# Remaining Issues for Claude Force v2.1.0

This document tracks remaining work items identified during the comprehensive security and quality review.

---

## Priority 1: Critical for Production (1-2 weeks)

### 🔴 Issue #1: CLI Testing Framework
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 40 hours
**Severity:** HIGH
**Category:** Testing

**Description:**
CLI module has 0% test coverage (1,125 statements untested). This is the primary user interface and needs comprehensive testing.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Implement subprocess-based CLI integration tests
- [ ] Test all 20+ CLI commands (init, run, list, info, recommend, analyze, etc.)
- [ ] Test argument parsing and validation
- [ ] Test error handling and user feedback
- [ ] Test output formatting (JSON, table, verbose modes)
- [ ] Target: 80% CLI coverage

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- CLI coverage increases from 0% to 80%
- All main commands have integration tests
- Error scenarios are tested
- Output formats are validated

**Files:**
- `claude_force/cli.py`
- `tests/test_cli_integration.py` (new)

---

### 🟡 Issue #2: Fix 48 Failing Tests
**Status:** In Progress (14 tests fixed)
**Effort:** 8 hours remaining (was 16 hours)
**Severity:** MEDIUM
**Category:** Testing

**Description:**
48 tests currently failing (down from 60). Fixed path validation issues, now mainly stress test and integration test failures remain.

**Progress:**
- ✅ Fixed 14 test failures (13 import_export + 1 path_validator)
- ✅ All import_export tests passing (25/25)
- ✅ All path_validator tests passing (17/17)
- ⚠️ 37 stress test failures (timing/threshold issues)
- ⚠️ 11 integration/CLI test failures

**Root Causes:**
- Stress tests: Marginal threshold failures (75% vs 80% required)
- Stress tests: API method name changes (analyze_task_complexity)
- Integration tests: API signature mismatches
- Integration tests: Mock setup issues

**Tasks:**
- [x] Fix import_export path validation issues
- [x] Fix empty path validation
- [ ] Update stress test thresholds or fix timing issues
- [ ] Fix API method name calls in stress tests
- [ ] Update integration test mocks
- [ ] Fix orchestrator test signatures

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Test pass rate increases to >95% (currently 86.7%)
- All core functionality tests pass
- Stress test issues documented or resolved
- All critical path tests pass

**Current Status:**
- 438 passed (was 426) = +12 tests
- 48 failed (was 60) = -12 failures
- 19 skipped
- Pass rate: 86.7% (up from 84.4%)

**Files:**
- `tests/test_stress_*.py` (37 failures)
- `tests/integration/` (11 failures)
- `tests/test_import_export.py` (fixed ✅)
- `tests/test_path_validator.py` (fixed ✅)

---

### 🟡 Issue #3: Agent Documentation Completeness
**Status:** Partial (2/19 agents fixed)
**Effort:** 3.5 hours remaining (was 4 hours)
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Documentation

**Description:**
Agent files missing required sections: Input Requirements, Reads, Writes, Tools Available, Guardrails.

**Progress:**
- ✅ ai-engineer.md - Complete
- ✅ prompt-engineer.md - Complete
- ⚠️ 17 agents remaining

**Affected Agents (Remaining):**
- [ ] claude-code-expert.md
- [ ] backend-architect.md
- [ ] frontend-specialist.md
- [ ] ml-engineer.md
- [ ] data-scientist.md
- [ ] devops-specialist.md
- [ ] security-specialist.md
- [ ] qa-automation-expert.md
- [ ] code-reviewer.md
- [ ] deployment-integration-expert.md
- [ ] (and 7 more agent files)

**Tasks:**
- [x] Add missing sections to ai-engineer.md
- [x] Add missing sections to prompt-engineer.md
- [ ] Validate all agents have required sections
- [ ] Ensure consistent formatting
- [ ] Run test_agent_files_have_required_sections
- [ ] Create template for batch updates

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- All agent files pass required sections test
- Documentation is complete and consistent
- Test suite passes all agent documentation tests

---

## Priority 2: Important Enhancements (2-4 weeks)

### 🟢 Issue #4: Expand Integration Test Coverage
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 20 hours
**Severity:** MEDIUM
**Category:** Testing

**Description:**
Current integration test coverage is only 20%. Need more end-to-end workflow tests.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Add multi-agent workflow tests (100+ tests)
- [ ] Test marketplace install + usage scenarios
- [ ] Test error recovery and resilience
- [ ] Test cost threshold enforcement
- [ ] Test semantic agent selection
- [ ] Test performance tracking integration

**Target Coverage:**
- Current: 45 tests, 20% coverage
- Target: 100+ tests, 40% coverage

**Focus Areas:**
- Multi-agent workflows end-to-end
- Marketplace integration
- Error recovery
- Cost management

---

### 🟢 Issue #5: Load and Stress Testing
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 16 hours
**Severity:** MEDIUM
**Category:** Testing

**Description:**
No comprehensive load/stress testing for production readiness. Need to validate system behavior under high load.

**Framework:** locust or pytest-benchmark

**Scenarios:**
- [ ] 100+ concurrent agent requests
- [ ] 1000+ skills loaded simultaneously
- [ ] Memory leak detection over 10K operations
- [ ] 24-hour sustained load test

**Metrics to Track:**
- Response time percentiles (p50, p95, p99)
- Memory usage over time
- Error rate under load
- Throughput (requests/second)

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- No memory leaks detected
- Response time <2s at p95 under load
- Error rate <1% under normal load
- System stable for 24+ hours

---

### 🟢 Issue #6: Security Testing Automation
**Status:** Partial (Bandit runs in CI)
**Effort:** 8 hours
**Severity:** MEDIUM
**Category:** Security

**Description:**
Security scans run in CI but don't fail builds. Need to enforce security gates.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Remove `|| true` from Bandit security checks
- [ ] Add input fuzzing tests
- [ ] Test API key handling (ensure no leaks)
- [ ] Validate file permissions on .claude/ directory
- [ ] Add pre-commit security hooks
- [ ] Integrate with Snyk or similar

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- CI fails on security issues
- No secrets in logs/errors
- Proper file permissions validated
- Pre-commit hooks block commits with issues

**Files:**
- `.github/workflows/ci.yml`
- `.pre-commit-config.yaml` (new)

---

### 🟢 Issue #7: Path Validation Integration
**Status:** Mostly Complete (import_export done)
**Effort:** 4 hours remaining (was 8 hours)
**Severity:** MEDIUM
**Category:** Security

**Description:**
Created path_validator.py utility and integrated into critical paths. Remaining integrations are lower risk.

**Progress:**
- ✅ Path validator utility created (165 lines)
- ✅ Comprehensive test suite (17 tests, all passing)
- ✅ Fixed critical symlink bypass vulnerability
- ✅ Integrated into import_export.py
- ✅ Empty path validation added
- ✅ Tested with malicious paths (../, symlinks, etc.)
- ⚠️ marketplace.py integration pending
- ⚠️ quick_start.py integration pending
- ⚠️ CLI integration pending

**Tasks:**
- [x] Audit all file operations for user input
- [x] Add path validation to import_export.py
- [x] Add unit tests for path validator (17 tests)
- [x] Test with malicious paths
- [x] Fix symlink bypass vulnerability
- [ ] Add path validation to marketplace.py (lower risk)
- [ ] Add path validation to quick_start.py (lower risk)
- [ ] Add path validation to CLI file operations (lower risk)

**Files:**
- ✅ `claude_force/path_validator.py` - Complete (181 lines)
- ✅ `claude_force/import_export.py` - Integrated
- ✅ `tests/test_path_validator.py` - Complete (268 lines, 17 tests)
- ⚠️ `claude_force/marketplace.py` - Pending
- ⚠️ `claude_force/quick_start.py` - Pending
- ⚠️ `claude_force/cli.py` - Pending

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- ✅ Critical paths validated (import_export)
- ✅ Path traversal attacks prevented
- ✅ Tests verify malicious paths rejected
- ⚠️ All user-provided paths validated (80% complete)

---

## Priority 3: Nice to Have (1-2 months)

### 🔵 Issue #8: Monitoring and Observability
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 24 hours
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Operations

**Description:**
No external monitoring/alerting system. Need production-grade observability.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Integrate Sentry for error tracking
- [ ] Add Prometheus metrics endpoint
- [ ] Create Grafana dashboards
- [ ] Add health check endpoints
- [ ] Configure alerting rules
- [ ] Document monitoring setup

**Metrics to Track:**
- API rate limit approaching
- High error rates (>5%)
- Performance degradation (>2x normal)
- Cost threshold exceeded

**Alert Channels:**
- PagerDuty for critical
- Slack for warnings
- Email for info

---

### 🔵 Issue #9: CLI Module Refactoring
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 8 hours
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Code Quality

**Description:**
cli.py is 1,125 lines (exceeds 500-800 line recommended limit). Need to split into smaller modules.

**Proposed Structure:**
```
claude_force/cli/
├── __init__.py
├── commands.py      # Command handlers
├── formatters.py    # Output formatting
├── validators.py    # Input validation
└── demo.py          # Demo mode initialization
```

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Create cli/ package structure
- [ ] Extract command handlers to commands.py
- [ ] Extract formatters to formatters.py
- [ ] Extract validators to validators.py
- [ ] Update imports
- [ ] Run tests to verify no breaks

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- No file >500 lines
- All tests pass
- No breaking changes to CLI interface

---

### 🔵 Issue #10: Performance Regression Testing
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 16 hours
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Testing

**Description:**
No automated performance regression detection. Need to track performance over time.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Set baseline metrics (current 11.38ms startup)
- [ ] Add performance tests to CI
- [ ] Configure alerts for >20% slower
- [ ] Track historical performance data
- [ ] Create performance trend visualizations

**Baseline Metrics:**
- Startup time: 11.38ms
- Config load: 0.74ms
- Template matching: <50ms
- Skills loading: <20ms cached

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- CI fails if >20% slower
- Historical data tracked
- Trends visible in dashboard

---

### 🔵 Issue #11: Enhanced Features Implementation
**Status:** Documented as Planned
**Effort:** 40+ hours
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Feature

**Description:**
Complete the planned enhancements currently documented in code.

**Features:**
1. **Agent Execution Integration** (analytics.py)
   - Integrate with AgentOrchestrator
   - Collect real metrics instead of simulation
   - Support live agent benchmarking

2. **Historical Metrics Aggregation** (analytics.py)
   - Add database backend (PostgreSQL)
   - Implement time-series data storage
   - Create aggregation queries
   - Add data retention policies

3. **Code Extraction from Agent Output** (benchmark_runner.py)
   - Parse agent responses
   - Extract code blocks
   - Validate extracted code
   - Support multiple languages

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Real agent execution works
- Historical data queryable
- Code extraction accurate >90%

---

### 🔵 Issue #12: MCP Server Documentation
**Status:** Not Started
**Effort:** 4 hours
**Severity:** LOW
**Category:** Documentation

**Description:**
MCP server now has authentication and rate limiting but lacks documentation.

**Tasks:**
- [ ] Document authentication setup
- [ ] Document rate limiting configuration
- [ ] Provide example client code
- [ ] Document CORS configuration
- [ ] Add security best practices
- [ ] Create deployment guide

**Files:**
- `docs/mcp_server.md` (new)
- `README.md` (update)
- `examples/mcp/` (update examples)

---

## Summary Statistics

### By Priority:
- **Priority 1 (Critical):** 3 issues, ~60 hours
- **Priority 2 (Important):** 5 issues, ~80 hours
- **Priority 3 (Nice to Have):** 4 issues, ~112 hours
- **Total:** 12 issues, ~252 hours (~6 weeks)

### By Category:
- **Testing:** 5 issues
- **Security:** 2 issues
- **Documentation:** 2 issues
- **Code Quality:** 1 issue
- **Operations:** 1 issue
- **Feature:** 1 issue

### By Severity:
- **HIGH:** 1 issue
- **MEDIUM:** 6 issues
- **LOW:** 5 issues

---

## Completed Issues (This Session)

✅ **Security Fixes:**
- [x] Replace insecure pickle deserialization (CRITICAL)
- [x] Add MCP server authentication (CRITICAL)
- [x] Fix CORS configuration (HIGH)
- [x] Implement rate limiting (HIGH)
- [x] Add security headers (MEDIUM)
- [x] Create path validation utility (HIGH)
- [x] Replace MD5 with SHA256 (LOW)

✅ **Code Quality:**
- [x] Fix bare except clause
- [x] Add MIT LICENSE file
- [x] Document planned features (replace TODOs)
- [x] Add coverage enforcement (50% minimum)
- [x] Fix ai-engineer.md documentation

✅ **Configuration:**
- [x] Configure branch coverage
- [x] Add comprehensive coverage reporting

---

## Next Steps

### Immediate (This Week):
1. Create GitHub issues from this document
2. Prioritize CLI testing framework
3. Start fixing failing tests
4. Complete agent documentation

### Short-term (Next 2 Weeks):
1. Implement CLI testing framework
2. Fix all failing tests
3. Integrate path validation
4. Enforce security gates in CI

### Medium-term (Next Month):
1. Expand integration test coverage
2. Add load/stress testing
3. Set up monitoring and alerts
4. Refactor CLI module

### Long-term (Next Quarter):
1. Implement enhanced features
2. Performance regression testing
3. Complete documentation
4. Community feedback integration

---

**Last Updated:** 2025-11-14
**Created By:** Multi-agent review process
**Review Version:** v2.1.0-p1
