The	DT	O
speeches	NNS	O
in	IN	O
Tacitus	NP	B-AAUTHOR
'	POS	I-AAUTHOR
«	)	B-AWORK
Dialogus	NN	I-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
(	(	B-REFSCOPE
5	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
3-10	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
8	CD	I-REFSCOPE
;	:	I-REFSCOPE
11	CD	B-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
1-13	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
6	CD	I-REFSCOPE
;	:	I-REFSCOPE
16	CD	B-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
4-23	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
6	CD	I-REFSCOPE
;	:	I-REFSCOPE
25	CD	B-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
1-26	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
8	CD	I-REFSCOPE
;	:	I-REFSCOPE
28	CD	B-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
1-35	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
5	CD	I-REFSCOPE
;	:	I-REFSCOPE
36	CD	B-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
1-41	CD	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
5	CD	I-REFSCOPE
)	)	I-REFSCOPE
,	,	I-REFSCOPE
despite	IN	O
being	VBG	O
at	IN	O
variance	NN	O
with	IN	O
one	CD	O
another	DT	O
in	IN	O
other	JJ	O
respects	NNS	O
,	,	O
develop	VB	O
with	IN	O
increasing	VBG	O
sophistication	NN	O
a	DT	O
single	JJ	O
account	NN	O
of	IN	O
literary	JJ	O
history	NN	O
with	IN	O
a	DT	O
complex	JJ	O
interrelation	NN	O
of	IN	O
aesthetic	JJ	O
and	CC	O
political	JJ	O
factors	NNS	O
.	SENT	O

When	WRB	O
one	PP	O
seeks	VBZ	O
to	TO	O
slot	VB	O
the	DT	O
«	)	B-AWORK
Dialogus	NP	I-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
itself	PP	O
into	IN	O
that	DT	O
account	NN	O
,	,	O
however	RB	O
,	,	O
one	PP	O
finds	VBZ	O
that	IN	O
the	DT	O
form	NN	O
in	IN	O
which	WDT	O
the	DT	O
work	NN	O
is	VBZ	O
written	VBN	O
appears	VBZ	O
to	TO	O
challenge	VB	O
the	DT	O
very	JJ	O
analysis	NN	O
that	IN	O
it	PP	O
has	VBZ	O
developed	VBN	O
.	SENT	O