# Review by Staff Security Engineer (Round 2)

---

## Staff Security Engineer Review — Round 2

**All 440 tests pass. All 10 functional requirements implemented. Previous round's HIGH and MEDIUM findings have been addressed.**

### Key Security Assessment

The retry system is architecturally sound from a security perspective:
- **Safety-critical phase guard (FR-7)** correctly prevents model fallback on `review`, `decision`, and `fix` — the phases that gate code quality and security decisions
- **Config validation** properly enforces `max_attempts >= 1`, non-negative delays, and an allowlist for fallback models
- **Error messages** are generic (no raw API response body leakage)
- **Budget amplification** is bounded — per-run budget cap provides the outer safety net

### Remaining Findings (none are blockers)

VERDICT: approve

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/agent.py:248]: `resume` session ID propagated to retry attempts after 529 — should be cleared to `None` after first failure (restart-from-scratch semantics per PRD Non-Goals)
- [src/colonyos/agent.py:97]: `_friendly_error()` uses plain `"529" in lower` substring match while `_is_transient_error()` uses word-boundary regex — inconsistent false-positive protection
- [src/colonyos/config.py:22]: `_SAFETY_CRITICAL_PHASES` still uses raw strings instead of `Phase.XXX.value` — latent safety gate breakage risk on enum rename (flagged across 3 reviews now)
- [src/colonyos/agent.py:264-268]: `_is_transient_error(exc)` called 3x on same exception — extract to local boolean
- [src/colonyos/orchestrator.py:2441]: `RetryInfo(**p["retry_info"])` trusts run log JSON without explicit field extraction

SYNTHESIS:
This implementation is solid from a security standpoint. The critical safety gate — blocking model fallback on review/decision/fix phases — is correctly implemented and tested. Error detection properly prioritizes structured attributes over string matching, and the word-boundary regex fix from round 1 eliminates the false-positive risk. The remaining findings are all LOW severity: the `resume` leak is a correctness gap (not a data-leak vector since 529 callers rarely pass `resume`), the `_friendly_error` inconsistency only affects display text, and the raw-string `_SAFETY_CRITICAL_PHASES` is a defense-in-depth concern that should be addressed but isn't an active vulnerability. The fallback model running with `bypassPermissions` on non-safety-critical phases is an accepted architectural trade-off acknowledged in the PRD. Approving — ship it.