**Dataset**: model245
**Region**: EUR
**Delay**: 1

---

# Ranking model dataset Feature Engineering Analysis Report

**Dataset**: model245
**Category**: Model
**Region**: EUR
**Analysis Date**: 2024-01-15
**Fields Analyzed**: 0

---

## Executive Summary

**Primary Question Answered by Dataset**: What does this dataset fundamentally measure?
This dataset provides quantitative rankings of stocks generated by proprietary trading strategies developed by the company, representing systematic investment signals across the EUR region.

**Key Insights from Analysis**:
- Dataset contains model-generated rankings rather than raw fundamental or price data
- Represents systematic strategy outputs with delay=1, indicating end-of-day processing typical for model datasets
- Coverage universe TOPCS1600 suggests broad European equity coverage
- As a Model category dataset, fields likely represent scores, ranks, confidence metrics, or strategy-specific indicators

**Critical Field Relationships Identified**:
- Field analysis requires field inventory data not provided in current context
- Typical model datasets contain relationships between raw scores and normalized ranks
- Potential relationships between short-term and long-term ranking horizons (if multiple timeframes present)

**Most Promising Feature Concepts**:
1. Ranking Stability Metrics - because model consistency over time indicates signal robustness
2. Rank Change Dynamics - because momentum in ranking changes may predict future performance
3. Cross-Sectional Z-Score Normalization - because comparing model scores across sectors/industries is essential for fair comparison

---

## Dataset Deep Understanding

### Dataset Description
Stock ranked by strategy developed by company. This Model category dataset provides systematic ranking signals generated by proprietary quantitative strategies, covering European equities (EUR region) with end-of-day availability (delay=1).

### Field Inventory
| Field ID | Description | Data Type | Update Frequency | Coverage |
|----------|-------------|-----------|------------------|----------|
| `N/A` | No field definitions provided in dataset context | - | - | - |

*(Field analysis requires field inventory - typical Model datasets contain rank scores, confidence intervals, coverage flags, and strategy identifiers)*

### Field Deconstruction Analysis

#### Field Analysis Status
- **Status**: Unable to perform field deconstruction without field inventory
- **Typical Model Dataset Fields**: 
  - `rank` or `score`: Primary ranking metric
  - `coverage`: Binary indicator for universe inclusion
  - `confidence`: Model certainty metric
  - `tier` or `bucket`: Categorical ranking buckets

### Field Relationship Mapping

**The Story This Data Tells**:
Without specific field definitions, the narrative cannot be fully constructed. Generally, model245 would tell the story of how a proprietary quantitative strategy views the relative attractiveness of European equities, potentially including:
- Which stocks are ranked highest/lowest by the model
- How confident the model is in its predictions
- How rankings have evolved over time

**Key Relationships Identified**:
1. Relationships between score magnitude and rank position (if both fields present)
2. Temporal stability relationships (rank persistence over time)
3. Coverage vs. score relationships (whether uncovered stocks differ systematically)

**Missing Pieces That Would Complete the Picture**:
- Specific field identifiers and descriptions
- Horizon specifications (e.g., 12m, 1m ranking periods)
- Model version or strategy type classifications
- Historical coverage statistics

---

## Feature Concepts by Question Type

*[Note: Detailed feature concepts require field definitions. Below are conceptual frameworks applicable once fields are identified.]*

### Q1: "What is stable?" (Invariance Features)

**Concept**: Ranking Persistence Score
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` or `score` field
- **Definition**: Measures the stability of model rankings over time using rolling correlation or rank correlation
- **Why This Feature**: Stable rankings indicate consistent model conviction; unstable rankings suggest noise or regime changes
- **is filling nan necessary**: For model datasets, NaN values typically indicate stocks not covered by the model. These should generally NOT be filled blindly as coverage changes contain information about model scope. Use `ts_backfill()` only if continuity is specifically required for the strategy.
- **Directionality**: Higher values indicate persistent model views; lower values indicate churn
- **Boundary Conditions**: Near 1.0 indicates frozen rankings (potentially stale); near 0 indicates random ranking changes
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Coverage Stability
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires coverage or availability field
- **Definition**: Measures consistency of universe coverage over time
- **Why This Feature**: Changes in coverage may indicate model regime shifts or data availability issues
- **is filling nan necessary**: NaN in coverage fields usually means the stock is not in the model universe. Filling would incorrectly assume coverage.
- **Directionality**: Stable coverage (high values) indicates reliable model operation
- **Boundary Conditions**: Sudden drops indicate model changes or market stress
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q2: "What is changing?" (Dynamics Features)

**Concept**: Rank Momentum
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` field with temporal variations
- **Definition**: Rate of change in model rankings over multiple horizons
- **Why This Feature**: Accelerating rank changes may predict future price movements or signal model confidence shifts
- **is filling nan necessary**: Use `ts_backfill()` if analyzing continuous rank series, but preserve NaN for newly covered/uncovered stocks to avoid look-ahead bias.
- **Directionality**: Positive values indicate improving rankings; negative indicates deteriorating
- **Boundary Conditions**: Extreme changes may indicate data errors or corporate actions
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Rank Acceleration
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` or `score` field
- **Definition**: Second derivative of ranking changes (change of change)
- **Why This Feature**: Identifies inflection points where model conviction is building or fading
- **is filling nan necessary**: NaN handling should match the rank field treatment; consider `group_mean()` for cross-sectional context if appropriate.
- **Directionality**: Positive values indicate strengthening trends; negative indicates deceleration
- **Boundary Conditions**: Extreme positive/negative values signal rapid regime changes
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q3: "What is anomalous?" (Deviation Features)

**Concept**: Rank Deviation from Historical Norm
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` field
- **Definition**: Z-score of current rank relative to historical distribution for each instrument
- **Why This Feature**: Identifies when current rankings are unusual compared to a stock's typical model assessment
- **is filling nan necessary**: Historical NaNs should remain NaN to maintain valid statistical moments; do not fill unless creating balanced panels.
- **Directionality**: High positive Z-scores indicate unusually favorable rankings; negative indicates unusually poor
- **Boundary Conditions**: Values beyond ±3 indicate extreme anomalies warranting investigation
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Cross-Sectional Outlier Flag
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `score` or `rank` field
- **Definition**: Identifies stocks with model scores significantly deviating from peer groups (sector/industry)
- **Why This Feature**: Model outliers may represent unique opportunities or risks not captured by standard rankings
- **is filling nan necessary**: NaN values represent non-coverage and should be excluded from peer group calculations, not filled.
- **Directionality**: Extreme positive values indicate model favors stock significantly vs peers; negative indicates disfavor
- **Boundary Conditions**: Values beyond 2-3 standard deviations from sector mean
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q4: "What is combined?" (Interaction Features)

**Concept**: Rank-Confidence Interaction
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` and `confidence` fields
- **Definition**: Product or ratio of rank and confidence metrics to weight high-conviction signals
- **Why This Feature**: High rankings with low confidence may be noise; high confidence validates rank signal
- **is filling nan necessary**: If confidence is missing where rank exists, use `ts_backfill()` or set to neutral value (0.5) depending on model logic.
- **Directionality**: High values indicate high rank with high confidence (strong signal)
- **Boundary Conditions**: Confidence near 0 invalidates rank regardless of rank value
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Multi-Horizon Rank Consensus
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires multiple horizon rank fields (e.g., short_term_rank, long_term_rank)
- **Definition**: Agreement/disagreement between different ranking timeframes
- **Why This Feature**: Alignment across horizons indicates strong fundamental signal; divergence indicates uncertainty
- **is filling nan necessary**: Different horizons may have different coverage; fill only if the specific strategy requires complete panels.
- **Directionality**: Positive values indicate agreement (both high or both low); negative indicates conflict
- **Boundary Conditions**: Extreme disagreement may signal short-term vs long-term trade tension
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q5: "What is structural?" (Composition Features)

**Concept**: Decile Distribution Shift
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` or `score` field
- **Definition**: Tracking movement of stocks across ranking deciles over time
- **Why This Feature**: Structural shifts in portfolio composition indicate model regime changes
- **is filling nan necessary**: Stocks entering/exiting coverage create structural changes that should not be filled but explicitly modeled.
- **Directionality**: High values indicate upward structural migration; negative indicates degradation
- **Boundary Conditions**: Rapid decile jumps indicate high turnover or volatility
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Coverage Composition by Sector
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires coverage field and sector classifications (external)
- **Definition**: Proportion of sector covered by model over time
- **Why This Feature**: Changes in sector coverage reveal model scope evolution or data availability patterns
- **is filling nan necessary**: Sector classifications should be dense; coverage flags should not be filled.
- **Directionality**: Stable sector coverage indicates consistent model application
- **Boundary Conditions**: Sudden sector coverage drops indicate model changes or data issues
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q6: "What is cumulative?" (Accumulation Features)

**Concept**: Cumulative Rank Improvement
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` field
- **Definition**: Running sum of rank improvements over time
- **Why This Feature**: Cumulative improvement may indicate sustained positive momentum better than single-period changes
- **is filling nan necessary**: Use `ts_backfill()` to handle gaps in rank series only if assuming last rank persists; otherwise preserve NaN gaps.
- **Directionality**: High values indicate sustained upward trajectory; negative indicates consistent decline
- **Boundary Conditions**: Extreme values indicate persistent trends lasting multiple periods
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Time-Weighted Average Rank
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` field
- **Definition**: Exponentially weighted moving average of ranks emphasizing recent periods
- **Why This Feature**: Smoothes ranking noise while preserving recent signal; identifies persistent vs temporary rankings
- **is filling nan necessary**: `ts_decay_exp_window()` handles NaN internally; explicit filling may bias toward recent values.
- **Directionality**: Higher values indicate historically strong rankings (note: for rank data, lower numbers often mean higher ranks - directionality depends on encoding)
- **Boundary Conditions**: Divergence between current rank and TWAP indicates recent changes
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q7: "What is relative?" (Comparison Features)

**Concept**: Sector-Neutralized Rank
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` and sector grouping
- **Definition**: Rank relative to sector peers rather than absolute universe rank
- **Why This Feature**: Controls for sector biases in model; identifies best/worst within comparable groups
- **is filling nan necessary**: Sector means require dense data; use `group_mean()` with appropriate handling of sparse groups.
- **Directionality**: High values indicate top-ranked within sector; low indicates bottom-ranked
- **Boundary Conditions**: Uniform distribution within sectors indicates effective neutralization
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Rank Percentile within Industry
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` or `score` and industry classification
- **Definition**: Percentile position (0-1) within industry group
- **Why This Feature**: Relative positioning within peer groups controls for industry-specific model behaviors
- **is filling nan necessary**: Percentile calculations should exclude NaN; do not fill before ranking.
- **Directionality**: 1.0 indicates top of industry; 0.0 indicates bottom
- **Boundary Conditions**: Extreme percentiles indicate industry leaders/laggards
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

### Q8: "What is essential?" (Essence Features)

**Concept**: Model Signal Extraction (First Principle Rank)
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires multiple model fields or raw inputs
- **Definition**: Stripping away time-varying noise to identify persistent model conviction
- **Why This Feature**: Distinguishes temporary ranking fluctuations from fundamental model views
- **is filling nan necessary**: Essential signals should only use persistent data points; aggressive filling introduces artificial persistence.
- **Directionality**: High values indicate core model conviction; low values indicate weak or temporary signals
- **Boundary Conditions**: Near-zero values suggest model has no strong view; extreme values indicate high conviction
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

**Concept**: Rank Information Content
- **Sample Fields Used**: Requires `rank` and future returns (external validation)
- **Definition**: Measuring how much predictive information is contained in the rank signal
- **Why This Feature**: Quantifies the economic essence of the model output
- **is filling nan necessary**: Returns data typically dense; rank data gaps should be preserved to measure information conditional on coverage.
- **Directionality**: Higher values indicate ranks contain more predictive power
- **Boundary Conditions**: Values near zero indicate rank has no predictive content; positive indicates forecasting ability
- **Implementation Example**: `[Field definitions required to generate template]`

---

## Implementation Considerations

### Data Quality Notes
- **Coverage**: Model coverage may vary over time; stocks entering/exiting universe represent structural changes, not missing data
- **Timeliness**: Delay=1 indicates end-of-day availability; suitable for next-day trading but not intraday
- **Accuracy**: Model outputs depend on input data quality and model specification; backtesting required to validate
- **Potential Biases**: Sector/industry biases common in model rankings; universe constraints (TOPCS1600) limit small-cap representation

### Computational Complexity
- **Lightweight features**: Rank changes, simple ratios (if basic rank fields available)
- **Medium complexity**: Cross-sectional neutralizations, decile assignments, sector comparisons
- **Heavy computation**: Multi-horizon correlations, time-series regressions on ranks, complex decay functions

### Recommended Prioritization

**Tier 1 (Immediate Implementation)**:
1. Rank Momentum (ts_delta of rank) - Simple, interpretable, captures model dynamics
2. Sector-Neutralized Rank - Essential for removing structural biases in EUR region
3. Rank Persistence (ts_corr over time) - Validates model stability

**Tier 2 (Secondary Priority)**:
1. Rank-Confidence Interaction - Enhances signal quality if confidence data available
2. Multi-Horizon Consensus - Captages model alignment across timeframes
3. Cumulative Rank Improvement - Identifies sustained trends

**Tier 3 (Requires Further Validation)**:
1. Rank Information Content - Requires return data for validation
2. Complex decay functions - High computational cost, benefit requires testing

---

## Critical Questions for Further Exploration

### Unanswered Questions:
1. What specific ranking methodology does model245 employ (quantile, score-based, probability)?
2. Are there multiple horizons available (1m, 3m, 12m rankings) or single period?
3. What is the coverage overlap with standard universes (TOPCS1600 constituents)?
4. Does the dataset include confidence intervals or coverage flags?

### Recommended Additional Data:
- Historical field definitions for model245
- Sector/industry classifications for EUR universe (for neutralization)
- Price/return data (pv1) to validate rank predictive power
- Analyst estimate data (anl15) to compare model vs consensus rankings

### Assumptions to Challenge:
- Assumption that higher ranks always indicate buy signals (may be short signals or relative value)
- Assumption that model coverage is exogenous; coverage may be endogenous to model predictions
- Assumption that rank scales are consistent across time (model retraining may shift distributions)

---

## Methodology Notes

**Analysis Approach**: This report was generated by:
1. Dataset metadata analysis (category, delay, region, universe)
2. Inferential field analysis based on Model category dataset characteristics
3. Question-driven feature generation framework (8 fundamental questions)
4. Conceptual framework development pending field inventory

**Design Principles**:
- Focus on logical meaning of ranking data
- Emphasis on cross-sectional and temporal dynamics inherent in model datasets
- Prioritization of robustness features (stability, persistence) given model dataset nature
- Transparency regarding limitations due to missing field definitions

---

*Report generated: 2024-01-15*
*Analysis depth: Metadata analysis + Model category inference*
*Next steps: Obtain field inventory for model245 to generate specific Alpha expressions*