# Decision Gate

VERDICT: GO

### Rationale

All 7 persona reviews (Andrej Karpathy x2, Linus Torvalds, Principal Systems Engineer x2, Staff Security Engineer x2) unanimously approve the implementation. No CRITICAL or HIGH findings were raised. The implementation satisfies all 13 functional requirements from the PRD: `ReviewArtifactPath` dataclass and factory functions are added to `naming.py` (FR-6 through FR-9), `_save_review_artifact()` gains subdirectory support with dual path-traversal guards (FR-10), all ad-hoc filename construction in `orchestrator.py` is replaced with `naming.py` calls (FR-11), all 6 instruction templates are updated (FR-12), and `init.py` creates subdirectories with `.gitkeep` files (FR-13). Test coverage is thorough with new tests for naming functions, subdirectory writing, path traversal rejection, and init subdirectory creation.

### Unresolved Issues

- `task_review_artifact_path()` is defined and tested in `naming.py` but not yet wired into `orchestrator.py` (raised by 5/7 reviewers as LOW — dead code / forward-looking, not blocking)
- Branch contains ~1,500 lines of unrelated CI/CD and installer changes from prior commits (process hygiene, not blocking)
- `ReviewNames` dataclass is now effectively superseded by `ReviewArtifactPath` but not deprecated (cleanup item)

### Recommendation

Merge as-is. The three unresolved items are all LOW-severity housekeeping that can be addressed in follow-up PRs: (1) wire `task_review_artifact_path` into the orchestrator when task-level reviews are next touched, (2) separate unrelated CI/CD changes into their own PR in future workflows, (3) deprecate the legacy `ReviewNames` dataclass.
