# Review by Principal Systems Engineer (Google/Stripe caliber) (Round 2)

Now let me write the review output. I have all the information I need.

---

## Review: Principal Systems Engineer (Google/Stripe caliber)

### Completeness Assessment

**FR-1 (Directory structure)**: ✅ Implemented. `init.py` creates `decisions/` and `reviews/` subdirectories with `.gitkeep` files. The nested `reviews/<persona_slug>/` structure is created dynamically by `_save_review_artifact()` via `mkdir(parents=True)`.

**FR-2 (Timestamp prefixes)**: ✅ All artifact paths use `generate_timestamp()`.

**FR-3 (Decision filename pattern)**: ✅ `decision_artifact_path()` produces `{ts}_decision_{slug}.md` under `decisions/`.

**FR-4 (Persona review pattern)**: ✅ `persona_review_artifact_path()` produces `{ts}_round{N}_{slug}.md` under `reviews/{persona_slug}/`.

**FR-5 (Task review pattern)**: ✅ `task_review_artifact_path()` defined and tested. Not yet wired into orchestrator, but the PRD notes this is for "legacy pipeline task-level reviews" and the orchestrator doesn't currently produce these artifacts. The function exists for forward compatibility.

**FR-6 (ReviewArtifactPath dataclass)**: ✅ Frozen dataclass with `subdirectory`, `filename`, and `relative_path` property.

**FR-7, FR-8, FR-9**: ✅ All three factory functions implemented with proper slug sanitization.

**FR-10 (_save_review_artifact subdirectory param)**: ✅ Optional `subdirectory` parameter added with path-traversal validation via `is_relative_to()`.

**FR-11 (Replace ad-hoc filenames)**: ✅ All 5 call sites in orchestrator.py now use naming.py functions. Zero ad-hoc f-string filename construction remains (confirmed by grep for inline `.md` construction).

**FR-12 (Instruction templates)**: ✅ All 6 templates updated. `base.md` documents the subdirectory structure. `decision.md`, `decision_standalone.md`, `fix.md`, `fix_standalone.md` point to `{reviews_dir}/reviews/`. `learn.md` instructs recursive reading.

**FR-13 (Forward-only migration)**: ✅ No migration utility. `.gitkeep` files created for new subdirectories.

### Quality Assessment

- **192 tests pass**, 0 failures, 0.45s runtime.
- **No linter errors** observed.
- **Code follows existing conventions**: frozen dataclasses, same timestamp format, same slugify function, consistent docstring style.
- **No unnecessary dependencies** added.
- **Test coverage is solid**: `TestReviewArtifactPath` (3 tests), `TestDecisionArtifactPath` (3), `TestPersonaReviewArtifactPath` (4), `TestTaskReviewArtifactPath` (2), `TestStandaloneDecisionArtifactPath` (2), `TestSummaryArtifactPath` (2), `TestSaveReviewArtifact` (4 including path traversal).

### Safety Assessment

- **Path traversal guard**: Present and tested. `_save_review_artifact()` validates `target_dir.resolve().is_relative_to(reviews_root.resolve())` before writing. This is the right defense-in-depth pattern.
- **No secrets or credentials** in committed code.
- **No destructive operations**: Forward-only, existing files untouched.

### Observations from Systems Engineering Perspective

1. **Bonus functions**: `standalone_decision_artifact_path()` and `summary_artifact_path()` go beyond the PRD's 3 required functions (FR-7/8/9). These are reasonable extensions that centralize naming for artifact types that the orchestrator already produces. Good engineering judgment.

2. **Unrelated commits on branch**: The branch carries 5 commits from a prior feature (CI/CD pipeline, install script, releases). These are not part of this PRD's scope. In a production setting, this stacked-branch pattern creates merge risk, but for the purposes of reviewing the PRD implementation, the relevant commit (39b0cdb) is clean and scoped.

3. **Race condition analysis**: The `generate_timestamp()` uses second-level granularity. If two concurrent runs fire within the same second for the same feature/persona, filenames would collide. This is pre-existing behavior (not introduced by this change) and acceptable given the single-orchestrator execution model.

4. **Debuggability**: The nested structure significantly improves 3am debugging. `ls cOS_reviews/decisions/` gives you an instant chronological view of all gate verdicts. `ls cOS_reviews/reviews/staff_security_engineer/` shows full review history for one persona. This is the right data model for incident response.

5. **`task_review_artifact_path` not wired**: Defined and tested but not called from orchestrator. The PRD explicitly scopes this as forward compatibility for legacy task-level reviews. No concern — dead code with a clear purpose is preferable to ad-hoc construction when the need arises.

---

VERDICT: approve

FINDINGS:
- [src/colonyos/naming.py]: Two bonus functions (standalone_decision_artifact_path, summary_artifact_path) beyond PRD scope — reasonable extensions, fully tested
- [src/colonyos/orchestrator.py]: task_review_artifact_path not imported — intentional per PRD, exists for forward compatibility
- [branch]: 5 unrelated commits from prior feature (CI/CD pipeline) included on branch — stacked branch pattern, not a blocker

SYNTHESIS:
This is a clean, well-scoped implementation that hits every functional requirement in the PRD. The `ReviewArtifactPath` dataclass is appropriately minimal — a frozen value object with a convenience property, no overengineering. The path-traversal guard in `_save_review_artifact()` is exactly the kind of defense-in-depth a security-minded reviewer would want. All 6 instruction templates are updated consistently, and the `learn.md` template correctly instructs recursive discovery. Test coverage is comprehensive, including the path-traversal rejection case. The implementation follows the project's existing patterns (frozen dataclasses, optional timestamp injection for testability, slug sanitization). From a reliability perspective, the forward-only migration strategy is the right call — no blast radius from botched file moves, and agents are explicitly pointed at the new structure. This is ready to ship.