Argues	VBZ	O
that	IN	O
Ovid	NP	B-AAUTHOR
's	POS	I-AAUTHOR
longing	NN	O
for	IN	O
Rome	NP	O
in	IN	O
his	PP$	O
exile	NN	O
poetry	NN	O
is	VBZ	O
similar	JJ	O
to	TO	O
that	DT	O
of	IN	O
a	DT	O
spurned	VBN	O
lover	NN	O
for	IN	O
the	DT	O
inaccessible	JJ	O
object	NN	O
of	IN	O
his	PP$	O
love	NN	O
.	SENT	O
Yet	RB	O
the	DT	O
speaker	NN	O
of	IN	O
the	DT	O
exile	NN	O
poetry	NN	O
does	VBZ	O
not	RB	O
employ	VB	O
the	DT	O
advice	NN	O
of	IN	O
the	DT	O
«	)	B-AWORK
Remedia	NP	I-AWORK
amoris	NNS	I-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
on	IN	O
how	WRB	O
to	TO	O
fall	VB	O
out	RP	O
of	IN	O
love	NN	O
:	:	O
on	IN	O
the	DT	O
contary	NN	O
,	,	O
his	PP$	O
refusal	NN	O
or	CC	O
inability	NN	O
to	TO	O
do	VB	O
so	RB	O
is	VBZ	O
played	VBN	O
out	RP	O
in	IN	O
the	DT	O
«	)	B-AWORK
Tristia	NP	I-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
and	CC	O
«	)	B-AWORK
Epistulae	NP	I-AWORK
ex	FW	I-AWORK
Ponto	NP	I-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
as	IN	O
a	DT	O
self-referential	JJ	O
response	NN	O
to	TO	O
the	DT	O
«	)	O
Remedia	NP	B-AWORK
»	(	I-AWORK
.	SENT	I-AWORK