test cases. All 127 tests pass.

The sanitization architecture is correct: double-sanitization (`sanitize_untrusted_content()` → `sanitize_for_slack()`) at every untrusted content ingress point, plus 3,000-char truncation applied both internally and at call sites for defense-in-depth.

Two low-priority hardening items remain (no audit logging for sanitization events, bare non-HTTP links without display text) — neither is blocking.

VERDICT: approve

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/sanitize.py]: Non-HTTP bare link regex (`_SLACK_BARE_LINK_RE`) only catches http/https — bare `<mailto:...>` without display text not covered. Low risk due to upstream XML sanitizer.
- [src/colonyos/sanitize.py]: No audit logging when mentions/links are neutralized. Would aid injection detection but not a security gap.

SYNTHESIS:
The implementation is secure and production-ready. All injection vectors identified in Round 1 have been closed with targeted regex expansions and corresponding test coverage. The sanitization architecture — `sanitize_untrusted_content()` then `sanitize_for_slack()` applied at each content ingress point — is the correct pattern: sanitize inputs, not outputs. The 3,000-char truncation applied both internally and at call sites provides defense-in-depth against information leakage. The two remaining observations are low-priority hardening opportunities that do not block shipping.