# v0.15.0 SubAgent Development Plan

**Purpose**: SubAgent（Task tool）を活用した効率的な並列開発
**Target**: v0.15.0 Unified Memory Model (8週間 → 4-5週間に短縮可能)
**Last Updated**: 2025-11-03

---

## SubAgent活用の利点

### 1. 並列開発による時間短縮
```
従来（シーケンシャル）: 8週間
SubAgent活用（並列）: 4-5週間 (-40%〜-50%)
```

### 2. 独立したコンポーネントの同時開発
- Memory System core
- Backward compatibility layer
- CLI commands
- MCP tools
- Tests
- Documentation

### 3. 各SubAgentの専門性
- **Core開発Agent**: Memory model, storage, algorithms
- **Integration開発Agent**: Backward compatibility, migration
- **CLI開発Agent**: Command-line interface
- **MCP開発Agent**: MCP server tools
- **Test開発Agent**: Test suites
- **Doc開発Agent**: Documentation

---

## 並列開発可能なコンポーネント

### Phase 1: Core Components (Week 1-2を並列化)

#### 独立開発可能（並列実行）

**Agent 1: Memory Core** (Week 1-2)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryEntry model定義 (clauxton/core/memory.py)
- Memory class実装 (CRUD operations)
- MemoryStore 実装 (storage backend)
- Tests: tests/core/test_memory.py (50 tests)

Dependencies: None (完全に独立)
Estimated: 5-7日
```

**Agent 2: Backward Compatibility** (Week 1-2)
```
Tasks:
- KnowledgeBaseCompat実装 (clauxton/core/knowledge_base_compat.py)
- TaskManagerCompat実装 (clauxton/core/task_manager_compat.py)
- Deprecation warnings 実装
- Tests: tests/core/test_compatibility.py (40 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core (Agent 1の成果物)
Estimated: 5-7日

Note: Agent 1完了後に開始可能
```

**Agent 3: Migration Script** (Week 1-2)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryMigrator実装 (clauxton/utils/migrate_to_memory.py)
- KB → Memory migration
- Task → Memory migration
- Rollback機能
- Tests: tests/utils/test_migrate_to_memory.py (10 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core (Agent 1の成果物)
Estimated: 3-4日

Note: Agent 1完了後に開始可能
```

**Agent 4: CLI Commands** (Week 1-2)
```
Tasks:
- clauxton memory add/search/list/get/update/delete 実装
- Deprecation warnings for daily commands
- Click integration
- Tests: tests/cli/test_memory.py (20 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core (Agent 1の成果物)
Estimated: 4-5日

Note: Agent 1完了後に開始可能
```

**Agent 5: MCP Tools** (Week 1-2)
```
Tasks:
- memory_add/search/get/update/delete MCP tools
- Deprecated kb_*/task_* tools (with warnings)
- Tests: tests/mcp/test_server_memory.py (30 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core (Agent 1の成果物)
Estimated: 5-6日

Note: Agent 1完了後に開始可能
```

#### Phase 1の並列実行戦略

```
Day 1-7:
  Agent 1 (Memory Core) → 単独開発

Day 8-14 (Agent 1完了後):
  Agent 2 (Backward Compat) ┐
  Agent 3 (Migration)      ├─ 並列実行 (4エージェント同時)
  Agent 4 (CLI Commands)    │
  Agent 5 (MCP Tools)      ┘

結果: Week 1-2 を 2週間 → 10-12日 に短縮
```

---

### Phase 2: Smart Memory (Week 3-4を並列化)

#### 独立開発可能（並列実行）

**Agent 6: Memory Extraction** (Week 3-4)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryExtractor実装 (clauxton/semantic/memory_extractor.py)
- extract_from_commit() 実装
- extract_from_recent_commits() 実装
- Decision/pattern detection
- Tests: tests/semantic/test_memory_extractor.py (15 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core
Estimated: 5-6日
```

**Agent 7: Relationship Detection** (Week 3-4)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryLinker実装 (clauxton/semantic/memory_linker.py)
- find_relationships() 実装
- suggest_merge_candidates() 実装
- Tests: tests/semantic/test_memory_linker.py (15 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core
Estimated: 5-6日
```

**Agent 8: CLI Extract Commands** (Week 3-4)
```
Tasks:
- clauxton memory extract 実装
- clauxton memory link 実装
- clauxton memory suggest-merge 実装
- Tests: tests/cli/test_memory_extract.py (10 tests)

Dependencies: Agent 6, 7
Estimated: 3-4日

Note: Agent 6, 7完了後に開始
```

#### Phase 2の並列実行戦略

```
Day 15-20:
  Agent 6 (Memory Extraction) ┐
  Agent 7 (Relationship)      ┘─ 並列実行 (2エージェント同時)

Day 21-24 (Agent 6, 7完了後):
  Agent 8 (CLI Extract) → 単独開発

結果: Week 3-4 を 2週間 → 10日 に短縮
```

---

### Phase 3: Memory Intelligence (Week 5-6を並列化)

#### 独立開発可能（並列実行）

**Agent 9: Question-Answering** (Week 5-6)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryQA実装 (clauxton/semantic/memory_qa.py)
- answer_question() 実装
- MCP tool: answer_question()
- Tests: tests/semantic/test_memory_qa.py (10 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core, Semantic search
Estimated: 5-6日
```

**Agent 10: Summarization** (Week 5-6)
```
Tasks:
- MemorySummarizer実装 (clauxton/semantic/memory_summarizer.py)
- summarize_project() 実装
- predict_next_tasks() 実装
- generate_knowledge_gaps() 実装
- MCP tools: get_project_summary(), suggest_next_tasks()
- Tests: tests/semantic/test_memory_summarizer.py (10 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core
Estimated: 5-6日
```

**Agent 11: Memory Graph** (Week 5-6)
```
Tasks:
- MemoryGraph実装 (clauxton/visualization/memory_graph.py)
- generate_graph_data() 実装
- export_to_dot() 実装
- export_to_mermaid() 実装
- CLI: clauxton memory graph
- Tests: tests/visualization/test_memory_graph.py (5 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core, Relationship detection
Estimated: 4-5日
```

#### Phase 3の並列実行戦略

```
Day 25-30:
  Agent 9 (Q&A)         ┐
  Agent 10 (Summary)    ├─ 並列実行 (3エージェント同時)
  Agent 11 (Graph)      ┘

結果: Week 5-6 を 2週間 → 6日 に短縮
```

---

### Phase 4: Documentation & Polish (Week 7-8を並列化)

#### 独立開発可能（並列実行）

**Agent 12: Core Documentation** (Week 7-8)
```
Tasks:
- docs/MEMORY_SYSTEM.md 作成
- docs/MEMORY_QUICK_START.md 作成
- docs/MIGRATION_GUIDE_v0.15.0.md 作成
- Code examples, diagrams

Dependencies: All implementation complete
Estimated: 4-5日
```

**Agent 13: API Documentation** (Week 7-8)
```
Tasks:
- Update docs/mcp-index.md
- Update README.md
- Update docs/architecture.md
- CLI help texts

Dependencies: All implementation complete
Estimated: 3-4日
```

**Agent 14: Integration Tests** (Week 7-8)
```
Tasks:
- tests/integration/test_memory_workflow.py (15 scenarios)
- End-to-end workflow tests
- Performance tests
- User acceptance tests

Dependencies: All implementation complete
Estimated: 4-5日
```

**Agent 15: TUI Integration** (Week 7-8)
```
Tasks:
- Memory Explorer tab (clauxton/tui/memory_explorer.py)
- Update dashboard for Memory System
- Keyboard shortcuts for memory commands
- Tests: tests/tui/test_memory_explorer.py (10 tests)

Dependencies: Memory Core, CLI commands
Estimated: 5-6日
```

#### Phase 4の並列実行戦略

```
Day 31-36:
  Agent 12 (Core Docs)    ┐
  Agent 13 (API Docs)     ├─ 並列実行 (4エージェント同時)
  Agent 14 (Integration)  │
  Agent 15 (TUI)          ┘

結果: Week 7-8 を 2週間 → 6日 に短縮
```

---

## SubAgent実行プラン

### 準備フェーズ (Day 0)

**タスク**: SubAgent実行のための準備
```bash
# 1. 開発ブランチ作成
git checkout -b feature/v0.15.0-unified-memory

# 2. SubAgent用のタスク定義ファイル作成
# (各Agentへの詳細指示)
```

### Phase 1実行 (Day 1-12)

#### Day 1-7: Agent 1 (Memory Core)

**SubAgent起動コマンド**:
```
Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"

Prompt:
"Implement Memory System core for Clauxton v0.15.0.

Context:
- Read docs/v0.15.0_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md (Week 1-2 section)
- Read docs/v0.15.0_MIGRATION_VALIDATION.md
- Existing codebase: clauxton/core/

Tasks:
1. Implement MemoryEntry model (clauxton/core/memory.py)
   - Pydantic model with strict validation
   - Fields: id, type, title, content, category, tags, created_at, updated_at, related_to, source, confidence, source_ref, legacy_id
   - Type: Literal["knowledge", "decision", "code", "task", "pattern"]

2. Implement Memory class (clauxton/core/memory.py)
   - add(entry: MemoryEntry) -> str
   - get(memory_id: str) -> Optional[MemoryEntry]
   - search(query: str, type_filter: List[str], limit: int) -> List[MemoryEntry]
   - update(memory_id: str, **kwargs) -> bool
   - delete(memory_id: str) -> bool
   - find_related(memory_id: str, limit: int) -> List[MemoryEntry]

3. Implement MemoryStore (clauxton/core/memory_store.py)
   - YAML-based storage (.clauxton/memories.yml)
   - Atomic writes with backup
   - Index for fast lookup
   - load_all(), save(), rebuild_index()

4. Write comprehensive tests (tests/core/test_memory.py)
   - CRUD operations (10 tests)
   - Type filtering (10 tests)
   - Relationship management (10 tests)
   - Legacy ID compatibility (10 tests)
   - Edge cases (10 tests)

Requirements:
- Follow existing code style (see CLAUDE.md)
- Use Pydantic for validation
- Use atomic file writes (see clauxton/utils/yaml_utils.py)
- Type hints required
- Docstrings (Google style)
- Coverage >95%

Deliverables:
- clauxton/core/memory.py
- clauxton/core/memory_store.py
- tests/core/test_memory.py (50 tests)
- All tests passing

Do NOT:
- Modify existing KB/Task code yet
- Implement CLI/MCP integration yet
- Write documentation yet

Expected duration: 5-7 days
Status reporting: Daily progress updates"
```

#### Day 8-12: Agents 2-5 (並列実行)

**4つのSubAgentを並列起動**:

```
# Agent 2: Backward Compatibility
Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
Prompt: [Detailed prompt for backward compatibility layer]
Dependencies: Wait for Agent 1 completion

# Agent 3: Migration Script
Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
Prompt: [Detailed prompt for migration script]
Dependencies: Wait for Agent 1 completion

# Agent 4: CLI Commands
Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
Prompt: [Detailed prompt for CLI commands]
Dependencies: Wait for Agent 1 completion

# Agent 5: MCP Tools
Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
Prompt: [Detailed prompt for MCP tools]
Dependencies: Wait for Agent 1 completion
```

**並列実行方法** (Claude Code):
```
I'll launch 4 SubAgents in parallel for backward compatibility, migration, CLI, and MCP implementation.

[Launch all 4 Task tools in a single message]
```

### Phase 2実行 (Day 13-24)

同様に Agent 6, 7を並列実行 → Agent 8を実行

### Phase 3実行 (Day 25-30)

Agent 9, 10, 11を並列実行

### Phase 4実行 (Day 31-36)

Agent 12, 13, 14, 15を並列実行

---

## SubAgent活用の実践ガイド

### 1. 詳細な指示が重要

**良い例**:
```
Task: Implement MemoryEntry model

Requirements:
- File: clauxton/core/memory.py
- Use Pydantic BaseModel
- Fields: id (str, pattern="^MEM-\d{8}-\d{3}$"), type (Literal[...]), ...
- Add validation: title min_length=1, max_length=200
- Add docstrings (Google style)
- Follow existing code style in clauxton/core/knowledge_base.py

Tests:
- tests/core/test_memory.py
- Test ID validation
- Test type validation
- Test edge cases (empty string, Unicode, etc.)

Example:
```python
class MemoryEntry(BaseModel):
    id: str = Field(..., pattern=r"^MEM-\d{8}-\d{3}$")
    # ...
```
```

**悪い例**:
```
Task: Implement memory system
```

### 2. 依存関係の明確化

```
Agent 2 (Backward Compat):
  Dependencies: Agent 1 (Memory Core)
  Wait condition: tests/core/test_memory.py が全て pass

Agent 8 (CLI Extract):
  Dependencies: Agent 6 (Memory Extraction), Agent 7 (Relationship)
  Wait condition: Both test suites passing
```

### 3. 成果物の検証

各SubAgent完了後:
```bash
# Tests実行
pytest tests/core/test_memory.py -v

# Type check
mypy clauxton/core/memory.py

# Lint
ruff check clauxton/core/memory.py

# Coverage
pytest --cov=clauxton/core/memory.py --cov-report=term
```

### 4. SubAgent間の調整

**統合ブランチ**:
```bash
feature/v0.15.0-unified-memory  (main branch)
  ├─ agent-1-memory-core       (Agent 1)
  ├─ agent-2-backward-compat   (Agent 2)
  ├─ agent-3-migration         (Agent 3)
  ├─ agent-4-cli-commands      (Agent 4)
  └─ agent-5-mcp-tools         (Agent 5)

# 各Agent完了後にmainブランチにmerge
```

---

## タイムライン比較

### シーケンシャル開発 (従来)

```
Week 1-2: Core Integration          [████████████████] 14日
Week 3-4: Smart Memory               [████████████████] 14日
Week 5-6: Memory Intelligence        [████████████████] 14日
Week 7-8: UX Polish                  [████████████████] 14日
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
合計: 56日 (8週間)
```

### SubAgent並列開発

```
Phase 1: Core Components
  Agent 1 (Memory Core)                [███████] 7日
  Agents 2-5 (並列)                    [█████] 5日
  └─ Subtotal: 12日

Phase 2: Smart Memory
  Agents 6-7 (並列)                    [██████] 6日
  Agent 8 (CLI Extract)                [████] 4日
  └─ Subtotal: 10日

Phase 3: Memory Intelligence
  Agents 9-11 (並列)                   [██████] 6日
  └─ Subtotal: 6日

Phase 4: Documentation & Polish
  Agents 12-15 (並列)                  [██████] 6日
  └─ Subtotal: 6日

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
合計: 34日 (約5週間)

時間短縮: 56日 → 34日 (▲22日, -39%)
```

---

## リスクと対策

### リスク1: SubAgent間の調整コスト

**リスク**: 並列開発でインターフェース不整合

**対策**:
- Agent 1 (Memory Core) を最優先で完成
- 明確なAPI定義を先に作成
- Type hints + Pydantic で型安全性確保

### リスク2: SubAgentの品質ばらつき

**リスク**: 各Agentのコード品質が異なる

**対策**:
- 詳細な要件定義（コードスタイル、テストカバレッジ）
- 自動チェック（mypy, ruff, pytest）
- コードレビュー必須

### リスク3: 依存関係の待ち時間

**リスク**: Agent 1完了待ちで時間ロス

**対策**:
- Agent 1を最短で完成（7日 → 5日に圧縮）
- 並列Agentは仕様書ベースで先行開発
- Mock/Stubで先行テスト

---

## SubAgent活用の成功条件

### 1. 明確なタスク分割
- ✅ 独立したコンポーネント
- ✅ 明確な入出力
- ✅ 依存関係が少ない

### 2. 詳細な仕様書
- ✅ API定義明確
- ✅ コード例あり
- ✅ テスト要件明確

### 3. 自動化されたCI
- ✅ pytest自動実行
- ✅ mypy自動チェック
- ✅ ruff自動チェック

### 4. 調整メカニズム
- ✅ Git branching strategy
- ✅ Daily standup (進捗確認)
- ✅ Integration testing

---

---

## 品質保証戦略: SubAgentによるレビュー・改善

### 課題認識

SubAgent並列開発での品質リスク:
- コード品質のばらつき
- パフォーマンス最適化の不足
- テスト観点の漏れ
- セキュリティ脆弱性
- ドキュメント不足

### 解決策: 3層品質保証アプローチ

#### Layer 1: 開発時品質要件（各SubAgent）

**各SubAgentへの品質要件を明示**:

```
Task: Implement Memory Core

[... 実装要件 ...]

Quality Requirements (必須):

1. Code Review (Self-Review):
   - Follow code style: CLAUDE.md
   - Type hints: 100% coverage
   - Docstrings: Google style, all public APIs
   - No code smells (complex functions, magic numbers)

2. Performance:
   - Memory.search(): <100ms for 1,000 entries
   - Memory.add(): <50ms
   - Add performance benchmarks
   - Profile critical paths

3. Testing (Comprehensive):
   - Unit tests: >50 tests
   - Edge cases: Unicode, empty, None, large data
   - Error handling: All exceptions tested
   - Security: Injection, validation, boundary checks
   - Performance tests: Benchmark critical operations
   - Coverage: >95%

4. Lint & Type Check:
   - mypy --strict: Must pass
   - ruff check: Must pass (no warnings)
   - No type: ignore unless justified

5. Documentation:
   - Code comments for complex logic
   - API documentation with examples
   - Usage guide (inline examples)
   - Edge case documentation

Self-Review Checklist (完了条件):
- [ ] All tests pass (pytest)
- [ ] Coverage >95% (pytest --cov)
- [ ] Type check passes (mypy --strict)
- [ ] Lint passes (ruff check)
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
- [ ] Documentation complete
- [ ] Security review done

Deliverables:
- Implementation
- Comprehensive tests
- Performance benchmarks
- Documentation
- Self-review report
```

**効果**: 基本的な品質を開発段階で確保

---

#### Layer 2: Phase完了後の統合レビューAgent（推奨）

**各Phase完了後に専門レビューAgentを実行**:

##### Review Agent: Phase 1 Quality Assurance

**実行タイミング**: Day 12 (Phase 1完了後)

**SubAgent Prompt**:
```
Task: Comprehensive Quality Review for Phase 1 (Core Components)

Context:
- Phase 1 deliverables complete (Agents 1-5)
- Files to review:
  - clauxton/core/memory.py
  - clauxton/core/memory_store.py
  - clauxton/core/knowledge_base_compat.py
  - clauxton/core/task_manager_compat.py
  - clauxton/utils/migrate_to_memory.py
  - clauxton/cli/memory.py
  - clauxton/mcp/server.py (memory tools)
  - All test files

Review Checklist:

1. Code Quality Review:
   - Code style consistency across all files
   - DRY principle (no code duplication)
   - SOLID principles
   - Clear naming conventions
   - Appropriate abstraction levels
   - Error handling consistency

2. Performance Analysis:
   - Profile all critical paths
   - Identify bottlenecks (>100ms operations)
   - Check algorithmic complexity (O(n²) → O(n log n))
   - Memory usage analysis
   - Caching opportunities
   - Database query optimization (if applicable)

3. Test Quality Review:
   ✅ Test Observation Points (観点):
      - Functional correctness
      - Edge cases (boundary values)
      - Error conditions (exceptions, invalid input)
      - Concurrency (if applicable)
      - Integration between components
      - Regression (breaking changes)

   ✅ Coverage Analysis:
      - Line coverage >95%
      - Branch coverage >90%
      - Missing test scenarios

   ✅ Test Types:
      - Unit tests (isolation)
      - Integration tests (component interaction)
      - Performance tests (benchmarks)
      - Security tests (injection, validation)
      - Scenario tests (user workflows)

   ✅ Test Quality:
      - Test naming clarity
      - Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
      - No flaky tests
      - Fast execution (<5s total)

4. Security Review:
   - Input validation (all user inputs)
   - SQL/Command injection risks
   - Path traversal vulnerabilities
   - YAML deserialization safety
   - Authentication/Authorization (if applicable)
   - Sensitive data handling
   - Dependencies security scan

5. Lint & Type Check:
   - mypy --strict passes
   - ruff check passes (no warnings)
   - No suppressed warnings without justification
   - Type hints completeness

6. Documentation Review:
   - API documentation completeness
   - Code comments for complex logic
   - Usage examples present
   - Migration guide accuracy
   - Changelog updated

7. Integration Validation:
   - Components work together
   - No breaking changes to existing APIs
   - Backward compatibility verified
   - Migration script tested

Deliverables:
1. Comprehensive review report:
   - Summary of findings
   - Critical issues (blocking)
   - Major issues (high priority)
   - Minor issues (nice-to-have)

2. Performance analysis report:
   - Benchmark results
   - Bottleneck identification
   - Optimization recommendations

3. Security audit report:
   - Vulnerabilities found
   - Risk assessment
   - Mitigation recommendations

4. Test gap analysis:
   - Missing test scenarios
   - Coverage gaps
   - Recommended additional tests

5. Improvement task list:
   - Prioritized (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
   - Effort estimation
   - Implementation suggestions

6. Documentation gaps:
   - Missing documentation
   - Unclear sections
   - Example code needed

Expected duration: 1.5 days
```

**同様のReview Agentを各Phase完了後に実行**:
- Phase 1完了後 (Day 12): Review Agent 1
- Phase 2完了後 (Day 24): Review Agent 2
- Phase 3完了後 (Day 30): Review Agent 3
- Phase 4完了後 (Day 36): Review Agent 4

**タイムライン影響**:
```
開発: 34日
+ Review: 6日 (各Phase 1.5日)
合計: 40日 (約6週間)

それでも従来の8週間より2週間短縮
```

---

#### Layer 3: Critical Issues の手動レビュー

**人間の判断が必要な領域**:

1. **Architecture Decisions**
   - コンポーネント設計の妥当性
   - API設計の一貫性
   - 将来の拡張性

2. **Security Critical Paths**
   - 認証・認可ロジック
   - データ暗号化
   - 外部入力の処理

3. **Performance Critical Paths**
   - メインワークフローの速度
   - メモリ使用量
   - スケーラビリティ

**手動レビュー後にSubAgentで改善**:

```
# 開発者が問題発見
git diff
pytest --cov
mypy clauxton/core/memory.py

# 問題あればSubAgentに改善依頼
Task: Improve Memory Search Performance

Context:
- Current code: clauxton/core/memory.py, line 145-180
- Issue: search() is O(n) linear scan, slow for 10K+ entries
- Benchmark: Currently 500ms for 10K entries, target <100ms

Analysis:
- No indexing on common search fields
- Full content scan for every search
- No caching of search results

Tasks:
1. Add inverted index for full-text search
2. Add caching for recent searches (LRU cache)
3. Optimize filtering logic
4. Add performance tests (100, 1K, 10K, 100K entries)
5. Verify <100ms for 10K entries

Deliverables:
- Optimized code with indexing
- Performance tests
- Benchmark comparison (before/after)
- Documentation update

Expected: 1 day
```

---

### 統合品質ダッシュボード

**Phase完了毎に品質メトリクスを集計**:

```
Phase 1 Quality Dashboard:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Code Quality:
  ✅ mypy --strict: Pass
  ✅ ruff check: Pass (0 warnings)
  ✅ Code complexity: Average 5.2 (target <10)
  ⚠️ Code duplication: 3 instances found

Performance:
  ✅ Memory.search(): 85ms (target <100ms)
  ✅ Memory.add(): 42ms (target <50ms)
  ❌ Migration: 2.5s for 1000 entries (target <1s)

Testing:
  ✅ Test count: 150 tests (target 100+)
  ✅ Coverage: 96% (target >95%)
  ⚠️ Missing: Concurrency tests
  ✅ Performance tests: Present
  ✅ Security tests: Present

Security:
  ✅ Input validation: Complete
  ✅ Injection risks: None found
  ⚠️ YAML deserialization: Using safe_load (OK)
  ✅ Dependencies: No known vulnerabilities

Documentation:
  ✅ API docs: Complete
  ✅ Code comments: Good
  ⚠️ Migration guide: Needs more examples
  ✅ Changelog: Updated

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Overall Status: ✅ PASS with Minor Issues
Critical Issues: 0
Major Issues: 1 (Migration performance)
Minor Issues: 3
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Action Items:
1. [HIGH] Optimize migration performance (Agent X)
2. [MEDIUM] Add concurrency tests (Agent X)
3. [LOW] Add more migration examples (Agent X or Manual)
4. [LOW] Refactor 3 code duplication instances (Manual)
```

---

### 実行例: ユーザープロンプトでのレビュー

**Phase 1完了後、ユーザーが実行**:

```
Prompt 1: "コードをレビュー/改善して。"

→ Review Agent 1 起動
→ 上記の包括的レビュー実行
→ 改善タスクリスト作成
```

```
Prompt 2: "パフォーマンスは最適化されておりパフォーマンステストできていますか？テストの **観点**、カバレッジ、Lintチェック、シナリオテスト、セキュリティテストに不足はありませんか？また、ドキュメントの追加や修正は必要ないですか？"

→ Review Agent 1 起動（詳細モード）
→ 全項目を個別にチェック:
   ✅ パフォーマンステスト
   ✅ テスト観点（7種類）
   ✅ カバレッジ（95%+）
   ✅ Lintチェック
   ✅ シナリオテスト
   ✅ セキュリティテスト
   ✅ ドキュメント
→ ギャップ分析レポート作成
→ 改善タスク作成
```

**改善タスクを別SubAgentで実行**:

```
# Review Agent 1の結果
Issues found:
1. [CRITICAL] Migration performance: 2.5s (target <1s)
2. [MAJOR] Missing concurrency tests
3. [MINOR] Documentation examples insufficient

# 改善SubAgent起動
Task 1: Optimize Migration Performance
Task 2: Add Concurrency Tests
Task 3: Enhance Documentation Examples

→ 3つのSubAgentを並列起動
→ 1-2日で改善完了
```

---

## まとめ

### 品質保証付きSubAgent開発

| 項目 | 従来 | SubAgent開発 | SubAgent+QA | 改善 |
|------|------|-------------|------------|------|
| **開発期間** | 56日 | 34日 | 40日 | -29% |
| **品質保証** | 手動 | 部分的 | 包括的 | 向上 |
| **テストカバレッジ** | 85% | 90% | 95%+ | +10% |
| **パフォーマンス最適化** | 最後 | 各Phase後 | 各Phase後 | 早期 |
| **セキュリティ** | 手動 | 基本 | 包括的 | 向上 |

### 推奨戦略

**3層品質保証**:
1. **Layer 1**: 各SubAgentに品質要件明示（開発時）
2. **Layer 2**: Phase完了後にReview Agent（統合レビュー）
3. **Layer 3**: Critical issues の手動レビュー

**タイムライン**:
```
開発 (並列): 34日
品質保証: +6日
合計: 40日 (6週間)

従来の8週間より2週間短縮
+ 品質向上（Coverage 85%→95%+）
```

### 次のアクション

1. ✅ SubAgent実行計画の承認（品質保証含む）
2. 📝 各Agentへの詳細指示作成（品質要件含む）
3. 🚀 Phase 1 Agent 1から開始（2025-11-27）
4. 🔍 Phase 1完了後にReview Agent 1実行（Day 12）

---

**Last Updated**: 2025-11-03
**Status**: 📋 SubAgent Plan Ready (Quality Assurance Included)
**Estimated Time**: 40日 (6週間) with comprehensive QA
**Time Saving**: -29% (56日 → 40日)
**Quality Improvement**: Coverage 85% → 95%+
**Next Action**: Start Agent 1 (Memory Core) on 2025-11-27
