# Decision Gate

Verdict: **GO**

---

## Decision Gate Result

**VERDICT: GO**

### Rationale

All 7 persona reviews unanimously **approve** the implementation. No CRITICAL or HIGH findings were raised — only LOW and MEDIUM observations. The implementation satisfies all 13 functional requirements from the PRD:

- **`naming.py`**: `ReviewArtifactPath` frozen dataclass + 5 factory functions (`decision_artifact_path`, `persona_review_artifact_path`, `task_review_artifact_path`, `standalone_decision_artifact_path`, `summary_artifact_path`)
- **`orchestrator.py`**: All ad-hoc filename construction replaced with `naming.py` calls; `_save_review_artifact()` gains subdirectory support with **dual** path-traversal guards (subdirectory + filename)
- **Instruction templates**: All 6 updated to reference the nested structure
- **`init.py`**: Creates `decisions/` and `reviews/` subdirectories with `.gitkeep` files
- **Tests**: Comprehensive coverage for all new naming functions, subdirectory writing, path traversal rejection, and init behavior

### Unresolved Issues (non-blocking)

- `task_review_artifact_path()` defined but not yet called from orchestrator (dead code / forward-looking)
- Branch includes ~1,500 lines of unrelated CI/CD changes from prior commits
- Legacy `ReviewNames` dataclass not yet deprecated

### Recommendation

**Merge as-is.** All three unresolved items are LOW-severity housekeeping for follow-up PRs.